-
A post-selection algorithm for improving dynamic ensemble selection methods
Authors:
Paulo R. G. Cordeiro,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Rafael M. O. Cruz
Abstract:
Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) is a Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS) approach that aims to select an ensemble for each query sample during the selection phase. Even with the proposal of several DES approaches, no particular DES technique is the best choice for different problems. Thus, we hypothesize that selecting the best DES approach per query instance can lead to better accuracy. To evaluat…
▽ More
Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) is a Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS) approach that aims to select an ensemble for each query sample during the selection phase. Even with the proposal of several DES approaches, no particular DES technique is the best choice for different problems. Thus, we hypothesize that selecting the best DES approach per query instance can lead to better accuracy. To evaluate this idea, we introduce the Post-Selection Dynamic Ensemble Selection (PS-DES) approach, a post-selection scheme that evaluates ensembles selected by several DES techniques using different metrics. Experimental results show that using accuracy as a metric to select the ensembles, PS-DES performs better than individual DES techniques. PS-DES source code is available in a GitHub repository
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2023; v1 submitted 25 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
The choice of scaling technique matters for classification performance
Authors:
Lucas B. V. de Amorim,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Rafael M. O. Cruz
Abstract:
Dataset scaling, also known as normalization, is an essential preprocessing step in a machine learning pipeline. It is aimed at adjusting attributes scales in a way that they all vary within the same range. This transformation is known to improve the performance of classification models, but there are several scaling techniques to choose from, and this choice is not generally done carefully. In th…
▽ More
Dataset scaling, also known as normalization, is an essential preprocessing step in a machine learning pipeline. It is aimed at adjusting attributes scales in a way that they all vary within the same range. This transformation is known to improve the performance of classification models, but there are several scaling techniques to choose from, and this choice is not generally done carefully. In this paper, we execute a broad experiment comparing the impact of 5 scaling techniques on the performances of 20 classification algorithms among monolithic and ensemble models, applying them to 82 publicly available datasets with varying imbalance ratios. Results show that the choice of scaling technique matters for classification performance, and the performance difference between the best and the worst scaling technique is relevant and statistically significant in most cases. They also indicate that choosing an inadequate technique can be more detrimental to classification performance than not scaling the data at all. We also show how the performance variation of an ensemble model, considering different scaling techniques, tends to be dictated by that of its base model. Finally, we discuss the relationship between a model's sensitivity to the choice of scaling technique and its performance and provide insights into its applicability on different model deployment scenarios. Full results and source code for the experiments in this paper are available in a GitHub repository.\footnote{https://github.com/amorimlb/scaling\_matters}
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Local overlap reduction procedure for dynamic ensemble selection
Authors:
Mariana A. Souza,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Rafael M. O. Cruz
Abstract:
Class imbalance is a characteristic known for making learning more challenging for classification models as they may end up biased towards the majority class. A promising approach among the ensemble-based methods in the context of imbalance learning is Dynamic Selection (DS). DS techniques single out a subset of the classifiers in the ensemble to label each given unknown sample according to their…
▽ More
Class imbalance is a characteristic known for making learning more challenging for classification models as they may end up biased towards the majority class. A promising approach among the ensemble-based methods in the context of imbalance learning is Dynamic Selection (DS). DS techniques single out a subset of the classifiers in the ensemble to label each given unknown sample according to their estimated competence in the area surrounding the query. Because only a small region is taken into account in the selection scheme, the global class disproportion may have less impact over the system's performance. However, the presence of local class overlap may severely hinder the DS techniques' performance over imbalanced distributions as it not only exacerbates the effects of the under-representation but also introduces ambiguous and possibly unreliable samples to the competence estimation process. Thus, in this work, we propose a DS technique which attempts to minimize the effects of the local class overlap during the classifier selection procedure. The proposed method iteratively removes from the target region the instance perceived as the hardest to classify until a classifier is deemed competent to label the query sample. The known samples are characterized using instance hardness measures that quantify the local class overlap. Experimental results show that the proposed technique can significantly outperform the baseline as well as several other DS techniques, suggesting its suitability for dealing with class under-representation and overlap. Furthermore, the proposed technique still yielded competitive results when using an under-sampled, less overlapped version of the labelled sets, specially over the problems with a high proportion of minority class samples in overlap areas. Code available at https://github.com/marianaasouza/lords.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Selecting and combining complementary feature representations and classifiers for hate speech detection
