-
Schelling Games with Continuous Types
Authors:
Davide Bilò,
Vittorio Bilò,
Michelle Döring,
Pascal Lenzner,
Louise Molitor,
Jonas Schmidt
Abstract:
In most major cities and urban areas, residents form homogeneous neighborhoods along ethnic or socioeconomic lines. This phenomenon is widely known as residential segregation and has been studied extensively. Fifty years ago, Schelling proposed a landmark model that explains residential segregation in an elegant agent-based way. A recent stream of papers analyzed Schelling's model using game-theor…
▽ More
In most major cities and urban areas, residents form homogeneous neighborhoods along ethnic or socioeconomic lines. This phenomenon is widely known as residential segregation and has been studied extensively. Fifty years ago, Schelling proposed a landmark model that explains residential segregation in an elegant agent-based way. A recent stream of papers analyzed Schelling's model using game-theoretic approaches. However, all these works considered models with a given number of discrete types modeling different ethnic groups.
We focus on segregation caused by non-categorical attributes, such as household income or position in a political left-right spectrum. For this, we consider agent types that can be represented as real numbers. This opens up a great variety of reasonable models and, as a proof of concept, we focus on several natural candidates. In particular, we consider agents that evaluate their location by the average type-difference or the maximum type-difference to their neighbors, or by having a certain tolerance range for type-values of neighboring agents. We study the existence and computation of equilibria and provide bounds on the Price of Anarchy and Stability. Also, we present simulation results that compare our models and shed light on the obtained equilibria for our variants.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Tolerance is Necessary for Stability: Single-Peaked Swap Schelling Games
Authors:
Davide Bilò,
Vittorio Bilò,
Pascal Lenzner,
Louise Molitor
Abstract:
Residential segregation in metropolitan areas is a phenomenon that can be observed all over the world. Recently, this was investigated via game-theoretic models. There, selfish agents of two types are equipped with a monotone utility function that ensures higher utility if an agent has more same-type neighbors. The agents strategically choose their location on a given graph that serves as resident…
▽ More
Residential segregation in metropolitan areas is a phenomenon that can be observed all over the world. Recently, this was investigated via game-theoretic models. There, selfish agents of two types are equipped with a monotone utility function that ensures higher utility if an agent has more same-type neighbors. The agents strategically choose their location on a given graph that serves as residential area to maximize their utility. However, sociological polls suggest that real-world agents are actually favoring mixed-type neighborhoods, and hence should be modeled via non-monotone utility functions. To address this, we study Swap Schelling Games with single-peaked utility functions. Our main finding is that tolerance, i.e., agents favoring fifty-fifty neighborhoods or being in the minority, is necessary for equilibrium existence on almost regular or bipartite graphs. Regarding the quality of equilibria, we derive (almost) tight bounds on the Price of Anarchy and the Price of Stability. In particular, we show that the latter is constant on bipartite and almost regular graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2022; v1 submitted 26 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
The Impact of Selfish Behavior in Load Balancing Games
Authors:
Vittorio Bilò,
Cosimo Vinci
Abstract:
To what extent does the structure of the players' strategy space influence the efficiency of decentralized solutions in congestion games? In this work, we investigate whether better performance are possible when restricting to load balancing games in which players can only choose among single resources. We consider three different solutions concepts, namely, approximate pure Nash equilibria, appro…
▽ More
To what extent does the structure of the players' strategy space influence the efficiency of decentralized solutions in congestion games? In this work, we investigate whether better performance are possible when restricting to load balancing games in which players can only choose among single resources. We consider three different solutions concepts, namely, approximate pure Nash equilibria, approximate one-round walks generated by selfish players aiming at minimizing their personal cost and approximate one-round walks generated by cooperative players aiming at minimizing the marginal increase in the sum of the players' personal costs. The last two concepts can be interpreted as solutions of greedy online algorithms for the related resource selection problem. We show that, under fairly general latency functions on the resources, better bounds cannot be achieved if players are either weighted or asymmetric. On the positive side, we prove that, under mild assumptions on the latency functions, improvements on the performance of approximate pure Nash equilibria are possible for load balancing games with weighted and symmetric players in the case of identical resources. We also design lower bounds on the performance of one-round walks in load balancing games with unweighted players and identical resources.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Data-Driven Models of Selfish Routing: Why Price of Anarchy Does Depend on Network Topology
