-
Adapting to time: why nature evolved a diverse set of neurons
Authors:
Karim G. Habashy,
Benjamin D. Evans,
Dan F. M. Goodman,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
Brains have evolved a diverse set of neurons with varying morphologies, physiological properties and rich dynamics that impact their processing of temporal information. By contrast, most neural network models include a homogeneous set of units that only vary in terms of their spatial parameters (weights and biases). To investigate the importance of temporal parameters to neural function, we traine…
▽ More
Brains have evolved a diverse set of neurons with varying morphologies, physiological properties and rich dynamics that impact their processing of temporal information. By contrast, most neural network models include a homogeneous set of units that only vary in terms of their spatial parameters (weights and biases). To investigate the importance of temporal parameters to neural function, we trained spiking neural networks on tasks of varying temporal complexity, with different subsets of parameters held constant. We find that in a tightly resource constrained setting, adapting conduction delays is essential to solve all test conditions, and indeed that it is possible to solve these tasks using only temporal parameters (delays and time constants) with weights held constant. In the most complex spatio-temporal task we studied, we found that an adaptable bursting parameter was essential. More generally, allowing for adaptation of both temporal and spatial parameters increases network robustness to noise, an important feature for both biological brains and neuromorphic computing systems. In summary, our findings highlight how rich and adaptable dynamics are key to solving temporally structured tasks at a low neural resource cost, which may be part of the reason why biological neurons vary so dramatically in their physiological properties.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2024; v1 submitted 22 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
MindSet: Vision. A toolbox for testing DNNs on key psychological experiments
Authors:
Valerio Biscione,
Dong Yin,
Gaurav Malhotra,
Marin Dujmovic,
Milton L. Montero,
Guillermo Puebla,
Federico Adolfi,
Rachel F. Heaton,
John E. Hummel,
Benjamin D. Evans,
Karim Habashy,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
Multiple benchmarks have been developed to assess the alignment between deep neural networks (DNNs) and human vision. In almost all cases these benchmarks are observational in the sense they are composed of behavioural and brain responses to naturalistic images that have not been manipulated to test hypotheses regarding how DNNs or humans perceive and identify objects. Here we introduce the toolbo…
▽ More
Multiple benchmarks have been developed to assess the alignment between deep neural networks (DNNs) and human vision. In almost all cases these benchmarks are observational in the sense they are composed of behavioural and brain responses to naturalistic images that have not been manipulated to test hypotheses regarding how DNNs or humans perceive and identify objects. Here we introduce the toolbox MindSet: Vision, consisting of a collection of image datasets and related scripts designed to test DNNs on 30 psychological findings. In all experimental conditions, the stimuli are systematically manipulated to test specific hypotheses regarding human visual perception and object recognition. In addition to providing pre-generated datasets of images, we provide code to regenerate these datasets, offering many configurable parameters which greatly extend the dataset versatility for different research contexts, and code to facilitate the testing of DNNs on these image datasets using three different methods (similarity judgments, out-of-distribution classification, and decoder method), accessible at https://github.com/MindSetVision/mindset-vision. We test ResNet-152 on each of these methods as an example of how the toolbox can be used.
