Showing 1–50 of 65 results for author: Barman, S

Causal Contextual Bandits with Adaptive Context

Authors: Rahul Madhavan, Aurghya Maiti, Gaurav Sinha, Siddharth Barman

Abstract: We study a variant of causal contextual bandits where the context is chosen based on an initial intervention chosen by the learner. At the beginning of each round, the learner selects an initial action, depending on which a stochastic context is revealed by the environment. Following this, the learner then selects a final action and receives a reward. Given $T$ rounds of interactions with the envi… ▽ More We study a variant of causal contextual bandits where the context is chosen based on an initial intervention chosen by the learner. At the beginning of each round, the learner selects an initial action, depending on which a stochastic context is revealed by the environment. Following this, the learner then selects a final action and receives a reward. Given $T$ rounds of interactions with the environment, the objective of the learner is to learn a policy (of selecting the initial and the final action) with maximum expected reward. In this paper we study the specific situation where every action corresponds to intervening on a node in some known causal graph. We extend prior work from the deterministic context setting to obtain simple regret minimization guarantees. This is achieved through an instance-dependent causal parameter, $λ$, which characterizes our upper bound. Furthermore, we prove that our simple regret is essentially tight for a large class of instances. A key feature of our work is that we use convex optimization to address the bandit exploration problem. We also conduct experiments to validate our theoretical results, and release our code at our project GitHub repository: https://github.com/adaptiveContextualCausalBandits/aCCB. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2024; v1 submitted 28 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Reinforcement Learning Conference (RLC) 2024, 10 pages (31 pages including appendix), 8 plots. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2111.00886

Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivity

Authors: Ayush Sawarni, Nirjhar Das, Siddharth Barman, Gaurav Sinha

Abstract: We study the generalized linear contextual bandit problem within the constraints of limited adaptivity. In this paper, we present two algorithms, $\texttt{B-GLinCB}$ and $\texttt{RS-GLinCB}$, that address, respectively, two prevalent limited adaptivity settings. Given a budget $M$ on the number of policy updates, in the first setting, the algorithm needs to decide upfront $M$ rounds at which it wi… ▽ More We study the generalized linear contextual bandit problem within the constraints of limited adaptivity. In this paper, we present two algorithms, $\texttt{B-GLinCB}$ and $\texttt{RS-GLinCB}$, that address, respectively, two prevalent limited adaptivity settings. Given a budget $M$ on the number of policy updates, in the first setting, the algorithm needs to decide upfront $M$ rounds at which it will update its policy, while in the second setting it can adaptively perform $M$ policy updates during its course. For the first setting, we design an algorithm $\texttt{B-GLinCB}$, that incurs $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret when $M = Ω\left( \log{\log T} \right)$ and the arm feature vectors are generated stochastically. For the second setting, we design an algorithm $\texttt{RS-GLinCB}$ that updates its policy $\tilde{O}(\log^2 T)$ times and achieves a regret of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ even when the arm feature vectors are adversarially generated. Notably, in these bounds, we manage to eliminate the dependence on a key instance dependent parameter $κ$, that captures non-linearity of the underlying reward model. Our novel approach for removing this dependence for generalized linear contextual bandits might be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2024; v1 submitted 10 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: Reorganization; New Experiments

