Comparison of 1D and 3D Models for the Estimation of Fractional Flow Reserve
Authors:
P. J. Blanco,
C. A. Bulant,
L. O. Müller,
G. D. Maso Talou,
C. Guedes Bezerra,
P. L. Lemos,
R. A. Feijóo
Abstract:
In this work we propose to validate the predictive capabilities of one-dimensional (1D) blood flow models with full three-dimensional (3D) models in the context of patient-specific coronary hemodynamics in hyperemic conditions. Such conditions mimic the state of coronary circulation during the acquisition of the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) index. Demonstrating that 1D models accurately reproduce…
▽ More
In this work we propose to validate the predictive capabilities of one-dimensional (1D) blood flow models with full three-dimensional (3D) models in the context of patient-specific coronary hemodynamics in hyperemic conditions. Such conditions mimic the state of coronary circulation during the acquisition of the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) index. Demonstrating that 1D models accurately reproduce FFR estimates obtained with 3D models has implications in the approach to computationally estimate FFR. To this end, a sample of 20 patients was employed from which 29 3D geometries of arterial trees were constructed, 9 obtained from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and 20 from intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS). For each 3D arterial model, a 1D counterpart was generated. The same outflow and inlet pressure boundary conditions were applied to both (3D and 1D) models. In the 1D setting, pressure losses at stenoses and bifurcations were accounted for through specific lumped models. Comparisons between 1D models ($\text{FFR}_{\text{1D}}$) and 3D models ($\text{FFR}_{\text{3D}}$) were performed in terms of predicted $\text{FFR}$ value. Compared to $\text{FFR}_{\text{3D}}$, $\text{FFR}_{\text{1D}}$ resulted with a difference of 0.00$\pm$0.03 and overall predictive capability AUC, Acc, Spe, Sen, PPV and NPV of 0.97, 0.98, 0.90, 0.99, 0.82, and 0.99, with an FFR threshold of 0.8. We conclude that inexpensive $\text{FFR}_{\text{1D}}$ simulations can be reliably used as a surrogate of demanding $\text{FFR}_{\text{3D}}$ computations.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
Towards a glaucoma risk index based on simulated hemodynamics from fundus images
Authors:
José Ignacio Orlando,
João Barbosa Breda,
Karel van Keer,
Matthew B. Blaschko,
Pablo J. Blanco,
Carlos A. Bulant
Abstract:
Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible but preventable blindness in the world. Its major treatable risk factor is the intra-ocular pressure, although other biomarkers are being explored to improve the understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease. It has been recently observed that glaucoma induces changes in the ocular hemodynamics. However, its effects on the functional behavior of…
▽ More
Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible but preventable blindness in the world. Its major treatable risk factor is the intra-ocular pressure, although other biomarkers are being explored to improve the understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease. It has been recently observed that glaucoma induces changes in the ocular hemodynamics. However, its effects on the functional behavior of the retinal arterioles have not been studied yet. In this paper we propose a first approach for characterizing those changes using computational hemodynamics. The retinal blood flow is simulated using a 0D model for a steady, incompressible non Newtonian fluid in rigid domains. The simulation is performed on patient-specific arterial trees extracted from fundus images. We also propose a novel feature representation technique to comprise the outcomes of the simulation stage into a fixed length feature vector that can be used for classification studies. Our experiments on a new database of fundus images show that our approach is able to capture representative changes in the hemodynamics of glaucomatous patients. Code and data are publicly available in https://ignaciorlando.github.io.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2018; v1 submitted 25 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
