Dynamic Silos: Increased Modularity in Intra-organizational Communication Networks during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Authors:
Tiona Zuzul,
Emily Cox Pahnke,
Jonathan Larson,
Patrick Bourke,
Nicholas Caurvina,
Neha Parikh Shah,
Fereshteh Amini,
Jeffrey Weston,
Youngser Park,
Joshua Vogelstein,
Christopher White,
Carey E. Priebe
Abstract:
Workplace communications around the world were drastically altered by Covid-19, related work-from-home orders, and the rise of remote work. To understand these shifts, we analyzed aggregated, anonymized metadata from over 360 billion emails within 4,361 organizations worldwide. By comparing month-to-month and year-over-year metrics, we examined changes in network community structures over 24 month…
▽ More
Workplace communications around the world were drastically altered by Covid-19, related work-from-home orders, and the rise of remote work. To understand these shifts, we analyzed aggregated, anonymized metadata from over 360 billion emails within 4,361 organizations worldwide. By comparing month-to-month and year-over-year metrics, we examined changes in network community structures over 24 months before and after Covid-19. We also examined shifts across multiple communication media (email, instant messages, video calls, and calendaring software) within a single global organization, and compared them to communications shifts that were driven by changes in formal organizational structure. We found that, in 2020, organizations around the world became more siloed than in 2019, evidenced by increased modularity. This shift was concurrent with decreased stability within silos. Collectively, our analyses indicate that following the onset of Covid-19, employees began to shift more dynamically between subcommunities (teams, workgroups or functional areas). At the same time, once in a subcommunity, they limited their communication to other members of that community. We term these network changes dynamic silos. We provide initial insights into the meaning and implications of dynamic silos for the future of work.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2023; v1 submitted 1 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
Distance-based Positive and Unlabeled Learning for Ranking
Authors:
Hayden S. Helm,
Amitabh Basu,
Avanti Athreya,
Youngser Park,
Joshua T. Vogelstein,
Carey E. Priebe,
Michael Winding,
Marta Zlatic,
Albert Cardona,
Patrick Bourke,
Jonathan Larson,
Marah Abdin,
Piali Choudhury,
Weiwei Yang,
Christopher W. White
Abstract:
Learning to rank -- producing a ranked list of items specific to a query and with respect to a set of supervisory items -- is a problem of general interest. The setting we consider is one in which no analytic description of what constitutes a good ranking is available. Instead, we have a collection of representations and supervisory information consisting of a (target item, interesting items set)…
▽ More
Learning to rank -- producing a ranked list of items specific to a query and with respect to a set of supervisory items -- is a problem of general interest. The setting we consider is one in which no analytic description of what constitutes a good ranking is available. Instead, we have a collection of representations and supervisory information consisting of a (target item, interesting items set) pair. We demonstrate analytically, in simulation, and in real data examples that learning to rank via combining representations using an integer linear program is effective when the supervision is as light as "these few items are similar to your item of interest." While this nomination task is quite general, for specificity we present our methodology from the perspective of vertex nomination in graphs. The methodology described herein is model agnostic.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2022; v1 submitted 19 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