Reinforcement Learning Jazz Improvisation: When Music Meets Game Theory

Authors: Vedant Tapiavala, Joshua Piesner, Sourjyamoy Barman, Feng Fu

Abstract: Live performances of music are always charming, with the unpredictability of improvisation due to the dynamic between musicians and interactions with the audience. Jazz improvisation is a particularly noteworthy example for further investigation from a theoretical perspective. Here, we introduce a novel mathematical game theory model for jazz improvisation, providing a framework for studying music… ▽ More Live performances of music are always charming, with the unpredictability of improvisation due to the dynamic between musicians and interactions with the audience. Jazz improvisation is a particularly noteworthy example for further investigation from a theoretical perspective. Here, we introduce a novel mathematical game theory model for jazz improvisation, providing a framework for studying music theory and improvisational methodologies. We use computational modeling, mainly reinforcement learning, to explore diverse stochastic improvisational strategies and their paired performance on improvisation. We find that the most effective strategy pair is a strategy that reacts to the most recent payoff (Stepwise Changes) with a reinforcement learning strategy limited to notes in the given chord (Chord-Following Reinforcement Learning). Conversely, a strategy that reacts to the partner's last note and attempts to harmonize with it (Harmony Prediction) strategy pair yields the lowest non-control payoff and highest standard deviation, indicating that picking notes based on immediate reactions to the partner player can yield inconsistent outcomes. On average, the Chord-Following Reinforcement Learning strategy demonstrates the highest mean payoff, while Harmony Prediction exhibits the lowest. Our work lays the foundation for promising applications beyond jazz: including the use of artificial intelligence (AI) models to extract data from audio clips to refine musical reward systems, and training machine learning (ML) models on existing jazz solos to further refine strategies within the game. △ Less

Submitted 25 February, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: 16 pages, 4 figures

Parameterized Guarantees for Almost Envy-Free Allocations

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Debajyoti Kar, Shraddha Pathak

Abstract: We study fair allocation of indivisible goods among agents with additive valuations. We obtain novel approximation guarantees for three of the strongest fairness notions in discrete fair division, namely envy-free up to the removal of any positively-valued good (EFx), pairwise maximin shares (PMMS), and envy-free up to the transfer of any positively-valued good (tEFx). Our approximation guarantees… ▽ More We study fair allocation of indivisible goods among agents with additive valuations. We obtain novel approximation guarantees for three of the strongest fairness notions in discrete fair division, namely envy-free up to the removal of any positively-valued good (EFx), pairwise maximin shares (PMMS), and envy-free up to the transfer of any positively-valued good (tEFx). Our approximation guarantees are in terms of an instance-dependent parameter $γ\in (0,1]$ that upper bounds, for each indivisible good in the given instance, the multiplicative range of nonzero values for the good across the agents. First, we consider allocations wherein, between any pair of agents and up to the removal of any positively-valued good, the envy is multiplicatively bounded. Specifically, the current work develops a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a $\left( \frac{2γ}{\sqrt{5+4γ}-1}\right)$-approximately EFx allocation for any given fair division instance with range parameter $γ\in (0,1]$. For instances with $γ\geq 0.511$, the obtained approximation guarantee for EFx surpasses the previously best-known approximation bound of $(φ-1) \approx 0.618$, here $φ$ denotes the golden ratio. Furthermore, for $γ\in (0,1]$, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm for finding allocations wherein the PMMS requirement is satisfied, between every pair of agents, within a multiplicative factor of $\frac{5}{6} γ$. En route to this result, we obtain novel existential and computational guarantees for $\frac{5}{6}$-approximately PMMS allocations under restricted additive valuations. Finally, we develop an algorithm that efficiently computes a $2γ$-approximately tEFx allocation. Specifically, we obtain existence and efficient computation of exact tEFx allocations for all instances with $γ\in [0.5, 1]$. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: 28 pages

Nearly Equitable Allocations Beyond Additivity and Monotonicity

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Umang Bhaskar, Yeshwant Pandit, Soumyajit Pyne

Abstract: Equitability (EQ) in fair division requires that items be allocated such that all agents value the bundle they receive equally. With indivisible items, an equitable allocation may not exist, and hence we instead consider a meaningful analog, EQx, that requires equitability up to any item. EQx allocations exist for monotone, additive valuations. However, if (1) the agents' valuations are not additi… ▽ More Equitability (EQ) in fair division requires that items be allocated such that all agents value the bundle they receive equally. With indivisible items, an equitable allocation may not exist, and hence we instead consider a meaningful analog, EQx, that requires equitability up to any item. EQx allocations exist for monotone, additive valuations. However, if (1) the agents' valuations are not additive or (2) the set of indivisible items includes both goods and chores (positively and negatively valued items), then prior to the current work it was not known whether EQx allocations exist or not. We study both the existence and efficient computation of EQx allocations. (1) For monotone valuations (not necessarily additive), we show that EQx allocations always exist. Also, for the large class of weakly well-layered valuations, EQx allocations can be found in polynomial time. Further, we prove that approximately EQx allocations can be computed efficiently under general monotone valuations. (2) For non-monotone valuations, we show that an EQx allocation may not exist, even for two agents with additive valuations. Under some special cases, however, we establish existence and efficient computability of EQx allocations. This includes the case of two agents with additive valuations where each item is either a good or a chore, and there are no mixed items. In addition, we show that, under nonmonotone valuations, determining the existence of EQx allocations is weakly NP-hard for two agents and strongly NP-hard for more agents. △ Less

