-
Solving Data-centric Tasks using Large Language Models
Authors:
Shraddha Barke,
Christian Poelitz,
Carina Suzana Negreanu,
Benjamin Zorn,
José Cambronero,
Andrew D. Gordon,
Vu Le,
Elnaz Nouri,
Nadia Polikarpova,
Advait Sarkar,
Brian Slininger,
Neil Toronto,
Jack Williams
Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly replacing help forums like StackOverflow, and are especially helpful for non-professional programmers and end users. These users are often interested in data-centric tasks, such as spreadsheet manipulation and data wrangling, which are hard to solve if the intent is only communicated using a natural-language description, without including the data. But how…
▽ More
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly replacing help forums like StackOverflow, and are especially helpful for non-professional programmers and end users. These users are often interested in data-centric tasks, such as spreadsheet manipulation and data wrangling, which are hard to solve if the intent is only communicated using a natural-language description, without including the data. But how do we decide how much data and which data to include in the prompt? This paper makes two contributions towards answering this question. First, we create a dataset of real-world NL-to-code tasks manipulating tabular data, mined from StackOverflow posts. Second, we introduce a cluster-then-select prompting technique, which adds the most representative rows from the input data to the LLM prompt. Our experiments show that LLM performance is indeed sensitive to the amount of data passed in the prompt, and that for tasks with a lot of syntactic variation in the input table, our cluster-then-select technique outperforms a random selection baseline.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2024; v1 submitted 18 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Assessing GPT4-V on Structured Reasoning Tasks
Authors:
Mukul Singh,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Vu Le,
Gust Verbruggen
Abstract:
Multi-modality promises to unlock further uses for large language models. Recently, the state-of-the-art language model GPT-4 was enhanced with vision capabilities. We carry out a prompting evaluation of GPT-4V and five other baselines on structured reasoning tasks, such as mathematical reasoning, visual data analysis, and code generation. We show that visual Chain-of-Thought, an extension of Chai…
▽ More
Multi-modality promises to unlock further uses for large language models. Recently, the state-of-the-art language model GPT-4 was enhanced with vision capabilities. We carry out a prompting evaluation of GPT-4V and five other baselines on structured reasoning tasks, such as mathematical reasoning, visual data analysis, and code generation. We show that visual Chain-of-Thought, an extension of Chain-of-Thought to multi-modal LLMs, yields significant improvements over the vanilla model. We also present a categorized analysis of scenarios where these models perform well and where they struggle, highlighting challenges associated with coherent multimodal reasoning.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
CodeFusion: A Pre-trained Diffusion Model for Code Generation
Authors:
Mukul Singh,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Vu Le,
Carina Negreanu,
Gust Verbruggen
Abstract:
Imagine a developer who can only change their last line of code, how often would they have to start writing a function from scratch before it is correct? Auto-regressive models for code generation from natural language have a similar limitation: they do not easily allow reconsidering earlier tokens generated. We introduce CodeFusion, a pre-trained diffusion code generation model that addresses thi…
▽ More
Imagine a developer who can only change their last line of code, how often would they have to start writing a function from scratch before it is correct? Auto-regressive models for code generation from natural language have a similar limitation: they do not easily allow reconsidering earlier tokens generated. We introduce CodeFusion, a pre-trained diffusion code generation model that addresses this limitation by iteratively denoising a complete program conditioned on the encoded natural language. We evaluate CodeFusion on the task of natural language to code generation for Bash, Python, and Microsoft Excel conditional formatting (CF) rules. Experiments show that CodeFusion (75M parameters) performs on par with state-of-the-art auto-regressive systems (350M-175B parameters) in top-1 accuracy and outperforms them in top-3 and top-5 accuracy due to its better balance in diversity versus quality.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 26 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
FormaT5: Abstention and Examples for Conditional Table Formatting with Natural Language
Authors:
Mukul Singh,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Vu Le,
Carina Negreanu,
Elnaz Nouri,
Mohammad Raza,
Gust Verbruggen
Abstract:
Formatting is an important property in tables for visualization, presentation, and analysis. Spreadsheet software allows users to automatically format their tables by writing data-dependent conditional formatting (CF) rules. Writing such rules is often challenging for users as it requires them to understand and implement the underlying logic. We present FormaT5, a transformer-based model that can…
▽ More
