Detecting signal from science:The structure of research communities and prior knowledge improves prediction of genetic regulatory experiments
Authors:
Alexander V. Belikov,
Andrey Rzhetsky,
James Evans
Abstract:
The explosive growth of scientists, scientific journals, articles and findings in recent years exponentially increases the difficulty scientists face in navigating prior knowledge. This challenge is exacerbated by uncertainty about the reproducibility of published findings. The availability of massive digital archives, machine reading and extraction tools on the one hand, and automated high-throug…
▽ More
The explosive growth of scientists, scientific journals, articles and findings in recent years exponentially increases the difficulty scientists face in navigating prior knowledge. This challenge is exacerbated by uncertainty about the reproducibility of published findings. The availability of massive digital archives, machine reading and extraction tools on the one hand, and automated high-throughput experiments on the other, allow us to evaluate these challenges at scale and identify novel opportunities for accelerating scientific advance. Here we demonstrate a Bayesian calculus that enables the positive prediction of robust, replicable scientific claims with findings automatically extracted from published literature on gene interactions. We matched these findings, filtered by science, with unfiltered gene interactions measured by the massive LINCS L1000 high-throughput experiment to identify and counteract sources of bias. Our calculus is built on easily extracted publication meta-data regarding the position of a scientific claim within the web of prior knowledge, and its breadth of support across institutions, authors and communities, revealing that scientifically focused but socially and institutionally independent research activity is most likely to replicate. These findings recommend policies that go against the common practice of channeling biomedical research funding into centralized research consortia and institutes rather than dispersing it more broadly. Our results demonstrate that robust scientific findings hinge upon a delicate balance of shared focus and independence, and that this complex pattern can be computationally exploited to decode bias and predict the replicability of published findings. These insights provide guidance for scientists navigating the research literature and for science funders seeking to improve it.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
Distillation of neural network models for detection and description of key points of images
Authors:
A. V. Yashchenko,
A. V. Belikov,
M. V. Peterson,
A. S. Potapov
Abstract:
Image matching and classification methods, as well as synchronous location and map**, are widely used on embedded and mobile devices. Their most resource-intensive part is the detection and description of the key points of the images. And if the classical methods of detecting and describing key points can be executed in real time on mobile devices, then for modern neural network methods with the…
▽ More
Image matching and classification methods, as well as synchronous location and map**, are widely used on embedded and mobile devices. Their most resource-intensive part is the detection and description of the key points of the images. And if the classical methods of detecting and describing key points can be executed in real time on mobile devices, then for modern neural network methods with the best quality, such use is difficult. Thus, it is important to increase the speed of neural network models for the detection and description of key points. The subject of research is distillation as one of the methods for reducing neural network models. The aim of thestudy is to obtain a more compact model of detection and description of key points, as well as a description of the procedure for obtaining this model. A method for the distillation of neural networks for the task of detecting and describing key points was tested. The objective function and training parameters that provide the best results in the framework of the study are proposed. A new data set has been introduced for testing key point detection methods and a new quality indicator of the allocated key points and their corresponding local features. As a result of training in the described way, the new model, with the same number of parameters, showed greater accuracy in comparing key points than the original model. A new model with a significantly smaller number of parameters shows the accuracy of point matching close to the accuracy of the original model.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
