-
No Forking Way: Detecting Cloning Attacks on Intel SGX Applications
Authors:
Samira Briongos,
Ghassan Karame,
Claudio Soriente,
Annika Wilde
Abstract:
Forking attacks against TEEs like Intel SGX can be carried out either by rolling back the application to a previous state, or by cloning the application and by partitioning its inputs across the cloned instances. Current solutions to forking attacks require Trusted Third Parties (TTP) that are hard to find in real-world deployments. In the absence of a TTP, many TEE applications rely on monotonic…
▽ More
Forking attacks against TEEs like Intel SGX can be carried out either by rolling back the application to a previous state, or by cloning the application and by partitioning its inputs across the cloned instances. Current solutions to forking attacks require Trusted Third Parties (TTP) that are hard to find in real-world deployments. In the absence of a TTP, many TEE applications rely on monotonic counters to mitigate forking attacks based on rollbacks; however, they have no protection mechanism against forking attack based on cloning. In this paper, we analyze 72 SGX applications and show that approximately 20% of those are vulnerable to forking attacks based on cloning - including those that rely on monotonic counters. To address this problem, we present CloneBuster, the first practical clone-detection mechanism for Intel SGX that does not rely on a TTP and, as such, can be used directly to protect existing applications. CloneBuster allows enclaves to (self-) detect whether another enclave with the same binary is running on the same platform. To do so, CloneBuster relies on a cache-based covert channel for enclaves to signal their presence to (and detect the presence of) clones on the same machine. We show that CloneBuster is robust despite a malicious OS, only incurs a marginal impact on the application performance, and adds approximately 800 LoC to the TCB. When used in conjunction with monotonic counters, CloneBuster allows applications to benefit from a comprehensive protection against forking attacks.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
CACHE SNIPER : Accurate timing control of cache evictions
Authors:
Samira Briongos,
Ida Bruhns,
Pedro Malagón,
Thomas Eisenbarth,
José M. Moya
Abstract:
Microarchitectural side channel attacks have been very prominent in security research over the last few years. Caches have been an outstanding covert channel, as they provide high resolution and generic cross-core leakage even with simple user-mode code execution privileges. To prevent these generic cross-core attacks, all major cryptographic libraries now provide countermeasures to hinder key ext…
▽ More
Microarchitectural side channel attacks have been very prominent in security research over the last few years. Caches have been an outstanding covert channel, as they provide high resolution and generic cross-core leakage even with simple user-mode code execution privileges. To prevent these generic cross-core attacks, all major cryptographic libraries now provide countermeasures to hinder key extraction via cross-core cache attacks, for instance avoiding secret dependent access patterns and prefetching data. In this paper, we show that implementations protected by 'good-enough' countermeasures aimed at preventing simple cache attacks are still vulnerable. We present a novel attack that uses a special timing technique to determine when an encryption has started and then evict the data precisely at the desired instant. This new attack does not require special privileges nor explicit synchronization between the attacker and the victim. One key improvement of our attack is a method to evict data from the cache with a single memory access and in absence of shared memory by leveraging the transient capabilities of TSX and relying on the recently reverse-engineered L3 replacement policy. We demonstrate the efficiency by performing an asynchronous last level cache attack to extract an RSA key from the latest wolfSSL library, which has been especially adapted to avoid leaky access patterns, and by extracting an AES key from the S-Box implementation included in OpenSSL bypassing the per round prefetch intended as a protection against cache attacks.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
RELOAD+REFRESH: Abusing Cache Replacement Policies to Perform Stealthy Cache Attacks
Authors:
Samira Briongos,
Pedro Malagón,
José M. Moya,
Thomas Eisenbarth
Abstract:
Caches have become the prime method for unintended information extraction across logical isolation boundaries. Even Spectre and Meltdown rely on the cache side channel, as it provides great resolution and is widely available on all major CPU platforms. As a consequence, several methods to stop cache attacks by detecting them have been proposed. Detection is strongly aided by the fact that observin…
▽ More
Caches have become the prime method for unintended information extraction across logical isolation boundaries. Even Spectre and Meltdown rely on the cache side channel, as it provides great resolution and is widely available on all major CPU platforms. As a consequence, several methods to stop cache attacks by detecting them have been proposed. Detection is strongly aided by the fact that observing cache activity of co-resident processes is not possible without altering the cache state and thereby forcing evictions on the observed processes. In this work, we show that this widely held assumption is incorrect. Through clever usage of the cache replacement policy it is possible to track a victims process cache accesses without forcing evictions on the victim's data. Hence, online detection mechanisms that rely on these evictions can be circumvented as they do not detect be the introduced RELOAD+REFRESH attack. The attack requires a profound understanding of the cache replacement policy. We present a methodology to recover the replacement policy and apply it to the last five generations of Intel processors. We further show empirically that the performance of RELOAD+REFRESH on cryptographic implementations is comparable to that of other widely used cache attacks, while its detectability becomes extremely difficult, due to the negligible effect on the victims cache access pattern.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
CacheShield: Protecting Legacy Processes Against Cache Attacks
Authors:
Samira Briongos,
Gorka Irazoqui,
Pedro Malagón,
Thomas Eisenbarth
Abstract:
Cache attacks pose a threat to any code whose execution flow or memory accesses depend on sensitive information. Especially in public clouds, where caches are shared across several tenants, cache attacks remain an unsolved problem. Cache attacks rely on evictions by the spy process, which alter the execution behavior of the victim process. We show that hardware performance events of cryptographic…
▽ More
Cache attacks pose a threat to any code whose execution flow or memory accesses depend on sensitive information. Especially in public clouds, where caches are shared across several tenants, cache attacks remain an unsolved problem. Cache attacks rely on evictions by the spy process, which alter the execution behavior of the victim process. We show that hardware performance events of cryptographic routines reveal the presence of cache attacks. Based on this observation, we propose CacheShield, a tool to protect legacy code by monitoring its execution and detecting the presence of cache attacks, thus providing the opportunity to take preventative measures. CacheShield can be run by users and does not require alteration of the OS or hypervisor, while previously proposed software-based countermeasures require cooperation from the hypervisor. Unlike methods that try to detect malicious processes, our approach is lean, as only a fraction of the system needs to be monitored. It also integrates well into today's cloud infrastructure, as concerned users can opt to use CacheShield without support from the cloud service provider. Our results show that CacheShield detects cache attacks fast, with high reliability, and with few false positives, even in the presence of strong noise.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