Formatting is an important property in tables for visualization, presentation, and analysis. Spreadsheet software allows users to automatically format their tables by writing data-dependent conditional formatting (CF) rules. Writing such rules is often challenging for users as it requires them to understand and implement the underlying logic. We present FormaT5, a transformer-based model that can generate a CF rule given the target table and a natural language description of the desired formatting logic. We find that user descriptions for these tasks are often under-specified or ambiguous, making it harder for code generation systems to accurately learn the desired rule in a single step. To tackle this problem of under-specification and minimise argument errors, FormaT5 learns to predict placeholders though an abstention objective. These placeholders can then be filled by a second model or, when examples of rows that should be formatted are available, by a programming-by-example system. To evaluate FormaT5 on diverse and real scenarios, we create an extensive benchmark of 1053 CF tasks, containing real-world descriptions collected from four different sources. We release our benchmarks to encourage research in this area. Abstention and filling allow FormaT5 to outperform 8 different neural approaches on our benchmarks, both with and without examples. Our results illustrate the value of building domain-specific learning systems.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 26 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Tabular Representation, Noisy Operators, and Impacts on Table Structure Understanding Tasks in LLMs
Authors:
Ananya Singha,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Vu Le,
Chris Parnin
Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied for tabular tasks using in-context learning. The prompt representation for a table may play a role in the LLMs ability to process the table. Inspired by prior work, we generate a collection of self-supervised structural tasks (e.g. navigate to a cell and row; transpose the table) and evaluate the performance differences when using 8 formats. In…
▽ More
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied for tabular tasks using in-context learning. The prompt representation for a table may play a role in the LLMs ability to process the table. Inspired by prior work, we generate a collection of self-supervised structural tasks (e.g. navigate to a cell and row; transpose the table) and evaluate the performance differences when using 8 formats. In contrast to past work, we introduce 8 noise operations inspired by real-world messy data and adversarial inputs, and show that such operations can impact LLM performance across formats for different structural understanding tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Automating Human Tutor-Style Programming Feedback: Leveraging GPT-4 Tutor Model for Hint Generation and GPT-3.5 Student Model for Hint Validation
Authors:
Tung Phung,
Victor-Alexandru Pădurean,
Anjali Singh,
Christopher Brooks,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Adish Singla,
Gustavo Soares
Abstract:
Generative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing programming education by automatically generating individualized feedback for students. We investigate the role of generative AI models in providing human tutor-style programming hints to help students resolve errors in their buggy programs. Recent works have benchmarked state-of-the-art models for various feedback generation…
▽ More
Generative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing programming education by automatically generating individualized feedback for students. We investigate the role of generative AI models in providing human tutor-style programming hints to help students resolve errors in their buggy programs. Recent works have benchmarked state-of-the-art models for various feedback generation scenarios; however, their overall quality is still inferior to human tutors and not yet ready for real-world deployment. In this paper, we seek to push the limits of generative AI models toward providing high-quality programming hints and develop a novel technique, GPT4Hints-GPT3.5Val. As a first step, our technique leverages GPT-4 as a ``tutor'' model to generate hints -- it boosts the generative quality by using symbolic information of failing test cases and fixes in prompts. As a next step, our technique leverages GPT-3.5, a weaker model, as a ``student'' model to further validate the hint quality -- it performs an automatic quality validation by simulating the potential utility of providing this feedback. We show the efficacy of our technique via extensive evaluation using three real-world datasets of Python programs covering a variety of concepts ranging from basic algorithms to regular expressions and data analysis using pandas library.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2023; v1 submitted 5 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Co-audit: tools to help humans double-check AI-generated content
Authors:
Andrew D. Gordon,
Carina Negreanu,
José Cambronero,
Rasika Chakravarthy,
Ian Drosos,
Hao Fang,
Bhaskar Mitra,
Hannah Richardson,
Advait Sarkar,
Stephanie Simmons,
Jack Williams,
Ben Zorn
Abstract:
Users are increasingly being warned to check AI-generated content for correctness. Still, as LLMs (and other generative models) generate more complex output, such as summaries, tables, or code, it becomes harder for the user to audit or evaluate the output for quality or correctness. Hence, we are seeing the emergence of tool-assisted experiences to help the user double-check a piece of AI-generat…
▽ More
Users are increasingly being warned to check AI-generated content for correctness. Still, as LLMs (and other generative models) generate more complex output, such as summaries, tables, or code, it becomes harder for the user to audit or evaluate the output for quality or correctness. Hence, we are seeing the emergence of tool-assisted experiences to help the user double-check a piece of AI-generated content. We refer to these as co-audit tools. Co-audit tools complement prompt engineering techniques: one helps the user construct the input prompt, while the other helps them check the output response. As a specific example, this paper describes recent research on co-audit tools for spreadsheet computations powered by generative models. We explain why co-audit experiences are essential for any application of generative AI where quality is important and errors are consequential (as is common in spreadsheet computations). We propose a preliminary list of principles for co-audit, and outline research challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
