Showing 1–31 of 31 results for author: Branzei, S

Spectral Lower Bounds for Local Search

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Nicholas J. Recker

Abstract: Local search is a powerful heuristic in optimization and computer science, the complexity of which has been studied in the white box and black box models. In the black box model, we are given a graph $G = (V,E)$ and oracle access to a function $f : V \to \mathbb{R}$. The local search problem is to find a vertex $v$ that is a local minimum, i.e. with $f(v) \leq f(u)$ for all $(u,v) \in E$, using as… ▽ More Local search is a powerful heuristic in optimization and computer science, the complexity of which has been studied in the white box and black box models. In the black box model, we are given a graph $G = (V,E)$ and oracle access to a function $f : V \to \mathbb{R}$. The local search problem is to find a vertex $v$ that is a local minimum, i.e. with $f(v) \leq f(u)$ for all $(u,v) \in E$, using as few queries to the oracle as possible. We show that if a graph $G$ admits a lazy, irreducible, and reversible Markov chain with stationary distribution $π$, then the randomized query complexity of local search on $G$ is $Ω\left( \frac{\sqrt{n}}{t_{mix} \cdot \exp(3σ)}\right)$, where $t_{mix}$ is the mixing time of the chain and $σ= \max_{u,v \in V(G)} \frac{π(v)}{π(u)}.$ This theorem formally establishes a connection between the query complexity of local search and the mixing time of the fastest mixing Markov chain for the given graph. We also get several corollaries that lower bound the complexity as a function of the spectral gap, one of which slightly improves a result from prior work. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2024; v1 submitted 10 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2305.08269

Dueling Over Dessert, Mastering the Art of Repeated Cake Cutting

Authors: Simina Brânzei, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Reed Phillips, Suho Shin, Kun Wang

Abstract: We consider the setting of repeated fair division between two players, denoted Alice and Bob, with private valuations over a cake. In each round, a new cake arrives, which is identical to the ones in previous rounds. Alice cuts the cake at a point of her choice, while Bob chooses the left piece or the right piece, leaving the remainder for Alice. We consider two versions: sequential, where Bob obs… ▽ More We consider the setting of repeated fair division between two players, denoted Alice and Bob, with private valuations over a cake. In each round, a new cake arrives, which is identical to the ones in previous rounds. Alice cuts the cake at a point of her choice, while Bob chooses the left piece or the right piece, leaving the remainder for Alice. We consider two versions: sequential, where Bob observes Alice's cut point before choosing left/right, and simultaneous, where he only observes her cut point after making his choice. The simultaneous version was first considered by Aumann and Maschler (1995). We observe that if Bob is almost myopic and chooses his favorite piece too often, then he can be systematically exploited by Alice through a strategy akin to a binary search. This strategy allows Alice to approximate Bob's preferences with increasing precision, thereby securing a disproportionate share of the resource over time. We analyze the limits of how much a player can exploit the other one and show that fair utility profiles are in fact achievable. Specifically, the players can enforce the equitable utility profile of $(1/2, 1/2)$ in the limit on every trajectory of play, by kee** the other player's utility to approximately $1/2$ on average while guaranteeing they themselves get at least approximately $1/2$ on average. We show this theorem using a connection with Blackwell approachability. Finally, we analyze a natural dynamic known as fictitious play, where players best respond to the empirical distribution of the other player. We show that fictitious play converges to the equitable utility profile of $(1/2, 1/2)$ at a rate of $O(1/\sqrt{T})$. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2024; v1 submitted 13 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Phase Transitions of Diversity in Stochastic Block Model Dynamics

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Nithish Kumar, Gireeja Ranade

Abstract: This paper proposes a stochastic block model with dynamics where the population grows using preferential attachment. Nodes with higher weighted degree are more likely to recruit new nodes, and nodes always recruit nodes from their own community. This model can capture how communities grow or shrink based on their collaborations with other nodes in the network, where an edge represents collaboratio… ▽ More This paper proposes a stochastic block model with dynamics where the population grows using preferential attachment. Nodes with higher weighted degree are more likely to recruit new nodes, and nodes always recruit nodes from their own community. This model can capture how communities grow or shrink based on their collaborations with other nodes in the network, where an edge represents collaboration on a project. Focusing on the case of two communities, we derive a deterministic approximation to the dynamics and characterize the phase transitions for diversity, i.e. the parameter regimes in which either one of the communities dies out or the two communities reach parity over time. In particular, we find that the minority may vanish when the probability of cross-community edges is low, even when cross-community projects are more valuable than projects with collaborators from the same community. △ Less

Submitted 12 January, 2024; v1 submitted 26 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: 25 pages, 5 figures. In Proceedings of Allerton 2023

Learning and Collusion in Multi-unit Auctions

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Mahsa Derakhshan, Negin Golrezaei, Yanjun Han

