Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Bigatti, A M

Computing and Using Minimal Polynomials

Authors: John Abbott, Anna Maria Bigatti, Elisa Palezzato, Lorenzo Robbiano

Abstract: Given a zero-dimensional ideal I in a polynomial ring, many computations start by finding univariate polynomials in I. Searching for a univariate polynomial in I is a particular case of considering the minimal polynomial of an element in P/I. It is well known that minimal polynomials may be computed via elimination, therefore this is considered to be a "resolved problem". But being the key of so m… ▽ More Given a zero-dimensional ideal I in a polynomial ring, many computations start by finding univariate polynomials in I. Searching for a univariate polynomial in I is a particular case of considering the minimal polynomial of an element in P/I. It is well known that minimal polynomials may be computed via elimination, therefore this is considered to be a "resolved problem". But being the key of so many computations, it is worth investigating its meaning, its optimization, its applications (e.g. testing if a zero-dimensional ideal is radical, primary or maximal). We present efficient algorithms for computing the minimal polynomial of an element of P/I. For the specific case where the coefficients are in Q, we show how to use modular methods to obtain a guaranteed result. We also present some applications of minimal polynomials, namely algorithms for computing radicals and primary decompositions of zero-dimensional ideals, and also for testing radicality and maximality. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2019; v1 submitted 23 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Comments: This is a fully revised version. To be published in Journal of Symbolic Computation, special Issue on Symbolic Computation and Satisfiability Checking

MSC Class: 13P25; 13P10; 13-04; 14Q10; 68W30

Journal ref: JSC 2019

Groebner Bases for Everyone with CoCoA-5 and CoCoALib

Authors: John Abbott, Anna Maria Bigatti

Abstract: We present a survey on the developments related to Groebner bases, and show explicit examples in CoCoA. The CoCoA project dates back to 1987: its aim was to create a "mathematician"-friendly computational laboratory for studying Commutative Algebra, most especially Groebner bases. Always maintaining this "friendly" tradition, the project has grown and evolved, and the software has been completely… ▽ More We present a survey on the developments related to Groebner bases, and show explicit examples in CoCoA. The CoCoA project dates back to 1987: its aim was to create a "mathematician"-friendly computational laboratory for studying Commutative Algebra, most especially Groebner bases. Always maintaining this "friendly" tradition, the project has grown and evolved, and the software has been completely rewritten. CoCoA offers Groebner bases for all levels of interest: from the basic, explicit call in the interactive system CoCoA-5, to problem-specific optimized implementations, to the computer--computer communication with the open source C++ software library, CoCoALib, or the prototype OpenMath-based server. The openness and clean design of CoCoALib and CoCoA-5 are intended to offer different levels of usage, and to encourage external contributions. △ Less

Submitted 18 April, 2017; v1 submitted 22 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Comments: 24 pages

MSC Class: 13P15; 13P10; 13-04; 14Q10; 68W30; 05E40; 68W24

Journal ref: Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 75, 2017

Satisfiability Checking meets Symbolic Computation (Project Paper)

Authors: E. Abraham, J. Abbott, B. Becker, A. M. Bigatti, M. Brain, B. Buchberger, A. Cimatti, J. H. Davenport, M. England, P. Fontaine, S. Forrest, A. Griggio, D. Kroening, W. M. Seiler, T. Sturm

Abstract: Symbolic Computation and Satisfiability Checking are two research areas, both having their individual scientific focus but sharing also common interests in the development, implementation and application of decision procedures for arithmetic theories. Despite their commonalities, the two communities are rather weakly connected. The aim of our newly accepted SC-square project (H2020-FETOPEN-CSA) is… ▽ More Symbolic Computation and Satisfiability Checking are two research areas, both having their individual scientific focus but sharing also common interests in the development, implementation and application of decision procedures for arithmetic theories. Despite their commonalities, the two communities are rather weakly connected. The aim of our newly accepted SC-square project (H2020-FETOPEN-CSA) is to strengthen the connection between these communities by creating common platforms, initiating interaction and exchange, identifying common challenges, and develo** a common roadmap from theory along the way to tools and (industrial) applications. In this paper we report on the aims and on the first activities of this project, and formalise some relevant challenges for the unified SC-square community. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Journal ref: M. Kohlhase, M. Johansson, B. Miller, L. de Moura, F. Tompa, eds., Intelligent Computer Mathematics (Proceedings of CICM 2016), pp. 28-43, (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9791). Springer International Publishing, 2016

Satisfiability Checking and Symbolic Computation

Authors: E. Abraham, J. Abbott, B. Becker, A. M. Bigatti, M. Brain, B. Buchberger, A. Cimatti, J. H. Davenport, M. England, P. Fontaine, S. Forrest, A. Griggio, D. Kroening, W. M. Seiler, T. Sturm

Abstract: Symbolic Computation and Satisfiability Checking are viewed as individual research areas, but they share common interests in the development, implementation and application of decision procedures for arithmetic theories. Despite these commonalities, the two communities are currently only weakly connected. We introduce a new project SC-square to build a joint community in this area, supported by a… ▽ More Symbolic Computation and Satisfiability Checking are viewed as individual research areas, but they share common interests in the development, implementation and application of decision procedures for arithmetic theories. Despite these commonalities, the two communities are currently only weakly connected. We introduce a new project SC-square to build a joint community in this area, supported by a newly accepted EU (H2020-FETOPEN-CSA) project of the same name. We aim to strengthen the connection between these communities by creating common platforms, initiating interaction and exchange, identifying common challenges, and develo** a common roadmap. This abstract and accompanying poster describes the motivation and aims for the project, and reports on the first activities. △ Less

Submitted 23 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Comments: 3 page Extended Abstract to accompany an ISSAC 2016 poster. Poster available at http://www.sc-square.org/SC2-AnnouncementPoster.pdf

Journal ref: ACM Communications in Computer Algebra, 50:4 (issue 198), pp. 145-147, ACM, 2016