-
In Situ AI Prototy**: Infusing Multimodal Prompts into Mobile Settings with MobileMaker
Authors:
Savvas Petridis,
Michael Xieyang Liu,
Alexander J. Fiannaca,
Vivian Tsai,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have lowered the barriers to rapidly prototy** AI-powered features via prompting, especially for mobile-intended use cases. Despite the value of situated user feedback, the process of soliciting early, mobile-situated user feedback on AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-c…
▽ More
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have lowered the barriers to rapidly prototy** AI-powered features via prompting, especially for mobile-intended use cases. Despite the value of situated user feedback, the process of soliciting early, mobile-situated user feedback on AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-case-specific prototype, there is a crucial need to understand the wide range of in-the-wild input likely to be provided by the user, as well as their in-context expectations of the AI's behavior. To explore the concept of in situ AI prototy** and testing, we created MobileMaker: an AI prototy** tool that enables designers to rapidly create mobile AI prototypes that can be tested on-device, and enables testers to make on-device, in-the-field revisions of the prototype through natural language. In an exploratory study with 16 users, we explored how user feedback on prototypes created with MobileMaker compares to that of existing prototy** tools (e.g., Figma, prompt editors). We found that MobileMaker prototypes enabled more serendipitous discovery of: model input edge cases, discrepancies between AI's and user's in-context interpretation of the task, and contextual signals missed by the AI. Furthermore, we learned that while the ability to make in-the-wild revisions led users to feel more fulfilled as active participants in the design process, it might also constrain their feedback to the subset of changes perceived as more actionable or implementable by the prototy** tool.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
"We Need Structured Output": Towards User-centered Constraints on Large Language Model Output
Authors:
Michael Xieyang Liu,
Frederick Liu,
Alexander J. Fiannaca,
Terry Koo,
Lucas Dixon,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Large language models can produce creative and diverse responses. However, to integrate them into current developer workflows, it is essential to constrain their outputs to follow specific formats or standards. In this work, we surveyed 51 experienced industry professionals to understand the range of scenarios and motivations driving the need for output constraints from a user-centered perspective…
▽ More
Large language models can produce creative and diverse responses. However, to integrate them into current developer workflows, it is essential to constrain their outputs to follow specific formats or standards. In this work, we surveyed 51 experienced industry professionals to understand the range of scenarios and motivations driving the need for output constraints from a user-centered perspective. We identified 134 concrete use cases for constraints at two levels: low-level, which ensures the output adhere to a structured format and an appropriate length, and high-level, which requires the output to follow semantic and stylistic guidelines without hallucination. Critically, applying output constraints could not only streamline the currently repetitive process of develo**, testing, and integrating LLM prompts for developers, but also enhance the user experience of LLM-powered features and applications. We conclude with a discussion on user preferences and needs towards articulating intended constraints for LLMs, alongside an initial design for a constraint prototy** tool.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
PromptInfuser: How Tightly Coupling AI and UI Design Impacts Designers' Workflows
Authors:
Savvas Petridis,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Prototy** AI applications is notoriously difficult. While large language model (LLM) prompting has dramatically lowered the barriers to AI prototy**, designers are still prototy** AI functionality and UI separately. We investigate how coupling prompt and UI design affects designers' workflows. Grounding this research, we developed PromptInfuser, a Figma plugin that enables users to create se…
▽ More
Prototy** AI applications is notoriously difficult. While large language model (LLM) prompting has dramatically lowered the barriers to AI prototy**, designers are still prototy** AI functionality and UI separately. We investigate how coupling prompt and UI design affects designers' workflows. Grounding this research, we developed PromptInfuser, a Figma plugin that enables users to create semi-functional mockups, by connecting UI elements to the inputs and outputs of prompts. In a study with 14 designers, we compare PromptInfuser to designers' current AI-prototy** workflow. PromptInfuser was perceived to be significantly more useful for communicating product ideas, more capable of producing prototypes that realistically represent the envisioned artifact, more efficient for prototy**, and more helpful for anticipating UI issues and technical constraints. PromptInfuser encouraged iteration over prompt and UI together, which helped designers identify UI and prompt incompatibilities and reflect upon their total solution. Together, these findings inform future systems for prototy** AI applications.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principles
Authors:
Savvas Petridis,
Ben Wedin,
James Wexler,
Aaron Donsbach,
Mahima Pushkarna,
Nitesh Goyal,
Carrie J. Cai,
Michael Terry
Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) prompting is a promising new approach for users to create and customize their own chatbots. However, current methods for steering a chatbot's outputs, such as prompt engineering and fine-tuning, do not support users in converting their natural feedback on the model's outputs to changes in the prompt or model. In this work, we explore how to enable users to interactively…
▽ More
Large language model (LLM) prompting is a promising new approach for users to create and customize their own chatbots. However, current methods for steering a chatbot's outputs, such as prompt engineering and fine-tuning, do not support users in converting their natural feedback on the model's outputs to changes in the prompt or model. In this work, we explore how to enable users to interactively refine model outputs through their feedback, by hel** them convert their feedback into a set of principles (i.e. a constitution) that dictate the model's behavior. From a formative study, we (1) found that users needed support converting their feedback into principles for the chatbot and (2) classified the different principle types desired by users. Inspired by these findings, we developed ConstitutionMaker, an interactive tool for converting user feedback into principles, to steer LLM-based chatbots. With ConstitutionMaker, users can provide either positive or negative feedback in natural language, select auto-generated feedback, or rewrite the chatbot's response; each mode of feedback automatically generates a principle that is inserted into the chatbot's prompt. In a user study with 14 participants, we compare ConstitutionMaker to an ablated version, where users write their own principles. With ConstitutionMaker, participants felt that their principles could better guide the chatbot, that they could more easily convert their feedback into principles, and that they could write principles more efficiently, with less mental demand. ConstitutionMaker helped users identify ways to improve the chatbot, formulate their intuitive responses to the model into feedback, and convert this feedback into specific and clear principles. Together, these findings inform future tools that support the interactive critiquing of LLM outputs.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
The Design Space of Generative Models
Authors:
Meredith Ringel Morris,
Carrie J. Cai,
Jess Holbrook,
Chinmay Kulkarni,
Michael Terry
Abstract:
Card et al.'s classic paper "The Design Space of Input Devices" established the value of design spaces as a tool for HCI analysis and invention. We posit that develo** design spaces for emerging pre-trained, generative AI models is necessary for supporting their integration into human-centered systems and practices. We explore what it means to develop an AI model design space by proposing two de…
▽ More
Card et al.'s classic paper "The Design Space of Input Devices" established the value of design spaces as a tool for HCI analysis and invention. We posit that develo** design spaces for emerging pre-trained, generative AI models is necessary for supporting their integration into human-centered systems and practices. We explore what it means to develop an AI model design space by proposing two design spaces relating to generative AI models: the first considers how HCI can impact generative models (i.e., interfaces for models) and the second considers how generative models can impact HCI (i.e., models as an HCI prototy** material).
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
Authors:
Joon Sung Park,
Joseph C. O'Brien,
Carrie J. Cai,
Meredith Ringel Morris,
Percy Liang,
Michael S. Bernstein
Abstract:
Believable proxies of human behavior can empower interactive applications ranging from immersive environments to rehearsal spaces for interpersonal communication to prototy** tools. In this paper, we introduce generative agents--computational software agents that simulate believable human behavior. Generative agents wake up, cook breakfast, and head to work; artists paint, while authors write; t…
▽ More
Believable proxies of human behavior can empower interactive applications ranging from immersive environments to rehearsal spaces for interpersonal communication to prototy** tools. In this paper, we introduce generative agents--computational software agents that simulate believable human behavior. Generative agents wake up, cook breakfast, and head to work; artists paint, while authors write; they form opinions, notice each other, and initiate conversations; they remember and reflect on days past as they plan the next day. To enable generative agents, we describe an architecture that extends a large language model to store a complete record of the agent's experiences using natural language, synthesize those memories over time into higher-level reflections, and retrieve them dynamically to plan behavior. We instantiate generative agents to populate an interactive sandbox environment inspired by The Sims, where end users can interact with a small town of twenty five agents using natural language. In an evaluation, these generative agents produce believable individual and emergent social behaviors: for example, starting with only a single user-specified notion that one agent wants to throw a Valentine's Day party, the agents autonomously spread invitations to the party over the next two days, make new acquaintances, ask each other out on dates to the party, and coordinate to show up for the party together at the right time. We demonstrate through ablation that the components of our agent architecture--observation, planning, and reflection--each contribute critically to the believability of agent behavior. By fusing large language models with computational, interactive agents, this work introduces architectural and interaction patterns for enabling believable simulations of human behavior.
