Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Brier, É

A Note on the Ramanujan Machine

Authors: Eric Brier, David Naccache, Ofer Yifrach-Stav

Abstract: The Ramanujan Machine project detects new expressions related to constants of interest, such as $ζ$ function values, $γ$ and algebraic numbers (to name a few). In particular the project lists a number of conjectures involving even and odd $ζ$ function values, logarithms etc. We show that many relations detected by the Ramanujan Machine Project stem from a specific algebraic observation and show ho… ▽ More The Ramanujan Machine project detects new expressions related to constants of interest, such as $ζ$ function values, $γ$ and algebraic numbers (to name a few). In particular the project lists a number of conjectures involving even and odd $ζ$ function values, logarithms etc. We show that many relations detected by the Ramanujan Machine Project stem from a specific algebraic observation and show how to generate infinitely many. This provides an automated proof and/or an explanation of many of the relations listed as conjectures by the project (although not all of them). △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2022; v1 submitted 2 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Near-Optimal Pool Testing under Urgency Constraints

Authors: Éric Brier, Megi Dervishi, Rémi Géraud-Stewart, David Naccache, Ofer Yifrach-Stav

Abstract: Detection of rare traits or diseases in a large population is challenging. Pool testing allows covering larger swathes of population at a reduced cost, while simplifying logistics. However, testing precision decreases as it becomes unclear which member of a pool made the global test positive. In this paper we discuss testing strategies that provably approach best-possible strategy - optimal in t… ▽ More Detection of rare traits or diseases in a large population is challenging. Pool testing allows covering larger swathes of population at a reduced cost, while simplifying logistics. However, testing precision decreases as it becomes unclear which member of a pool made the global test positive. In this paper we discuss testing strategies that provably approach best-possible strategy - optimal in the sense that no other strategy can give exact results with fewer tests. Our algorithms guarantee that they provide a complete and exact result for every individual, without exceeding $1/0.99$ times the number of tests the optimal strategy would require. This threshold is arbitrary: algorithms closer to the optimal bound can be described, however their complexity increases, making them less practical. Moreover, the way the algorithms process input samples leads to some individuals' status to be known sooner, thus allowing to take urgency into account when assigning individuals to tests. △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

A Fractional $3n+1$ Conjecture

Authors: Éric Brier, Rémi Géraud-Stewart, David Naccache

Abstract: In this paper we introduce and discuss the sequence of \emph{real numbers} defined as $u_0 \in \mathbb R$ and $u_{n+1} = Δ(u_n)$ where \begin{equation*} Δ(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{x}{2} &\text{if } \operatorname{frac}(x)<\frac{1}{2} \\[4px] \frac{3x+1}{2} & \text{if } \operatorname{frac}(x)\geq\frac{1}{2} \end{cases} \end{equation*} This sequence is reminiscent of the famous Collatz sequence, and… ▽ More In this paper we introduce and discuss the sequence of \emph{real numbers} defined as $u_0 \in \mathbb R$ and $u_{n+1} = Δ(u_n)$ where \begin{equation*} Δ(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{x}{2} &\text{if } \operatorname{frac}(x)<\frac{1}{2} \\[4px] \frac{3x+1}{2} & \text{if } \operatorname{frac}(x)\geq\frac{1}{2} \end{cases} \end{equation*} This sequence is reminiscent of the famous Collatz sequence, and seems to exhibit an interesting behaviour. Indeed, we conjecture that iterating $Δ$ will eventually either converge to zero, or loop over sequences of real numbers with integer parts $1,2,4,7,11,18,9,4,7,3,5,9,4,7,11,18,9,4,7,3,6,3,1,2,4,7,3,6,3$. We prove this conjecture for $u_0 \in [0, 100]$. Extending the proof to larger fixed values seems to be a matter of computing power. The authors pledge to offer a reward to the first person who proves or refutes the conjecture completely -- with a proof published in a serious refereed mathematical conference or journal. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

The Look-and-Say The Biggest Sequence Eventually Cycles

Authors: Éric Brier, Rémi Géraud-Stewart, David Naccache, Alessandro Pacco, Emanuele Troiani

Abstract: In this paper we consider a variant of Conway's sequence (OEIS A005150, A006715) defined as follows: the next term in the sequence is obtained by considering contiguous runs of digits, and rewriting them as $ab$ where $b$ is the digit and $a$ is the maximum of $b$ and the run's length. We dub this the "look-and-say the biggest" (LSB) sequence. Conway's sequence is very similar ($b$ is just the run… ▽ More In this paper we consider a variant of Conway's sequence (OEIS A005150, A006715) defined as follows: the next term in the sequence is obtained by considering contiguous runs of digits, and rewriting them as $ab$ where $b$ is the digit and $a$ is the maximum of $b$ and the run's length. We dub this the "look-and-say the biggest" (LSB) sequence. Conway's sequence is very similar ($b$ is just the run's length). For any starting value except 22, Conway's sequence grows exponentially: the ration of lengths converges to a known constant $λ$. We show that LSB does not: for every starting value, LSB eventually reaches a cycle. Furthermore, all cycles have a period of at most 9. △ Less

