-
Type Universes as Allocation Effects
Authors:
Paulette Koronkevich,
William J. Bowman
Abstract:
In this paper, we explore a connection between type universes and memory allocation. Type universe hierarchies are used in dependent type theories to ensure consistency, by forbidding a type from quantifying over all types. Instead, the types of types (universes) form a hierarchy, and a type can only quantify over types in other universes (with some exceptions), restricting cyclic reasoning in pro…
▽ More
In this paper, we explore a connection between type universes and memory allocation. Type universe hierarchies are used in dependent type theories to ensure consistency, by forbidding a type from quantifying over all types. Instead, the types of types (universes) form a hierarchy, and a type can only quantify over types in other universes (with some exceptions), restricting cyclic reasoning in proofs. We present a perspective where universes also describe \emph{where} values are allocated in the heap, and the choice of universe algebra imposes a structure on the heap overall. The resulting type system provides a simple declarative system for reasoning about and restricting memory allocation, without reasoning about reads or writes. We present a theoretical framework for equip** a type system with higher-order references restricted by a universe hierarchy, and conjecture that many existing universe algebras give rise to interesting systems for reasoning about allocation. We present 3 instantiations of this approach to enable reasoning about allocation in the simply typed $λ$-calculus: (1) the standard ramified universe hierarchy, which we prove guarantees termination of the language extended with higher-order references by restricting cycles in the heap; (2) an extension with an \emph{impredicative} base universe, which we conjecture enables full-ground references (with terminating computation but cyclic ground data structures); (3) an extension with \emph{universe polymorphism}, which divides the heap into fine-grained regions.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Human Perception-Inspired Grain Segmentation Refinement Using Conditional Random Fields
Authors:
Doruk Aksoy,
Huolin L. Xin,
Timothy J. Rupert,
William J. Bowman
Abstract:
Accurate segmentation of interconnected line networks, such as grain boundaries in polycrystalline material microstructures, poses a significant challenge due to the fragmented masks produced by conventional computer vision algorithms, including convolutional neural networks. These algorithms struggle with thin masks, often necessitating intricate post-processing for effective contour closure and…
▽ More
Accurate segmentation of interconnected line networks, such as grain boundaries in polycrystalline material microstructures, poses a significant challenge due to the fragmented masks produced by conventional computer vision algorithms, including convolutional neural networks. These algorithms struggle with thin masks, often necessitating intricate post-processing for effective contour closure and continuity. Addressing this issue, this paper introduces a fast, high-fidelity post-processing technique, leveraging domain knowledge about grain boundary connectivity and employing conditional random fields and perceptual grou** rules. This approach significantly enhances segmentation mask accuracy, achieving a 79% segment identification accuracy in validation with a U-Net model on electron microscopy images of a polycrystalline oxide. Additionally, a novel grain alignment metric is introduced, showing a 51% improvement in grain alignment, providing a more detailed assessment of segmentation performance for complex microstructures. This method not only enables rapid and accurate segmentation but also facilitates an unprecedented level of data analysis, significantly improving the statistical representation of grain boundary networks, making it suitable for a range of disciplines where precise segmentation of interconnected line networks is essential.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Dependent Type Systems as Macros
Authors:
Stephen Chang,
Michael Ballantyne,
Milo Turner,
William J. Bowman
Abstract:
We present Turnstile+, a high-level, macros-based metaDSL for building dependently typed languages. With it, programmers may rapidly prototype and iterate on the design of new dependently typed features and extensions. Or they may create entirely new DSLs whose dependent type "power" is tailored to a specific domain. Our framework's support of language-oriented programming also makes it suitable f…
▽ More
We present Turnstile+, a high-level, macros-based metaDSL for building dependently typed languages. With it, programmers may rapidly prototype and iterate on the design of new dependently typed features and extensions. Or they may create entirely new DSLs whose dependent type "power" is tailored to a specific domain. Our framework's support of language-oriented programming also makes it suitable for experimenting with systems of interacting components, e.g., a proof assistant and its companion DSLs. This paper explains the implementation details of Turnstile+, as well as how it may be used to create a wide-variety of dependently typed languages, from a lightweight one with indexed types, to a full spectrum proof assistant, complete with a tactic system and extensions for features like sized types and SMT interaction.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Is Sized Ty** for Coq Practical?
Authors:
Jonathan Chan,
Yufeng Li,
William J. Bowman
Abstract:
Contemporary proof assistants such as Coq require that recursive functions be terminating and corecursive functions be productive to maintain logical consistency of their type theories, and some ensure these properties using syntactic checks. However, being syntactic, they are inherently delicate and restrictive, preventing users from easily writing obviously terminating or productive functions at…
▽ More
Contemporary proof assistants such as Coq require that recursive functions be terminating and corecursive functions be productive to maintain logical consistency of their type theories, and some ensure these properties using syntactic checks. However, being syntactic, they are inherently delicate and restrictive, preventing users from easily writing obviously terminating or productive functions at their whim.
Meanwhile, there exist many sized type theories that perform type-based termination and productivity checking, including theories based on the Calculus of (Co)Inductive Constructions (CIC), the core calculus underlying Coq. These theories are more robust and compositional in comparison. So why haven't they been adapted to Coq?
In this paper, we venture to answer this question with CIC$\widehat{*}$, a sized type theory based on CIC. It extends past work on sized types in CIC with additional Coq features such as global and local definitions. We also present a corresponding size inference algorithm and implement it within Coq's kernel; for maximal backward compatibility with existing Coq developments, it requires no additional annotations from the user.
In our evaluation of the implementation, we find a severe performance degradation when compiling parts of the Coq standard library, inherent to the algorithm itself. We conclude that if we wish to maintain backward compatibility, using size inference as a replacement for syntactic checking is wildly impractical in terms of performance.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2021; v1 submitted 11 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Typed Closure Conversion for the Calculus of Constructions
Authors:
William J. Bowman,
Amal Ahmed
Abstract:
Dependently typed languages such as Coq are used to specify and verify the full functional correctness of source programs. Type-preserving compilation can be used to preserve these specifications and proofs of correctness through compilation into the generated target-language programs. Unfortunately, type-preserving compilation of dependent types is hard. In essence, the problem is that dependent…
▽ More
Dependently typed languages such as Coq are used to specify and verify the full functional correctness of source programs. Type-preserving compilation can be used to preserve these specifications and proofs of correctness through compilation into the generated target-language programs. Unfortunately, type-preserving compilation of dependent types is hard. In essence, the problem is that dependent type systems are designed around high-level compositional abstractions to decide type checking, but compilation interferes with the type-system rules for reasoning about run-time terms.
We develop a type-preserving closure-conversion translation from the Calculus of Constructions (CC) with strong dependent pairs ($Σ$ types)---a subset of the core language of Coq---to a type-safe, dependently typed compiler intermediate language named CC-CC. The central challenge in this work is how to translate the source type-system rules for reasoning about functions into target type-system rules for reasoning about closures. To justify these rules, we prove soundness of CC-CC by giving a model in CC. In addition to type preservation, we prove correctness of separate compilation.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