△ Less
Submitted 8 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Visual Reasoning in Object-Centric Deep Neural Networks: A Comparative Cognition Approach
Authors:
Guillermo Puebla,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
Achieving visual reasoning is a long-term goal of artificial intelligence. In the last decade, several studies have applied deep neural networks (DNNs) to the task of learning visual relations from images, with modest results in terms of generalization of the relations learned. However, in recent years, object-centric representation learning has been put forward as a way to achieve visual reasonin…
▽ More
Achieving visual reasoning is a long-term goal of artificial intelligence. In the last decade, several studies have applied deep neural networks (DNNs) to the task of learning visual relations from images, with modest results in terms of generalization of the relations learned. However, in recent years, object-centric representation learning has been put forward as a way to achieve visual reasoning within the deep learning framework. Object-centric models attempt to model input scenes as compositions of objects and relations between them. To this end, these models use several kinds of attention mechanisms to segregate the individual objects in a scene from the background and from other objects. In this work we tested relation learning and generalization in several object-centric models, as well as a ResNet-50 baseline. In contrast to previous research, which has focused heavily in the same-different task in order to asses relational reasoning in DNNs, we use a set of tasks -- with varying degrees of difficulty -- derived from the comparative cognition literature. Our results show that object-centric models are able to segregate the different objects in a scene, even in many out-of-distribution cases. In our simpler tasks, this improves their capacity to learn and generalize visual relations in comparison to the ResNet-50 baseline. However, object-centric models still struggle in our more difficult tasks and conditions. We conclude that abstract visual reasoning remains an open challenge for DNNs, including object-centric models.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
The role of object-centric representations, guided attention, and external memory on generalizing visual relations
Authors:
Guillermo Puebla,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
Visual reasoning is a long-term goal of vision research. In the last decade, several works have attempted to apply deep neural networks (DNNs) to the task of learning visual relations from images, with modest results in terms of the generalization of the relations learned. In recent years, several innovations in DNNs have been developed in order to enable learning abstract relation from images. In…
▽ More
Visual reasoning is a long-term goal of vision research. In the last decade, several works have attempted to apply deep neural networks (DNNs) to the task of learning visual relations from images, with modest results in terms of the generalization of the relations learned. In recent years, several innovations in DNNs have been developed in order to enable learning abstract relation from images. In this work, we systematically evaluate a series of DNNs that integrate mechanism such as slot attention, recurrently guided attention, and external memory, in the simplest possible visual reasoning task: deciding whether two objects are the same or different. We found that, although some models performed better than others in generalizing the same-different relation to specific types of images, no model was able to generalize this relation across the board. We conclude that abstract visual reasoning remains largely an unresolved challenge for DNNs.
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Successes and critical failures of neural networks in capturing human-like speech recognition
Authors:
Federico Adolfi,
Jeffrey S. Bowers,
David Poeppel
Abstract:
Natural and artificial audition can in principle acquire different solutions to a given problem. The constraints of the task, however, can nudge the cognitive science and engineering of audition to qualitatively converge, suggesting that a closer mutual examination would potentially enrich artificial hearing systems and process models of the mind and brain. Speech recognition - an area ripe for su…
▽ More
Natural and artificial audition can in principle acquire different solutions to a given problem. The constraints of the task, however, can nudge the cognitive science and engineering of audition to qualitatively converge, suggesting that a closer mutual examination would potentially enrich artificial hearing systems and process models of the mind and brain. Speech recognition - an area ripe for such exploration - is inherently robust in humans to a number transformations at various spectrotemporal granularities. To what extent are these robustness profiles accounted for by high-performing neural network systems? We bring together experiments in speech recognition under a single synthesis framework to evaluate state-of-the-art neural networks as stimulus-computable, optimized observers. In a series of experiments, we (1) clarify how influential speech manipulations in the literature relate to each other and to natural speech, (2) show the granularities at which machines exhibit out-of-distribution robustness, reproducing classical perceptual phenomena in humans, (3) identify the specific conditions where model predictions of human performance differ, and (4) demonstrate a crucial failure of all artificial systems to perceptually recover where humans do, suggesting alternative directions for theory and model building. These findings encourage a tighter synergy between the cognitive science and engineering of audition.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2023; v1 submitted 6 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Lost in Latent Space: Disentangled Models and the Challenge of Combinatorial Generalisation
Authors:
Milton L. Montero,
Jeffrey S. Bowers,
Rui Ponte Costa,
Casimir J. H. Ludwig,
Gaurav Malhotra
Abstract:
Recent research has shown that generative models with highly disentangled representations fail to generalise to unseen combination of generative factor values. These findings contradict earlier research which showed improved performance in out-of-training distribution settings when compared to entangled representations. Additionally, it is not clear if the reported failures are due to (a) encoders…
▽ More