Submitted 12 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: 28 pages

Nash Regret Guarantees for Linear Bandits

Authors: Ayush Sawarni, Soumybrata Pal, Siddharth Barman

Abstract: We obtain essentially tight upper bounds for a strengthened notion of regret in the stochastic linear bandits framework. The strengthening -- referred to as Nash regret -- is defined as the difference between the (a priori unknown) optimum and the geometric mean of expected rewards accumulated by the linear bandit algorithm. Since the geometric mean corresponds to the well-studied Nash social welf… ▽ More We obtain essentially tight upper bounds for a strengthened notion of regret in the stochastic linear bandits framework. The strengthening -- referred to as Nash regret -- is defined as the difference between the (a priori unknown) optimum and the geometric mean of expected rewards accumulated by the linear bandit algorithm. Since the geometric mean corresponds to the well-studied Nash social welfare (NSW) function, this formulation quantifies the performance of a bandit algorithm as the collective welfare it generates across rounds. NSW is known to satisfy fairness axioms and, hence, an upper bound on Nash regret provides a principled fairness guarantee. We consider the stochastic linear bandits problem over a horizon of $T$ rounds and with set of arms ${X}$ in ambient dimension $d$. Furthermore, we focus on settings in which the stochastic reward -- associated with each arm in ${X}$ -- is a non-negative, $ν$-sub-Poisson random variable. For this setting, we develop an algorithm that achieves a Nash regret of $O\left( \sqrt{\frac{dν}{T}} \log( T |X|)\right)$. In addition, addressing linear bandit instances in which the set of arms ${X}$ is not necessarily finite, we obtain a Nash regret upper bound of $O\left( \frac{d^\frac{5}{4}ν^{\frac{1}{2}}}{\sqrt{T}} \log(T)\right)$. Since bounded random variables are sub-Poisson, these results hold for bounded, positive rewards. Our linear bandit algorithm is built upon the successive elimination method with novel technical insights, including tailored concentration bounds and the use of sampling via John ellipsoid in conjunction with the Kiefer-Wolfowitz optimal design. △ Less

Submitted 3 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 35 pages

Learning Good Interventions in Causal Graphs via Covering

Authors: Ayush Sawarni, Rahul Madhavan, Gaurav Sinha, Siddharth Barman

Abstract: We study the causal bandit problem that entails identifying a near-optimal intervention from a specified set $A$ of (possibly non-atomic) interventions over a given causal graph. Here, an optimal intervention in ${A}$ is one that maximizes the expected value for a designated reward variable in the graph, and we use the standard notion of simple regret to quantify near optimality. Considering Berno… ▽ More We study the causal bandit problem that entails identifying a near-optimal intervention from a specified set $A$ of (possibly non-atomic) interventions over a given causal graph. Here, an optimal intervention in ${A}$ is one that maximizes the expected value for a designated reward variable in the graph, and we use the standard notion of simple regret to quantify near optimality. Considering Bernoulli random variables and for causal graphs on $N$ vertices with constant in-degree, prior work has achieved a worst case guarantee of $\widetilde{O} (N/\sqrt{T})$ for simple regret. The current work utilizes the idea of covering interventions (which are not necessarily contained within ${A}$) and establishes a simple regret guarantee of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{N/T})$. Notably, and in contrast to prior work, our simple regret bound depends only on explicit parameters of the problem instance. We also go beyond prior work and achieve a simple regret guarantee for causal graphs with unobserved variables. Further, we perform experiments to show improvements over baselines in this setting. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 26 pages

Guaranteeing Envy-Freeness under Generalized Assignment Constraints

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Sudarshan Shyam, K. V. N. Sreenivas

