ECG Feature Importance Rankings: Cardiologists vs. Algorithms
Authors:
Temesgen Mehari,
Ashish Sundar,
Alen Bosnjakovic,
Peter Harris,
Steven E. Williams,
Axel Loewe,
Olaf Doessel,
Claudia Nagel,
Nils Strodthoff,
Philip J. Aston
Abstract:
Feature importance methods promise to provide a ranking of features according to importance for a given classification task. A wide range of methods exist but their rankings often disagree and they are inherently difficult to evaluate due to a lack of ground truth beyond synthetic datasets. In this work, we put feature importance methods to the test on real-world data in the domain of cardiology,…
▽ More
Feature importance methods promise to provide a ranking of features according to importance for a given classification task. A wide range of methods exist but their rankings often disagree and they are inherently difficult to evaluate due to a lack of ground truth beyond synthetic datasets. In this work, we put feature importance methods to the test on real-world data in the domain of cardiology, where we try to distinguish three specific pathologies from healthy subjects based on ECG features comparing to features used in cardiologists' decision rules as ground truth. Some methods generally performed well and others performed poorly, while some methods did well on some but not all of the problems considered.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