△ Less
Submitted 5 August, 2023; v1 submitted 6 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems
Authors:
Joon Sung Park,
Lindsay Popowski,
Carrie J. Cai,
Meredith Ringel Morris,
Percy Liang,
Michael S. Bernstein
Abstract:
Social computing prototypes probe the social behaviors that may arise in an envisioned system design. This prototy** practice is currently limited to recruiting small groups of people. Unfortunately, many challenges do not arise until a system is populated at a larger scale. Can a designer understand how a social system might behave when populated, and make adjustments to the design before the s…
▽ More
Social computing prototypes probe the social behaviors that may arise in an envisioned system design. This prototy** practice is currently limited to recruiting small groups of people. Unfortunately, many challenges do not arise until a system is populated at a larger scale. Can a designer understand how a social system might behave when populated, and make adjustments to the design before the system falls prey to such challenges? We introduce social simulacra, a prototy** technique that generates a breadth of realistic social interactions that may emerge when a social computing system is populated. Social simulacra take as input the designer's description of a community's design -- goal, rules, and member personas -- and produce as output an instance of that design with simulated behavior, including posts, replies, and anti-social behaviors. We demonstrate that social simulacra shift the behaviors that they generate appropriately in response to design changes, and that they enable exploration of "what if?" scenarios where community members or moderators intervene. To power social simulacra, we contribute techniques for prompting a large language model to generate thousands of distinct community members and their social interactions with each other; these techniques are enabled by the observation that large language models' training data already includes a wide variety of positive and negative behavior on social media platforms. In evaluations, we show that participants are often unable to distinguish social simulacra from actual community behavior and that social computing designers successfully refine their social computing designs when using social simulacra.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
PromptChainer: Chaining Large Language Model Prompts through Visual Programming
Authors:
Tongshuang Wu,
Ellen Jiang,
Aaron Donsbach,
Jeff Gray,
Alejandra Molina,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J Cai
Abstract:
While LLMs can effectively help prototype single ML functionalities, many real-world applications involve complex tasks that cannot be easily handled via a single run of an LLM. Recent work has found that chaining multiple LLM runs together (with the output of one step being the input to the next) can help users accomplish these more complex tasks, and in a way that is perceived to be more transpa…
▽ More
While LLMs can effectively help prototype single ML functionalities, many real-world applications involve complex tasks that cannot be easily handled via a single run of an LLM. Recent work has found that chaining multiple LLM runs together (with the output of one step being the input to the next) can help users accomplish these more complex tasks, and in a way that is perceived to be more transparent and controllable. However, it remains unknown what users need when authoring their own LLM chains -- a key step for lowering the barriers for non-AI-experts to prototype AI-infused applications. In this work, we explore the LLM chain authoring process. We conclude from pilot studies find that chaining requires careful scaffolding for transforming intermediate node outputs, as well as debugging the chain at multiple granularities; to help with these needs, we designed PromptChainer, an interactive interface for visually programming chains. Through case studies with four people, we show that PromptChainer supports building prototypes for a range of applications, and conclude with open questions on scaling chains to complex tasks, and supporting low-fi chain prototy**.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Prompts
Authors:
Tongshuang Wu,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive potential on simple tasks, their breadth of scope, lack of transparency, and insufficient controllability can make them less effective when assisting humans on more complex tasks. In response, we introduce the concept of Chaining LLM steps together, where the output of one step becomes the input for the next, thus aggregating the g…
▽ More
Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive potential on simple tasks, their breadth of scope, lack of transparency, and insufficient controllability can make them less effective when assisting humans on more complex tasks. In response, we introduce the concept of Chaining LLM steps together, where the output of one step becomes the input for the next, thus aggregating the gains per step. We first define a set of LLM primitive operations useful for Chain construction, then present an interactive system where users can modify these Chains, along with their intermediate results, in a modular way. In a 20-person user study, we found that Chaining not only improved the quality of task outcomes, but also significantly enhanced system transparency, controllability, and sense of collaboration. Additionally, we saw that users developed new ways of interacting with LLMs through Chains: they leveraged sub-tasks to calibrate model expectations, compared and contrasted alternative strategies by observing parallel downstream effects, and debugged unexpected model outputs by "unit-testing" sub-components of a Chain. In two case studies, we further explore how LLM Chains may be used in future applications
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2022; v1 submitted 4 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
AI Song Contest: Human-AI Co-Creation in Songwriting
Authors:
Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang,
Hendrik Vincent Koops,
Ed Newton-Rex,