Submitted 12 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Stuttering Conway Sequences Are Still Conway Sequences

Authors: Éric Brier, Rémi Géraud-Stewart, David Naccache, Alessandro Pacco, Emanuele Troiani

Abstract: A look-and-say sequence is obtained iteratively by reading off the digits of the current value, grou** identical digits together: starting with 1, the sequence reads: 1, 11, 21, 1211, 111221, 312211, etc. (OEIS A005150). Starting with any digit $d \neq 1$ gives Conway's sequence: $d$, $1d$, $111d$, $311d$, $13211d$, etc. (OEIS A006715). Conway popularised these sequences and studied some of thei… ▽ More A look-and-say sequence is obtained iteratively by reading off the digits of the current value, grou** identical digits together: starting with 1, the sequence reads: 1, 11, 21, 1211, 111221, 312211, etc. (OEIS A005150). Starting with any digit $d \neq 1$ gives Conway's sequence: $d$, $1d$, $111d$, $311d$, $13211d$, etc. (OEIS A006715). Conway popularised these sequences and studied some of their properties. In this paper we consider a variant subbed "look-and-say again" where digits are repeated twice. We prove that the look-and-say again sequence contains only the digits $1, 2, 4, 6, d$, where $d$ represents the starting digit. Such sequences decompose and the ratio of successive lengths converges to Conway's constant. In fact, these properties result from a commuting diagram between look-and-say again sequences and "classical" look-and-say sequences. Similar results apply to the "look-and-say three times" sequence. △ Less

Submitted 11 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Optimal Covid-19 Pool Testing with a priori Information

Authors: Marc Beunardeau, Éric Brier, Noémie Cartier, Aisling Connolly, Nathanaël Courant, Rémi Géraud-Stewart, David Naccache, Ofer Yifrach-Stav

Abstract: As humanity struggles to contain the global Covid-19 infection, prophylactic actions are grandly slowed down by the shortage of testing kits. Governments have taken several measures to work around this shortage: the FDA has become more liberal on the approval of Covid-19 tests in the US. In the UK emergency measures allowed to increase the daily number of locally produced test kits to 100,000. Chi… ▽ More As humanity struggles to contain the global Covid-19 infection, prophylactic actions are grandly slowed down by the shortage of testing kits. Governments have taken several measures to work around this shortage: the FDA has become more liberal on the approval of Covid-19 tests in the US. In the UK emergency measures allowed to increase the daily number of locally produced test kits to 100,000. China has recently launched a massive test manufacturing program. However, all those efforts are very insufficient and many poor countries are still under threat. A popular method for reducing the number of tests consists in pooling samples, i.e. mixing patient samples and testing the mixed samples once. If all the samples are negative, pooling succeeds at a unitary cost. However, if a single sample is positive, failure does not indicate which patient is infected. This paper describes how to optimally detect infected patients in pools, i.e. using a minimal number of tests to precisely identify them, given the a priori probabilities that each of the patients is healthy. Those probabilities can be estimated using questionnaires, supervised machine learning or clinical examinations. The resulting algorithms, which can be interpreted as informed divide-and-conquer strategies, are non-intuitive and quite surprising. They are patent-free. Co-authors are listed in alphabetical order. △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2020; v1 submitted 6 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

A Number-Theoretic Error-Correcting Code

Authors: Eric Brier, Jean-Sébastien Coron, Rémi Géraud, Diana Maimut, David Naccache

Abstract: In this paper we describe a new error-correcting code (ECC) inspired by the Naccache-Stern cryptosystem. While by far less efficient than Turbo codes, the proposed ECC happens to be more efficient than some established ECCs for certain sets of parameters. The new ECC adds an appendix to the message. The appendix is the modular product of small primes representing the message bits. The receiver rec… ▽ More In this paper we describe a new error-correcting code (ECC) inspired by the Naccache-Stern cryptosystem. While by far less efficient than Turbo codes, the proposed ECC happens to be more efficient than some established ECCs for certain sets of parameters. The new ECC adds an appendix to the message. The appendix is the modular product of small primes representing the message bits. The receiver recomputes the product and detects transmission errors using modular division and lattice reduction. △ Less

Submitted 1 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.