Abstract: We consider repeated multi-unit auctions with uniform pricing, which are widely used in practice for allocating goods such as carbon licenses. In each round, $K$ identical units of a good are sold to a group of buyers that have valuations with diminishing marginal returns. The buyers submit bids for the units, and then a price $p$ is set per unit so that all the units are sold. We consider two var… ▽ More We consider repeated multi-unit auctions with uniform pricing, which are widely used in practice for allocating goods such as carbon licenses. In each round, $K$ identical units of a good are sold to a group of buyers that have valuations with diminishing marginal returns. The buyers submit bids for the units, and then a price $p$ is set per unit so that all the units are sold. We consider two variants of the auction, where the price is set to the $K$-th highest bid and $(K+1)$-st highest bid, respectively. We analyze the properties of this auction in both the offline and online settings. In the offline setting, we consider the problem that one player $i$ is facing: given access to a data set that contains the bids submitted by competitors in past auctions, find a bid vector that maximizes player $i$'s cumulative utility on the data set. We design a polynomial time algorithm for this problem, by showing it is equivalent to finding a maximum-weight path on a carefully constructed directed acyclic graph. In the online setting, the players run learning algorithms to update their bids as they participate in the auction over time. Based on our offline algorithm, we design efficient online learning algorithms for bidding. The algorithms have sublinear regret, under both full information and bandit feedback structures. We complement our online learning algorithms with regret lower bounds. Finally, we analyze the quality of the equilibria in the worst case through the lens of the core solution concept in the game among the bidders. We show that the $(K+1)$-st price format is susceptible to collusion among the bidders; meanwhile, the $K$-th price format does not have this issue. △ Less

Submitted 12 January, 2024; v1 submitted 27 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 40 pages, 1 figure. In Proceedings of NeurIPS 2023

The Sharp Power Law of Local Search on Expanders

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Davin Choo, Nicholas Recker

Abstract: Local search is a powerful heuristic in optimization and computer science, the complexity of which was studied in the white box and black box models. In the black box model, we are given a graph $G = (V,E)$ and oracle access to a function $f : V \to \mathbb{R}$. The local search problem is to find a vertex $v$ that is a local minimum, i.e. with $f(v) \leq f(u)$ for all $(u,v) \in E$, using as few… ▽ More Local search is a powerful heuristic in optimization and computer science, the complexity of which was studied in the white box and black box models. In the black box model, we are given a graph $G = (V,E)$ and oracle access to a function $f : V \to \mathbb{R}$. The local search problem is to find a vertex $v$ that is a local minimum, i.e. with $f(v) \leq f(u)$ for all $(u,v) \in E$, using as few queries as possible. The query complexity is well understood on the grid and the hypercube, but much less is known beyond. We show the query complexity of local search on $d$-regular expanders with constant degree is $Ω\left(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log{n}}\right)$, where $n$ is the number of vertices. This matches within a logarithmic factor the upper bound of $O(\sqrt{n})$ for constant degree graphs from Aldous (1983), implying that steepest descent with a warm start is an essentially optimal algorithm for expanders. The best lower bound known from prior work was $Ω\left(\frac{\sqrt[8]{n}}{\log{n}}\right)$, shown by Santha and Szegedy (2004) for quantum and randomized algorithms. We obtain this result by considering a broader framework of graph features such as vertex congestion and separation number. We show that for each graph, the randomized query complexity of local search is $Ω\left(\frac{n^{1.5}}{g}\right)$, where $g$ is the vertex congestion of the graph; and $Ω\left(\sqrt[4]{\frac{s}Δ}\right)$, where $s$ is the separation number and $Δ$ is the maximum degree. For separation number the previous bound was $Ω\left(\sqrt[8]{\frac{s}Δ} /\log{n}\right)$, given by Santha and Szegedy for quantum and randomized algorithms. We also show a variant of the relational adversary method from Aaronson (2006), which is asymptotically at least as strong as the version in Aaronson (2006) for all randomized algorithms and strictly stronger for some problems. △ Less

Submitted 15 August, 2023; v1 submitted 14 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

The Query Complexity of Local Search and Brouwer in Rounds

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Jiawei Li

Abstract: We consider the query complexity of finding a local minimum of a function defined on a graph, where at most $k$ rounds of interaction with the oracle are allowed. Rounds model parallel settings, where each query takes resources to complete and is executed on a separate processor. Thus the query complexity in $k$ rounds informs how many processors are needed to achieve a parallel time of $k$. We… ▽ More We consider the query complexity of finding a local minimum of a function defined on a graph, where at most $k$ rounds of interaction with the oracle are allowed. Rounds model parallel settings, where each query takes resources to complete and is executed on a separate processor. Thus the query complexity in $k$ rounds informs how many processors are needed to achieve a parallel time of $k$. We focus on the d-dimensional grid $[n]^d$, where the dimension $d$ is a constant, and consider two regimes for the number of rounds: constant and polynomial in n. We give algorithms and lower bounds that characterize the trade-off between the number of rounds of adaptivity and the query complexity of local search. When the number of rounds $k$ is constant, we show that the query complexity of local search in $k$ rounds is $Θ\bigl(n^{\frac{d^{k+1} - d^k}{d^k - 1}}\bigl)$, for both deterministic and randomized algorithms. When the number of rounds is polynomial, i.e. $k = n^α$ for $0 < α< d/2$, the randomized query complexity is $Θ\left(n^{d-1 - \frac{d-2}{d}α}\right)$ for all $d \geq 5$. For $d=3$ and $d=4$, we show the same upper bound expression holds and give almost matching lower bounds. The local search analysis also enables us to characterize the query complexity of computing a Brouwer fixed point in rounds. Our proof technique for lower bounding the query complexity in rounds may be of independent interest as an alternative to the classical relational adversary method of Aaronson from the fully adaptive setting. △ Less

Submitted 5 November, 2021; v1 submitted 31 December, 2020; originally announced January 2021.