DataVinci: Learning Syntactic and Semantic String Repairs
Authors:
Mukul Singh,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Vu Le,
Carina Negreanu,
Gust Verbruggen
Abstract:
String data is common in real-world datasets: 67.6% of values in a sample of 1.8 million real Excel spreadsheets from the web were represented as text. Systems that successfully clean such string data can have a significant impact on real users. While prior work has explored errors in string data, proposed approaches have often been limited to error detection or require that the user provide annot…
▽ More
String data is common in real-world datasets: 67.6% of values in a sample of 1.8 million real Excel spreadsheets from the web were represented as text. Systems that successfully clean such string data can have a significant impact on real users. While prior work has explored errors in string data, proposed approaches have often been limited to error detection or require that the user provide annotations, examples, or constraints to fix the errors. Furthermore, these systems have focused independently on syntactic errors or semantic errors in strings, but ignore that strings often contain both syntactic and semantic substrings. We introduce DataVinci, a fully unsupervised string data error detection and repair system. DataVinci learns regular-expression-based patterns that cover a majority of values in a column and reports values that do not satisfy such patterns as data errors. DataVinci can automatically derive edits to the data error based on the majority patterns and constraints learned over other columns without the need for further user interaction. To handle strings with both syntactic and semantic substrings, DataVinci uses an LLM to abstract (and re-concretize) portions of strings that are semantic prior to learning majority patterns and deriving edits. Because not all data can result in majority patterns, DataVinci leverages execution information from an existing program (which reads the target data) to identify and correct data repairs that would not otherwise be identified. DataVinci outperforms 7 baselines on both error detection and repair when evaluated on 4 existing and new benchmarks.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Demonstration of CORNET: A System For Learning Spreadsheet Formatting Rules By Example
Authors:
Mukul Singh,
Jose Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Vu Le,
Carina Negreanu,
Gust Verbruggen
Abstract:
Data management and analysis tasks are often carried out using spreadsheet software. A popular feature in most spreadsheet platforms is the ability to define data-dependent formatting rules. These rules can express actions such as "color red all entries in a column that are negative" or "bold all rows not containing error or failure." Unfortunately, users who want to exercise this functionality ne…
▽ More
Data management and analysis tasks are often carried out using spreadsheet software. A popular feature in most spreadsheet platforms is the ability to define data-dependent formatting rules. These rules can express actions such as "color red all entries in a column that are negative" or "bold all rows not containing error or failure." Unfortunately, users who want to exercise this functionality need to manually write these conditional formatting (CF) rules. We introduce CORNET, a system that automatically learns such conditional formatting rules from user examples. CORNET takes inspiration from inductive program synthesis and combines symbolic rule enumeration, based on semi-supervised clustering and iterative decision tree learning, with a neural ranker to produce accurate conditional formatting rules. In this demonstration, we show CORNET in action as a simple add-in to Microsoft Excel. After the user provides one or two formatted cells as examples, CORNET generates formatting rule suggestions for the user to apply to the spreadsheet.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Generative AI for Programming Education: Benchmarking ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Human Tutors
Authors:
Tung Phung,
Victor-Alexandru Pădurean,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Tobias Kohn,
Rupak Majumdar,
Adish Singla,
Gustavo Soares
Abstract:
Generative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing computing education by powering next-generation educational technologies for introductory programming. Recent works have studied these models for different scenarios relevant to programming education; however, these works are limited for several reasons, as they typically consider already outdated models or only specific scena…
▽ More
Generative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing computing education by powering next-generation educational technologies for introductory programming. Recent works have studied these models for different scenarios relevant to programming education; however, these works are limited for several reasons, as they typically consider already outdated models or only specific scenario(s). Consequently, there is a lack of a systematic study that benchmarks state-of-the-art models for a comprehensive set of programming education scenarios. In our work, we systematically evaluate two models, ChatGPT (based on GPT-3.5) and GPT-4, and compare their performance with human tutors for a variety of scenarios. We evaluate using five introductory Python programming problems and real-world buggy programs from an online platform, and assess performance using expert-based annotations. Our results show that GPT-4 drastically outperforms ChatGPT (based on GPT-3.5) and comes close to human tutors' performance for several scenarios. These results also highlight settings where GPT-4 still struggles, providing exciting future directions on develo** techniques to improve the performance of these models.
