-
An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study on General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Compliance in Open-Source Software
Authors:
Lucas Franke,
Huayu Liang,
Sahar Farzanehpour,
Aaron Brantly,
James C. Davis,
Chris Brown
Abstract:
Background: Governments worldwide are considering data privacy regulations. These laws, e.g. the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), require software developers to meet privacy-related requirements when interacting with users' data. Prior research describes the impact of such laws on software development, but only for commercial software. Open-source software is commonly in…
▽ More
Background: Governments worldwide are considering data privacy regulations. These laws, e.g. the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), require software developers to meet privacy-related requirements when interacting with users' data. Prior research describes the impact of such laws on software development, but only for commercial software. Open-source software is commonly integrated into regulated software, and thus must be engineered or adapted for compliance. We do not know how such laws impact open-source software development.
Aims: To understand how data privacy laws affect open-source software development. We studied the European Union's GDPR, the most prominent such law. We investigated how GDPR compliance activities influence OSS developer activity (RQ1), how OSS developers perceive fulfilling GDPR requirements (RQ2), the most challenging GDPR requirements to implement (RQ3), and how OSS developers assess GDPR compliance (RQ4).
Method: We distributed an online survey to explore perceptions of GDPR implementations from open-source developers (N=56). We further conducted a repository mining study to analyze development metrics on pull requests (N=31462) submitted to open-source GitHub repositories.
Results: GDPR policies complicate open-source development processes and introduce challenges for developers, primarily regarding the management of users' data, implementation costs and time, and assessments of compliance. Moreover, we observed negative perceptions of GDPR from open-source developers and significant increases in development activity, in particular metrics related to coding and reviewing activity, on GitHub pull requests related to GDPR compliance.
Conclusions: Our findings motivate policy-related resources and automated tools to support data privacy regulation implementation and compliance efforts in open-source software.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
A First Look at the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Open-Source Software
Authors:
Lucas Franke,
Huayu Liang,
Aaron Brantly,
James C Davis,
Chris Brown
Abstract:
This poster describes work on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in open-source software. Although open-source software is commonly integrated into regulated software, and thus must be engineered or adapted for compliance, we do not know how such laws impact open-source software development.
We surveyed open-source developers (N=47) to understand their experiences and perceptions of G…
▽ More
This poster describes work on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in open-source software. Although open-source software is commonly integrated into regulated software, and thus must be engineered or adapted for compliance, we do not know how such laws impact open-source software development.
We surveyed open-source developers (N=47) to understand their experiences and perceptions of GDPR. We learned many engineering challenges, primarily regarding the management of users' data and assessments of compliance. We call for improved policy-related resources, especially tools to support data privacy regulation implementation and compliance in open-source software.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
CoSINT: Designing a Collaborative Capture the Flag Competition to Investigate Misinformation
Authors:
Sukrit Venkatagiri,
Anirban Mukhopadhyay,
David Hicks,
Aaron Brantly,
Kurt Luther
Abstract:
Crowdsourced investigations shore up democratic institutions by debunking misinformation and uncovering human rights abuses. However, current crowdsourcing approaches rely on simplistic collaborative or competitive models and lack technological support, limiting their collective impact. Prior research has shown that blending elements of competition and collaboration can lead to greater performance…
▽ More
Crowdsourced investigations shore up democratic institutions by debunking misinformation and uncovering human rights abuses. However, current crowdsourcing approaches rely on simplistic collaborative or competitive models and lack technological support, limiting their collective impact. Prior research has shown that blending elements of competition and collaboration can lead to greater performance and creativity, but crowdsourced investigations pose unique analytical and ethical challenges. In this paper, we employed a four-month-long Research through Design process to design and evaluate a novel interaction style called collaborative capture the flag competitions (CoCTFs). We instantiated this interaction style through CoSINT, a platform that enables a trained crowd to work with professional investigators to identify and investigate social media misinformation. Our mixed-methods evaluation showed that CoSINT leverages the complementary strengths of competition and collaboration, allowing a crowd to quickly identify and debunk misinformation. We also highlight tensions between competition versus collaboration and discuss implications for the design of crowdsourced investigations.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