Consensus with Bounded Space and Minimal Communication

Authors: Simina Branzei, Yuval Peres

Abstract: Population protocols are a fundamental model in distributed computing, where many nodes with bounded memory and computational power have random pairwise interactions over time. This model has been studied in a rich body of literature aiming to understand the tradeoffs between the memory and time needed to perform computational tasks. We study the population protocol model focusing on the communi… ▽ More Population protocols are a fundamental model in distributed computing, where many nodes with bounded memory and computational power have random pairwise interactions over time. This model has been studied in a rich body of literature aiming to understand the tradeoffs between the memory and time needed to perform computational tasks. We study the population protocol model focusing on the communication complexity needed to achieve consensus with high probability. When the number of memory states is $s = O(\log \log{n})$, the best upper bound known was given by a protocol with $O(n \log{n})$ communication, while the best lower bound was $Ω(n \log(n)/s)$ communication. We design a protocol that shows the lower bound is sharp. When each agent has $s=O(\log{n}^θ)$ states of memory, with $θ\in (0,1/2)$, consensus can be reached in time $O(\log(n))$ with $O(n \log{(n)}/s)$ communications with high probability. △ Less

Submitted 31 December, 2020; originally announced January 2021.

Searching, Sorting, and Cake Cutting in Rounds

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Dimitris Paparas, Nicholas Recker

Abstract: We study searching and sorting in rounds motivated by a fair division question: given a cake cutting problem with $n$ players, compute a fair allocation in at most $k$ rounds of interaction with the players. Rounds interpolate between the simultaneous and the fully adaptive settings, also capturing parallel complexity. We find that proportional cake cutting in rounds is equivalent to sorting with… ▽ More We study searching and sorting in rounds motivated by a fair division question: given a cake cutting problem with $n$ players, compute a fair allocation in at most $k$ rounds of interaction with the players. Rounds interpolate between the simultaneous and the fully adaptive settings, also capturing parallel complexity. We find that proportional cake cutting in rounds is equivalent to sorting with rank queries in rounds. We design a protocol for proportional cake cutting in rounds, while lower bounds for sorting in rounds with rank queries were given by Alon and Azar. Inspired by the rank query model, we then consider two basic search problems: ordered and unordered search. In unordered search, we get an array $\vec{x}=(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$ and an element $z$ promised to be in $\vec{x}$. We have access to an oracle that receives queries of the form "Is $z$ at location $i$?" and answers "Yes" or "No". The goal is to find the location of $z$ with success probability at least $p$ in at most $k$ rounds of interaction with the oracle. We show the expected query complexity of randomized algorithms on a worst case input is $np\bigl(\frac{k+1}{2k}\bigr) \pm O(1)$, while that of deterministic algorithms on a worst case input distribution is $np \bigl(1 - \frac{k-1}{2k}p \bigr) \pm O(1)$. These bounds apply even to fully adaptive unordered search, where the ratio between the two complexities converges to $2-p$ as the size of the array grows. In ordered search, we get sorted array $\vec{x}=(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$ and element $z$ promised to be in $\vec{x}$. We have access to an oracle that gets comparison queries. Here we find that the expected query complexity of randomized algorithms on a worst case input and deterministic algorithms on a worst case input distribution is essentially the same: $p k \cdot n^{\frac{1}{k}} \pm O(1+pk)$. △ Less

Submitted 19 November, 2023; v1 submitted 1 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Tit-for-Tat Dynamics and Market Volatility

Authors: Simina Brânzei

Abstract: We consider tit-for-tat dynamics in production markets, where there is a set of $n$ players connected via a weighted graph. Each player $i$ can produce an eponymous good using its linear production function, given as input various amounts of goods in the system. In the tit-for-tat dynamic, each player $i$ shares its good with its neighbors in fractions proportional to how much they helped player… ▽ More We consider tit-for-tat dynamics in production markets, where there is a set of $n$ players connected via a weighted graph. Each player $i$ can produce an eponymous good using its linear production function, given as input various amounts of goods in the system. In the tit-for-tat dynamic, each player $i$ shares its good with its neighbors in fractions proportional to how much they helped player $i$'s production in the last round. Our contribution is to characterize the asymptotic behavior of the dynamic as a function of the graph structure, finding that the fortune of a player grows in the long term if and only if the player has a good self loop (i.e. the player works well alone) or works well with at least one other player. We also consider a generalized damped update, where the players may update their strategies with different speeds, and obtain a lower bound on their rate of growth by identifying a function that gives insight into the behavior of the dynamical system. The model can capture circular economies, where players use each other's products, and organizational partnerships, where fostering long-term growth of an organization hinges on creating relationships in which reciprocal exchanges between the agents in the organization are paramount. △ Less

Submitted 12 January, 2024; v1 submitted 9 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: To appear in Nonlinearity