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Woshington V. de Sousa,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
Hate speech is a major issue in social networks due to the high volume of data generated daily. Recent works demonstrate the usefulness of machine learning (ML) in dealing with the nuances required to distinguish between hateful posts from just sarcasm or offensive language. Many ML solutions for hate speech detection have been proposed by either changing how features are extracted from the text o…
▽ More
Hate speech is a major issue in social networks due to the high volume of data generated daily. Recent works demonstrate the usefulness of machine learning (ML) in dealing with the nuances required to distinguish between hateful posts from just sarcasm or offensive language. Many ML solutions for hate speech detection have been proposed by either changing how features are extracted from the text or the classification algorithm employed. However, most works consider only one type of feature extraction and classification algorithm. This work argues that a combination of multiple feature extraction techniques and different classification models is needed. We propose a framework to analyze the relationship between multiple feature extraction and classification techniques to understand how they complement each other. The framework is used to select a subset of complementary techniques to compose a robust multiple classifiers system (MCS) for hate speech detection. The experimental study considering four hate speech classification datasets demonstrates that the proposed framework is a promising methodology for analyzing and designing high-performing MCS for this task. MCS system obtained using the proposed framework significantly outperforms the combination of all models and the homogeneous and heterogeneous selection heuristics, demonstrating the importance of having a proper selection scheme. Source code, figures, and dataset splits can be found in the GitHub repository: https://github.com/Menelau/Hate-Speech-MCS.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Label noise detection under the Noise at Random model with ensemble filters
Authors:
Kecia G. Moura,
Ricardo B. C. Prudêncio,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
Label noise detection has been widely studied in Machine Learning because of its importance in improving training data quality. Satisfactory noise detection has been achieved by adopting ensembles of classifiers. In this approach, an instance is assigned as mislabeled if a high proportion of members in the pool misclassifies it. Previous authors have empirically evaluated this approach; neverthele…
▽ More
Label noise detection has been widely studied in Machine Learning because of its importance in improving training data quality. Satisfactory noise detection has been achieved by adopting ensembles of classifiers. In this approach, an instance is assigned as mislabeled if a high proportion of members in the pool misclassifies it. Previous authors have empirically evaluated this approach; nevertheless, they mostly assumed that label noise is generated completely at random in a dataset. This is a strong assumption since other types of label noise are feasible in practice and can influence noise detection results. This work investigates the performance of ensemble noise detection under two different noise models: the Noisy at Random (NAR), in which the probability of label noise depends on the instance class, in comparison to the Noisy Completely at Random model, in which the probability of label noise is entirely independent. In this setting, we investigate the effect of class distribution on noise detection performance since it changes the total noise level observed in a dataset under the NAR assumption. Further, an evaluation of the ensemble vote threshold is conducted to contrast with the most common approaches in the literature. In many performed experiments, choosing a noise generation model over another can lead to different results when considering aspects such as class imbalance and noise level ratio among different classes.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Impact of lung segmentation on the diagnosis and explanation of COVID-19 in chest X-ray images
Authors:
Lucas O. Teixeira,
Rodolfo M. Pereira,
Diego Bertolini,
Luiz S. Oliveira,
Loris Nanni,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Yandre M. G. Costa
Abstract:
COVID-19 frequently provokes pneumonia, which can be diagnosed using imaging exams. Chest X-ray (CXR) is often useful because it is cheap, fast, widespread, and uses less radiation. Here, we demonstrate the impact of lung segmentation in COVID-19 identification using CXR images and evaluate which contents of the image influenced the most. Semantic segmentation was performed using a U-Net CNN archi…
▽ More
COVID-19 frequently provokes pneumonia, which can be diagnosed using imaging exams. Chest X-ray (CXR) is often useful because it is cheap, fast, widespread, and uses less radiation. Here, we demonstrate the impact of lung segmentation in COVID-19 identification using CXR images and evaluate which contents of the image influenced the most. Semantic segmentation was performed using a U-Net CNN architecture, and the classification using three CNN architectures (VGG, ResNet, and Inception). Explainable Artificial Intelligence techniques were employed to estimate the impact of segmentation. A three-classes database was composed: lung opacity (pneumonia), COVID-19, and normal. We assessed the impact of creating a CXR image database from different sources, and the COVID-19 generalization from one source to another. The segmentation achieved a Jaccard distance of 0.034 and a Dice coefficient of 0.982. The classification using segmented images achieved an F1-Score of 0.88 for the multi-class setup, and 0.83 for COVID-19 identification. In the cross-dataset scenario, we obtained an F1-Score of 0.74 and an area under the ROC curve of 0.9 for COVID-19 identification using segmented images. Experiments support the conclusion that even after segmentation, there is a strong bias introduced by underlying factors from different sources.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2021; v1 submitted 21 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Multi-label learning for dynamic model type recommendation