Monica Dinculescu,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Machine learning is challenging the way we make music. Although research in deep generative models has dramatically improved the capability and fluency of music models, recent work has shown that it can be challenging for humans to partner with this new class of algorithms. In this paper, we present findings on what 13 musician/developer teams, a total of 61 users, needed when co-creating a song w…
▽ More
Machine learning is challenging the way we make music. Although research in deep generative models has dramatically improved the capability and fluency of music models, recent work has shown that it can be challenging for humans to partner with this new class of algorithms. In this paper, we present findings on what 13 musician/developer teams, a total of 61 users, needed when co-creating a song with AI, the challenges they faced, and how they leveraged and repurposed existing characteristics of AI to overcome some of these challenges. Many teams adopted modular approaches, such as independently running multiple smaller models that align with the musical building blocks of a song, before re-combining their results. As ML models are not easily steerable, teams also generated massive numbers of samples and curated them post-hoc, or used a range of strategies to direct the generation, or algorithmically ranked the samples. Ultimately, teams not only had to manage the "flare and focus" aspects of the creative process, but also juggle them with a parallel process of exploring and curating multiple ML models and outputs. These findings reflect a need to design machine learning-powered music interfaces that are more decomposable, steerable, interpretable, and adaptive, which in return will enable artists to more effectively explore how AI can extend their personal expression.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Human-Centered Tools for Co** with Imperfect Algorithms during Medical Decision-Making
Authors:
Carrie J. Cai,
Emily Reif,
Narayan Hegde,
Jason Hipp,
Been Kim,
Daniel Smilkov,
Martin Wattenberg,
Fernanda Viegas,
Greg S. Corrado,
Martin C. Stumpe,
Michael Terry
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used in image retrieval systems for medical decision making. One application of ML is to retrieve visually similar medical images from past patients (e.g. tissue from biopsies) to reference when making a medical decision with a new patient. However, no algorithm can perfectly capture an expert's ideal notion of similarity for every case: an image that is…
▽ More
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used in image retrieval systems for medical decision making. One application of ML is to retrieve visually similar medical images from past patients (e.g. tissue from biopsies) to reference when making a medical decision with a new patient. However, no algorithm can perfectly capture an expert's ideal notion of similarity for every case: an image that is algorithmically determined to be similar may not be medically relevant to a doctor's specific diagnostic needs. In this paper, we identified the needs of pathologists when searching for similar images retrieved using a deep learning algorithm, and developed tools that empower users to cope with the search algorithm on-the-fly, communicating what types of similarity are most important at different moments in time. In two evaluations with pathologists, we found that these refinement tools increased the diagnostic utility of images found and increased user trust in the algorithm. The tools were preferred over a traditional interface, without a loss in diagnostic accuracy. We also observed that users adopted new strategies when using refinement tools, re-purposing them to test and understand the underlying algorithm and to disambiguate ML errors from their own errors. Taken together, these findings inform future human-ML collaborative systems for expert decision-making.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Similar Image Search for Histopathology: SMILY
Authors:
Narayan Hegde,
Jason D. Hipp,
Yun Liu,
Michael E. Buck,
Emily Reif,
Daniel Smilkov,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai,
Mahul B. Amin,
Craig H. Mermel,
Phil Q. Nelson,
Lily H. Peng,
Greg S. Corrado,
Martin C. Stumpe
Abstract:
The increasing availability of large institutional and public histopathology image datasets is enabling the searching of these datasets for diagnosis, research, and education. Though these datasets typically have associated metadata such as diagnosis or clinical notes, even carefully curated datasets rarely contain annotations of the location of regions of interest on each image. Because pathology…
▽ More
The increasing availability of large institutional and public histopathology image datasets is enabling the searching of these datasets for diagnosis, research, and education. Though these datasets typically have associated metadata such as diagnosis or clinical notes, even carefully curated datasets rarely contain annotations of the location of regions of interest on each image. Because pathology images are extremely large (up to 100,000 pixels in each dimension), further laborious visual search of each image may be needed to find the feature of interest. In this paper, we introduce a deep learning based reverse image search tool for histopathology images: Similar Medical Images Like Yours (SMILY). We assessed SMILY's ability to retrieve search results in two ways: using pathologist-provided annotations, and via prospective studies where pathologists evaluated the quality of SMILY search results. As a negative control in the second evaluation, pathologists were blinded to whether search results were retrieved by SMILY or randomly. In both types of assessments, SMILY was able to retrieve search results with similar histologic features, organ site, and prostate cancer Gleason grade compared with the original query. SMILY may be a useful general-purpose tool in the pathologist's arsenal, to improve the efficiency of searching large archives of histopathology images, without the need to develop and implement specific tools for each application.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2019; v1 submitted 30 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
