-
Voronoi Candidates for Bayesian Optimization
Authors:
Nathan Wycoff,
John W. Smith,
Annie S. Booth,
Robert B. Gramacy
Abstract:
Bayesian optimization (BO) offers an elegant approach for efficiently optimizing black-box functions. However, acquisition criteria demand their own challenging inner-optimization, which can induce significant overhead. Many practical BO methods, particularly in high dimension, eschew a formal, continuous optimization of the acquisition function and instead search discretely over a finite set of s…
▽ More
Bayesian optimization (BO) offers an elegant approach for efficiently optimizing black-box functions. However, acquisition criteria demand their own challenging inner-optimization, which can induce significant overhead. Many practical BO methods, particularly in high dimension, eschew a formal, continuous optimization of the acquisition function and instead search discretely over a finite set of space-filling candidates. Here, we propose to use candidates which lie on the boundary of the Voronoi tessellation of the current design points, so they are equidistant to two or more of them. We discuss strategies for efficient implementation by directly sampling the Voronoi boundary without explicitly generating the tessellation, thus accommodating large designs in high dimension. On a battery of test problems optimized via Gaussian processes with expected improvement, our proposed approach significantly improves the execution time of a multi-start continuous search without a loss in accuracy.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Quality-Diversity Generative Sampling for Learning with Synthetic Data
Authors:
Allen Chang,
Matthew C. Fontaine,
Serena Booth,
Maja J. Matarić,
Stefanos Nikolaidis
Abstract:
Generative models can serve as surrogates for some real data sources by creating synthetic training datasets, but in doing so they may transfer biases to downstream tasks. We focus on protecting quality and diversity when generating synthetic training datasets. We propose quality-diversity generative sampling (QDGS), a framework for sampling data uniformly across a user-defined measure space, desp…
▽ More
Generative models can serve as surrogates for some real data sources by creating synthetic training datasets, but in doing so they may transfer biases to downstream tasks. We focus on protecting quality and diversity when generating synthetic training datasets. We propose quality-diversity generative sampling (QDGS), a framework for sampling data uniformly across a user-defined measure space, despite the data coming from a biased generator. QDGS is a model-agnostic framework that uses prompt guidance to optimize a quality objective across measures of diversity for synthetically generated data, without fine-tuning the generative model. Using balanced synthetic datasets generated by QDGS, we first debias classifiers trained on color-biased shape datasets as a proof-of-concept. By applying QDGS to facial data synthesis, we prompt for desired semantic concepts, such as skin tone and age, to create an intersectional dataset with a combined blend of visual features. Leveraging this balanced data for training classifiers improves fairness while maintaining accuracy on facial recognition benchmarks. Code available at: https://github.com/Cylumn/qd-generative-sampling.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2024; v1 submitted 21 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Learning Optimal Advantage from Preferences and Mistaking it for Reward
Authors:
W. Bradley Knox,
Stephane Hatgis-Kessell,
Sigurdur Orn Adalgeirsson,
Serena Booth,
Anca Dragan,
Peter Stone,
Scott Niekum
Abstract:
We consider algorithms for learning reward functions from human preferences over pairs of trajectory segments, as used in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Most recent work assumes that human preferences are generated based only upon the reward accrued within those segments, or their partial return. Recent work casts doubt on the validity of this assumption, proposing an alternati…
▽ More
We consider algorithms for learning reward functions from human preferences over pairs of trajectory segments, as used in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Most recent work assumes that human preferences are generated based only upon the reward accrued within those segments, or their partial return. Recent work casts doubt on the validity of this assumption, proposing an alternative preference model based upon regret. We investigate the consequences of assuming preferences are based upon partial return when they actually arise from regret. We argue that the learned function is an approximation of the optimal advantage function, $\hat{A^*_r}$, not a reward function. We find that if a specific pitfall is addressed, this incorrect assumption is not particularly harmful, resulting in a highly shaped reward function. Nonetheless, this incorrect usage of $\hat{A^*_r}$ is less desirable than the appropriate and simpler approach of greedy maximization of $\hat{A^*_r}$. From the perspective of the regret preference model, we also provide a clearer interpretation of fine tuning contemporary large language models with RLHF. This paper overall provides insight regarding why learning under the partial return preference model tends to work so well in practice, despite it conforming poorly to how humans give preferences.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Sex-based Disparities in Brain Aging: A Focus on Parkinson's Disease
Authors:
Iman Beheshti,
Samuel Booth,
Ji Hyun Ko
Abstract:
PD is linked to faster brain aging. Sex is recognized as an important factor in PD, such that males are twice as likely as females to have the disease and have more severe symptoms and a faster progression rate. Despite previous research, there remains a significant gap in understanding the function of sex in the process of brain aging in PD patients. The T1-weighted MRI-driven brain-predicted age…
▽ More
PD is linked to faster brain aging. Sex is recognized as an important factor in PD, such that males are twice as likely as females to have the disease and have more severe symptoms and a faster progression rate. Despite previous research, there remains a significant gap in understanding the function of sex in the process of brain aging in PD patients. The T1-weighted MRI-driven brain-predicted age difference was computed in a group of 373 PD patients from the PPMI database using a robust brain-age estimation framework that was trained on 949 healthy subjects. Linear regression models were used to investigate the association between brain-PAD and clinical variables in PD, stratified by sex. All female PD patients were used in the correlational analysis while the same number of males were selected based on propensity score matching method considering age, education level, age of symptom onset, and clinical symptom severity. Despite both patient groups being matched for demographics, motor and non-motor symptoms, it was observed that males with Parkinson's disease exhibited a significantly higher mean brain age-delta than their female counterparts . In the propensity score-matched PD male group, brain-PAD was found to be associated with a decline in general cognition, a worse degree of sleep behavior disorder, reduced visuospatial acuity, and caudate atrophy. Conversely, no significant links were observed between these factors and brain-PAD in the PD female group.
