-
Are Doppler Velocity Measurements Useful for Spinning Radar Odometry?
Authors:
Daniil Lisus,
Keenan Burnett,
David J. Yoon,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
Spinning, frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar has been gaining popularity for autonomous vehicle navigation. The spinning radar is chosen over the more classic automotive `fixed' radar as it is able to capture the full 360 degree field of view without requiring multiple sensors and extensive calibration. However, commercially available spinning radar systems have not previously had th…
▽ More
Spinning, frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar has been gaining popularity for autonomous vehicle navigation. The spinning radar is chosen over the more classic automotive `fixed' radar as it is able to capture the full 360 degree field of view without requiring multiple sensors and extensive calibration. However, commercially available spinning radar systems have not previously had the ability to extract radial velocities due to the lack of repeated measurements in the same direction and fundamental hardware setup. A new firmware upgrade now makes it possible to alternate the modulation of the radar signal between azimuths. In this paper, we first present a way to use this alternating modulation to extract radial Doppler velocity measurements from single raw radar intensity scans. We then incorporate these measurements in two different modern odometry pipelines and evaluate them in progressively challenging autonomous driving environments. We show that using Doppler velocity measurements enables our odometry to continue functioning at state-of-the-art even in severely geometrically degenerate environments.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
IMU as an Input vs. a Measurement of the State in Inertial-Aided State Estimation
Authors:
Keenan Burnett,
Angela P. Schoellig,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
In this technical report, we compare treating an IMU as an input to a motion model against treating it as a measurement of the state in a continuous-time state estimation framework. Treating IMU measurements as inputs to a motion model and then preintegrating these measurements has almost become a de-facto standard in many robotics applications. However, this approach has a few shortcomings. First…
▽ More
In this technical report, we compare treating an IMU as an input to a motion model against treating it as a measurement of the state in a continuous-time state estimation framework. Treating IMU measurements as inputs to a motion model and then preintegrating these measurements has almost become a de-facto standard in many robotics applications. However, this approach has a few shortcomings. First, it conflates the IMU measurement noise with the underlying process noise. Second, it is unclear how the state will be propagated in the case of IMU measurement dropout. Third, it does not lend itself well to dealing with multiple high-rate sensors such as a lidar and an IMU or multiple IMUs. In this work, we methodically compare the performance of these two approaches on a 1D simulation and show that they perform identically, assuming that each method's hyperparameters have been tuned on a training set. We show how to preintegrate heterogeneous factors using Gaussian process interpolation. We also provide results for our continuous-time lidar-inertial odometry in simulation and on the Newer College Dataset. Code for our lidar-inertial odometry can be found at: https://github.com/utiasASRL/steam_icp
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Continuous-Time Radar-Inertial and Lidar-Inertial Odometry using a Gaussian Process Motion Prior
Authors:
Keenan Burnett,
Angela P. Schoellig,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
In this work, we demonstrate continuous-time radar-inertial and lidar-inertial odometry using a Gaussian process motion prior. Using a sparse prior, we demonstrate improved computational complexity during preintegration and interpolation. We use a white-noise-on-acceleration motion prior and treat the gyroscope as a direct measurement of the state while preintegrating accelerometer measurements to…
▽ More
In this work, we demonstrate continuous-time radar-inertial and lidar-inertial odometry using a Gaussian process motion prior. Using a sparse prior, we demonstrate improved computational complexity during preintegration and interpolation. We use a white-noise-on-acceleration motion prior and treat the gyroscope as a direct measurement of the state while preintegrating accelerometer measurements to form relative velocity factors. Our odometry is implemented using sliding-window batch trajectory estimation. To our knowledge, our work is the first to demonstrate radar-inertial odometry with a spinning mechanical radar using both gyroscope and accelerometer measurements. We improve the performance of our radar odometry by 19\% by incorporating an IMU. Our approach is efficient and we demonstrate real-time performance. Code for this project can be found at: https://github.com/utiasASRL/steam_icp
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Pointing the Way: Refining Radar-Lidar Localization Using Learned ICP Weights
Authors:
Daniil Lisus,
Johann Laconte,
Keenan Burnett,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
This paper presents a novel deep-learning-based approach to improve localizing radar measurements against lidar maps. Although the state of the art for localization is matching lidar data to lidar maps, radar has been considered as a promising alternative. This is largely due to radar being more resilient against adverse weather such as precipitation and heavy fog. To make use of existing high-qua…