Multiplayer Bandit Learning, from Competition to Cooperation

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Yuval Peres

Abstract: The stochastic multi-armed bandit model captures the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. We study the effects of competition and cooperation on this tradeoff. Suppose there are $k$ arms and two players, Alice and Bob. In every round, each player pulls an arm, receives the resulting reward, and observes the choice of the other player but not their reward. Alice's utility is $Γ_A + λΓ_B$… ▽ More The stochastic multi-armed bandit model captures the tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. We study the effects of competition and cooperation on this tradeoff. Suppose there are $k$ arms and two players, Alice and Bob. In every round, each player pulls an arm, receives the resulting reward, and observes the choice of the other player but not their reward. Alice's utility is $Γ_A + λΓ_B$ (and similarly for Bob), where $Γ_A$ is Alice's total reward and $λ\in [-1, 1]$ is a cooperation parameter. At $λ= -1$ the players are competing in a zero-sum game, at $λ= 1$, they are fully cooperating, and at $λ= 0$, they are neutral: each player's utility is their own reward. The model is related to the economics literature on strategic experimentation, where usually players observe each other's rewards. With discount factor $β$, the Gittins index reduces the one-player problem to the comparison between a risky arm, with a prior $μ$, and a predictable arm, with success probability $p$. The value of $p$ where the player is indifferent between the arms is the Gittins index $g = g(μ,β) > m$, where $m$ is the mean of the risky arm. We show that competing players explore less than a single player: there is $p^* \in (m, g)$ so that for all $p > p^*$, the players stay at the predictable arm. However, the players are not myopic: they still explore for some $p > m$. On the other hand, cooperating players explore more than a single player. We also show that neutral players learn from each other, receiving strictly higher total rewards than they would playing alone, for all $ p\in (p^*, g)$, where $p^*$ is the threshold from the competing case. Finally, we show that competing and neutral players eventually settle on the same arm in every Nash equilibrium, while this can fail for cooperating players. △ Less

Submitted 12 January, 2024; v1 submitted 3 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Proportional Dynamics in Exchange Economies

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Nikhil R. Devanur, Yuval Rabani

Abstract: We study the Proportional Response dynamic in exchange economies, where each player starts with some amount of money and a good. Every day, the players bring one unit of their good and submit bids on goods they like, each good gets allocated in proportion to the bid amounts, and each seller collects the bids received. Then every player updates the bids proportionally to the contribution of each go… ▽ More We study the Proportional Response dynamic in exchange economies, where each player starts with some amount of money and a good. Every day, the players bring one unit of their good and submit bids on goods they like, each good gets allocated in proportion to the bid amounts, and each seller collects the bids received. Then every player updates the bids proportionally to the contribution of each good in their utility. This dynamic models a process of learning how to bid and has been studied in a series of papers on Fisher and production markets, but not in exchange economies. Our main results are as follows: - For linear utilities, the dynamic converges to market equilibrium utilities and allocations, while the bids and prices may cycle. We give a combinatorial characterization of limit cycles for prices and bids. - We introduce a lazy version of the dynamic, where players may save money for later, and show this converges in everything: utilities, allocations, and prices. - For CES utilities in the substitute range $[0,1)$, the dynamic converges for all parameters. This answers an open question about exchange economies with linear utilities, where tatonnement does not converge to market equilibria, and no natural process leading to equilibria was known. We also note that proportional response is a process where the players exchange goods throughout time (in out-of-equilibrium states), while tatonnement only explains how exchange happens in the limit. △ Less

Submitted 11 September, 2023; v1 submitted 11 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: Published version of the paper. 25 pages, 6 figures

Algorithms for Competitive Division of Chores

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Fedor Sandomirskiy

Abstract: We study the problem of allocating divisible bads (chores) among multiple agents with additive utilities when monetary transfers are not allowed. The competitive rule is known for its remarkable fairness and efficiency properties in the case of goods. This rule was extended to chores in prior work by Bogomolnaia, Moulin, Sandomirskiy, and Yanovskaya (2017). The rule produces Pareto optimal and env… ▽ More We study the problem of allocating divisible bads (chores) among multiple agents with additive utilities when monetary transfers are not allowed. The competitive rule is known for its remarkable fairness and efficiency properties in the case of goods. This rule was extended to chores in prior work by Bogomolnaia, Moulin, Sandomirskiy, and Yanovskaya (2017). The rule produces Pareto optimal and envy-free allocations for both goods and chores. In the case of goods, the outcome of the competitive rule can be easily computed. Competitive allocations solve the Eisenberg-Gale convex program; hence the outcome is unique and can be approximately found by standard gradient methods. An exact algorithm that runs in polynomial time in the number of agents and goods was given by Orlin (2010). In the case of chores, the competitive rule does not solve any convex optimization problem; instead, competitive allocations correspond to local minima, local maxima, and saddle points of the Nash social welfare on the Pareto frontier of the set of feasible utilities. The Pareto frontier may contain many such points; consequently, the competitive rule's outcome is no longer unique. In this paper, we show that all the outcomes of the competitive rule for chores can be computed in strongly polynomial time if either the number of agents or the number of chores is fixed. The approach is based on a combination of three ideas: all consumption graphs of Pareto optimal allocations can be listed in polynomial time; for a given consumption graph, a candidate for a competitive utility profile can be constructed via an explicit formula; each candidate can be checked for competitiveness, and the allocation can be reconstructed using a maximum flow computation. Our algorithm gives an approximately-fair allocation of indivisible chores by the rounding technique of Barman and Krishnamurthy (2018). △ Less

Submitted 14 July, 2023; v1 submitted 3 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Sharing Information with Competitors

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Claudio Orlandi, Guang Yang

Abstract: We study the mechanism design problem in the setting where agents are rewarded using information only. This problem is motivated by the increasing interest in secure multiparty computation techniques. More specifically, we consider the setting of a joint computation where different agents have inputs of different quality and each agent is interested in learning as much as possible while maintainin… ▽ More We study the mechanism design problem in the setting where agents are rewarded using information only. This problem is motivated by the increasing interest in secure multiparty computation techniques. More specifically, we consider the setting of a joint computation where different agents have inputs of different quality and each agent is interested in learning as much as possible while maintaining exclusivity for information. Our high level question is to design mechanisms that motivate all agents (even those with high-quality input) to participate in the computation and we formally study problems such as set union, intersection, and average. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

