Agile methodologies in teams with highly creative and autonomous members
Authors:
Sergi Blanco-Cuaresma,
Alberto Accomazzi,
Michael J. Kurtz,
Edwin Henneken,
Carolyn S. Grant,
Donna M. Thompson,
Roman Chyla,
Stephen McDonald,
Golnaz Shapurian,
Timothy W. Hostetler,
Matthew R. Templeton,
Kelly E. Lockhart,
Kris Bukovi
Abstract:
The Agile manifesto encourages us to value individuals and interactions over processes and tools, while Scrum, the most adopted Agile development methodology, is essentially based on roles, events, artifacts, and the rules that bind them together (i.e., processes). Moreover, it is generally proclaimed that whenever a Scrum project does not succeed, the reason is because Scrum was not implemented c…
▽ More
The Agile manifesto encourages us to value individuals and interactions over processes and tools, while Scrum, the most adopted Agile development methodology, is essentially based on roles, events, artifacts, and the rules that bind them together (i.e., processes). Moreover, it is generally proclaimed that whenever a Scrum project does not succeed, the reason is because Scrum was not implemented correctly and not because Scrum may have its own flaws. This grants irrefutability to the methodology, discouraging deviations to fit the actual needs and peculiarities of the developers. In particular, the members of the NASA ADS team are highly creative and autonomous whose motivation can be affected if their freedom is too strongly constrained. We present our experience following Agile principles, reusing certain Scrum elements and seeking the satisfaction of the team members, while rapidly reacting/kee** the project in line with our stakeholders expectations.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
Fundamentals of effective cloud management for the new NASA Astrophysics Data System
Authors:
Sergi Blanco-Cuaresma,
Alberto Accomazzi,
Michael J. Kurtz,
Edwin Henneken,
Carolyn S. Grant,
Donna M. Thompson,
Roman Chyla,
Stephen McDonald,
Golnaz Shapurian,
Timothy W. Hostetler,
Matthew R. Templeton,
Kelly E. Lockhart,
Kris Bukovi,
Nathan Rapport
Abstract:
The new NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) is designed with a serviceoriented architecture (SOA) that consists of multiple customized Apache Solr search engine instances plus a collection of microservices, containerized using Docker, and deployed in Amazon Web Services (AWS). For complex systems, like the ADS, this loosely coupled architecture can lead to a more scalable, reliable and resilient s…
▽ More
The new NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) is designed with a serviceoriented architecture (SOA) that consists of multiple customized Apache Solr search engine instances plus a collection of microservices, containerized using Docker, and deployed in Amazon Web Services (AWS). For complex systems, like the ADS, this loosely coupled architecture can lead to a more scalable, reliable and resilient system if some fundamental questions are addressed. After having experimented with different AWS environments and deployment methods, we decided in December 2017 to go with Kubernetes as our container orchestration. Defining the best strategy to properly setup Kubernetes has shown to be challenging: automatic scaling services and load balancing traffic can lead to errors whose origin is difficult to identify, monitoring and logging the activity that happens across multiple layers for a single request needs to be carefully addressed, and the best workflow for a Continuous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) system is not self-evident. We present here how we tackle these challenges and our plans for the future.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