Authors:
Mariana A. Souza,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Rafael M. O. Cruz
Abstract:
Dynamic selection techniques aim at selecting the local experts around each test sample in particular for performing its classification. While generating the classifier on a local scope may make it easier for singling out the locally competent ones, as in the online local pool (OLP) technique, using the same base-classifier model in uneven distributions may restrict the local level of competence,…
▽ More
Dynamic selection techniques aim at selecting the local experts around each test sample in particular for performing its classification. While generating the classifier on a local scope may make it easier for singling out the locally competent ones, as in the online local pool (OLP) technique, using the same base-classifier model in uneven distributions may restrict the local level of competence, since each region may have a data distribution that favors one model over the others. Thus, we propose in this work a problem-independent dynamic base-classifier model recommendation for the OLP technique, which uses information regarding the behavior of a portfolio of models over the samples of different problems to recommend one (or several) of them on a per-instance manner. Our proposed framework builds a multi-label meta-classifier responsible for recommending a set of relevant model types based on the local data complexity of the region surrounding each test sample. The OLP technique then produces a local pool with the model that yields the highest probability score of the meta-classifier. Experimental results show that different data distributions favored different model types on a local scope. Moreover, based on the performance of an ideal model type selector, it was observed that there is a clear advantage in choosing a relevant model type for each test instance. Overall, the proposed model type recommender system yielded a statistically similar performance to the original OLP with fixed base-classifier model. Given the novelty of the approach and the gap in performance between the proposed framework and the ideal selector, we regard this as a promising research direction. Code available at github.com/marianaasouza/dynamic-model-recommender.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Evaluating Competence Measures for Dynamic Regressor Selection
Authors:
Thiago J. M. Moura,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Luiz S. Oliveira
Abstract:
Dynamic regressor selection (DRS) systems work by selecting the most competent regressors from an ensemble to estimate the target value of a given test pattern. This competence is usually quantified using the performance of the regressors in local regions of the feature space around the test pattern. However, choosing the best measure to calculate the level of competence correctly is not straightf…
▽ More
Dynamic regressor selection (DRS) systems work by selecting the most competent regressors from an ensemble to estimate the target value of a given test pattern. This competence is usually quantified using the performance of the regressors in local regions of the feature space around the test pattern. However, choosing the best measure to calculate the level of competence correctly is not straightforward. The literature of dynamic classifier selection presents a wide variety of competence measures, which cannot be used or adapted for DRS. In this paper, we review eight measures used with regression problems, and adapt them to test the performance of the DRS algorithms found in the literature. Such measures are extracted from a local region of the feature space around the test pattern, called region of competence, therefore competence measures.To better compare the competence measures, we perform a set of comprehensive experiments of 15 regression datasets. Three DRS systems were compared against individual regressor and static systems that use the Mean and the Median to combine the outputs of the regressors from the ensemble. The DRS systems were assessed varying the competence measures. Our results show that DRS systems outperform individual regressors and static systems but the choice of the competence measure is problem-dependent.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
ICPRAI 2018 SI: On dynamic ensemble selection and data preprocessing for multi-class imbalance learning
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Mariana A. Souza,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
Class-imbalance refers to classification problems in which many more instances are available for certain classes than for others. Such imbalanced datasets require special attention because traditional classifiers generally favor the majority class which has a large number of instances. Ensemble of classifiers have been reported to yield promising results. However, the majority of ensemble methods…
▽ More