Authors:
Francisco Benita,
Vittorio Bilò,
Barnabé Monnot,
Georgios Piliouras,
Cosimo Vinci
Abstract:
We investigate traffic routing both from the perspective of theory as well as real world data. First, we introduce a new type of games: $θ$-free flow games. Here, commuters only consider, in their strategy sets, paths whose free-flow costs (informally their lengths) are within a small multiplicative $(1+θ)$ constant of the optimal free-flow cost path connecting their source and destination, where…
▽ More
We investigate traffic routing both from the perspective of theory as well as real world data. First, we introduce a new type of games: $θ$-free flow games. Here, commuters only consider, in their strategy sets, paths whose free-flow costs (informally their lengths) are within a small multiplicative $(1+θ)$ constant of the optimal free-flow cost path connecting their source and destination, where $θ\geq0$. We provide an exhaustive analysis of tight bounds on PoA($θ$) for arbitrary classes of cost functions, both in the case of general congestion/routing games as well as in the special case of path-disjoint networks. Second, by using a large mobility dataset in Singapore, we inspect minute-by-minute decision-making of thousands of commuters, and find that $θ=1$ is a good estimate of agents' route (pre)selection mechanism. In contrast, in Pigou networks, the ratio of the free-flow costs of the routes, and thus $θ$, is \textit{infinite}; so, although such worst case networks are mathematically simple, they correspond to artificial routing scenarios with little resemblance to real world conditions, opening the possibility of proving much stronger Price of Anarchy guarantees by explicitly studying their dependency on $θ$. For example, in the case of the standard Bureau of Public Roads (BPR) cost model, where$c_e(x)= a_e x^4+b_e$, and for quartic cost functions in general, the standard PoA bound for $θ=\infty$ is $2.1505$, and this is tight both for general networks as well as path-disjoint and even parallel-edge networks. In comparison, for $θ=1$, the PoA in the case of general networks is only $1.6994$, whereas for path-disjoint/parallel-edge networks is even smaller ($1.3652$), showing that both the route geometries as captured by the parameter $θ$ as well as the network topology have significant effects on PoA.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2022; v1 submitted 27 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Nash Social Welfare in Selfish and Online Load Balancing
Authors:
Vittorio Bilò,
Gianpiero Monaco,
Luca Moscardelli,
Cosimo Vinci
Abstract:
In load balancing problems there is a set of clients, each wishing to select a resource from a set of permissible ones, in order to execute a certain task. Each resource has a latency function, which depends on its workload, and a client's cost is the completion time of her chosen resource. Two fundamental variants of load balancing problems are {\em selfish load balancing} (aka. {\em load balanci…
▽ More
In load balancing problems there is a set of clients, each wishing to select a resource from a set of permissible ones, in order to execute a certain task. Each resource has a latency function, which depends on its workload, and a client's cost is the completion time of her chosen resource. Two fundamental variants of load balancing problems are {\em selfish load balancing} (aka. {\em load balancing games}), where clients are non-cooperative selfish players aimed at minimizing their own cost solely, and {\em online load balancing}, where clients appear online and have to be irrevocably assigned to a resource without any knowledge about future requests. We revisit both selfish and online load balancing under the objective of minimizing the {\em Nash Social Welfare}, i.e., the geometric mean of the clients' costs. To the best of our knowledge, despite being a celebrated welfare estimator in many social contexts, the Nash Social Welfare has not been considered so far as a benchmarking quality measure in load balancing problems. We provide tight bounds on the price of anarchy of pure Nash equilibria and on the competitive ratio of the greedy algorithm under very general latency functions, including polynomial ones. For this particular class, we also prove that the greedy strategy is optimal as it matches the performance of any possible online algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Topological Influence and Locality in Swap Schelling Games
Authors:
Davide Bilò,
Vittorio Bilò,