Online Learning with an Almost Perfect Expert

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Yuval Peres

Abstract: We study the multiclass online learning problem where a forecaster makes a sequence of predictions using the advice of $n$ experts. Our main contribution is to analyze the regime where the best expert makes at most $b$ mistakes and to show that when $b = o(\log_4{n})$, the expected number of mistakes made by the optimal forecaster is at most $\log_4{n} + o(\log_4{n})$. We also describe an adversar… ▽ More We study the multiclass online learning problem where a forecaster makes a sequence of predictions using the advice of $n$ experts. Our main contribution is to analyze the regime where the best expert makes at most $b$ mistakes and to show that when $b = o(\log_4{n})$, the expected number of mistakes made by the optimal forecaster is at most $\log_4{n} + o(\log_4{n})$. We also describe an adversary strategy showing that this bound is tight and that the worst case is attained for binary prediction. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2018; v1 submitted 30 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Universal Growth in Production Economies

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Ruta Mehta, Noam Nisan

Abstract: We consider a simple variant of the von Neumann model of an expanding economy, in which multiple producers make goods according to their production function. The players trade their goods at the market and then use the bundles acquired for the production in the next round. We study a simple decentralized dynamic---known as proportional response---in which players update their bids proportionally t… ▽ More We consider a simple variant of the von Neumann model of an expanding economy, in which multiple producers make goods according to their production function. The players trade their goods at the market and then use the bundles acquired for the production in the next round. We study a simple decentralized dynamic---known as proportional response---in which players update their bids proportionally to how useful the investments were in the past round. We show this dynamic leads to growth of the economy in the long term (whenever growth is possible) but also creates unbounded inequality, i.e. very rich and very poor players emerge. We analyze several other phenomena, such as how the relation of a player with others influences its development and the Gini index of the system. One of the key technical findings is that the players learn a global feature of the network (the optimal cycle) in a decentralized way, while interacting locally with their direct neighbors. We obtain this by studying the volume in the resulting dynamical system and showing that the volume of each cycle expands or contracts by a constant factor in each round. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2019; v1 submitted 20 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: 42 pages, 26 figures

How to Charge Lightning: The Economics of Bitcoin Transaction Channels

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Erel Segal-Halevi, Aviv Zohar

Abstract: Off-chain transaction channels represent one of the leading techniques to scale the transaction throughput in cryptocurrencies. However, the economic effect of transaction channels on the system has not been explored much until now. We study the economics of Bitcoin transaction channels, and present a framework for an economic analysis of the lightning network and its effect on transaction fees… ▽ More Off-chain transaction channels represent one of the leading techniques to scale the transaction throughput in cryptocurrencies. However, the economic effect of transaction channels on the system has not been explored much until now. We study the economics of Bitcoin transaction channels, and present a framework for an economic analysis of the lightning network and its effect on transaction fees on the blockchain. Our framework allows us to reason about different patterns of demand for transactions and different topologies of the lightning network, and to derive the resulting fees for transacting both on and off the blockchain. Our initial results indicate that while the lightning network does allow for a substantially higher number of transactions to pass through the system, it does not necessarily provide higher fees to miners, and as a result may in fact lead to lower participation in mining within the system. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2022; v1 submitted 29 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Comments: An earlier version of the paper was presented at Scaling Bitcoin 2017

Walrasian Dynamics in Multi-unit Markets

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Aris Filos-Ratsikas

Abstract: In a multi-unit market, a seller brings multiple units of a good and tries to sell them to a set of buyers that have monetary endowments. While a Walrasian equilibrium does not always exist in this model, natural relaxations of the concept that retain its desirable fairness properties do exist. We study the dynamics of (Walrasian) envy-free pricing mechanisms in this environment, showing that fo… ▽ More In a multi-unit market, a seller brings multiple units of a good and tries to sell them to a set of buyers that have monetary endowments. While a Walrasian equilibrium does not always exist in this model, natural relaxations of the concept that retain its desirable fairness properties do exist. We study the dynamics of (Walrasian) envy-free pricing mechanisms in this environment, showing that for any such pricing mechanism, the best response dynamic starting from truth-telling converges to a pure Nash equilibrium with small loss in revenue and welfare. Moreover, we generalize these bounds to capture all the Nash equilibria for a large class of (monotone) pricing mechanisms. We also identify a natural mechanism, which selects the minimum Walrasian envy-free price, in which for $n=2$ buyers the best response dynamic converges from any starting profile, and for which we conjecture convergence for any number of buyers. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2018; v1 submitted 24 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Communication Complexity of Cake Cutting

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Noam Nisan

Abstract: We study classic cake-cutting problems, but in discrete models rather than using infinite-precision real values, specifically, focusing on their communication complexity. Using general discrete simulations of classical infinite-precision protocols (Robertson-Webb and moving-knife), we roughly partition the various fair-allocation problems into 3 classes: "easy" (constant number of rounds of logari… ▽ More We study classic cake-cutting problems, but in discrete models rather than using infinite-precision real values, specifically, focusing on their communication complexity. Using general discrete simulations of classical infinite-precision protocols (Robertson-Webb and moving-knife), we roughly partition the various fair-allocation problems into 3 classes: "easy" (constant number of rounds of logarithmic many bits), "medium" (poly-logarithmic total communication), and "hard". Our main technical result concerns two of the "medium" problems (perfect allocation for 2 players and equitable allocation for any number of players) which we prove are not in the "easy" class. Our main open problem is to separate the "hard" from the "medium" classes. △ Less

