-
The Research Object Suite of Ontologies: Sharing and Exchanging Research Data and Methods on the Open Web
Authors:
Khalid Belhajjame,
Jun Zhao,
Daniel Garijo,
Kristina Hettne,
Raul Palma,
Óscar Corcho,
José-Manuel Gómez-Pérez,
Sean Bechhofer,
Graham Klyne,
Carole Goble
Abstract:
Research in life sciences is increasingly being conducted in a digital and online environment. In particular, life scientists have been pioneers in embracing new computational tools to conduct their investigations. To support the sharing of digital objects produced during such research investigations, we have witnessed in the last few years the emergence of specialized repositories, e.g., DataVers…
▽ More
Research in life sciences is increasingly being conducted in a digital and online environment. In particular, life scientists have been pioneers in embracing new computational tools to conduct their investigations. To support the sharing of digital objects produced during such research investigations, we have witnessed in the last few years the emergence of specialized repositories, e.g., DataVerse and FigShare. Such repositories provide users with the means to share and publish datasets that were used or generated in research investigations. While these repositories have proven their usefulness, interpreting and reusing evidence for most research results is a challenging task. Additional contextual descriptions are needed to understand how those results were generated and/or the circumstances under which they were concluded. Because of this, scientists are calling for models that go beyond the publication of datasets to systematically capture the life cycle of scientific investigations and provide a single entry point to access the information about the hypothesis investigated, the datasets used, the experiments carried out, the results of the experiments, the people involved in the research, etc. In this paper we present the Research Object (RO) suite of ontologies, which provide a structured container to encapsulate research data and methods along with essential metadata descriptions. Research Objects are portable units that enable the sharing, preservation, interpretation and reuse of research investigation results. The ontologies we present have been designed in the light of requirements that we gathered from life scientists. They have been built upon existing popular vocabularies to facilitate interoperability. Furthermore, we have developed tools to support the creation and sharing of Research Objects, thereby promoting and facilitating their adoption.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2014; v1 submitted 17 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Structuring research methods and data with the Research Object model: genomics workflows as a case study
Authors:
Kristina M. Hettne,
Harish Dharuri,
Jun Zhao,
Katherine Wolstencroft,
Khalid Belhajjame,
Stian Soiland-Reyes,
Eleni Mina,
Mark Thompson,
Don Cruickshank,
Lourdes Verdes-Montenegro,
Julian Garrido,
David de Roure,
Oscar Corcho,
Graham Klyne,
Reinout van Schouwen,
Peter A. C. 't Hoen,
Sean Bechhofer,
Carole Goble,
Marco Roos
Abstract:
One of the main challenges for biomedical research lies in the computer-assisted integrative study of large and increasingly complex combinations of data in order to understand molecular mechanisms. The preservation of the materials and methods of such computational experiments with clear annotations is essential for understanding an experiment, and this is increasingly recognized in the bioinform…
▽ More
One of the main challenges for biomedical research lies in the computer-assisted integrative study of large and increasingly complex combinations of data in order to understand molecular mechanisms. The preservation of the materials and methods of such computational experiments with clear annotations is essential for understanding an experiment, and this is increasingly recognized in the bioinformatics community. Our assumption is that offering means of digital, structured aggregation and annotation of the objects of an experiment will provide necessary meta-data for a scientist to understand and recreate the results of an experiment. To support this we explored a model for the semantic description of a workflow-centric Research Object (RO), where an RO is defined as a resource that aggregates other resources, e.g., datasets, software, spreadsheets, text, etc. We applied this model to a case study where we analysed human metabolite variation by workflows.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2014; v1 submitted 12 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
-
Key Choices in the Design of Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS)
Authors:
Thomas Baker,
Sean Bechhofer,
Antoine Isaac,
Alistair Miles,
Guus Schreiber,
Ed Summers
Abstract:
Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) provides a data model and vocabulary for expressing Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) such as thesauri and classification schemes in Semantic Web applications. This paper presents the main components of SKOS and their formal expression in Web Ontology Language (OWL), providing an extensive account of the design decisions taken by the Semantic Web Dep…
▽ More
Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) provides a data model and vocabulary for expressing Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) such as thesauri and classification schemes in Semantic Web applications. This paper presents the main components of SKOS and their formal expression in Web Ontology Language (OWL), providing an extensive account of the design decisions taken by the Semantic Web Deployment (SWD) Working Group of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), which between 2006 and 2009 brought SKOS to the status of W3C Recommendation. The paper explains key design principles such as "minimal ontological commitment" and systematically cites the requirements and issues that influenced the design of SKOS components.
By reconstructing the discussion around alternative features and design options and presenting the rationale for design decisions, the paper aims at providing insight into how SKOS turned out as it did, and why. Assuming that SKOS, like any other successful technology, may eventually be subject to revision and improvement, the critical account offered here may help future editors approach such a task with deeper understanding.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2013;
originally announced February 2013.