Pascal Lenzner,
Louise Molitor
Abstract:
Residential segregation is a wide-spread phenomenon that can be observed in almost every major city. In these urban areas residents with different racial or socioeconomic background tend to form homogeneous clusters. Schelling's famous agent-based model for residential segregation explains how such clusters can form even if all agents are tolerant, i.e., if they agree to live in mixed neighborhood…
▽ More
Residential segregation is a wide-spread phenomenon that can be observed in almost every major city. In these urban areas residents with different racial or socioeconomic background tend to form homogeneous clusters. Schelling's famous agent-based model for residential segregation explains how such clusters can form even if all agents are tolerant, i.e., if they agree to live in mixed neighborhoods. For segregation to occur, all it needs is a slight bias towards agents preferring similar neighbors. Very recently, Schelling's model has been investigated from a game-theoretic point of view with selfish agents that strategically select their residential location. In these games, agents can improve on their current location by performing a location swap with another agent who is willing to swap. We significantly deepen these investigations by studying the influence of the underlying topology modeling the residential area on the existence of equilibria, the Price of Anarchy and on the dynamic properties of the resulting strategic multi-agent system. Moreover, as a new conceptual contribution, we also consider the influence of locality, i.e., if the location swaps are restricted to swaps of neighboring agents. We give improved almost tight bounds on the Price of Anarchy for arbitrary underlying graphs and we present (almost) tight bounds for regular graphs, paths and cycles. Moreover, we give almost tight bounds for grids, which are commonly used in empirical studies. For grids we also show that locality has a severe impact on the game dynamics.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
The Complexity of Computational Problems about Nash Equilibria in Symmetric Win-Lose Games
Authors:
Vittorio Bilò,
Marios Mavronicolas
Abstract:
We revisit the complexity of deciding, given a {\it bimatrix game,} whether it has a {\it Nash equilibrium} with certain natural properties; such decision problems were early known to be ${\mathcal{NP}}$-hard~\cite{GZ89}. We show that ${\mathcal{NP}}$-hardness still holds under two significant restrictions in simultaneity: the game is {\it win-lose} (that is, all {\it utilities} are $0$ or $1$) an…
▽ More
We revisit the complexity of deciding, given a {\it bimatrix game,} whether it has a {\it Nash equilibrium} with certain natural properties; such decision problems were early known to be ${\mathcal{NP}}$-hard~\cite{GZ89}. We show that ${\mathcal{NP}}$-hardness still holds under two significant restrictions in simultaneity: the game is {\it win-lose} (that is, all {\it utilities} are $0$ or $1$) and {\it symmetric}. To address the former restriction, we design win-lose {\it gadgets} and a win-lose reduction; to accomodate the latter restriction, we employ and analyze the classical {\it ${\mathsf{GHR}}$-symmetrization}~\cite{GHR63} in the win-lose setting. Thus, {\it symmetric win-lose bimatrix games} are as complex as general bimatrix games with respect to such decision problems. As a byproduct of our techniques, we derive hardness results for search, counting and parity problems about Nash equilibria in symmetric win-lose bimatrix games.
△ Less
Submitted 24 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Almost Envy-Free Allocations with Connected Bundles
Authors:
Vittorio Bilò,
Ioannis Caragiannis,
Michele Flammini,
Ayumi Igarashi,
Gianpiero Monaco,
Dominik Peters,
Cosimo Vinci,
William S. Zwicker
Abstract:
We study the existence of allocations of indivisible goods that are envy-free up to one good (EF1), under the additional constraint that each bundle needs to be connected in an underlying item graph. If the graph is a path and the utility functions are monotonic over bundles, we show the existence of EF1 allocations for at most four agents, and the existence of EF2 allocations for any number of ag…
▽ More
We study the existence of allocations of indivisible goods that are envy-free up to one good (EF1), under the additional constraint that each bundle needs to be connected in an underlying item graph. If the graph is a path and the utility functions are monotonic over bundles, we show the existence of EF1 allocations for at most four agents, and the existence of EF2 allocations for any number of agents; our proofs involve discrete analogues of the Stromquist's moving-knife protocol and the Su--Simmons argument based on Sperner's lemma. For identical utilities, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm that computes an EF1 allocation for any number of agents. For the case of two agents, we characterize the class of graphs that guarantee the existence of EF1 allocations as those whose biconnected components are arranged in a path; this property can be checked in linear time.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2022; v1 submitted 28 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