Recent research has shown that generative models with highly disentangled representations fail to generalise to unseen combination of generative factor values. These findings contradict earlier research which showed improved performance in out-of-training distribution settings when compared to entangled representations. Additionally, it is not clear if the reported failures are due to (a) encoders failing to map novel combinations to the proper regions of the latent space or (b) novel combinations being mapped correctly but the decoder/downstream process is unable to render the correct output for the unseen combinations. We investigate these alternatives by testing several models on a range of datasets and training settings. We find that (i) when models fail, their encoders also fail to map unseen combinations to correct regions of the latent space and (ii) when models succeed, it is either because the test conditions do not exclude enough examples, or because excluded generative factors determine independent parts of the output image. Based on these results, we argue that to generalise properly, models not only need to capture factors of variation, but also understand how to invert the generative process that was used to generate the data.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2024; v1 submitted 5 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Mixed Evidence for Gestalt Grou** in Deep Neural Networks
Authors:
Valerio Biscione,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
Gestalt psychologists have identified a range of conditions in which humans organize elements of a scene into a group or whole, and perceptual grou** principles play an essential role in scene perception and object identification. Recently, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) trained on natural images (ImageNet) have been proposed as compelling models of human vision based on reports that they perform w…
▽ More
Gestalt psychologists have identified a range of conditions in which humans organize elements of a scene into a group or whole, and perceptual grou** principles play an essential role in scene perception and object identification. Recently, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) trained on natural images (ImageNet) have been proposed as compelling models of human vision based on reports that they perform well on various brain and behavioral benchmarks. Here we test a total of 16 networks covering a variety of architectures and learning paradigms (convolutional, attention-based, supervised and self-supervised, feed-forward and recurrent) on dots (Experiment 1) and more complex shapes (Experiment 2) stimuli that produce strong Gestalts effects in humans. In Experiment 1 we found that convolutional networks were indeed sensitive in a human-like fashion to the principles of proximity, linearity, and orientation, but only at the output layer. In Experiment 2, we found that most networks exhibited Gestalt effects only for a few sets, and again only at the latest stage of processing. Overall, self-supervised and Vision-Transformer appeared to perform worse than convolutional networks in terms of human similarity. Remarkably, no model presented a grou** effect at the early or intermediate stages of processing. This is at odds with the widespread assumption that Gestalts occur prior to object recognition, and indeed, serve to organize the visual scene for the sake of object recognition. Our overall conclusion is that, albeit noteworthy that networks trained on simple 2D images support a form of Gestalt grou** for some stimuli at the output layer, this ability does not seem to transfer to more complex features. Additionally, the fact that this grou** only occurs at the last layer suggests that networks learn fundamentally different perceptual properties than humans.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2023; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Convolutional Neural Networks Are Not Invariant to Translation, but They Can Learn to Be
Authors:
Valerio Biscione,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
When seeing a new object, humans can immediately recognize it across different retinal locations: the internal object representation is invariant to translation. It is commonly believed that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are architecturally invariant to translation thanks to the convolution and/or pooling operations they are endowed with. In fact, several studies have found that these netwo…
▽ More
When seeing a new object, humans can immediately recognize it across different retinal locations: the internal object representation is invariant to translation. It is commonly believed that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are architecturally invariant to translation thanks to the convolution and/or pooling operations they are endowed with. In fact, several studies have found that these networks systematically fail to recognise new objects on untrained locations. In this work, we test a wide variety of CNNs architectures showing how, apart from DenseNet-121, none of the models tested was architecturally invariant to translation. Nevertheless, all of them could learn to be invariant to translation. We show how this can be achieved by pretraining on ImageNet, and it is sometimes possible with much simpler data sets when all the items are fully translated across the input canvas. At the same time, this invariance can be disrupted by further training due to catastrophic forgetting/interference. These experiments show how pretraining a network on an environment with the right `latent' characteristics (a more naturalistic environment) can result in the network learning deep perceptual rules which would dramatically improve subsequent generalization.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Learning Online Visual Invariances for Novel Objects via Supervised and Self-Supervised Training
Authors:
Valerio Biscione,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
Humans can identify objects following various spatial transformations such as scale and viewpoint. This extends to novel objects, after a single presentation at a single pose, sometimes referred to as online invariance. CNNs have been proposed as a compelling model of human vision, but their ability to identify objects across transformations is typically tested on held-out samples of trained categ…
▽ More
Humans can identify objects following various spatial transformations such as scale and viewpoint. This extends to novel objects, after a single presentation at a single pose, sometimes referred to as online invariance. CNNs have been proposed as a compelling model of human vision, but their ability to identify objects across transformations is typically tested on held-out samples of trained categories after extensive data augmentation. This paper assesses whether standard CNNs can support human-like online invariance by training models to recognize images of synthetic 3D objects that undergo several transformations: rotation, scaling, translation, brightness, contrast, and viewpoint. Through the analysis of models' internal representations, we show that standard supervised CNNs trained on transformed objects can acquire strong invariances on novel classes even when trained with as few as 50 objects taken from 10 classes. This extended to a different dataset of photographs of real objects. We also show that these invariances can be acquired in a self-supervised way, through solving the same/different task. We suggest that this latter approach may be similar to how humans acquire invariances.