△ Less
Submitted 18 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
SynthRAD2023 Grand Challenge dataset: generating synthetic CT for radiotherapy
Authors:
Adrian Thummerer,
Erik van der Bijl,
Arthur Jr Galapon,
Joost JC Verhoeff,
Johannes A Langendijk,
Stefan Both,
Cornelis,
AT van den Berg,
Matteo Maspero
Abstract:
Purpose: Medical imaging has become increasingly important in diagnosing and treating oncological patients, particularly in radiotherapy. Recent advances in synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generation have increased interest in public challenges to provide data and evaluation metrics for comparing different approaches openly. This paper describes a dataset of brain and pelvis computed tomograph…
▽ More
Purpose: Medical imaging has become increasingly important in diagnosing and treating oncological patients, particularly in radiotherapy. Recent advances in synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generation have increased interest in public challenges to provide data and evaluation metrics for comparing different approaches openly. This paper describes a dataset of brain and pelvis computed tomography (CT) images with rigidly registered CBCT and MRI images to facilitate the development and evaluation of sCT generation for radiotherapy planning.
Acquisition and validation methods: The dataset consists of CT, CBCT, and MRI of 540 brains and 540 pelvic radiotherapy patients from three Dutch university medical centers. Subjects' ages ranged from 3 to 93 years, with a mean age of 60. Various scanner models and acquisition settings were used across patients from the three data-providing centers. Details are available in CSV files provided with the datasets.
Data format and usage notes: The data is available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7260705) under the SynthRAD2023 collection. The images for each subject are available in nifti format.
Potential applications: This dataset will enable the evaluation and development of image synthesis algorithms for radiotherapy purposes on a realistic multi-center dataset with varying acquisition protocols. Synthetic CT generation has numerous applications in radiation therapy, including diagnosis, treatment planning, treatment monitoring, and surgical planning.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Models of human preference for learning reward functions
Authors:
W. Bradley Knox,
Stephane Hatgis-Kessell,
Serena Booth,
Scott Niekum,
Peter Stone,
Alessandro Allievi
Abstract:
The utility of reinforcement learning is limited by the alignment of reward functions with the interests of human stakeholders. One promising method for alignment is to learn the reward function from human-generated preferences between pairs of trajectory segments, a type of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). These human preferences are typically assumed to be informed solely by pa…
▽ More
The utility of reinforcement learning is limited by the alignment of reward functions with the interests of human stakeholders. One promising method for alignment is to learn the reward function from human-generated preferences between pairs of trajectory segments, a type of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). These human preferences are typically assumed to be informed solely by partial return, the sum of rewards along each segment. We find this assumption to be flawed and propose modeling human preferences instead as informed by each segment's regret, a measure of a segment's deviation from optimal decision-making. Given infinitely many preferences generated according to regret, we prove that we can identify a reward function equivalent to the reward function that generated those preferences, and we prove that the previous partial return model lacks this identifiability property in multiple contexts. We empirically show that our proposed regret preference model outperforms the partial return preference model with finite training data in otherwise the same setting. Additionally, we find that our proposed regret preference model better predicts real human preferences and also learns reward functions from these preferences that lead to policies that are better human-aligned. Overall, this work establishes that the choice of preference model is impactful, and our proposed regret preference model provides an improvement upon a core assumption of recent research. We have open sourced our experimental code, the human preferences dataset we gathered, and our training and preference elicitation interfaces for gathering a such a dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2023; v1 submitted 5 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Triangulation candidates for Bayesian optimization
