Users prefer Jpegli over same-sized libjpeg-turbo or MozJPEG
Authors:
Martin Bruse,
Luca Versari,
Zoltan Szabadka,
Jyrki Alakuijala
Abstract:
We performed pairwise comparisons by human raters of JPEG images from MozJPEG, libjpeg-turbo and our new Jpegli encoder. When compressing images at a quality similar to libjpeg-turbo quality 95, the Jpegli images were 54% likely to be preferred over both libjpeg-turbo and MozJPEG images, but used only 2.8 bits per pixel compared to libjpeg-turbo and MozJPEG that used 3.8 and 3.5 bits per pixel res…
▽ More
We performed pairwise comparisons by human raters of JPEG images from MozJPEG, libjpeg-turbo and our new Jpegli encoder. When compressing images at a quality similar to libjpeg-turbo quality 95, the Jpegli images were 54% likely to be preferred over both libjpeg-turbo and MozJPEG images, but used only 2.8 bits per pixel compared to libjpeg-turbo and MozJPEG that used 3.8 and 3.5 bits per pixel respectively. The raw ratings and source images are publicly available for further analysis and study.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Committee Draft of JPEG XL Image Coding System
Authors:
Alexander Rhatushnyak,
Jan Wassenberg,
Jon Sneyers,
Jyrki Alakuijala,
Lode Vandevenne,
Luca Versari,
Robert Obryk,
Zoltan Szabadka,
Evgenii Kliuchnikov,
Iulia-Maria Comsa,
Krzysztof Potempa,
Martin Bruse,
Moritz Firsching,
Renata Khasanova,
Ruud van Asseldonk,
Sami Boukortt,
Sebastian Gomez,
Thomas Fischbacher
Abstract:
JPEG XL is a practical approach focused on scalable web distribution and efficient compression of high-quality images. It provides various benefits compared to existing image formats: 60% size reduction at equivalent subjective quality; fast, parallelizable decoding and encoding configurations; features such as progressive, lossless, animation, and reversible transcoding of existing JPEG with 22%…
▽ More
JPEG XL is a practical approach focused on scalable web distribution and efficient compression of high-quality images. It provides various benefits compared to existing image formats: 60% size reduction at equivalent subjective quality; fast, parallelizable decoding and encoding configurations; features such as progressive, lossless, animation, and reversible transcoding of existing JPEG with 22% size reduction; support for high-quality applications including wide gamut, higher resolution/bit depth/dynamic range, and visually lossless coding. The JPEG XL architecture is traditional block-transform coding with upgrades to each component.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2019; v1 submitted 12 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
