Breaking Bad News in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Medicine: An Exploration of Disclosure and its Ethical Justification using the Hedonic Calculus
Authors:
Benjamin Post,
Cosmin Badea,
Aldo Faisal,
Stephen J. Brett
Abstract:
An appropriate ethical framework around the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare has become a key desirable with the increasingly widespread deployment of this technology. Advances in AI hold the promise of improving the precision of outcome prediction at the level of the individual. However, the addition of these technologies to patient-clinician interactions, as with any complex hum…
▽ More
An appropriate ethical framework around the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare has become a key desirable with the increasingly widespread deployment of this technology. Advances in AI hold the promise of improving the precision of outcome prediction at the level of the individual. However, the addition of these technologies to patient-clinician interactions, as with any complex human interaction, has potential pitfalls. While physicians have always had to carefully consider the ethical background and implications of their actions, detailed deliberations around fast-moving technological progress may not have kept up. We use a common but key challenge in healthcare interactions, the disclosure of bad news (likely imminent death), to illustrate how the philosophical framework of the 'Felicific Calculus' developed in the 18th century by Jeremy Bentham, may have a timely quasi-quantitative application in the age of AI. We show how this ethical algorithm can be used to assess, across seven mutually exclusive and exhaustive domains, whether an AI-supported action can be morally justified.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2022; v1 submitted 23 June, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
FAIR Data Pipeline: provenance-driven data management for traceable scientific workflows
Authors:
Sonia Natalie Mitchell,
Andrew Lahiff,
Nathan Cummings,
Jonathan Hollocombe,
Bram Boskamp,
Ryan Field,
Dennis Reddyhoff,
Kristian Zarebski,
Antony Wilson,
Bruno Viola,
Martin Burke,
Blair Archibald,
Paul Bessell,
Richard Blackwell,
Lisa A Boden,
Alys Brett,
Sam Brett,
Ruth Dundas,
Jessica Enright,
Alejandra N. Gonzalez-Beltran,
Claire Harris,
Ian Hinder,
Christopher David Hughes,
Martin Knight,
Vino Mano
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Modern epidemiological analyses to understand and combat the spread of disease depend critically on access to, and use of, data. Rapidly evolving data, such as data streams changing during a disease outbreak, are particularly challenging. Data management is further complicated by data being imprecisely identified when used. Public trust in policy decisions resulting from such analyses is easily da…
▽ More
Modern epidemiological analyses to understand and combat the spread of disease depend critically on access to, and use of, data. Rapidly evolving data, such as data streams changing during a disease outbreak, are particularly challenging. Data management is further complicated by data being imprecisely identified when used. Public trust in policy decisions resulting from such analyses is easily damaged and is often low, with cynicism arising where claims of "following the science" are made without accompanying evidence. Tracing the provenance of such decisions back through open software to primary data would clarify this evidence, enhancing the transparency of the decision-making process. Here, we demonstrate a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) data pipeline developed during the COVID-19 pandemic that allows easy annotation of data as they are consumed by analyses, while tracing the provenance of scientific outputs back through the analytical source code to data sources. Such a tool provides a mechanism for the public, and fellow scientists, to better assess the trust that should be placed in scientific evidence, while allowing scientists to support policy-makers in openly justifying their decisions. We believe that tools such as this should be promoted for use across all areas of policy-facing research.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2022; v1 submitted 13 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