On Colorful Bin Packing Games
Authors:
Vittorio Bilò,
Francesco Cellinese,
Giovanna Melideo,
Gianpiero Monaco
Abstract:
We consider colorful bin packing games in which selfish players control a set of items which are to be packed into a minimum number of unit capacity bins. Each item has one of $m\geq 2$ colors and cannot be packed next to an item of the same color. All bins have the same unitary cost which is shared among the items it contains, so that players are interested in selecting a bin of minimum shared co…
▽ More
We consider colorful bin packing games in which selfish players control a set of items which are to be packed into a minimum number of unit capacity bins. Each item has one of $m\geq 2$ colors and cannot be packed next to an item of the same color. All bins have the same unitary cost which is shared among the items it contains, so that players are interested in selecting a bin of minimum shared cost. We adopt two standard cost sharing functions: the egalitarian cost function which equally shares the cost of a bin among the items it contains, and the proportional cost function which shares the cost of a bin among the items it contains proportionally to their sizes. Although, under both cost functions, colorful bin packing games do not converge in general to a (pure) Nash equilibrium, we show that Nash equilibria are guaranteed to exist and we design an algorithm for computing a Nash equilibrium whose running time is polynomial under the egalitarian cost function and pseudo-polynomial for a constant number of colors under the proportional one. We also provide a complete characterization of the efficiency of Nash equilibria under both cost functions for general games, by showing that the prices of anarchy and stability are unbounded when $m\geq 3$ while they are equal to 3 for black and white games, where $m=2$. We finally focus on games with uniform sizes (i.e., all items have the same size) for which the two cost functions coincide. We show again a tight characterization of the efficiency of Nash equilibria and design an algorithm which returns Nash equilibria with best achievable performance.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
On the Robustness of the Approximate Price of Anarchy in Generalized Congestion Games
Authors:
Vittorio Bilò
Abstract:
One of the main results shown through Roughgarden's notions of smooth games and robust price of anarchy is that, for any sum-bounded utilitarian social function, the worst-case price of anarchy of coarse correlated equilibria coincides with that of pure Nash equilibria in the class of weighted congestion games with non-negative and non-decreasing latency functions and that such a value can always…
▽ More
One of the main results shown through Roughgarden's notions of smooth games and robust price of anarchy is that, for any sum-bounded utilitarian social function, the worst-case price of anarchy of coarse correlated equilibria coincides with that of pure Nash equilibria in the class of weighted congestion games with non-negative and non-decreasing latency functions and that such a value can always be derived through the, so called, smoothness argument. We significantly extend this result by proving that, for a variety of (even non-sum-bounded) utilitarian and egalitarian social functions and for a broad generalization of the class of weighted congestion games with non-negative (and possibly decreasing) latency functions, the worst-case price of anarchy of $ε$-approximate coarse correlated equilibria still coincides with that of $ε$-approximate pure Nash equilibria, for any $ε\geq 0$. As a byproduct of our proof, it also follows that such a value can always be determined by making use of the primal-dual method we introduced in a previous work. It is important to note that our scenario of investigation is beyond the scope of application of the robust price of anarchy (for as it is currently defined), so that our result seems unlikely to be alternatively proved via the smoothness framework.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Approximating the Revenue Maximization Problem with Sharp Demands
Authors:
Vittorio Bilò,
Michele Flammini,
Gianpiero Monaco
Abstract:
We consider the revenue maximization problem with sharp multi-demand, in which $m$ indivisible items have to be sold to $n$ potential buyers. Each buyer $i$ is interested in getting exactly $d_i$ items, and each item $j$ gives a benefit $v_{ij}$ to buyer $i$. We distinguish between unrelated and related valuations. In the former case, the benefit $v_{ij}$ is completely arbitrary, while, in the lat…
▽ More
