-
On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence
Authors:
Mario Krenn,
Robert Pollice,
Si Yue Guo,
Matteo Aldeghi,
Alba Cervera-Lierta,
Pascal Friederich,
Gabriel dos Passos Gomes,
Florian Häse,
Adrian **ich,
AkshatKumar Nigam,
Zhenpeng Yao,
Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Abstract:
Imagine an oracle that correctly predicts the outcome of every particle physics experiment, the products of every chemical reaction, or the function of every protein. Such an oracle would revolutionize science and technology as we know them. However, as scientists, we would not be satisfied with the oracle itself. We want more. We want to comprehend how the oracle conceived these predictions. This…
▽ More
Imagine an oracle that correctly predicts the outcome of every particle physics experiment, the products of every chemical reaction, or the function of every protein. Such an oracle would revolutionize science and technology as we know them. However, as scientists, we would not be satisfied with the oracle itself. We want more. We want to comprehend how the oracle conceived these predictions. This feat, denoted as scientific understanding, has frequently been recognized as the essential aim of science. Now, the ever-growing power of computers and artificial intelligence poses one ultimate question: How can advanced artificial systems contribute to scientific understanding or achieve it autonomously?
We are convinced that this is not a mere technical question but lies at the core of science. Therefore, here we set out to answer where we are and where we can go from here. We first seek advice from the philosophy of science to understand scientific understanding. Then we review the current state of the art, both from literature and by collecting dozens of anecdotes from scientists about how they acquired new conceptual understanding with the help of computers. Those combined insights help us to define three dimensions of android-assisted scientific understanding: The android as a I) computational microscope, II) resource of inspiration and the ultimate, not yet existent III) agent of understanding. For each dimension, we explain new avenues to push beyond the status quo and unleash the full power of artificial intelligence's contribution to the central aim of science. We hope our perspective inspires and focuses research towards androids that get new scientific understanding and ultimately bring us closer to true artificial scientists.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Design of quantum optical experiments with logic artificial intelligence
Authors:
Alba Cervera-Lierta,
Mario Krenn,
Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Abstract:
Logic Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a subfield of AI where variables can take two defined arguments, True or False, and are arranged in clauses that follow the rules of formal logic. Several problems that span from physical systems to mathematical conjectures can be encoded into these clauses and solved by checking their satisfiability (SAT). In contrast to machine learning approaches where the…
▽ More
Logic Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a subfield of AI where variables can take two defined arguments, True or False, and are arranged in clauses that follow the rules of formal logic. Several problems that span from physical systems to mathematical conjectures can be encoded into these clauses and solved by checking their satisfiability (SAT). In contrast to machine learning approaches where the results can be approximations or local minima, Logic AI delivers formal and mathematically exact solutions to those problems. In this work, we propose the use of logic AI for the design of optical quantum experiments. We show how to map into a SAT problem the experimental preparation of an arbitrary quantum state and propose a logic-based algorithm, called Klaus, to find an interpretable representation of the photonic setup that generates it. We compare the performance of Klaus with the state-of-the-art algorithm for this purpose based on continuous optimization. We also combine both logic and numeric strategies to find that the use of logic AI significantly improves the resolution of this problem, paving the path to develo** more formal-based approaches in the context of quantum physics experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2022; v1 submitted 27 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Learning Interpretable Representations of Entanglement in Quantum Optics Experiments using Deep Generative Models
Authors:
Daniel Flam-Shepherd,
Tony Wu,
Xuemei Gu,
Alba Cervera-Lierta,
Mario Krenn,
Alan Aspuru-Guzik
Abstract:
Quantum physics experiments produce interesting phenomena such as interference or entanglement, which are core properties of numerous future quantum technologies. The complex relationship between the setup structure of a quantum experiment and its entanglement properties is essential to fundamental research in quantum optics but is difficult to intuitively understand. We present a deep generative…
▽ More
Quantum physics experiments produce interesting phenomena such as interference or entanglement, which are core properties of numerous future quantum technologies. The complex relationship between the setup structure of a quantum experiment and its entanglement properties is essential to fundamental research in quantum optics but is difficult to intuitively understand. We present a deep generative model of quantum optics experiments where a variational autoencoder is trained on a dataset of quantum optics experimental setups. In a series of computational experiments, we investigate the learned representation of our Quantum Optics Variational Auto Encoder (QOVAE) and its internal understanding of the quantum optics world. We demonstrate that the QOVAE learns an interpretable representation of quantum optics experiments and the relationship between experiment structure and entanglement. We show the QOVAE is able to generate novel experiments for highly entangled quantum states with specific distributions that match its training data. The QOVAE can learn to generate specific entangled states and efficiently search the space of experiments that produce highly entangled quantum states. Importantly, we are able to interpret how the QOVAE structures its latent space, finding curious patterns that we can explain in terms of quantum physics. The results demonstrate how we can use and understand the internal representations of deep generative models in a complex scientific domain. The QOVAE and the insights from our investigations can be immediately applied to other physical systems.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2022; v1 submitted 6 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithms
Authors:
Kishor Bharti,
Alba Cervera-Lierta,
Thi Ha Kyaw,
Tobias Haug,
Sumner Alperin-Lea,
Abhinav Anand,
Matthias Degroote,
Hermanni Heimonen,
Jakob S. Kottmann,
Tim Menke,
Wai-Keong Mok,
Sukin Sim,
Leong-Chuan Kwek,
Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Abstract:
A universal fault-tolerant quantum computer that can solve efficiently problems such as integer factorization and unstructured database search requires millions of qubits with low error rates and long coherence times. While the experimental advancement towards realizing such devices will potentially take decades of research, noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers already exist. These co…
▽ More
A universal fault-tolerant quantum computer that can solve efficiently problems such as integer factorization and unstructured database search requires millions of qubits with low error rates and long coherence times. While the experimental advancement towards realizing such devices will potentially take decades of research, noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers already exist. These computers are composed of hundreds of noisy qubits, i.e. qubits that are not error-corrected, and therefore perform imperfect operations in a limited coherence time. In the search for quantum advantage with these devices, algorithms have been proposed for applications in various disciplines spanning physics, machine learning, quantum chemistry and combinatorial optimization. The goal of such algorithms is to leverage the limited available resources to perform classically challenging tasks. In this review, we provide a thorough summary of NISQ computational paradigms and algorithms. We discuss the key structure of these algorithms, their limitations, and advantages. We additionally provide a comprehensive overview of various benchmarking and software tools useful for programming and testing NISQ devices.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2021; v1 submitted 21 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