Submitted 18 August, 2018; v1 submitted 28 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Comments: Added efficient communication protocol for the monotone crossing problem

The Query Complexity of Cake Cutting

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Noam Nisan

Abstract: We study the query complexity of cake cutting and give lower and upper bounds for computing approximately envy-free, perfect, and equitable allocations with the minimum number of cuts. The lower bounds are tight for computing connected envy-free allocations among n=3 players and for computing perfect and equitable allocations with minimum number of cuts between n=2 players. We also formalize mov… ▽ More We study the query complexity of cake cutting and give lower and upper bounds for computing approximately envy-free, perfect, and equitable allocations with the minimum number of cuts. The lower bounds are tight for computing connected envy-free allocations among n=3 players and for computing perfect and equitable allocations with minimum number of cuts between n=2 players. We also formalize moving knife procedures and show that a large subclass of this family, which captures all the known moving knife procedures, can be simulated efficiently with arbitrarily small error in the Robertson-Webb query model. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2018; v1 submitted 8 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: Working paper

Nash Social Welfare Approximation for Strategic Agents

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Ruta Mehta

Abstract: The fair division of resources is an important age-old problem that has led to a rich body of literature. At the center of this literature lies the question of whether there exist fair mechanisms despite strategic behavior of the agents. A fundamental objective function used for measuring fair outcomes is the Nash social welfare, defined as the geometric mean of the agent utilities. This objective… ▽ More The fair division of resources is an important age-old problem that has led to a rich body of literature. At the center of this literature lies the question of whether there exist fair mechanisms despite strategic behavior of the agents. A fundamental objective function used for measuring fair outcomes is the Nash social welfare, defined as the geometric mean of the agent utilities. This objective function is maximized by widely known solution concepts such as Nash bargaining and the competitive equilibrium with equal incomes. In this work we focus on the question of (approximately) implementing the Nash social welfare. The starting point of our analysis is the Fisher market, a fundamental model of an economy, whose benchmark is precisely the (weighted) Nash social welfare. We begin by studying two extreme classes of valuations functions, namely perfect substitutes and perfect complements, and find that for perfect substitutes, the Fisher market mechanism has a constant approximation: at most 2 and at least e1e. However, for perfect complements, the Fisher market does not work well, its bound degrading linearly with the number of players. Strikingly, the Trading Post mechanism---an indirect market mechanism also known as the Shapley-Shubik game---has significantly better performance than the Fisher market on its own benchmark. Not only does Trading Post achieve an approximation of 2 for perfect substitutes, but this bound holds for all concave utilities and becomes arbitrarily close to optimal for Leontief utilities (perfect complements), where it reaches $(1+ε)$ for every $ε> 0$. Moreover, all the Nash equilibria of the Trading Post mechanism are pure for all concave utilities and satisfy an important notion of fairness known as proportionality. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2017; v1 submitted 6 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

To Give or Not to Give: Fair Division for Single Minded Valuations

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Yuezhou Lv, Ruta Mehta

Abstract: Single minded agents have strict preferences, in which a bundle is acceptable only if it meets a certain demand. Such preferences arise naturally in scenarios such as allocating computational resources among users, where the goal is to fairly serve as many requests as possible. In this paper we study the fair division problem for such agents, which is harder to handle due to discontinuity and comp… ▽ More Single minded agents have strict preferences, in which a bundle is acceptable only if it meets a certain demand. Such preferences arise naturally in scenarios such as allocating computational resources among users, where the goal is to fairly serve as many requests as possible. In this paper we study the fair division problem for such agents, which is harder to handle due to discontinuity and complementarities of the preferences. Our solution concept---the competitive allocation from equal incomes (CAEI)---is inspired from market equilibria and implements fair outcomes through a pricing mechanism. We study the existence and computation of CAEI for multiple divisible goods, cake cutting, and multiple discrete goods. For the first two scenarios we show that existence of CAEI solutions is guaranteed, while for the third we give a succinct characterization of instances that admit this solution; then we give an efficient algorithm to find one in all three cases. Maximizing social welfare turns out to be NP-hard in general, however we obtain efficient algorithms for (i) divisible and discrete goods when the number of different \emph{types} of players is a constant, (ii) cake cutting with contiguous demands, for which we establish an interesting connection with interval scheduling, and (iii) cake cutting with a constant number of players with arbitrary demands. Our solution is useful more generally, when the players have a target set of desired goods, and very small positive values for any bundle not containing their target set. △ Less

Submitted 28 April, 2016; v1 submitted 29 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Walrasian Pricing in Multi-unit Auctions

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Peter Bro Miltersen, Yulong Zeng

Abstract: Multi-unit auctions are a paradigmatic model, where a seller brings multiple units of a good, while several buyers bring monetary endowments. It is well known that Walrasian equilibria do not always exist in this model, however compelling relaxations such as (Walrasian) envy-free pricing do. In this paper we design an optimal envy-free mechanism for multi-unit auctions with budgets. When the marke… ▽ More Multi-unit auctions are a paradigmatic model, where a seller brings multiple units of a good, while several buyers bring monetary endowments. It is well known that Walrasian equilibria do not always exist in this model, however compelling relaxations such as (Walrasian) envy-free pricing do. In this paper we design an optimal envy-free mechanism for multi-unit auctions with budgets. When the market is even mildly competitive, the approximation ratios of this mechanism are small constants for both the revenue and welfare objectives, and in fact for welfare the approximation converges to 1 as the market becomes fully competitive. We also give an impossibility theorem, showing that truthfulness requires discarding resources and, in particular, is incompatible with (Pareto) efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 9 October, 2017; v1 submitted 28 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Comments: 32 pages, full version of MFCS 2017 paper (the previous title was "Envy-free pricing in multi-unit markets")