Abstract: We study fair division of goods under the broad class of generalized assignment constraints. In this constraint framework, the sizes and values of the goods are agent-specific, and one needs to allocate the goods among the agents fairly while further ensuring that each agent receives a bundle of total size at most the corresponding budget of the agent. Since, in such a constraint setting, it may n… ▽ More We study fair division of goods under the broad class of generalized assignment constraints. In this constraint framework, the sizes and values of the goods are agent-specific, and one needs to allocate the goods among the agents fairly while further ensuring that each agent receives a bundle of total size at most the corresponding budget of the agent. Since, in such a constraint setting, it may not always be feasible to partition all the goods among the agents, we conform -- as in recent works -- to the construct of charity to designate the set of unassigned goods. For this allocation framework, we obtain existential and computational guarantees for envy-free (appropriately defined) allocation of divisible and indivisible goods, respectively, among agents with individual, additive valuations for the goods. We deem allocations to be fair by evaluating envy only with respect to feasible subsets. In particular, an allocation is said to be feasibly envy-free (FEF) iff each agent prefers its bundle over every (budget) feasible subset within any other agent's bundle (and within the charity). The current work establishes that, for divisible goods, FEF allocations are guaranteed to exist and can be computed efficiently under generalized assignment constraints. In the context of indivisible goods, FEF allocations do not necessarily exist, and hence, we consider the fairness notion of feasible envy-freeness up to any good (FEFx). We show that, under generalized assignment constraints, an FEFx allocation of indivisible goods always exists. In fact, our FEFx result resolves open problems posed in prior works. Further, for indivisible goods and under generalized assignment constraints, we provide a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for computing FEFx allocations, and a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for computing approximate FEFx allocations. △ Less

Submitted 2 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 29 pages

Fair Chore Division under Binary Supermodular Costs

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Vishnu V. Narayan, Paritosh Verma

Abstract: We study the problem of dividing indivisible chores among agents whose costs (for the chores) are supermodular set functions with binary marginals. Such functions capture complementarity among chores, i.e., they constitute an expressive class wherein the marginal disutility of each chore is either one or zero, and the marginals increase with respect to supersets. In this setting, we study the broa… ▽ More We study the problem of dividing indivisible chores among agents whose costs (for the chores) are supermodular set functions with binary marginals. Such functions capture complementarity among chores, i.e., they constitute an expressive class wherein the marginal disutility of each chore is either one or zero, and the marginals increase with respect to supersets. In this setting, we study the broad landscape of finding fair and efficient chore allocations. In particular, we establish the existence of $(i)$ EF1 and Pareto efficient chore allocations, $(ii)$ MMS-fair and Pareto efficient allocations, and $(iii)$ Lorenz dominating chore allocations. Furthermore, we develop polynomial-time algorithms--in the value oracle model--for computing the chore allocations for each of these fairness and efficiency criteria. Complementing these existential and algorithmic results, we show that in this chore division setting, the aforementioned fairness notions, namely EF1, MMS, and Lorenz domination are incomparable: an allocation that satisfies any one of these notions does not necessarily satisfy the others. Additionally, we study EFX chore division. In contrast to the above-mentioned positive results, we show that, for binary supermodular costs, Pareto efficient allocations that are even approximately EFX do not exist, for any arbitrarily small approximation constant. Focusing on EFX fairness alone, when the cost functions are identical we present an algorithm (Add-and-Fix) that computes an EFX allocation. For binary marginals, we show that Add-and-Fix runs in polynomial time. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: 25 pages

