-
Expanding Frontiers: Settling an Understanding of Systems-of-Information Systems
Authors:
Valdemar Vicente Graciano Neto,
Bruno Gabriel Araújo Lebtag,
Paulo Gabriel Teixeira,
Priscilla Batista,
Vinícius Carvalho Lopes,
Jamal El-Hachem,
Jérémy Buisson,
Flavio Oquendo,
Juliana Fernandes,
Francisco Ferreira,
Rodrigo Peireira dos Santos,
Davi Viana,
Everton Cavalcante,
Mohamad Kassab,
Ahmad Mohsin,
Roberto Oliveira,
Vânia Neves,
Maria Istela Cagnin,
Elisa Yumi Nakagawa
Abstract:
System-of-Systems (SoS) has consolidated itself as a special type of software-intensive systems. As such, subtypes of SoS have also emerged, such as Cyber-Physical SoS (CPSoS) that are formed essentially of cyber-physical constituent systems and Systems-of-Information Systems (SoIS) that contain information systems as their constituents. In contrast to CPSoS that have been investigated and covered…
▽ More
System-of-Systems (SoS) has consolidated itself as a special type of software-intensive systems. As such, subtypes of SoS have also emerged, such as Cyber-Physical SoS (CPSoS) that are formed essentially of cyber-physical constituent systems and Systems-of-Information Systems (SoIS) that contain information systems as their constituents. In contrast to CPSoS that have been investigated and covered in the specialized literature, SoIS still lack critical discussion about their fundamentals. The main contribution of this paper is to present those fundamentals to set an understanding of SoIS. By offering a discussion and examining literature cases, we draw an essential settlement on SoIS definition, basics, and practical implications. The discussion herein presented results from research conducted on SoIS over the past years in interinstitutional and multinational research collaborations. The knowledge gathered in this paper arises from several scientific discussion meetings among the authors. As a result, we aim to contribute to the state of the art of SoIS besides paving the research avenues for the forthcoming years.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
ACME vs PDDL: support for dynamic reconfiguration of software architectures
Authors:
Jean-Eudes Méhus,
Thais Batista,
Jérémy Buisson
Abstract:
On the one hand, ACME is a language designed in the late 90s as an interchange format for software architectures. The need for recon guration at runtime has led to extend the language with speci c support in Plastik. On the other hand, PDDL is a predicative language for the description of planning problems. It has been designed in the AI community for the International Planning Competition of the…
▽ More
On the one hand, ACME is a language designed in the late 90s as an interchange format for software architectures. The need for recon guration at runtime has led to extend the language with speci c support in Plastik. On the other hand, PDDL is a predicative language for the description of planning problems. It has been designed in the AI community for the International Planning Competition of the ICAPS conferences. Several related works have already proposed to encode software architectures into PDDL. Existing planning algorithms can then be used in order to generate automatically a plan that updates an architecture to another one, i.e., the program of a recon guration. In this paper, we improve the encoding in PDDL. Noticeably we propose how to encode ADL types and constraints in the PDDL representation. That way, we can statically check our design and express PDDL constraints in order to ensure that the generated plan never goes through any bad or inconsistent architecture, not even temporarily.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2012;
originally announced June 2012.
-
Issues of Architectural Description Languages for Handling Dynamic Reconfiguration
Authors:
Leonardo Minora,
Jérémy Buisson,
Flavio Oquendo,
Thais Batista
Abstract:
Dynamic reconfiguration is the action of modifying a software system at runtime. Several works have been using architectural specification as the basis for dynamic reconfiguration. Indeed ADLs (architecture description languages) let architects describe the elements that could be reconfigured as well as the set of constraints to which the system must conform during reconfiguration. In this work, w…
▽ More
Dynamic reconfiguration is the action of modifying a software system at runtime. Several works have been using architectural specification as the basis for dynamic reconfiguration. Indeed ADLs (architecture description languages) let architects describe the elements that could be reconfigured as well as the set of constraints to which the system must conform during reconfiguration. In this work, we investigate the ADL literature in order to illustrate how reconfiguration is supported in four well-known ADLs: pi-ADL, ACME, C2SADL and Dynamic Wright. From this review, we conclude that none of these ADLs: (i) addresses the issue of consistently reconfiguring both instances and types; (ii) takes into account the behaviour of architectural elements during reconfiguration; and (iii) provides support for assessing reconfiguration, e.g., verifying the transition against properties.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2012;
originally announced May 2012.
-
Polychronous Interpretation of Synoptic, a Domain Specific Modeling Language for Embedded Flight-Software
Authors:
L. Besnard,
T. Gautier,
J. Ouy,
J. -P. Talpin,
J. -P. Bodeveix,
A. Cortier,
M. Pantel,
M. Strecker,
G. Garcia,
A. Rugina,
J. Buisson,
F. Dagnat
Abstract:
The SPaCIFY project, which aims at bringing advances in MDE to the satellite flight software industry, advocates a top-down approach built on a domain-specific modeling language named Synoptic. In line with previous approaches to real-time modeling such as Statecharts and Simulink, Synoptic features hierarchical decomposition of application and control modules in synchronous block diagrams and s…
▽ More
The SPaCIFY project, which aims at bringing advances in MDE to the satellite flight software industry, advocates a top-down approach built on a domain-specific modeling language named Synoptic. In line with previous approaches to real-time modeling such as Statecharts and Simulink, Synoptic features hierarchical decomposition of application and control modules in synchronous block diagrams and state machines. Its semantics is described in the polychronous model of computation, which is that of the synchronous language Signal.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2010;
originally announced March 2010.