Computation of Stackelberg Equilibria of Finite Sequential Games

Authors: Branislav Bosansky, Simina Branzei, Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen, Peter Bro Miltersen, Troels Bjerre Sorensen

Abstract: The Stackelberg equilibrium solution concept describes optimal strategies to commit to: Player 1 (termed the leader) publicly commits to a strategy and Player 2 (termed the follower) plays a best response to this strategy (ties are broken in favor of the leader). We study Stackelberg equilibria in finite sequential games (or extensive-form games) and provide new exact algorithms, approximate algor… ▽ More The Stackelberg equilibrium solution concept describes optimal strategies to commit to: Player 1 (termed the leader) publicly commits to a strategy and Player 2 (termed the follower) plays a best response to this strategy (ties are broken in favor of the leader). We study Stackelberg equilibria in finite sequential games (or extensive-form games) and provide new exact algorithms, approximate algorithms, and hardness results for several classes of these sequential games. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2016; v1 submitted 28 July, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

Characterization and Computation of Equilibria for Indivisible Goods

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Hadi Hosseini, Peter Bro Miltersen

Abstract: We consider the problem of allocating indivisible goods in a way that is fair, using one of the leading market mechanisms in economics: the competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. Focusing on two major classes of valuations, namely perfect substitutes and perfect complements, we establish the computational properties of algorithms operating in this framework. For the class of valuations with p… ▽ More We consider the problem of allocating indivisible goods in a way that is fair, using one of the leading market mechanisms in economics: the competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. Focusing on two major classes of valuations, namely perfect substitutes and perfect complements, we establish the computational properties of algorithms operating in this framework. For the class of valuations with perfect complements, our algorithm yields a surprisingly succinct characterization of instances that admit a competitive equilibrium from equal incomes. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2016; v1 submitted 23 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

The Adjusted Winner Procedure: Characterizations and Equilibria

Authors: Haris Aziz, Simina Brânzei, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Søren Kristoffer Stiil Frederiksen

Abstract: The Adjusted Winner procedure is an important fair division mechanism proposed by Brams and Taylor for allocating goods between two parties. It has been used in practice for divorce settlements and analyzing political disputes. Assuming truthful declaration of the valuations, it computes an allocation that is envy-free, equitable and Pareto optimal. We show that Adjusted Winner admits several el… ▽ More The Adjusted Winner procedure is an important fair division mechanism proposed by Brams and Taylor for allocating goods between two parties. It has been used in practice for divorce settlements and analyzing political disputes. Assuming truthful declaration of the valuations, it computes an allocation that is envy-free, equitable and Pareto optimal. We show that Adjusted Winner admits several elegant characterizations, which further shed light on the outcomes reached with strategic agents. We find that the procedure may not admit pure Nash equilibria in either the discrete or continuous variants, but is guaranteed to have $ε$-Nash equilibria for each $ε$ > 0. Moreover, under informed tie-breaking, exact pure Nash equilibria always exist, are Pareto optimal, and their social welfare is at least 3/4 of the optimal. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2017; v1 submitted 23 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Verifiably Truthful Mechanisms

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Ariel D. Procaccia

Abstract: It is typically expected that if a mechanism is truthful, then the agents would, indeed, truthfully report their private information. But why would an agent believe that the mechanism is truthful? We wish to design truthful mechanisms, whose truthfulness can be verified efficiently (in the computational sense). Our approach involves three steps: (i) specifying the structure of mechanisms, (ii) con… ▽ More It is typically expected that if a mechanism is truthful, then the agents would, indeed, truthfully report their private information. But why would an agent believe that the mechanism is truthful? We wish to design truthful mechanisms, whose truthfulness can be verified efficiently (in the computational sense). Our approach involves three steps: (i) specifying the structure of mechanisms, (ii) constructing a verification algorithm, and (iii) measuring the quality of verifiably truthful mechanisms. We demonstrate this approach using a case study: approximate mechanism design without money for facility location. △ Less

Submitted 28 November, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

An Algorithmic Framework for Strategic Fair Division

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Ioannis Caragiannis, David Kurokawa, Ariel D. Procaccia

Abstract: We study the paradigmatic fair division problem of allocating a divisible good among agents with heterogeneous preferences, commonly known as cake cutting. Classical cake cutting protocols are susceptible to manipulation. Do their strategic outcomes still guarantee fairness? To address this question we adopt a novel algorithmic approach, by designing a concrete computational framework for fair d… ▽ More We study the paradigmatic fair division problem of allocating a divisible good among agents with heterogeneous preferences, commonly known as cake cutting. Classical cake cutting protocols are susceptible to manipulation. Do their strategic outcomes still guarantee fairness? To address this question we adopt a novel algorithmic approach, by designing a concrete computational framework for fair division---the class of Generalized Cut and Choose (GCC) protocols}---and reasoning about the game-theoretic properties of algorithms that operate in this model. The class of GCC protocols includes the most important discrete cake cutting protocols, and turns out to be compatible with the study of fair division among strategic agents. In particular, GCC protocols are guaranteed to have approximate subgame perfect Nash equilibria, or even exact equilibria if the protocol's tie-breaking rule is flexible. We further observe that the (approximate) equilibria of proportional GCC protocols---which guarantee each of the $n$ agents a $1/n$-fraction of the cake---must be (approximately) proportional. Finally, we design a protocol in this framework with the property that its Nash equilibrium allocations coincide with the set of (contiguous) envy-free allocations. △ Less

Submitted 19 July, 2016; v1 submitted 8 July, 2013; originally announced July 2013.