△ Less
Submitted 31 July, 2023; v1 submitted 29 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Generating High-Precision Feedback for Programming Syntax Errors using Large Language Models
Authors:
Tung Phung,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Tobias Kohn,
Rupak Majumdar,
Adish Singla,
Gustavo Soares
Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs), such as Codex, hold great promise in enhancing programming education by automatically generating feedback for students. We investigate using LLMs to generate feedback for fixing syntax errors in Python programs, a key scenario in introductory programming. More concretely, given a student's buggy program, our goal is to generate feedback comprising a fixed program alon…
▽ More
Large language models (LLMs), such as Codex, hold great promise in enhancing programming education by automatically generating feedback for students. We investigate using LLMs to generate feedback for fixing syntax errors in Python programs, a key scenario in introductory programming. More concretely, given a student's buggy program, our goal is to generate feedback comprising a fixed program along with a natural language explanation describing the errors/fixes, inspired by how a human tutor would give feedback. While using LLMs is promising, the critical challenge is to ensure high precision in the generated feedback, which is imperative before deploying such technology in classrooms. The main research question we study is: Can we develop LLMs-based feedback generation techniques with a tunable precision parameter, giving educators quality control over the feedback that students receive? To this end, we introduce PyFiXV, our technique to generate high-precision feedback powered by Codex. The key idea behind PyFiXV is to use a novel run-time validation mechanism to decide whether the generated feedback is suitable for sharing with the student; notably, this validation mechanism also provides a precision knob to educators. We perform an extensive evaluation using two real-world datasets of Python programs with syntax errors and show the efficacy of PyFiXV in generating high-precision feedback.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2023; v1 submitted 24 January, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
FLAME: A small language model for spreadsheet formulas
Authors:
Harshit Joshi,
Abishai Ebenezer,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Aditya Kanade,
Vu Le,
Ivan Radiček,
Gust Verbruggen
Abstract:
Spreadsheets are a vital tool for end-user data management. Using large language models for formula authoring assistance in these environments can be difficult, as these models are expensive to train and challenging to deploy due to their size (up to billions of parameters). We present FLAME, a transformer-based model trained exclusively on Excel formulas that leverages domain insights to achieve…
▽ More
Spreadsheets are a vital tool for end-user data management. Using large language models for formula authoring assistance in these environments can be difficult, as these models are expensive to train and challenging to deploy due to their size (up to billions of parameters). We present FLAME, a transformer-based model trained exclusively on Excel formulas that leverages domain insights to achieve competitive performance while being substantially smaller (60M parameters) and training on two orders of magnitude less data. We curate a training dataset using sketch deduplication, introduce an Excel-specific formula tokenizer, and use domain-specific versions of masked span prediction and noisy auto-encoding as pre-training objectives. We evaluate FLAME on formula repair, formula completion, and similarity-based formula retrieval. FLAME can outperform much larger models, such as the Davinci (175B) and Cushman (12B) variants of Codex and CodeT5 (220M), in 10 of 14 evaluation settings for the repair and completion tasks. For formula retrieval, FLAME outperforms CodeT5, CodeBERT, and GraphCodeBERT.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2023; v1 submitted 31 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Repairing Bugs in Python Assignments Using Large Language Models
Authors:
Jialu Zhang,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Vu Le,
Ruzica Piskac,
Gustavo Soares,
Gust Verbruggen
Abstract:
Students often make mistakes on their introductory programming assignments as part of their learning process. Unfortunately, providing custom repairs for these mistakes can require a substantial amount of time and effort from class instructors. Automated program repair (APR) techniques can be used to synthesize such fixes. Prior work has explored the use of symbolic and neural techniques for APR i…
▽ More
Students often make mistakes on their introductory programming assignments as part of their learning process. Unfortunately, providing custom repairs for these mistakes can require a substantial amount of time and effort from class instructors. Automated program repair (APR) techniques can be used to synthesize such fixes. Prior work has explored the use of symbolic and neural techniques for APR in the education domain. Both types of approaches require either substantial engineering efforts or large amounts of data and training. We propose to use a large language model trained on code, such as Codex, to build an APR system -- MMAPR -- for introductory Python programming assignments. Our system can fix both syntactic and semantic mistakes by combining multi-modal prompts, iterative querying, test-case-based selection of few-shots, and program chunking. We evaluate MMAPR on 286 real student programs and compare to a baseline built by combining a state-of-the-art Python syntax repair engine, BIFI, and state-of-the-art Python semantic repair engine for student assignments, Refactory. We find that MMAPR can fix more programs and produce smaller patches on average.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Repair Is Nearly Generation: Multilingual Program Repair with LLMs