▽ More
This paper presents a novel deep-learning-based approach to improve localizing radar measurements against lidar maps. Although the state of the art for localization is matching lidar data to lidar maps, radar has been considered as a promising alternative. This is largely due to radar being more resilient against adverse weather such as precipitation and heavy fog. To make use of existing high-quality lidar maps, while maintaining performance in adverse weather, it is of interest to match radar data to lidar maps. However, owing in part to the unique artefacts present in radar measurements, radar-lidar localization has struggled to achieve comparable performance to lidar-lidar systems, preventing it from being viable for autonomous driving. This work builds on an ICP-based radar-lidar localization system by including a learned preprocessing step that weights radar points based on high-level scan information. Combining a proven analytical approach with a learned weight reduces localization errors in radar-lidar ICP results run on real-world autonomous driving data by up to 54.94% in translation and 68.39% in rotation, while maintaining interpretability and robustness.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2024; v1 submitted 15 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Need for Speed: Fast Correspondence-Free Lidar-Inertial Odometry Using Doppler Velocity
Authors:
David J. Yoon,
Keenan Burnett,
Johann Laconte,
Yi Chen,
Heethesh Vhavle,
Soeren Kammel,
James Reuther,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
In this paper, we present a fast, lightweight odometry method that uses the Doppler velocity measurements from a Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) lidar without data association. FMCW lidar is a recently emerging technology that enables per-return relative radial velocity measurements via the Doppler effect. Since the Doppler measurement model is linear with respect to the 6-degrees-of-fr…
▽ More
In this paper, we present a fast, lightweight odometry method that uses the Doppler velocity measurements from a Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) lidar without data association. FMCW lidar is a recently emerging technology that enables per-return relative radial velocity measurements via the Doppler effect. Since the Doppler measurement model is linear with respect to the 6-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) vehicle velocity, we can formulate a linear continuous-time estimation problem for the velocity and numerically integrate for the 6-DOF pose estimate afterward. The caveat is that angular velocity is not observable with a single FMCW lidar. We address this limitation by also incorporating the angular velocity measurements from a gyroscope. This results in an extremely efficient odometry method that processes lidar frames at an average wall-clock time of 5.64ms on a single thread, well below the 10Hz operating rate of the lidar we tested. We show experimental results on real-world driving sequences and compare against state-of-the-art Iterative Closest Point (ICP)-based odometry methods, presenting a compelling trade-off between accuracy and computation. We also present an algebraic observability study, where we demonstrate in theory that the Doppler measurements from multiple FMCW lidars are capable of observing all 6 degrees of freedom (translational and angular velocity).
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2023; v1 submitted 11 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Picking Up Speed: Continuous-Time Lidar-Only Odometry using Doppler Velocity Measurements
Authors:
Yuchen Wu,
David J. Yoon,
Keenan Burnett,
Soeren Kammel,
Yi Chen,
Heethesh Vhavle,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) lidar is a recently emerging technology that additionally enables per-return instantaneous relative radial velocity measurements via the Doppler effect. In this letter, we present the first continuous-time lidar-only odometry algorithm using these Doppler velocity measurements from an FMCW lidar to aid odometry in geometrically degenerate environments. We…
▽ More
Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) lidar is a recently emerging technology that additionally enables per-return instantaneous relative radial velocity measurements via the Doppler effect. In this letter, we present the first continuous-time lidar-only odometry algorithm using these Doppler velocity measurements from an FMCW lidar to aid odometry in geometrically degenerate environments. We apply an existing continuous-time framework that efficiently estimates the vehicle trajectory using Gaussian process regression to compensate for motion distortion due to the scanning-while-moving nature of any mechanically actuated lidar (FMCW and non-FMCW). We evaluate our proposed algorithm on several real-world datasets, including publicly available ones and datasets we collected. Our algorithm outperforms the only existing method that also uses Doppler velocity measurements, and we study difficult conditions where including this extra information greatly improves performance. We additionally demonstrate state-of-the-art performance of lidar-only odometry with and without using Doppler velocity measurements in nominal conditions. Code for this project can be found at: https://github.com/utiasASRL/steam_icp.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2022; v1 submitted 7 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Are We Ready for Radar to Replace Lidar in All-Weather Map** and Localization?