Authors:
Robert B. Gramacy,
Annie Sauer,
Nathan Wycoff
Abstract:
Bayesian optimization involves "inner optimization" over a new-data acquisition criterion which is non-convex/highly multi-modal, may be non-differentiable, or may otherwise thwart local numerical optimizers. In such cases it is common to replace continuous search with a discrete one over random candidates. Here we propose using candidates based on a Delaunay triangulation of the existing input de…
▽ More
Bayesian optimization involves "inner optimization" over a new-data acquisition criterion which is non-convex/highly multi-modal, may be non-differentiable, or may otherwise thwart local numerical optimizers. In such cases it is common to replace continuous search with a discrete one over random candidates. Here we propose using candidates based on a Delaunay triangulation of the existing input design. We detail the construction of these "tricands" and demonstrate empirically how they outperform both numerically optimized acquisitions and random candidate-based alternatives, and are well-suited for hybrid schemes, on benchmark synthetic and real simulation experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2022; v1 submitted 14 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
The Irrationality of Neural Rationale Models
Authors:
Yiming Zheng,
Serena Booth,
Julie Shah,
Yilun Zhou
Abstract:
Neural rationale models are popular for interpretable predictions of NLP tasks. In these, a selector extracts segments of the input text, called rationales, and passes these segments to a classifier for prediction. Since the rationale is the only information accessible to the classifier, it is plausibly defined as the explanation. Is such a characterization unconditionally correct? In this paper,…
▽ More
Neural rationale models are popular for interpretable predictions of NLP tasks. In these, a selector extracts segments of the input text, called rationales, and passes these segments to a classifier for prediction. Since the rationale is the only information accessible to the classifier, it is plausibly defined as the explanation. Is such a characterization unconditionally correct? In this paper, we argue to the contrary, with both philosophical perspectives and empirical evidence suggesting that rationale models are, perhaps, less rational and interpretable than expected. We call for more rigorous and comprehensive evaluations of these models to ensure desired properties of interpretability are indeed achieved. The code can be found at https://github.com/yimingz89/Neural-Rationale-Analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2022; v1 submitted 14 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Machine Learning Practices Outside Big Tech: How Resource Constraints Challenge Responsible Development
Authors:
Aspen Hopkins,
Serena Booth
Abstract:
Practitioners from diverse occupations and backgrounds are increasingly using machine learning (ML) methods. Nonetheless, studies on ML Practitioners typically draw populations from Big Tech and academia, as researchers have easier access to these communities. Through this selection bias, past research often excludes the broader, lesser-resourced ML community -- for example, practitioners working…
▽ More
Practitioners from diverse occupations and backgrounds are increasingly using machine learning (ML) methods. Nonetheless, studies on ML Practitioners typically draw populations from Big Tech and academia, as researchers have easier access to these communities. Through this selection bias, past research often excludes the broader, lesser-resourced ML community -- for example, practitioners working at startups, at non-tech companies, and in the public sector. These practitioners share many of the same ML development difficulties and ethical conundrums as their Big Tech counterparts; however, their experiences are subject to additional under-studied challenges stemming from deploying ML with limited resources, increased existential risk, and absent access to in-house research teams. We contribute a qualitative analysis of 17 interviews with stakeholders from organizations which are less represented in prior studies. We uncover a number of tensions which are introduced or exacerbated by these organizations' resource constraints -- tensions between privacy and ubiquity, resource management and performance optimization, and access and monopolization. Increased academic focus on these practitioners can facilitate a more holistic understanding of ML limitations, and so is useful for prescribing a research agenda to facilitate responsible ML development for all.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?
