-
MAESTRO-X: Distributed Orchestration of Rotary-Wing UAV-Relay Swarms
Authors:
Bharath Keshavamurthy,
Matthew Bliss,
Nicolò Michelusi
Abstract:
This work details a scalable framework to orchestrate a swarm of rotary-wing UAVs serving as cellular relays to facilitate beyond line-of-sight connectivity and traffic offloading for ground users. First, a Multiscale Adaptive Energy-conscious Scheduling and TRajectory Optimization (MAESTRO) framework is developed for a single UAV. Aiming to minimize the time-averaged latency to serve user request…
▽ More
This work details a scalable framework to orchestrate a swarm of rotary-wing UAVs serving as cellular relays to facilitate beyond line-of-sight connectivity and traffic offloading for ground users. First, a Multiscale Adaptive Energy-conscious Scheduling and TRajectory Optimization (MAESTRO) framework is developed for a single UAV. Aiming to minimize the time-averaged latency to serve user requests, subject to an average UAV power constraint, it is shown that the optimization problem can be cast as a semi-Markov decision process, and exhibits a multiscale structure: outer actions on radial wait velocities and terminal service positions minimize the long-term delay-power trade-off, optimized via value iteration; given these outer actions, inner actions on angular wait velocities and service trajectories minimize a short-term delay-energy cost. A novel hierarchical competitive swarm optimization scheme is developed in the inner optimization, to devise high-resolution trajectories via iterative pair-wise updates. Next, MAESTRO is eXtended to UAV swarms (MAESTRO-X) via scalable policy replication: enabled by a decentralized command-and-control network, the optimal single-agent policy is augmented with spread maximization, consensus-driven conflict resolution, adaptive frequency reuse, and piggybacking. Numerical evaluations show that, for user requests of 10 Mbits, generated according to a Poisson arrival process with rate 0.2 req/min/UAV, single-agent MAESTRO offers 3.8x faster service than a high-altitude platform and 29% faster than a static UAV deployment; moreover, for a swarm of 3 UAV-relays, MAESTRO-X delivers data payloads 4.7x faster than a successive convex approximation scheme; and remarkably, a single UAV optimized via MAESTRO outclasses 3 UAVs optimized via a deep-Q network by 38%.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2023; v1 submitted 2 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Power-Constrained Trajectory Optimization for Wireless UAV Relays with Random Requests
Authors:
Matthew Bliss,
Nicolò Michelusi
Abstract:
This paper studies the adaptive trajectory design of a rotary-wing UAV serving as a relay between ground nodes dispersed in a circular cell and generating uplink data transmissions randomly according to a Poisson process, and a central base station. We seek to minimize the expected average communication delay to service the data transmission requests, subject to an average power constraint on the…
▽ More
This paper studies the adaptive trajectory design of a rotary-wing UAV serving as a relay between ground nodes dispersed in a circular cell and generating uplink data transmissions randomly according to a Poisson process, and a central base station. We seek to minimize the expected average communication delay to service the data transmission requests, subject to an average power constraint on the mobility of the UAV. The problem is cast as a semi-Markov decision process, and it is shown that the policy exhibits a two-scale structure, which can be efficiently optimized: in the outer decision, upon starting a communication phase, and given its current radius, the UAV selects a target end radius position so as to optimally balance a trade-off between average long-term communication delay and power consumption; in the inner decision, the UAV selects its trajectory between the start radius and the selected end radius, so as to greedily minimize the delay and energy consumption to serve the current request. Numerical evaluations show that, during waiting phases, the UAV circles at some optimal radius at the most energy efficient speed, until a new request is received. Lastly, the expected average communication delay and power consumption of the optimal policy is compared to that of several heuristics, demonstrating a reduction in latency by over 50% and 20%, respectively, compared to static and mobile heuristic schemes.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2020; v1 submitted 21 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Trajectory Optimization for Rotary-Wing UAVs in Wireless Networks with Random Requests
Authors:
Matthew Bliss,
Nicolò Michelusi
Abstract:
This paper studies the trajectory optimization problem in a scenario where a single rotary-wing UAV acts as a relay of data payloads for downlink transmission requests generated randomly by two ground nodes (GNs) in a wireless network. The goal is to optimize the UAV trajectory in order to minimize the expected average communication delay to serve these random requests. It is shown that the proble…
▽ More
This paper studies the trajectory optimization problem in a scenario where a single rotary-wing UAV acts as a relay of data payloads for downlink transmission requests generated randomly by two ground nodes (GNs) in a wireless network. The goal is to optimize the UAV trajectory in order to minimize the expected average communication delay to serve these random requests. It is shown that the problem can be cast as a semi-Markov decision process (SMDP), and the resulting minimization problem is solved via multi-chain policy iteration. The optimality of a two-scale optimization approach is proved: the optimal trajectory in the communication phase greedily minimizes the communication delay of the current request while moving between the current start position and a target end position (inner optimization); the end positions are selected to minimize the expected average long-term delay in the SMDP (outer optimization). Numerical simulations show that the expected average delay is minimized when the UAV moves towards the geometric center of the GNs during phases in which it is not actively servicing transmission requests, and demonstrate significant improvements over sensible heuristics. Finally, it is revealed that the optimal end positions of communication phases become increasingly independent of the data payload, for large data payload values.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2019; v1 submitted 5 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
