-
Design and Implementation of an Heuristic-Enhanced Branch-and-Bound Solver for MILP
Authors:
Warley Almeida Silva,
Federico Bobbio,
Flore Caye,
Defeng Liu,
Justine Pepin,
Carl Perreault-Lafleur,
William St-Arnaud
Abstract:
We present a solver for Mixed Integer Programs (MIP) developed for the MIP competition 2022. Given the 10 minutes bound on the computational time established by the rules of the competition, our method focuses on finding a feasible solution and improves it through a Branch-and-Bound algorithm. Another rule of the competition allows the use of up to 8 threads. Each thread is given a different prima…
▽ More
We present a solver for Mixed Integer Programs (MIP) developed for the MIP competition 2022. Given the 10 minutes bound on the computational time established by the rules of the competition, our method focuses on finding a feasible solution and improves it through a Branch-and-Bound algorithm. Another rule of the competition allows the use of up to 8 threads. Each thread is given a different primal heuristic, which has been tuned by hyper-parameters, to find a feasible solution. In every thread, once a feasible solution is found, we stop and we use a Branch-and-Bound method, embedded with local search heuristics, to ameliorate the incumbent solution. The three variants of the Diving heuristic that we implemented manage to find a feasible solution for 10 instances of the training data set. These heuristics are the best performing among the heuristics that we implemented. Our Branch-and-Bound algorithm is effective on a small portion of the training data set, and it manages to find an incumbent feasible solution for an instance that we could not solve with the Diving heuristics. Overall, our combined methods, when implemented with extensive computational power, can solve 11 of the 19 problems of the training data set within the time limit. Our submission to the MIP competition was awarded the "Outstanding Student Submission" honorable mention.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2022; v1 submitted 3 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Capacity Variation in the Many-to-one Stable Matching
Authors:
Federico Bobbio,
Margarida Carvalho,
Andrea Lodi,
Alfredo Torrico
Abstract:
The many-to-one stable matching problem provides the fundamental abstraction of several real-world matching markets such as school choice and hospital-resident allocation. The agents on both sides are often referred to as residents and hospitals. The classical setup assumes that the agents rank the opposite side and that the capacities of the hospitals are fixed. It is known that increasing the ca…
▽ More
The many-to-one stable matching problem provides the fundamental abstraction of several real-world matching markets such as school choice and hospital-resident allocation. The agents on both sides are often referred to as residents and hospitals. The classical setup assumes that the agents rank the opposite side and that the capacities of the hospitals are fixed. It is known that increasing the capacity of a single hospital improves the residents' final allocation. On the other hand, reducing the capacity of a single hospital deteriorates the residents' allocation. In this work, we study the computational complexity of finding the optimal variation of hospitals' capacities that leads to the best outcome for the residents, subject to stability and a capacity variation constraint. First, we show that the decision problem of finding the optimal capacity expansion is NP-complete and the corresponding optimization problem is inapproximable within a certain factor. This result holds under strict and complete preferences, and even if we allocate extra capacities to disjoint sets of hospitals. Second, we obtain analogous computational complexity results for the problem of capacity reduction. Finally, we study the variants of these problems when the goal is to maximize the size of the final matching under incomplete preference lists.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
The First AI4TSP Competition: Learning to Solve Stochastic Routing Problems
Authors:
Laurens Bliek,
Paulo da Costa,
Reza Refaei Afshar,
Yingqian Zhang,
Tom Catshoek,
Daniël Vos,
Sicco Verwer,
Fynn Schmitt-Ulms,
André Hottung,
Tapan Shah,
Meinolf Sellmann,
Kevin Tierney,
Carl Perreault-Lafleur,
Caroline Leboeuf,
Federico Bobbio,
Justine Pepin,
Warley Almeida Silva,
Ricardo Gama,
Hugo L. Fernandes,
Martin Zaefferer,
Manuel López-Ibáñez,
Ekhine Irurozki
Abstract:
This paper reports on the first international competition on AI for the traveling salesman problem (TSP) at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021 (IJCAI-21). The TSP is one of the classical combinatorial optimization problems, with many variants inspired by real-world applications. This first competition asked the participants to develop algorithms to solve a time-depe…
▽ More
This paper reports on the first international competition on AI for the traveling salesman problem (TSP) at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021 (IJCAI-21). The TSP is one of the classical combinatorial optimization problems, with many variants inspired by real-world applications. This first competition asked the participants to develop algorithms to solve a time-dependent orienteering problem with stochastic weights and time windows (TD-OPSWTW). It focused on two types of learning approaches: surrogate-based optimization and deep reinforcement learning. In this paper, we describe the problem, the setup of the competition, the winning methods, and give an overview of the results. The winning methods described in this work have advanced the state-of-the-art in using AI for stochastic routing problems. Overall, by organizing this competition we have introduced routing problems as an interesting problem setting for AI researchers. The simulator of the problem has been made open-source and can be used by other researchers as a benchmark for new AI methods.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Capacity Planning in Stable Matching
Authors:
Federico Bobbio,
Margarida Carvalho,
Andrea Lodi,
Ignacio Rios,
Alfredo Torrico
Abstract:
We introduce the problem of jointly increasing school capacities and finding a student-optimal assignment in the expanded market. Due to the impossibility of efficiently solving the problem with classical methods, we generalize existent mathematical programming formulations of stability constraints to our setting, most of which result in integer quadratically-constrained programs. In addition, we…
▽ More
We introduce the problem of jointly increasing school capacities and finding a student-optimal assignment in the expanded market. Due to the impossibility of efficiently solving the problem with classical methods, we generalize existent mathematical programming formulations of stability constraints to our setting, most of which result in integer quadratically-constrained programs. In addition, we propose a novel mixed-integer linear programming formulation that is exponentially large on the problem size. We show that its stability constraints can be separated by exploiting the objective function, leading to an effective cutting-plane algorithm. We conclude the theoretical analysis of the problem by discussing some mechanism properties. On the computational side, we evaluate the performance of our approaches in a detailed study, and we find that our cutting-plane method outperforms our generalization of existing mixed-integer approaches. We also propose two heuristics that are effective for large instances of the problem. Finally, we use the Chilean school choice system data to demonstrate the impact of capacity planning under stability conditions. Our results show that each additional seat can benefit multiple students and that we can effectively target the assignment of previously unassigned students or improve the assignment of several students through improvement chains. These insights empower the decision-maker in tuning the matching algorithm to provide a fair application-oriented solution.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2023; v1 submitted 2 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