Authors:
Harshit Joshi,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Vu Le,
Ivan Radicek,
Gust Verbruggen
Abstract:
Most programmers make mistakes when writing code. Some of these mistakes are small and require few edits to the original program -- a class of errors recently termed last mile mistakes. These errors break the flow for experienced developers and can stump novice programmers. Existing automated repair techniques targeting this class of errors are language-specific and do not easily carry over to new…
▽ More
Most programmers make mistakes when writing code. Some of these mistakes are small and require few edits to the original program -- a class of errors recently termed last mile mistakes. These errors break the flow for experienced developers and can stump novice programmers. Existing automated repair techniques targeting this class of errors are language-specific and do not easily carry over to new languages. Transferring symbolic approaches requires substantial engineering and neural approaches require data and retraining. We introduce RING, a multilingual repair engine powered by a large language model trained on code (LLMC) such as Codex. Such a multilingual engine enables a flipped model for programming assistance, one where the programmer writes code and the AI assistance suggests fixes, compared to traditional code suggestion technology. Taking inspiration from the way programmers manually fix bugs, we show that a prompt-based strategy that conceptualizes repair as localization, transformation, and candidate ranking, can successfully repair programs in multiple languages with minimal effort. We present the first results for such a multilingual repair engine by evaluating on 6 different languages and comparing performance to language-specific repair engines. We show that RING can outperform language-specific repair engines for three of these languages.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2022; v1 submitted 24 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
CORNET: Learning Table Formatting Rules By Example
Authors:
Mukul Singh,
José Cambronero,
Sumit Gulwani,
Vu Le,
Carina Negreanu,
Mohammad Raza,
Gust Verbruggen
Abstract:
Spreadsheets are widely used for table manipulation and presentation. Stylistic formatting of these tables is an important property for both presentation and analysis. As a result, popular spreadsheet software, such as Excel, supports automatically formatting tables based on rules. Unfortunately, writing such formatting rules can be challenging for users as it requires knowledge of the underlying…
▽ More
Spreadsheets are widely used for table manipulation and presentation. Stylistic formatting of these tables is an important property for both presentation and analysis. As a result, popular spreadsheet software, such as Excel, supports automatically formatting tables based on rules. Unfortunately, writing such formatting rules can be challenging for users as it requires knowledge of the underlying rule language and data logic. We present CORNET, a system that tackles the novel problem of automatically learning such formatting rules from user examples in the form of formatted cells. CORNET takes inspiration from advances in inductive programming and combines symbolic rule enumeration with a neural ranker to learn conditional formatting rules. To motivate and evaluate our approach, we extracted tables with over 450K unique formatting rules from a corpus of over 1.8M real worksheets. Since we are the first to introduce conditional formatting, we compare CORNET to a wide range of symbolic and neural baselines adapted from related domains. Our results show that CORNET accurately learns rules across varying evaluation setups. Additionally, we show that CORNET finds shorter rules than those that a user has written and discovers rules in spreadsheets that users have manually formatted.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2022; v1 submitted 11 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
LoopStack: a Lightweight Tensor Algebra Compiler Stack
Authors:
Bram Wasti,
José Pablo Cambronero,
Benoit Steiner,
Hugh Leather,
Aleksandar Zlateski
Abstract:
We present LoopStack, a domain specific compiler stack for tensor operations, composed of a frontend, LoopTool, and an efficient optimizing code generator, LoopNest. This stack enables us to compile entire neural networks and generate code targeting the AVX2, AVX512, NEON, and NEONfp16 instruction sets while incorporating optimizations often missing from other machine learning compiler backends. W…
▽ More