Approximation Algorithms for Envy-Free Cake Division with Connected Pieces

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Pooja Kulkarni

Abstract: Cake cutting is a classic model for studying fair division of a heterogeneous, divisible resource among agents with individual preferences. Addressing cake division under a typical requirement that each agent must receive a connected piece of the cake, we develop approximation algorithms for finding envy-free (fair) cake divisions. In particular, this work improves the state-of-the-art additive ap… ▽ More Cake cutting is a classic model for studying fair division of a heterogeneous, divisible resource among agents with individual preferences. Addressing cake division under a typical requirement that each agent must receive a connected piece of the cake, we develop approximation algorithms for finding envy-free (fair) cake divisions. In particular, this work improves the state-of-the-art additive approximation bound for this fundamental problem. Our results hold for general cake division instances in which the agents' valuations satisfy basic assumptions and are normalized (to have value $1$ for the cake). Furthermore, the developed algorithms execute in polynomial time under the standard Robertson-Webb query model. Prior work has shown that one can efficiently compute a cake division (with connected pieces) in which the additive envy of any agent is at most $1/3$. An efficient algorithm is also known for finding connected cake divisions that are (almost) $1/2$-multiplicatively envy-free. Improving the additive approximation guarantee and maintaining the multiplicative one, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a connected cake division that is both $\left(\frac{1}{4} +o(1) \right)$-additively envy-free and $\left(\frac{1}{2} - o(1) \right)$-multiplicatively envy-free. Our algorithm is based on the ideas of interval growing and envy-cycle-elimination. In addition, we study cake division instances in which the number of distinct valuations across the agents is parametrically bounded. We show that such cake division instances admit a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme for connected envy-free cake division. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2023; v1 submitted 18 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 20 pages

Finding Fair Allocations under Budget Constraints

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Sudarshan Shyam, K. V. N. Sreenivas

Abstract: We study the fair allocation of indivisible goods among agents with identical, additive valuations but individual budget constraints. Here, the indivisible goods--each with a specific size and value--need to be allocated such that the bundle assigned to each agent is of total size at most the agent's budget. Since envy-free allocations do not necessarily exist in the indivisible goods context, com… ▽ More We study the fair allocation of indivisible goods among agents with identical, additive valuations but individual budget constraints. Here, the indivisible goods--each with a specific size and value--need to be allocated such that the bundle assigned to each agent is of total size at most the agent's budget. Since envy-free allocations do not necessarily exist in the indivisible goods context, compelling relaxations--in particular, the notion of envy-freeness up to $k$ goods (EFk)--have received significant attention in recent years. In an EFk allocation, each agent prefers its own bundle over that of any other agent, up to the removal of $k$ goods, and the agents have similarly bounded envy against the charity (which corresponds to the set of all unallocated goods). Recently, Wu et al. (2021) showed that an allocation that satisfies the budget constraints and maximizes the Nash social welfare is $1/4$-approximately EF1. However, the computation (or even existence) of exact EFk allocations remained an intriguing open problem. We make notable progress towards this by proposing a simple, greedy, polynomial-time algorithm that computes EF2 allocations under budget constraints. Our algorithmic result implies the universal existence of EF2 allocations in this fair division context. The analysis of the algorithm exploits intricate structural properties of envy-freeness. Interestingly, the same algorithm also provides EF1 guarantees for important special cases. Specifically, we settle the existence of EF1 allocations for instances in which: (i) the value of each good is proportional to its size, (ii) all goods have the same size, or (iii) all the goods have the same value. Our EF2 result extends to the setting wherein the goods' sizes are agent specific. △ Less

Submitted 17 March, 2023; v1 submitted 17 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 22 pages

Nash Welfare Guarantees for Fair and Efficient Coverage

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Anand Krishna, Y. Narahari, Soumyarup Sadhukhan

Abstract: We study coverage problems in which, for a set of agents and a given threshold $T$, the goal is to select $T$ subsets (of the agents) that, while satisfying combinatorial constraints, achieve fair and efficient coverage among the agents. In this setting, the valuation of each agent is equated to the number of selected subsets that contain it, plus one. The current work utilizes the Nash social wel… ▽ More We study coverage problems in which, for a set of agents and a given threshold $T$, the goal is to select $T$ subsets (of the agents) that, while satisfying combinatorial constraints, achieve fair and efficient coverage among the agents. In this setting, the valuation of each agent is equated to the number of selected subsets that contain it, plus one. The current work utilizes the Nash social welfare function to quantify the extent of fairness and collective efficiency. We develop a polynomial-time $\left(18 + o(1) \right)$-approximation algorithm for maximizing Nash social welfare in coverage instances. Our algorithm applies to all instances wherein, for the underlying combinatorial constraints, there exists an FPTAS for weight maximization. We complement the algorithmic result by proving that Nash social welfare maximization is APX-hard in coverage instances. △ Less