Class-imbalance refers to classification problems in which many more instances are available for certain classes than for others. Such imbalanced datasets require special attention because traditional classifiers generally favor the majority class which has a large number of instances. Ensemble of classifiers have been reported to yield promising results. However, the majority of ensemble methods applied to imbalanced learning are static ones. Moreover, they only deal with binary imbalanced problems. Hence, this paper presents an empirical analysis of dynamic selection techniques and data preprocessing methods for dealing with multi-class imbalanced problems. We considered five variations of preprocessing methods and fourteen dynamic selection schemes. Our experiments conducted on 26 multi-class imbalanced problems show that the dynamic ensemble improves the AUC and the G-mean as compared to the static ensemble. Moreover, data preprocessing plays an important role in such cases.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2018; v1 submitted 22 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
On Meta-Learning for Dynamic Ensemble Selection
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose a novel dynamic ensemble selection framework using meta-learning. The framework is divided into three steps. In the first step, the pool of classifiers is generated from the training data. The second phase is responsible to extract the meta-features and train the meta-classifier. Five distinct sets of meta-features are proposed, each one corresponding to a different crite…
▽ More
In this paper, we propose a novel dynamic ensemble selection framework using meta-learning. The framework is divided into three steps. In the first step, the pool of classifiers is generated from the training data. The second phase is responsible to extract the meta-features and train the meta-classifier. Five distinct sets of meta-features are proposed, each one corresponding to a different criterion to measure the level of competence of a classifier for the classification of a given query sample. The meta-features are computed using the training data and used to train a meta-classifier that is able to predict whether or not a base classifier from the pool is competent enough to classify an input instance. Three different training scenarios for the training of the meta-classifier are considered: problem-dependent, problem-independent and hybrid. Experimental results show that the problem-dependent scenario provides the best result. In addition, the performance of the problem-dependent scenario is strongly correlated with the recognition rate of the system. A comparison with state-of-the-art techniques shows that the proposed-dependent approach outperforms current dynamic ensemble selection techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
META-DES.H: a dynamic ensemble selection technique using meta-learning and a dynamic weighting approach
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
In Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) techniques, only the most competent classifiers are selected to classify a given query sample. Hence, the key issue in DES is how to estimate the competence of each classifier in a pool to select the most competent ones. In order to deal with this issue, we proposed a novel dynamic ensemble selection framework using meta-learning, called META-DES. The framework…
▽ More
In Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) techniques, only the most competent classifiers are selected to classify a given query sample. Hence, the key issue in DES is how to estimate the competence of each classifier in a pool to select the most competent ones. In order to deal with this issue, we proposed a novel dynamic ensemble selection framework using meta-learning, called META-DES. The framework is divided into three steps. In the first step, the pool of classifiers is generated from the training data. In the second phase the meta-features are computed using the training data and used to train a meta-classifier that is able to predict whether or not a base classifier from the pool is competent enough to classify an input instance. In this paper, we propose improvements to the training and generalization phase of the META-DES framework. In the training phase, we evaluate four different algorithms for the training of the meta-classifier. For the generalization phase, three combination approaches are evaluated: Dynamic selection, where only the classifiers that attain a certain competence level are selected; Dynamic weighting, where the meta-classifier estimates the competence of each classifier in the pool, and the outputs of all classifiers in the pool are weighted based on their level of competence; and a hybrid approach, in which first an ensemble with the most competent classifiers is selected, after which the weights of the selected classifiers are estimated in order to be used in a weighted majority voting scheme. Experiments are carried out on 30 classification datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that the changes proposed in this paper significantly improve the recognition accuracy of the system in several datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Analyzing different prototype selection techniques for dynamic classifier and ensemble selection
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
In dynamic selection (DS) techniques, only the most competent classifiers, for the classification of a specific test sample are selected to predict the sample's class labels. The more important step in DES techniques is estimating the competence of the base classifiers for the classification of each specific test sample. The classifiers' competence is usually estimated using the neighborhood of th…
▽ More
