Cross-Corpus Multilingual Speech Emotion Recognition: Amharic vs. Other Languages
Authors:
Ephrem Afele Retta,
Richard Sutcliffe,
Jabar Mahmood,
Michael Abebe Berwo,
Eiad Almekhlafi,
Sajjad Ahmed Khan,
Shehzad Ashraf Chaudhry,
Mustafa Mhamed,
Jun Feng
Abstract:
In a conventional Speech emotion recognition (SER) task, a classifier for a given language is trained on a pre-existing dataset for that same language. However, where training data for a language does not exist, data from other languages can be used instead. We experiment with cross-lingual and multilingual SER, working with Amharic, English, German and URDU. For Amharic, we use our own publicly-a…
▽ More
In a conventional Speech emotion recognition (SER) task, a classifier for a given language is trained on a pre-existing dataset for that same language. However, where training data for a language does not exist, data from other languages can be used instead. We experiment with cross-lingual and multilingual SER, working with Amharic, English, German and URDU. For Amharic, we use our own publicly-available Amharic Speech Emotion Dataset (ASED). For English, German and Urdu we use the existing RAVDESS, EMO-DB and URDU datasets. We followed previous research in map** labels for all datasets to just two classes, positive and negative. Thus we can compare performance on different languages directly, and combine languages for training and testing. In Experiment 1, monolingual SER trials were carried out using three classifiers, AlexNet, VGGE (a proposed variant of VGG), and ResNet50. Results averaged for the three models were very similar for ASED and RAVDESS, suggesting that Amharic and English SER are equally difficult. Similarly, German SER is more difficult, and Urdu SER is easier. In Experiment 2, we trained on one language and tested on another, in both directions for each pair: Amharic<->German, Amharic<->English, and Amharic<->Urdu. Results with Amharic as target suggested that using English or German as source will give the best result. In Experiment 3, we trained on several non-Amharic languages and then tested on Amharic. The best accuracy obtained was several percent greater than the best accuracy in Experiment 2, suggesting that a better result can be obtained when using two or three non-Amharic languages for training than when using just one non-Amharic language. Overall, the results suggest that cross-lingual and multilingual training can be an effective strategy for training a SER classifier when resources for a language are scarce.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
Kinit Classification in Ethiopian Chants, Azmaris and Modern Music: A New Dataset and CNN Benchmark
Authors:
Ephrem A. Retta,
Richard Sutcliffe,
Eiad Almekhlafi,
Yosef K. Enku,
Eyob Alemu,
Tigist D. Gemechu,
Michael A. Berwo,
Mustafa Mhamed,
Jun Feng
Abstract:
In this paper, we create EMIR, the first-ever Music Information Retrieval dataset for Ethiopian music. EMIR is freely available for research purposes and contains 600 sample recordings of Orthodox Tewahedo chants, traditional Azmari songs and contemporary Ethiopian secular music. Each sample is classified by five expert judges into one of four well-known Ethiopian Kinits, Tizita, Bati, Ambassel an…
▽ More
In this paper, we create EMIR, the first-ever Music Information Retrieval dataset for Ethiopian music. EMIR is freely available for research purposes and contains 600 sample recordings of Orthodox Tewahedo chants, traditional Azmari songs and contemporary Ethiopian secular music. Each sample is classified by five expert judges into one of four well-known Ethiopian Kinits, Tizita, Bati, Ambassel and Anchihoye. Each Kinit uses its own pentatonic scale and also has its own stylistic characteristics. Thus, Kinit classification needs to combine scale identification with genre recognition. After describing the dataset, we present the Ethio Kinits Model (EKM), based on VGG, for classifying the EMIR clips. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether Filterbank, Mel-spectrogram, Chroma, or Mel-frequency Cepstral coefficient (MFCC) features work best for Kinit classification using EKM. MFCC was found to be superior and was therefore adopted for Experiment 2, where the performance of EKM models using MFCC was compared using three different audio sample lengths. 3s length gave the best results. In Experiment 3, EKM and four existing models were compared on the EMIR dataset: AlexNet, ResNet50, VGG16 and LSTM. EKM was found to have the best accuracy (95.00%) as well as the fastest training time. We hope this work will encourage others to explore Ethiopian music and to experiment with other models for Kinit classification.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