Authors:
Keenan Burnett,
Yuchen Wu,
David J. Yoon,
Angela P. Schoellig,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
We present an extensive comparison between three topometric localization systems: radar-only, lidar-only, and a cross-modal radar-to-lidar system across varying seasonal and weather conditions using the Boreas dataset. Contrary to our expectations, our experiments showed that our lidar-only pipeline achieved the best localization accuracy even during a snowstorm. Our results seem to suggest that t…
▽ More
We present an extensive comparison between three topometric localization systems: radar-only, lidar-only, and a cross-modal radar-to-lidar system across varying seasonal and weather conditions using the Boreas dataset. Contrary to our expectations, our experiments showed that our lidar-only pipeline achieved the best localization accuracy even during a snowstorm. Our results seem to suggest that the sensitivity of lidar localization to moderate precipitation has been exaggerated in prior works. However, our radar-only pipeline was able to achieve competitive accuracy with a much smaller map. Furthermore, radar localization and radar sensors still have room to improve and may yet prove valuable in extreme weather or as a redundant backup system. Code for this project can be found at: https://github.com/utiasASRL/vtr3
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2023; v1 submitted 18 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Boreas: A Multi-Season Autonomous Driving Dataset
Authors:
Keenan Burnett,
David J. Yoon,
Yuchen Wu,
Andrew Zou Li,
Haowei Zhang,
Shichen Lu,
**gxing Qian,
Wei-Kang Tseng,
Andrew Lambert,
Keith Y. K. Leung,
Angela P. Schoellig,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
The Boreas dataset was collected by driving a repeated route over the course of one year, resulting in stark seasonal variations and adverse weather conditions such as rain and falling snow. In total, the Boreas dataset includes over 350km of driving data featuring a 128-channel Velodyne Alpha Prime lidar, a 360$^\circ$ Navtech CIR304-H scanning radar, a 5MP FLIR Blackfly S camera, and centimetre-…
▽ More
The Boreas dataset was collected by driving a repeated route over the course of one year, resulting in stark seasonal variations and adverse weather conditions such as rain and falling snow. In total, the Boreas dataset includes over 350km of driving data featuring a 128-channel Velodyne Alpha Prime lidar, a 360$^\circ$ Navtech CIR304-H scanning radar, a 5MP FLIR Blackfly S camera, and centimetre-accurate post-processed ground truth poses. Our dataset will support live leaderboards for odometry, metric localization, and 3D object detection. The dataset and development kit are available at https://www.boreas.utias.utoronto.ca
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2023; v1 submitted 18 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Radar Odometry Combining Probabilistic Estimation and Unsupervised Feature Learning
Authors:
Keenan Burnett,
David J. Yoon,
Angela P. Schoellig,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
This paper presents a radar odometry method that combines probabilistic trajectory estimation and deep learned features without needing groundtruth pose information. The feature network is trained unsupervised, using only the on-board radar data. With its theoretical foundation based on a data likelihood objective, our method leverages a deep network for processing rich radar data, and a non-diffe…
▽ More
This paper presents a radar odometry method that combines probabilistic trajectory estimation and deep learned features without needing groundtruth pose information. The feature network is trained unsupervised, using only the on-board radar data. With its theoretical foundation based on a data likelihood objective, our method leverages a deep network for processing rich radar data, and a non-differentiable classic estimator for probabilistic inference. We provide extensive experimental results on both the publicly available Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset and an additional 100 km of driving collected in an urban setting. Our sliding-window implementation of radar odometry outperforms most hand-crafted methods and approaches the current state of the art without requiring a groundtruth trajectory for training. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of radar odometry under adverse weather conditions. Code for this project can be found at: https://github.com/utiasASRL/hero_radar_odometry
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2021; v1 submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Do We Need to Compensate for Motion Distortion and Doppler Effects in Spinning Radar Navigation?