In dynamic selection (DS) techniques, only the most competent classifiers, for the classification of a specific test sample are selected to predict the sample's class labels. The more important step in DES techniques is estimating the competence of the base classifiers for the classification of each specific test sample. The classifiers' competence is usually estimated using the neighborhood of the test sample defined on the validation samples, called the region of competence. Thus, the performance of DS techniques is sensitive to the distribution of the validation set. In this paper, we evaluate six prototype selection techniques that work by editing the validation data in order to remove noise and redundant instances. Experiments conducted using several state-of-the-art DS techniques over 30 classification problems demonstrate that by using prototype selection techniques we can improve the classification accuracy of DS techniques and also significantly reduce the computational cost involved.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
A Method For Dynamic Ensemble Selection Based on a Filter and an Adaptive Distance to Improve the Quality of the Regions of Competence
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Tsang Ing Ren
Abstract:
Dynamic classifier selection systems aim to select a group of classifiers that is most adequate for a specific query pattern. This is done by defining a region around the query pattern and analyzing the competence of the classifiers in this region. However, the regions are often surrounded by noise which can difficult the classifier selection. This fact makes the performance of most dynamic select…
▽ More
Dynamic classifier selection systems aim to select a group of classifiers that is most adequate for a specific query pattern. This is done by defining a region around the query pattern and analyzing the competence of the classifiers in this region. However, the regions are often surrounded by noise which can difficult the classifier selection. This fact makes the performance of most dynamic selection systems no better than static selections. In this paper, we demonstrate that the performance dynamic selection systems end up limited by the quality of the regions extracted. Thereafter, we propose a new dynamic classifier selection that improves the regions of competence in order to achieve higher recognition rates. obtained from several classification databases show the proposed method not only increase the recognition performance but also decreases the computational cost.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
META-DES.Oracle: Meta-learning and feature selection for ensemble selection
Authors:
Rafael M. O Cruz,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
The key issue in Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) is defining a suitable criterion for calculating the classifiers' competence. There are several criteria available to measure the level of competence of base classifiers, such as local accuracy estimates and ranking. However, using only one criterion may lead to a poor estimation of the classifier's competence. In order to deal with this issue, we…
▽ More
The key issue in Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) is defining a suitable criterion for calculating the classifiers' competence. There are several criteria available to measure the level of competence of base classifiers, such as local accuracy estimates and ranking. However, using only one criterion may lead to a poor estimation of the classifier's competence. In order to deal with this issue, we have proposed a novel dynamic ensemble selection framework using meta-learning, called META-DES. An important aspect of the META-DES framework is that multiple criteria can be embedded in the system encoded as different sets of meta-features. However, some DES criteria are not suitable for every classification problem. For instance, local accuracy estimates may produce poor results when there is a high degree of overlap between the classes. Moreover, a higher classification accuracy can be obtained if the performance of the meta-classifier is optimized for the corresponding data. In this paper, we propose a novel version of the META-DES framework based on the formal definition of the Oracle, called META-DES.Oracle. The Oracle is an abstract method that represents an ideal classifier selection scheme. A meta-feature selection scheme using an overfitting cautious Binary Particle Swarm Optimization (BPSO) is proposed for improving the performance of the meta-classifier. The difference between the outputs obtained by the meta-classifier and those presented by the Oracle is minimized. Thus, the meta-classifier is expected to obtain results that are similar to the Oracle. Experiments carried out using 30 classification problems demonstrate that the optimization procedure based on the Oracle definition leads to a significant improvement in classification accuracy when compared to previous versions of the META-DES framework and other state-of-the-art DES techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
META-DES: A Dynamic Ensemble Selection Framework using Meta-Learning
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Tsang Ing Ren
Abstract:
Dynamic ensemble selection systems work by estimating the level of competence of each classifier from a pool of classifiers. Only the most competent ones are selected to classify a given test sample. This is achieved by defining a criterion to measure the level of competence of a base classifier, such as, its accuracy in local regions of the feature space around the query instance. However, using…
▽ More
Dynamic ensemble selection systems work by estimating the level of competence of each classifier from a pool of classifiers. Only the most competent ones are selected to classify a given test sample. This is achieved by defining a criterion to measure the level of competence of a base classifier, such as, its accuracy in local regions of the feature space around the query instance. However, using only one criterion about the behavior of a base classifier is not sufficient to accurately estimate its level of competence. In this paper, we present a novel dynamic ensemble selection framework using meta-learning. We propose five distinct sets of meta-features, each one corresponding to a different criterion to measure the level of competence of a classifier for the classification of input samples. The meta-features are extracted from the training data and used to train a meta-classifier to predict whether or not a base classifier is competent enough to classify an input instance. During the generalization phase, the meta-features are extracted from the query instance and passed down as input to the meta-classifier. The meta-classifier estimates, whether a base classifier is competent enough to be added to the ensemble. Experiments are conducted over several small sample size classification problems, i.e., problems with a high degree of uncertainty due to the lack of training data. Experimental results show the proposed meta-learning framework greatly improves classification accuracy when compared against current state-of-the-art dynamic ensemble selection techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