We consider the revenue maximization problem with sharp multi-demand, in which $m$ indivisible items have to be sold to $n$ potential buyers. Each buyer $i$ is interested in getting exactly $d_i$ items, and each item $j$ gives a benefit $v_{ij}$ to buyer $i$. We distinguish between unrelated and related valuations. In the former case, the benefit $v_{ij}$ is completely arbitrary, while, in the latter, each item $j$ has a quality $q_j$, each buyer $i$ has a value $v_i$ and the benefit $v_{ij}$ is defined as the product $v_i q_j$. The problem asks to determine a price for each item and an allocation of bundles of items to buyers with the aim of maximizing the total revenue, that is, the sum of the prices of all the sold items. The allocation must be envy-free, that is, each buyer must be happy with her assigned bundle and cannot improve her utility. We first prove that, for related valuations, the problem cannot be approximated to a factor $O(m^{1-ε})$, for any $ε>0$, unless {\sf P} = {\sf NP} and that such result is asymptotically tight. In fact we provide a simple $m$-approximation algorithm even for unrelated valuations. We then focus on an interesting subclass of "proper" instances, that do not contain buyers a priori known not being able to receive any item. For such instances, we design an interesting $2$-approximation algorithm and show that no $(2-ε)$-approximation is possible for any $0<ε\leq 1$, unless {\sf P} $=$ {\sf NP}. We observe that it is possible to efficiently check if an instance is proper, and if discarding useless buyers is allowed, an instance can be made proper in polynomial time, without worsening the value of its optimal solution.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
On Linear Congestion Games with Altruistic Social Context
Authors:
Vittorio Bilò
Abstract:
We study the issues of existence and inefficiency of pure Nash equilibria in linear congestion games with altruistic social context, in the spirit of the model recently proposed by de Keijzer {\em et al.} \cite{DSAB13}. In such a framework, given a real matrix $Γ=(γ_{ij})$ specifying a particular social context, each player $i$ aims at optimizing a linear combination of the payoffs of all the play…
▽ More
We study the issues of existence and inefficiency of pure Nash equilibria in linear congestion games with altruistic social context, in the spirit of the model recently proposed by de Keijzer {\em et al.} \cite{DSAB13}. In such a framework, given a real matrix $Γ=(γ_{ij})$ specifying a particular social context, each player $i$ aims at optimizing a linear combination of the payoffs of all the players in the game, where, for each player $j$, the multiplicative coefficient is given by the value $γ_{ij}$. We give a broad characterization of the social contexts for which pure Nash equilibria are always guaranteed to exist and provide tight or almost tight bounds on their prices of anarchy and stability. In some of the considered cases, our achievements either improve or extend results previously known in the literature.
△ Less
Submitted 15 August, 2013;
originally announced August 2013.
-
A Unifying Tool for Bounding the Quality of Non-Cooperative Solutions in Weighted Congestion Games
Authors:
Vittorio Bilò
Abstract:
We present a general technique, based on a primal-dual formulation, for analyzing the quality of self-emerging solutions in weighted congestion games. With respect to traditional combinatorial approaches, the primal-dual schema has at least three advantages: first, it provides an analytic tool which can always be used to prove tight upper bounds for all the cases in which we are able to characteri…
▽ More
We present a general technique, based on a primal-dual formulation, for analyzing the quality of self-emerging solutions in weighted congestion games. With respect to traditional combinatorial approaches, the primal-dual schema has at least three advantages: first, it provides an analytic tool which can always be used to prove tight upper bounds for all the cases in which we are able to characterize exactly the polyhedron of the solutions under analysis; secondly, in each such a case the complementary slackness conditions give us an hint on how to construct matching lower bounding instances; thirdly, proofs become simpler and easy to check. For the sake of exposition, we first apply our technique to the problems of bounding the prices of anarchy and stability of exact and approximate pure Nash equilibria, as well as the approximation ratio of the solutions achieved after a one-round walk starting from the empty strategy profile, in the case of affine latency functions and we show how all the known upper bounds for these measures (and some of their generalizations) can be easily reobtained under a unified approach. Then, we use the technique to attack the more challenging setting of polynomial latency functions. In particular, we obtain the first known upper bounds on the price of stability of pure Nash equilibria and on the approximation ratio of the solutions achieved after a one-round walk starting from the empty strategy profile for unweighted players in the cases of quadratic and cubic latency functions. We believe that our technique, thanks to its versatility, may prove to be a powerful tool also in several other applications.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