We present LoopStack, a domain specific compiler stack for tensor operations, composed of a frontend, LoopTool, and an efficient optimizing code generator, LoopNest. This stack enables us to compile entire neural networks and generate code targeting the AVX2, AVX512, NEON, and NEONfp16 instruction sets while incorporating optimizations often missing from other machine learning compiler backends. We evaluate our stack on a collection of full neural networks and commonly used network blocks as well as individual operators, and show that LoopStack generates machine code that matches and frequently exceeds the performance of in state-of-the-art machine learning frameworks in both cases. We also show that for a large collection of schedules LoopNest's compilation is orders of magnitude faster than LLVM, while resulting in equal or improved run time performance. Additionally, LoopStack has a very small memory footprint - a binary size of 245KB, and under 30K lines of effective code makes it ideal for use on mobile and embedded devices.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Searching for Replacement Classes
Authors:
Malavika Samak,
Jose Pablo Cambronero,
Martin C. Rinard
Abstract:
Software developers must often replace existing components in their systems to adapt to evolving environments or tooling. While traditional code search systems are effective at retrieving components with related functionality, it is much more challenging to retrieve components that can be used to directly replace existing functionality, as replacements must account for more fundamental program pro…
▽ More
Software developers must often replace existing components in their systems to adapt to evolving environments or tooling. While traditional code search systems are effective at retrieving components with related functionality, it is much more challenging to retrieve components that can be used to directly replace existing functionality, as replacements must account for more fundamental program properties such as type compatibility. To address this problem, we introduce ClassFinder, a system which given a query class Q, and a search corpus S, returns a ranked subset of classes that can replace Q and its functionality. ClassFinder produces afield and method map** between the classes that can provide useful hints to a developer and can be used to effectively refine the ranking of candidate replacement classes. Our technique leverages the complementary strengths of a distributed embeddings-based search and type-based analysis, using the former to prune down candidates for an optimization-based approach based on the latter. ClassFinder retrieves replacement classes, along with a type-aware field/method map** between classes. We evaluate ClassFinder on a search space of ~600thousand open sourceJava classes. Querying ClassFinder with 24 known Java classes provided meaningful replacement classes and map**s, in many cases producing complete map**s with functionally identical replacement classes.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Inferring Drop-in Binary Parsers from Program Executions
Authors:
Thurston H. Y. Dang,
Jose P. Cambronero,
Martin C. Rinard
Abstract:
We present BIEBER (Byte-IdEntical Binary parsER), the first system to model and regenerate a full working parser from instrumented program executions. To achieve this, BIEBER exploits the regularity (e.g., header fields and array-like data structures) that is commonly found in file formats. Key generalization steps derive strided loops that parse input file data and rewrite concrete loop bounds wi…
▽ More
We present BIEBER (Byte-IdEntical Binary parsER), the first system to model and regenerate a full working parser from instrumented program executions. To achieve this, BIEBER exploits the regularity (e.g., header fields and array-like data structures) that is commonly found in file formats. Key generalization steps derive strided loops that parse input file data and rewrite concrete loop bounds with expressions over input file header bytes. These steps enable BIEBER to generalize parses of specific input files to obtain parsers that operate over input files of arbitrary size. BIEBER also incrementally and efficiently infers a decision tree that reads file header bytes to route input files of different types to inferred parsers of the appropriate type. The inferred parsers and decision tree are expressed in an IR; separate backends (C and Perl in our prototype) can translate the IR into the same language as the original program (for a safer drop-in replacement), or automatically port to a different language. An empirical evaluation shows that BIEBER can successfully regenerate parsers for six file formats (waveform audio [1654 files], MT76x0 .BIN firmware containers [5 files], OS/2 1.x bitmap images [9 files], Windows 3.x bitmaps [9971 files], Windows 95/NT4 bitmaps [133 files], and Windows 98/2000 bitmaps [859 files]), correctly parsing 100% (>= 99.98% when using standard held-out cross-validation) of the corresponding corpora. The regenerated parsers contain automatically inserted safety checks that eliminate common classes of errors such as memory errors. We find that BIEBER can help reverse-engineer file formats, because it automatically identifies predicates for the decision tree that relate to key semantics of the file format. We also discuss how BIEBER helped us detect and fix two new bugs in stb_image as well as independently rediscover and fix a known bug.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Characterizing Developer Use of Automatically Generated Patches
Authors:
José Pablo Cambronero,
Jiasi Shen,
Jürgen Cito,
Elena Glassman,
Martin Rinard
Abstract:
We present a study that characterizes the way developers use automatically generated patches when fixing software defects. Our study tasked two groups of developers with repairing defects in C programs. Both groups were provided with the defective line of code. One was also provided with five automatically generated and validated patches, all of which modified the defective line of code, and one o…
▽ More
We present a study that characterizes the way developers use automatically generated patches when fixing software defects. Our study tasked two groups of developers with repairing defects in C programs. Both groups were provided with the defective line of code. One was also provided with five automatically generated and validated patches, all of which modified the defective line of code, and one of which was correct. Contrary to our initial expectations, the group with access to the generated patches did not produce more correct patches and did not produce patches in less time. We characterize the main behaviors observed in experimental subjects: a focus on understanding the defect and the relationship of the patches to the original source code. Based on this characterization, we highlight various potentially productive directions for future developer-centric automatic patch generation systems.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2019; v1 submitted 15 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
When Deep Learning Met Code Search
Authors:
Jose Cambronero,
Hongyu Li,
Seohyun Kim,
Koushik Sen,
Satish Chandra
Abstract:
There have been multiple recent proposals on using deep neural networks for code search using natural language. Common across these proposals is the idea of $\mathit{embedding}$ code and natural language queries, into real vectors and then using vector distance to approximate semantic correlation between code and the query. Multiple approaches exist for learning these embeddings, including…
▽ More
There have been multiple recent proposals on using deep neural networks for code search using natural language. Common across these proposals is the idea of $\mathit{embedding}$ code and natural language queries, into real vectors and then using vector distance to approximate semantic correlation between code and the query. Multiple approaches exist for learning these embeddings, including $\mathit{unsupervised}$ techniques, which rely only on a corpus of code examples, and $\mathit{supervised}$ techniques, which use an $\mathit{aligned}$ corpus of paired code and natural language descriptions. The goal of this supervision is to produce embeddings that are more similar for a query and the corresponding desired code snippet. Clearly, there are choices in whether to use supervised techniques at all, and if one does, what sort of network and training to use for supervision. This paper is the first to evaluate these choices systematically. To this end, we assembled implementations of state-of-the-art techniques to run on a common platform, training and evaluation corpora. To explore the design space in network complexity, we also introduced a new design point that is a $\mathit{minimal}$ supervision extension to an existing unsupervised technique. Our evaluation shows that: 1. adding supervision to an existing unsupervised technique can improve performance, though not necessarily by much; 2. simple networks for supervision can be more effective that more sophisticated sequence-based networks for code search; 3. while it is common to use docstrings to carry out supervision, there is a sizeable gap between the effectiveness of docstrings and a more query-appropriate supervision corpus.
The evaluation dataset is now available at arXiv:1908.09804
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2019; v1 submitted 9 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Incremental Color Quantization for Color-Vision-Deficient Observers Using Mobile Gaming Data
Authors:
Jose Cambronero,
Phillip Stanley-Marbell,
Martin Rinard
Abstract:
The sizes of compressed images depend on their spatial resolution (number of pixels) and on their color resolution (number of color quantization levels). We introduce DaltonQuant, a new color quantization technique for image compression that cloud services can apply to images destined for a specific user with known color vision deficiencies. DaltonQuant improves compression in a user-specific but…
▽ More
The sizes of compressed images depend on their spatial resolution (number of pixels) and on their color resolution (number of color quantization levels). We introduce DaltonQuant, a new color quantization technique for image compression that cloud services can apply to images destined for a specific user with known color vision deficiencies. DaltonQuant improves compression in a user-specific but reversible manner thereby improving a user's network bandwidth and data storage efficiency. DaltonQuant quantizes image data to account for user-specific color perception anomalies, using a new method for incremental color quantization based on a large corpus of color vision acuity data obtained from a popular mobile game. Servers that host images can revert DaltonQuant's image requantization and compression when those images must be transmitted to a different user, making the technique practical to deploy on a large scale. We evaluate DaltonQuant's compression performance on the Kodak PC reference image set and show that it improves compression by an additional 22%-29% over the state-of-the-art compressors TinyPNG and pngquant.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