Authors:
Yilun Zhou,
Serena Booth,
Marco Tulio Ribeiro,
Julie Shah
Abstract:
Feature attribution methods are popular in interpretable machine learning. These methods compute the attribution of each input feature to represent its importance, but there is no consensus on the definition of "attribution", leading to many competing methods with little systematic evaluation, complicated in particular by the lack of ground truth attribution. To address this, we propose a dataset…
▽ More
Feature attribution methods are popular in interpretable machine learning. These methods compute the attribution of each input feature to represent its importance, but there is no consensus on the definition of "attribution", leading to many competing methods with little systematic evaluation, complicated in particular by the lack of ground truth attribution. To address this, we propose a dataset modification procedure to induce such ground truth. Using this procedure, we evaluate three common methods: saliency maps, rationales, and attentions. We identify several deficiencies and add new perspectives to the growing body of evidence questioning the correctness and reliability of these methods applied on datasets in the wild. We further discuss possible avenues for remedy and recommend new attribution methods to be tested against ground truth before deployment. The code is available at https://github.com/YilunZhou/feature-attribution-evaluation
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2021; v1 submitted 27 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
RoCUS: Robot Controller Understanding via Sampling
Authors:
Yilun Zhou,
Serena Booth,
Nadia Figueroa,
Julie Shah
Abstract:
As robots are deployed in complex situations, engineers and end users must develop a holistic understanding of their behaviors, capabilities, and limitations. Some behaviors are directly optimized by the objective function. They often include success rate, completion time or energy consumption. Other behaviors -- e.g., collision avoidance, trajectory smoothness or motion legibility -- are typicall…
▽ More
As robots are deployed in complex situations, engineers and end users must develop a holistic understanding of their behaviors, capabilities, and limitations. Some behaviors are directly optimized by the objective function. They often include success rate, completion time or energy consumption. Other behaviors -- e.g., collision avoidance, trajectory smoothness or motion legibility -- are typically emergent but equally important for safe and trustworthy deployment. Designing an objective which optimizes every aspect of robot behavior is hard. In this paper, we advocate for systematic analysis of a wide array of behaviors for holistic understanding of robot controllers and, to this end, propose a framework, RoCUS, which uses Bayesian posterior sampling to find situations where the robot controller exhibits user-specified behaviors, such as highly jerky motions. We use RoCUS to analyze three controller classes (deep learning models, rapidly exploring random trees and dynamical system formulations) on two domains (2D navigation and a 7 degree-of-freedom arm reaching), and uncover insights to further our understanding of these controllers and ultimately improve their designs.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2021; v1 submitted 25 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Bayes-TrEx: a Bayesian Sampling Approach to Model Transparency by Example
Authors:
Serena Booth,
Yilun Zhou,
Ankit Shah,
Julie Shah
Abstract:
Post-hoc explanation methods are gaining popularity for interpreting, understanding, and debugging neural networks. Most analyses using such methods explain decisions in response to inputs drawn from the test set. However, the test set may have few examples that trigger some model behaviors, such as high-confidence failures or ambiguous classifications. To address these challenges, we introduce a…
▽ More
Post-hoc explanation methods are gaining popularity for interpreting, understanding, and debugging neural networks. Most analyses using such methods explain decisions in response to inputs drawn from the test set. However, the test set may have few examples that trigger some model behaviors, such as high-confidence failures or ambiguous classifications. To address these challenges, we introduce a flexible model inspection framework: Bayes-TrEx. Given a data distribution, Bayes-TrEx finds in-distribution examples with a specified prediction confidence. We demonstrate several use cases of Bayes-TrEx, including revealing highly confident (mis)classifications, visualizing class boundaries via ambiguous examples, understanding novel-class extrapolation behavior, and exposing neural network overconfidence. We use Bayes-TrEx to study classifiers trained on CLEVR, MNIST, and Fashion-MNIST, and we show that this framework enables more flexible holistic model analysis than just inspecting the test set. Code is available at https://github.com/serenabooth/Bayes-TrEx.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2020; v1 submitted 19 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Sampling Prediction-Matching Examples in Neural Networks: A Probabilistic Programming Approach
Authors:
Serena Booth,
Ankit Shah,
Yilun Zhou,
Julie Shah
Abstract:
Though neural network models demonstrate impressive performance, we do not understand exactly how these black-box models make individual predictions. This drawback has led to substantial research devoted to understand these models in areas such as robustness, interpretability, and generalization ability. In this paper, we consider the problem of exploring the prediction level sets of a classifier…
▽ More
Though neural network models demonstrate impressive performance, we do not understand exactly how these black-box models make individual predictions. This drawback has led to substantial research devoted to understand these models in areas such as robustness, interpretability, and generalization ability. In this paper, we consider the problem of exploring the prediction level sets of a classifier using probabilistic programming. We define a prediction level set to be the set of examples for which the predictor has the same specified prediction confidence with respect to some arbitrary data distribution. Notably, our sampling-based method does not require the classifier to be differentiable, making it compatible with arbitrary classifiers. As a specific instantiation, if we take the classifier to be a neural network and the data distribution to be that of the training data, we can obtain examples that will result in specified predictions by the neural network. We demonstrate this technique with experiments on a synthetic dataset and MNIST. Such level sets in classification may facilitate human understanding of classification behaviors.
△ Less
Submitted 9 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Panphasia: a user guide
Authors:
Adrian Jenkins,
Stephen Booth
Abstract:
We make a very large realisation of a Gaussian white noise field, called PANPHASIA, public by releasing software that computes this field. Panphasia is designed specifically for setting up Gaussian initial conditions for cosmological simulations and resimulations of structure formation. We make available both software to compute the field itself and codes to illustrate applications including a mod…
▽ More
We make a very large realisation of a Gaussian white noise field, called PANPHASIA, public by releasing software that computes this field. Panphasia is designed specifically for setting up Gaussian initial conditions for cosmological simulations and resimulations of structure formation. We make available both software to compute the field itself and codes to illustrate applications including a modified version of a public serial initial conditions generator. We document the software and present the results of a few basic tests of the field. The properties and method of construction of Panphasia are described in full in a companion paper Jenkins 2013.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