Submitted 5 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: 19 pages

Fairness and Welfare Quantification for Regret in Multi-Armed Bandits

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Arnab Maiti, Ayush Sawarni

Abstract: We extend the notion of regret with a welfarist perspective. Focussing on the classic multi-armed bandit (MAB) framework, the current work quantifies the performance of bandit algorithms by applying a fundamental welfare function, namely the Nash social welfare (NSW) function. This corresponds to equating algorithm's performance to the geometric mean of its expected rewards and leads us to the stu… ▽ More We extend the notion of regret with a welfarist perspective. Focussing on the classic multi-armed bandit (MAB) framework, the current work quantifies the performance of bandit algorithms by applying a fundamental welfare function, namely the Nash social welfare (NSW) function. This corresponds to equating algorithm's performance to the geometric mean of its expected rewards and leads us to the study of Nash regret, defined as the difference between the -- a priori unknown -- optimal mean (among the arms) and the algorithm's performance. Since NSW is known to satisfy fairness axioms, our approach complements the utilitarian considerations of average (cumulative) regret, wherein the algorithm is evaluated via the arithmetic mean of its expected rewards. This work develops an algorithm that, given the horizon of play $T$, achieves a Nash regret of $O \left( \sqrt{\frac{k \log T}{T}} \right)$, here $k$ denotes the number of arms in the MAB instance. Since, for any algorithm, the Nash regret is at least as much as its average regret (the AM-GM inequality), the known lower bound on average regret holds for Nash regret as well. Therefore, our Nash regret guarantee is essentially tight. In addition, we develop an anytime algorithm with a Nash regret guarantee of $O \left( \sqrt{\frac{k\log T}{T}} \log T \right)$. △ Less

Submitted 27 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: 32 pages

Achieving Envy-Freeness with Limited Subsidies under Dichotomous Valuations

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Anand Krishna, Y. Narahari, Soumyarup Sadhukhan

Abstract: We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among agents in a fair manner. While envy-free allocations of indivisible goods are not guaranteed to exist, envy-freeness can be achieved by additionally providing some subsidy to the agents. These subsidies can be alternatively viewed as a divisible good (money) that is fractionally assigned among the agents to realize an envy-free outcome. In… ▽ More We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among agents in a fair manner. While envy-free allocations of indivisible goods are not guaranteed to exist, envy-freeness can be achieved by additionally providing some subsidy to the agents. These subsidies can be alternatively viewed as a divisible good (money) that is fractionally assigned among the agents to realize an envy-free outcome. In this setup, we bound the subsidy required to attain envy-freeness among agents with dichotomous valuations, i.e., among agents whose marginal value for any good is either zero or one. We prove that, under dichotomous valuations, there exists an allocation that achieves envy-freeness with a per-agent subsidy of either $0$ or $1$. Furthermore, such an envy-free solution can be computed efficiently in the standard value-oracle model. Notably, our results hold for general dichotomous valuations and, in particular, do not require the (dichotomous) valuations to be additive, submodular, or even subadditive. Also, our subsidy bounds are tight and provide a linear (in the number of agents) factor improvement over the bounds known for general monotone valuations. △ Less

Submitted 19 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: 19 pages

Intervention Efficient Algorithm for Two-Stage Causal MDPs

Authors: Rahul Madhavan, Aurghya Maiti, Gaurav Sinha, Siddharth Barman

Abstract: We study Markov Decision Processes (MDP) wherein states correspond to causal graphs that stochastically generate rewards. In this setup, the learner's goal is to identify atomic interventions that lead to high rewards by intervening on variables at each state. Generalizing the recent causal-bandit framework, the current work develops (simple) regret minimization guarantees for two-stage causal MDP… ▽ More We study Markov Decision Processes (MDP) wherein states correspond to causal graphs that stochastically generate rewards. In this setup, the learner's goal is to identify atomic interventions that lead to high rewards by intervening on variables at each state. Generalizing the recent causal-bandit framework, the current work develops (simple) regret minimization guarantees for two-stage causal MDPs, with parallel causal graph at each state. We propose an algorithm that achieves an instance dependent regret bound. A key feature of our algorithm is that it utilizes convex optimization to address the exploration problem. We identify classes of instances wherein our regret guarantee is essentially tight, and experimentally validate our theoretical results. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: 29 pages

