The Tracking Machine Learning challenge : Throughput phase
Authors:
Sabrina Amrouche,
Laurent Basara,
Paolo Calafiura,
Dmitry Emeliyanov,
Victor Estrade,
Steven Farrell,
Cécile Germain,
Vladimir Vava Gligorov,
Tobias Golling,
Sergey Gorbunov,
Heather Gray,
Isabelle Guyon,
Mikhail Hushchyn,
Vincenzo Innocente,
Moritz Kiehn,
Marcel Kunze,
Edward Moyse,
David Rousseau,
Andreas Salzburger,
Andrey Ustyuzhanin,
Jean-Roch Vlimant
Abstract:
This paper reports on the second "Throughput" phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first "Accuracy" phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given O($10^5$) points, the participants had to connect them in…
▽ More
This paper reports on the second "Throughput" phase of the Tracking Machine Learning (TrackML) challenge on the Codalab platform. As in the first "Accuracy" phase, the participants had to solve a difficult experimental problem linked to tracking accurately the trajectory of particles as e.g. created at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC): given O($10^5$) points, the participants had to connect them into O($10^4$) individual groups that represent the particle trajectories which are approximated helical. While in the first phase only the accuracy mattered, the goal of this second phase was a compromise between the accuracy and the speed of inference. Both were measured on the Codalab platform where the participants had to upload their software. The best three participants had solutions with good accuracy and speed an order of magnitude faster than the state of the art when the challenge was designed. Although the core algorithms were less diverse than in the first phase, a diversity of techniques have been used and are described in this paper. The performance of the algorithms are analysed in depth and lessons derived.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2021; v1 submitted 3 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
Machine Learning in High Energy Physics Community White Paper
Authors:
Kim Albertsson,
Piero Altoe,
Dustin Anderson,
John Anderson,
Michael Andrews,
Juan Pedro Araque Espinosa,
Adam Aurisano,
Laurent Basara,
Adrian Bevan,
Wahid Bhimji,
Daniele Bonacorsi,
Bjorn Burkle,
Paolo Calafiura,
Mario Campanelli,
Louis Capps,
Federico Carminati,
Stefano Carrazza,
Yi-fan Chen,
Taylor Childers,
Yann Coadou,
Elias Coniavitis,
Kyle Cranmer,
Claire David,
Douglas Davis,
Andrea De Simone
, et al. (103 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Machine learning has been applied to several problems in particle physics research, beginning with applications to high-level physics analysis in the 1990s and 2000s, followed by an explosion of applications in particle and event identification and reconstruction in the 2010s. In this document we discuss promising future research and development areas for machine learning in particle physics. We d…
▽ More
Machine learning has been applied to several problems in particle physics research, beginning with applications to high-level physics analysis in the 1990s and 2000s, followed by an explosion of applications in particle and event identification and reconstruction in the 2010s. In this document we discuss promising future research and development areas for machine learning in particle physics. We detail a roadmap for their implementation, software and hardware resource requirements, collaborative initiatives with the data science community, academia and industry, and training the particle physics community in data science. The main objective of the document is to connect and motivate these areas of research and development with the physics drivers of the High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider and future neutrino experiments and identify the resource needs for their implementation. Additionally we identify areas where collaboration with external communities will be of great benefit.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2019; v1 submitted 8 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