FIRE-DES++: Enhanced Online Pruning of Base Classifiers for Dynamic Ensemble Selection
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Dayvid V. R. Oliveira,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Robert Sabourin
Abstract:
Despite being very effective in several classification tasks, Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) techniques can select classifiers that classify all samples in the region of competence as being from the same class. The Frienemy Indecision REgion DES (FIRE-DES) tackles this problem by pre-selecting classifiers that correctly classify at least one pair of samples from different classes in the region o…
▽ More
Despite being very effective in several classification tasks, Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) techniques can select classifiers that classify all samples in the region of competence as being from the same class. The Frienemy Indecision REgion DES (FIRE-DES) tackles this problem by pre-selecting classifiers that correctly classify at least one pair of samples from different classes in the region of competence of the test sample. However, FIRE-DES applies the pre-selection for the classification of a test sample if and only if its region of competence is composed of samples from different classes (indecision region), even though this criterion is not reliable for determining if a test sample is located close to the borders of classes (true indecision region) when the region of competence is obtained using classical nearest neighbors approach. Because of that, FIRE-DES mistakes noisy regions for true indecision regions, leading to the pre-selection of incompetent classifiers, and mistakes true indecision regions for safe regions, leaving samples in such regions without any pre-selection. To tackle these issues, we propose the FIRE-DES++, an enhanced FIRE-DES that removes noise and reduces the overlap of classes in the validation set; and defines the region of competence using an equal number of samples of each class, avoiding selecting a region of competence with samples of a single class. Experiments are conducted using FIRE-DES++ with 8 different dynamic selection techniques on 64 classification datasets. Experimental results show that FIRE-DES++ increases the classification performance of all DES techniques considered in this work, outperforming FIRE-DES with 7 out of the 8 DES techniques, and outperforming state-of-the-art DES frameworks.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2018; v1 submitted 30 September, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Online local pool generation for dynamic classifier selection: an extended version
Authors:
Mariana A. Souza,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Robert Sabourin
Abstract:
Dynamic Classifier Selection (DCS) techniques have difficulty in selecting the most competent classifier in a pool, even when its presence is assured. Since the DCS techniques rely only on local data to estimate a classifier's competence, the manner in which the pool is generated could affect the choice of the best classifier for a given sample. That is, the global perspective in which pools are g…
▽ More
Dynamic Classifier Selection (DCS) techniques have difficulty in selecting the most competent classifier in a pool, even when its presence is assured. Since the DCS techniques rely only on local data to estimate a classifier's competence, the manner in which the pool is generated could affect the choice of the best classifier for a given sample. That is, the global perspective in which pools are generated may not help the DCS techniques in selecting a competent classifier for samples that are likely to be mislabelled. Thus, we propose in this work an online pool generation method that produces a locally accurate pool for test samples in difficult regions of the feature space. The difficulty of a given area is determined by the classification difficulty of the samples in it. That way, by using classifiers that were generated in a local scope, it could be easier for the DCS techniques to select the best one for the difficult samples. For the query samples in easy regions, a simple nearest neighbors rule is used. In the extended version of this work, a deep analysis on the correlation between instance hardness and the performance of DCS techniques is presented. An instance hardness measure that conveys the degree of local class overlap is then used to decide when the local pool is used in the proposed scheme. The proposed method yielded significantly greater recognition rates in comparison to a Bagging-generated pool and two other global pool generation schemes for all DCS techniques evaluated. The proposed scheme's performance was also significantly superior to three state-of-the-art classification models and statistically equivalent to five of them. Moreover, an extended analysis on the computational complexity of the proposed method and of several DS techniques is presented in this version. We also provide the implementation of the proposed technique using the DESLib library on GitHub.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Dynamic Ensemble Selection VS K-NN: why and when Dynamic Selection obtains higher classification performance?
