-
On confidence intervals for precision matrices and the eigendecomposition of covariance matrices
Authors:
Teodora Popordanoska,
Aleksei Tiulpin,
Wacha Bounliphone,
Matthew B. Blaschko
Abstract:
The eigendecomposition of a matrix is the central procedure in probabilistic models based on matrix factorization, for instance principal component analysis and topic models. Quantifying the uncertainty of such a decomposition based on a finite sample estimate is essential to reasoning under uncertainty when employing such models. This paper tackles the challenge of computing confidence bounds on…
▽ More
The eigendecomposition of a matrix is the central procedure in probabilistic models based on matrix factorization, for instance principal component analysis and topic models. Quantifying the uncertainty of such a decomposition based on a finite sample estimate is essential to reasoning under uncertainty when employing such models. This paper tackles the challenge of computing confidence bounds on the individual entries of eigenvectors of a covariance matrix of fixed dimension. Moreover, we derive a method to bound the entries of the inverse covariance matrix, the so-called precision matrix. The assumptions behind our method are minimal and require that the covariance matrix exists, and its empirical estimator converges to the true covariance. We make use of the theory of U-statistics to bound the $L_2$ perturbation of the empirical covariance matrix. From this result, we obtain bounds on the eigenvectors using Weyl's theorem and the eigenvalue-eigenvector identity and we derive confidence intervals on the entries of the precision matrix using matrix inversion perturbation bounds. As an application of these results, we demonstrate a new statistical test, which allows us to test for non-zero values of the precision matrix. We compare this test to the well-known Fisher-z test for partial correlations, and demonstrate the soundness and scalability of the proposed statistical test, as well as its application to real-world data from medical and physics domains.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Fast Non-Parametric Tests of Relative Dependency and Similarity
Authors:
Wacha Bounliphone,
Eugene Belilovsky,
Arthur Tenenhaus,
Ioannis Antonoglou,
Arthur Gretton,
Matthew B. Blashcko
Abstract:
We introduce two novel non-parametric statistical hypothesis tests. The first test, called the relative test of dependency, enables us to determine whether one source variable is significantly more dependent on a first target variable or a second. Dependence is measured via the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC). The second test, called the relative test of similarity, is use to determi…
▽ More
We introduce two novel non-parametric statistical hypothesis tests. The first test, called the relative test of dependency, enables us to determine whether one source variable is significantly more dependent on a first target variable or a second. Dependence is measured via the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC). The second test, called the relative test of similarity, is use to determine which of the two samples from arbitrary distributions is significantly closer to a reference sample of interest and the relative measure of similarity is based on the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD). To construct these tests, we have used as our test statistics the difference of HSIC statistics and of MMD statistics, respectively. The resulting tests are consistent and unbiased, and have favorable convergence properties. The effectiveness of the relative dependency test is demonstrated on several real-world problems: we identify languages groups from a multilingual parallel corpus, and we show that tumor location is more dependent on gene expression than chromosome imbalance. We also demonstrate the performance of the relative test of similarity over a broad selection of model comparisons problems in deep generative models.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
A Test of Relative Similarity For Model Selection in Generative Models
Authors:
Wacha Bounliphone,
Eugene Belilovsky,
Matthew B. Blaschko,
Ioannis Antonoglou,
Arthur Gretton
Abstract:
Probabilistic generative models provide a powerful framework for representing data that avoids the expense of manual annotation typically needed by discriminative approaches. Model selection in this generative setting can be challenging, however, particularly when likelihoods are not easily accessible. To address this issue, we introduce a statistical test of relative similarity, which is used to…
▽ More
Probabilistic generative models provide a powerful framework for representing data that avoids the expense of manual annotation typically needed by discriminative approaches. Model selection in this generative setting can be challenging, however, particularly when likelihoods are not easily accessible. To address this issue, we introduce a statistical test of relative similarity, which is used to determine which of two models generates samples that are significantly closer to a real-world reference dataset of interest. We use as our test statistic the difference in maximum mean discrepancies (MMDs) between the reference dataset and each model dataset, and derive a powerful, low-variance test based on the joint asymptotic distribution of the MMDs between each reference-model pair. In experiments on deep generative models, including the variational auto-encoder and generative moment matching network, the tests provide a meaningful ranking of model performance as a function of parameter and training settings.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2016; v1 submitted 14 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
-
A low variance consistent test of relative dependency
Authors:
Wacha Bounliphone,
Arthur Gretton,
Arthur Tenenhaus,
Matthew Blaschko
Abstract:
We describe a novel non-parametric statistical hypothesis test of relative dependence between a source variable and two candidate target variables. Such a test enables us to determine whether one source variable is significantly more dependent on a first target variable or a second. Dependence is measured via the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), resulting in a pair of empirical depen…
▽ More
We describe a novel non-parametric statistical hypothesis test of relative dependence between a source variable and two candidate target variables. Such a test enables us to determine whether one source variable is significantly more dependent on a first target variable or a second. Dependence is measured via the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), resulting in a pair of empirical dependence measures (source-target 1, source-target 2). We test whether the first dependence measure is significantly larger than the second. Modeling the covariance between these HSIC statistics leads to a provably more powerful test than the construction of independent HSIC statistics by sub-sampling. The resulting test is consistent and unbiased, and (being based on U-statistics) has favorable convergence properties. The test can be computed in quadratic time, matching the computational complexity of standard empirical HSIC estimators. The effectiveness of the test is demonstrated on several real-world problems: we identify language groups from a multilingual corpus, and we prove that tumor location is more dependent on gene expression than chromosomal imbalances. Source code is available for download at https://github.com/wbounliphone/reldep.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2015; v1 submitted 15 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