Authors:
Keenan Burnett,
Angela P. Schoellig,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
In order to tackle the challenge of unfavorable weather conditions such as rain and snow, radar is being revisited as a parallel sensing modality to vision and lidar. Recent works have made tremendous progress in applying spinning radar to odometry and place recognition. However, these works have so far ignored the impact of motion distortion and Doppler effects on spinning-radar-based navigation,…
▽ More
In order to tackle the challenge of unfavorable weather conditions such as rain and snow, radar is being revisited as a parallel sensing modality to vision and lidar. Recent works have made tremendous progress in applying spinning radar to odometry and place recognition. However, these works have so far ignored the impact of motion distortion and Doppler effects on spinning-radar-based navigation, which may be significant in the self-driving car domain where speeds can be high. In this work, we demonstrate the effect of these distortions on radar odometry using the Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset and metric localization using our own data-taking platform. We revisit a lightweight estimator that can recover the motion between a pair of radar scans while accounting for both effects. Our conclusion is that both motion distortion and the Doppler effect are significant in different aspects of spinning radar navigation, with the former more prominent than the latter. Code for this project can be found at: https://github.com/keenan-burnett/yeti_radar_odometry
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2021; v1 submitted 6 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Zeus: A System Description of the Two-Time Winner of the Collegiate SAE AutoDrive Competition
Authors:
Keenan Burnett,
**gxing Qian,
Xintong Du,
Linqiao Liu,
David J. Yoon,
Tianchang Shen,
Susan Sun,
Sepehr Samavi,
Michael J. Sorocky,
Mollie Bianchi,
Kaicheng Zhang,
Arkady Arkhangorodsky,
Quinlan Sykora,
Shichen Lu,
Yizhou Huang,
Angela P. Schoellig,
Timothy D. Barfoot
Abstract:
The SAE AutoDrive Challenge is a three-year collegiate competition to develop a self-driving car by 2020. The second year of the competition was held in June 2019 at MCity, a mock town built for self-driving car testing at the University of Michigan. Teams were required to autonomously navigate a series of intersections while handling pedestrians, traffic lights, and traffic signs. Zeus is aUToron…
▽ More
The SAE AutoDrive Challenge is a three-year collegiate competition to develop a self-driving car by 2020. The second year of the competition was held in June 2019 at MCity, a mock town built for self-driving car testing at the University of Michigan. Teams were required to autonomously navigate a series of intersections while handling pedestrians, traffic lights, and traffic signs. Zeus is aUToronto's winning entry in the AutoDrive Challenge. This article describes the system design and development of Zeus as well as many of the lessons learned along the way. This includes details on the team's organizational structure, sensor suite, software components, and performance at the Year 2 competition. With a team of mostly undergraduates and minimal resources, aUToronto has made progress towards a functioning self-driving vehicle, in just two years. This article may prove valuable to researchers looking to develop their own self-driving platform.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
aUToTrack: A Lightweight Object Detection and Tracking System for the SAE AutoDrive Challenge
Authors:
Keenan Burnett,
Sepehr Samavi,
Steven L. Waslander,
Timothy D. Barfoot,
Angela P. Schoellig
Abstract:
The University of Toronto is one of eight teams competing in the SAE AutoDrive Challenge -- a competition to develop a self-driving car by 2020. After placing first at the Year 1 challenge, we are headed to MCity in June 2019 for the second challenge. There, we will interact with pedestrians, cyclists, and cars. For safe operation, it is critical to have an accurate estimate of the position of all…
▽ More
The University of Toronto is one of eight teams competing in the SAE AutoDrive Challenge -- a competition to develop a self-driving car by 2020. After placing first at the Year 1 challenge, we are headed to MCity in June 2019 for the second challenge. There, we will interact with pedestrians, cyclists, and cars. For safe operation, it is critical to have an accurate estimate of the position of all objects surrounding the vehicle. The contributions of this work are twofold: First, we present a new object detection and tracking dataset (UofTPed50), which uses GPS to ground truth the position and velocity of a pedestrian. To our knowledge, a dataset of this type for pedestrians has not been shown in the literature before. Second, we present a lightweight object detection and tracking system (aUToTrack) that uses vision, LIDAR, and GPS/IMU positioning to achieve state-of-the-art performance on the KITTI Object Tracking benchmark. We show that aUToTrack accurately estimates the position and velocity of pedestrians, in real-time, using CPUs only. aUToTrack has been tested in closed-loop experiments on a real self-driving car, and we demonstrate its performance on our dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Building a Winning Self-Driving Car in Six Months
Authors:
Keenan Burnett,
Andreas Schimpe,
Sepehr Samavi,
Mona Gridseth,
Chengzhi Winston Liu,
Qiyang Li,
Zachary Kroeze,
Angela P. Schoellig
Abstract:
The SAE AutoDrive Challenge is a three-year competition to develop a Level 4 autonomous vehicle by 2020. The first set of challenges were held in April of 2018 in Yuma, Arizona. Our team (aUToronto/Zeus) placed first. In this paper, we describe our complete system architecture and specialized algorithms that enabled us to win. We show that it is possible to develop a vehicle with basic autonomy fe…
▽ More
The SAE AutoDrive Challenge is a three-year competition to develop a Level 4 autonomous vehicle by 2020. The first set of challenges were held in April of 2018 in Yuma, Arizona. Our team (aUToronto/Zeus) placed first. In this paper, we describe our complete system architecture and specialized algorithms that enabled us to win. We show that it is possible to develop a vehicle with basic autonomy features in just six months relying on simple, robust algorithms. We do not make use of a prior map. Instead, we have developed a multi-sensor visual localization solution. All of our algorithms run in real-time using CPUs only. We also highlight the closed-loop performance of our system in detail in several experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