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Hiba H. Zakane,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
Multiple classifier systems focus on the combination of classifiers to obtain better performance than a single robust one. These systems unfold three major phases: pool generation, selection and integration. One of the most promising MCS approaches is Dynamic Selection (DS), which relies on finding the most competent classifier or ensemble of classifiers to predict each test sample. The majority o…
▽ More
Multiple classifier systems focus on the combination of classifiers to obtain better performance than a single robust one. These systems unfold three major phases: pool generation, selection and integration. One of the most promising MCS approaches is Dynamic Selection (DS), which relies on finding the most competent classifier or ensemble of classifiers to predict each test sample. The majority of the DS techniques are based on the K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN) definition, and the quality of the neighborhood has a huge impact on the performance of DS methods. In this paper, we perform an analysis comparing the classification results of DS techniques and the K-NN classifier under different conditions. Experiments are performed on 18 state-of-the-art DS techniques over 30 classification datasets and results show that DS methods present a significant boost in classification accuracy even though they use the same neighborhood as the K-NN. The reasons behind the outperformance of DS techniques over the K-NN classifier reside in the fact that DS techniques can deal with samples with a high degree of instance hardness (samples that are located close to the decision border) as opposed to the K-NN. In this paper, not only we explain why DS techniques achieve higher classification performance than the K-NN but also when DS should be used.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
An Ensemble Generation Method Based on Instance Hardness
Authors:
Felipe N. Walmsley,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Dayvid V. R. Oliveira,
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Robert Sabourin
Abstract:
In Machine Learning, ensemble methods have been receiving a great deal of attention. Techniques such as Bagging and Boosting have been successfully applied to a variety of problems. Nevertheless, such techniques are still susceptible to the effects of noise and outliers in the training data. We propose a new method for the generation of pools of classifiers based on Bagging, in which the probabili…
▽ More
In Machine Learning, ensemble methods have been receiving a great deal of attention. Techniques such as Bagging and Boosting have been successfully applied to a variety of problems. Nevertheless, such techniques are still susceptible to the effects of noise and outliers in the training data. We propose a new method for the generation of pools of classifiers based on Bagging, in which the probability of an instance being selected during the resampling process is inversely proportional to its instance hardness, which can be understood as the likelihood of an instance being misclassified, regardless of the choice of classifier. The goal of the proposed method is to remove noisy data without sacrificing the hard instances which are likely to be found on class boundaries. We evaluate the performance of the method in nineteen public data sets, and compare it to the performance of the Bagging and Random Subspace algorithms. Our experiments show that in high noise scenarios the accuracy of our method is significantly better than that of Bagging.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2018; v1 submitted 19 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
K-Nearest Oracles Borderline Dynamic Classifier Ensemble Selection
Authors:
Dayvid V. R. Oliveira,
George D. C. Cavalcanti,
Thyago N. Porpino,
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Robert Sabourin
Abstract:
Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) techniques aim to select locally competent classifiers for the classification of each new test sample. Most DES techniques estimate the competence of classifiers using a given criterion over the region of competence of the test sample (its the nearest neighbors in the validation set). The K-Nearest Oracles Eliminate (KNORA-E) DES selects all classifiers that correc…
▽ More
Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) techniques aim to select locally competent classifiers for the classification of each new test sample. Most DES techniques estimate the competence of classifiers using a given criterion over the region of competence of the test sample (its the nearest neighbors in the validation set). The K-Nearest Oracles Eliminate (KNORA-E) DES selects all classifiers that correctly classify all samples in the region of competence of the test sample, if such classifier exists, otherwise, it removes from the region of competence the sample that is furthest from the test sample, and the process repeats. When the region of competence has samples of different classes, KNORA-E can reduce the region of competence in such a way that only samples of a single class remain in the region of competence, leading to the selection of locally incompetent classifiers that classify all samples in the region of competence as being from the same class. In this paper, we propose two DES techniques: K-Nearest Oracles Borderline (KNORA-B) and K-Nearest Oracles Borderline Imbalanced (KNORA-BI). KNORA-B is a DES technique based on KNORA-E that reduces the region of competence but maintains at least one sample from each class that is in the original region of competence. KNORA-BI is a variation of KNORA-B for imbalance datasets that reduces the region of competence but maintains at least one minority class sample if there is any in the original region of competence. Experiments are conducted comparing the proposed techniques with 19 DES techniques from the literature using 40 datasets. The results show that the proposed techniques achieved interesting results, with KNORA-BI outperforming state-of-art techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