The Authorship Dilemma: Alphabetical or Contribution?

Authors: Margareta Ackerman, Simina Brânzei

Abstract: Scientific communities have adopted different conventions for ordering authors on publications. Are these choices inconsequential, or do they have significant influence on individual authors, the quality of the projects completed, and research communities at large? What are the trade-offs of using one convention over another? In order to investigate these questions, we formulate a basic two-player… ▽ More Scientific communities have adopted different conventions for ordering authors on publications. Are these choices inconsequential, or do they have significant influence on individual authors, the quality of the projects completed, and research communities at large? What are the trade-offs of using one convention over another? In order to investigate these questions, we formulate a basic two-player game theoretic model, which already illustrates interesting phenomena that can occur in more realistic settings. We find that alphabetical ordering can improve research quality, while contribution-based ordering leads to a denser collaboration network and a greater number of publications. Contrary to the assumption that free riding is a weakness of the alphabetical ordering scheme, this phenomenon can occur under any contribution scheme, and the worst case occurs under contribution-based ordering. Finally, we show how authors working on multiple projects can cooperate to attain optimal research quality and eliminate free riding given either contribution scheme. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2016; v1 submitted 16 August, 2012; originally announced August 2012.

Equilibria of Chinese Auctions

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Clara Forero, Kate Larson, Peter Bro Miltersen

Abstract: Chinese auctions are a combination between a raffle and an auction and are held in practice at charity events or festivals. In a Chinese auction, multiple players compete for several items by buying tickets, which can be used to win the items. In front of each item there is a basket, and the players can bid by placing tickets in the basket(s) corresponding to the item(s) they are trying to win. Af… ▽ More Chinese auctions are a combination between a raffle and an auction and are held in practice at charity events or festivals. In a Chinese auction, multiple players compete for several items by buying tickets, which can be used to win the items. In front of each item there is a basket, and the players can bid by placing tickets in the basket(s) corresponding to the item(s) they are trying to win. After all the players have placed their tickets, a ticket is drawn at random from each basket and the item is given to the owner of the winning ticket. While a player is never guaranteed to win an item, they can improve their chances of getting it by increasing the number of tickets for that item. In this paper we investigate the existence of pure Nash equilibria in both the continuous and discrete settings. When the players have continuous budgets, we show that a pure Nash equilibrium may not exist for asymmetric games when some valuations are zero. In that case we prove that the auctioneer can stabilize the game by placing his own ticket in each basket. On the other hand, when all the valuations are strictly positive, a pure Nash equilibrium is guaranteed to exist, and the equilibrium strategies are symmetric when both valuations and budgets are symmetric. We also study Chinese auctions with discrete budgets, for which we give both existence results and counterexamples. While the literature on rent-seeking contests traditionally focuses on continuous costly tickets, the discrete variant is very natural and more closely models the version of the auction held in practice. △ Less

Submitted 3 September, 2012; v1 submitted 1 August, 2012; originally announced August 2012.

Matching Games with Additive Externalities

Authors: Simina Brânzei, Tomasz P. Michalak, Talal Rahwan, Kate Larson, Nicholas R. Jennings

Abstract: Two-sided matchings are an important theoretical tool used to model markets and social interactions. In many real life problems the utility of an agent is influenced not only by their own choices, but also by the choices that other agents make. Such an influence is called an externality. Whereas fully expressive representations of externalities in matchings require exponential space, in this paper… ▽ More Two-sided matchings are an important theoretical tool used to model markets and social interactions. In many real life problems the utility of an agent is influenced not only by their own choices, but also by the choices that other agents make. Such an influence is called an externality. Whereas fully expressive representations of externalities in matchings require exponential space, in this paper we propose a compact model of externalities, in which the influence of a match on each agent is computed additively. In this framework, we analyze many-to-many and one-to-one matchings under neutral, optimistic, and pessimistic behaviour, and provide both computational hardness results and polynomial-time algorithms for computing stable outcomes. △ Less

Submitted 16 July, 2012; originally announced July 2012.

Weighted Clustering

Authors: Margareta Ackerman, Shai Ben-David, Simina Brânzei, David Loker

Abstract: One of the most prominent challenges in clustering is "the user's dilemma," which is the problem of selecting an appropriate clustering algorithm for a specific task. A formal approach for addressing this problem relies on the identification of succinct, user-friendly properties that formally capture when certain clustering methods are preferred over others. Until now these properties focused on… ▽ More One of the most prominent challenges in clustering is "the user's dilemma," which is the problem of selecting an appropriate clustering algorithm for a specific task. A formal approach for addressing this problem relies on the identification of succinct, user-friendly properties that formally capture when certain clustering methods are preferred over others. Until now these properties focused on advantages of classical Linkage-Based algorithms, failing to identify when other clustering paradigms, such as popular center-based methods, are preferable. We present surprisingly simple new properties that delineate the differences between common clustering paradigms, which clearly and formally demonstrates advantages of center-based approaches for some applications. These properties address how sensitive algorithms are to changes in element frequencies, which we capture in a generalized setting where every element is associated with a real-valued weight. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2016; v1 submitted 8 September, 2011; originally announced September 2011.