△ Less
Submitted 14 January, 2022; v1 submitted 4 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Generalisation in Neural Networks Does not Require Feature Overlap
Authors:
Jeff Mitchell,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
That shared features between train and test data are required for generalisation in artificial neural networks has been a common assumption of both proponents and critics of these models. Here, we show that convolutional architectures avoid this limitation by applying them to two well known challenges, based on learning the identity function and learning rules governing sequences of words. In each…
▽ More
That shared features between train and test data are required for generalisation in artificial neural networks has been a common assumption of both proponents and critics of these models. Here, we show that convolutional architectures avoid this limitation by applying them to two well known challenges, based on learning the identity function and learning rules governing sequences of words. In each case, successful performance on the test set requires generalising to features that were not present in the training data, which is typically not feasible for standard connectionist models. However, our experiments demonstrate that neural networks can succeed on such problems when they incorporate the weight sharing employed by convolutional architectures. In the image processing domain, such architectures are intended to reflect the symmetry under spatial translations of the natural world that such images depict. We discuss the role of symmetry in the two tasks and its connection to generalisation.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Are there any 'object detectors' in the hidden layers of CNNs trained to identify objects or scenes?
Authors:
Ella M. Gale,
Nicholas Martin,
Ryan Blything,
Anh Nguyen,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
Various methods of measuring unit selectivity have been developed with the aim of better understanding how neural networks work. But the different measures provide divergent estimates of selectivity, and this has led to different conclusions regarding the conditions in which selective object representations are learned and the functional relevance of these representations. In an attempt to better…
▽ More
Various methods of measuring unit selectivity have been developed with the aim of better understanding how neural networks work. But the different measures provide divergent estimates of selectivity, and this has led to different conclusions regarding the conditions in which selective object representations are learned and the functional relevance of these representations. In an attempt to better characterize object selectivity, we undertake a comparison of various selectivity measures on a large set of units in AlexNet, including localist selectivity, precision, class-conditional mean activity selectivity (CCMAS), network dissection,the human interpretation of activation maximization (AM) images, and standard signal-detection measures. We find that the different measures provide different estimates of object selectivity, with precision and CCMAS measures providing misleadingly high estimates. Indeed, the most selective units had a poor hit-rate or a high false-alarm rate (or both) in object classification, making them poor object detectors. We fail to find any units that are even remotely as selective as the 'grandmother cell' units reported in recurrent neural networks. In order to generalize these results, we compared selectivity measures on units in VGG-16 and GoogLeNet trained on the ImageNet or Places-365 datasets that have been described as 'object detectors'. Again, we find poor hit-rates and high false-alarm rates for object classification. We conclude that signal-detection measures provide a better assessment of single-unit selectivity compared to common alternative approaches, and that deep convolutional networks of image classification do not learn object detectors in their hidden layers.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
When and where do feed-forward neural networks learn localist representations?
Authors:
Ella M. Gale,
Nicolas Martin,
Jeffrey S. Bowers
Abstract:
According to parallel distributed processing (PDP) theory in psychology, neural networks (NN) learn distributed rather than interpretable localist representations. This view has been held so strongly that few researchers have analysed single units to determine if this assumption is correct. However, recent results from psychology, neuroscience and computer science have shown the occasional existen…
▽ More
According to parallel distributed processing (PDP) theory in psychology, neural networks (NN) learn distributed rather than interpretable localist representations. This view has been held so strongly that few researchers have analysed single units to determine if this assumption is correct. However, recent results from psychology, neuroscience and computer science have shown the occasional existence of local codes emerging in artificial and biological neural networks. In this paper, we undertake the first systematic survey of when local codes emerge in a feed-forward neural network, using generated input and output data with known qualities. We find that the number of local codes that emerge from a NN follows a well-defined distribution across the number of hidden layer neurons, with a peak determined by the size of input data, number of examples presented and the sparsity of input data. Using a 1-hot output code drastically decreases the number of local codes on the hidden layer. The number of emergent local codes increases with the percentage of dropout applied to the hidden layer, suggesting that the localist encoding may offer a resilience to noisy networks. This data suggests that localist coding can emerge from feed-forward PDP networks and suggests some of the conditions that may lead to interpretable localist representations in the cortex. The findings highlight how local codes should not be dismissed out of hand.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