On dynamic ensemble selection and data preprocessing for multi-class imbalance learning
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
Class-imbalance refers to classification problems in which many more instances are available for certain classes than for others. Such imbalanced datasets require special attention because traditional classifiers generally favor the majority class which has a large number of instances. Ensemble of classifiers have been reported to yield promising results. However, the majority of ensemble methods…
▽ More
Class-imbalance refers to classification problems in which many more instances are available for certain classes than for others. Such imbalanced datasets require special attention because traditional classifiers generally favor the majority class which has a large number of instances. Ensemble of classifiers have been reported to yield promising results. However, the majority of ensemble methods applied too imbalanced learning are static ones. Moreover, they only deal with binary imbalanced problems. Hence, this paper presents an empirical analysis of dynamic selection techniques and data preprocessing methods for dealing with multi-class imbalanced problems. We considered five variations of preprocessing methods and four dynamic selection methods. Our experiments conducted on 26 multi-class imbalanced problems show that the dynamic ensemble improves the F-measure and the G-mean as compared to the static ensemble. Moreover, data preprocessing plays an important role in such cases.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2018; v1 submitted 10 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
DESlib: A Dynamic ensemble selection library in Python
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Luiz G. Hafemann,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
DESlib is an open-source python library providing the implementation of several dynamic selection techniques. The library is divided into three modules: (i) \emph{dcs}, containing the implementation of dynamic classifier selection methods (DCS); (ii) \emph{des}, containing the implementation of dynamic ensemble selection methods (DES); (iii) \emph{static}, with the implementation of static ensembl…
▽ More
DESlib is an open-source python library providing the implementation of several dynamic selection techniques. The library is divided into three modules: (i) \emph{dcs}, containing the implementation of dynamic classifier selection methods (DCS); (ii) \emph{des}, containing the implementation of dynamic ensemble selection methods (DES); (iii) \emph{static}, with the implementation of static ensemble techniques. The library is fully documented (documentation available online on Read the Docs), has a high test coverage (codecov.io) and is part of the scikit-learn-contrib supported projects. Documentation, code and examples can be found on its GitHub page: https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/DESlib.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2019; v1 submitted 14 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
A DEEP analysis of the META-DES framework for dynamic selection of ensemble of classifiers
Authors:
Rafael M. O. Cruz,
Robert Sabourin,
George D. C. Cavalcanti
Abstract:
Dynamic ensemble selection (DES) techniques work by estimating the level of competence of each classifier from a pool of classifiers. Only the most competent ones are selected to classify a given test sample. Hence, the key issue in DES is the criterion used to estimate the level of competence of the classifiers in predicting the label of a given test sample. In order to perform a more robust ense…
▽ More
Dynamic ensemble selection (DES) techniques work by estimating the level of competence of each classifier from a pool of classifiers. Only the most competent ones are selected to classify a given test sample. Hence, the key issue in DES is the criterion used to estimate the level of competence of the classifiers in predicting the label of a given test sample. In order to perform a more robust ensemble selection, we proposed the META-DES framework using meta-learning, where multiple criteria are encoded as meta-features and are passed down to a meta-classifier that is trained to estimate the competence level of a given classifier. In this technical report, we present a step-by-step analysis of each phase of the framework during training and test. We show how each set of meta-features is extracted as well as their impact on the estimation of the competence level of the base classifier. Moreover, an analysis of the impact of several factors in the system performance, such as the number of classifiers in the pool, the use of different linear base classifiers, as well as the size of the validation data. We show that using the dynamic selection of linear classifiers through the META-DES framework, we can solve complex non-linear classification problems where other combination techniques such as AdaBoost cannot.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2015; v1 submitted 2 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