Sublinear Approximation Algorithm for Nash Social Welfare with XOS Valuations

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Anand Krishna, Pooja Kulkarni, Shivika Narang

Abstract: We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among $n$ agents with the objective of maximizing Nash social welfare (NSW). This welfare function is defined as the geometric mean of the agents' valuations and, hence, it strikes a balance between the extremes of social welfare (arithmetic mean) and egalitarian welfare (max-min value). Nash social welfare has been extensively studied in recent… ▽ More We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among $n$ agents with the objective of maximizing Nash social welfare (NSW). This welfare function is defined as the geometric mean of the agents' valuations and, hence, it strikes a balance between the extremes of social welfare (arithmetic mean) and egalitarian welfare (max-min value). Nash social welfare has been extensively studied in recent years for various valuation classes. In particular, a notable negative result is known when the agents' valuations are complement-free and are specified via value queries: for XOS valuations, one necessarily requires exponentially many value queries to find any sublinear (in $n$) approximation for NSW. Indeed, this lower bound implies that stronger query models are needed for finding better approximations. Towards this, we utilize demand oracles and XOS oracles; both of these query models are standard and have been used in prior work on social welfare maximization with XOS valuations. We develop the first sublinear approximation algorithm for maximizing Nash social welfare under XOS valuations, specified via demand and XOS oracles. Hence, this work breaks the $O(n)$-approximation barrier for NSW maximization under XOS valuations. We obtain this result by develo** a novel connection between NSW and social welfare under a capped version of the agents' valuations. In addition to this insight, which might be of independent interest, this work relies on an intricate combination of multiple technical ideas, including the use of repeated matchings and the discrete moving knife method. In addition, we partially complement the algorithmic result by showing that, under XOS valuations, an exponential number of demand and XOS queries are necessarily required to approximate NSW within a factor of $\left(1 - \frac{1}{e}\right)$. △ Less

Submitted 15 July, 2022; v1 submitted 2 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: 41 pages

Truthful and Fair Mechanisms for Matroid-Rank Valuations

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Paritosh Verma

Abstract: We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among strategic agents. We focus on settings wherein monetary transfers are not available and each agent's private valuation is a submodular function with binary marginals, i.e., the agents' valuations are matroid-rank functions. In this setup, we establish a notable dichotomy between two of the most well-studied fairness notions in discrete fai… ▽ More We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among strategic agents. We focus on settings wherein monetary transfers are not available and each agent's private valuation is a submodular function with binary marginals, i.e., the agents' valuations are matroid-rank functions. In this setup, we establish a notable dichotomy between two of the most well-studied fairness notions in discrete fair division; specifically, between envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and maximin shares (MMS). First, we show that a Pareto-efficient mechanism of Babaioff et al. (2021) is group strategy-proof for finding EF1 allocations, under matroid-rank valuations. The group strategy-proofness guarantee strengthens the result of Babaioff et al. (2021), that establishes truthfulness (individually for each agent) in the same context. Our result also generalizes a work of Halpern et al. (2020), from binary additive valuations to the matroid-rank case. Next, we establish that an analogous positive result cannot be achieved for MMS, even when considering truthfulness on an individual level. Specifically, we prove that, for matroid-rank valuations, there does not exist a truthful mechanism that is index oblivious, Pareto efficient, and maximin fair. For establishing our results, we develop a characterization of truthful mechanisms for matroid-rank functions. This characterization in fact holds for a broader class of valuations (specifically, holds for binary XOS functions) and might be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: 22 pages

Universal and Tight Online Algorithms for Generalized-Mean Welfare

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Arnab Maiti

Abstract: We study fair and efficient allocation of divisible goods, in an online manner, among $n$ agents. The goods arrive online in a sequence of $T$ time periods. The agents' values for a good are revealed only after its arrival, and the online algorithm needs to fractionally allocate the good, immediately and irrevocably, among the agents. Towards a unifying treatment of fairness and economic efficienc… ▽ More We study fair and efficient allocation of divisible goods, in an online manner, among $n$ agents. The goods arrive online in a sequence of $T$ time periods. The agents' values for a good are revealed only after its arrival, and the online algorithm needs to fractionally allocate the good, immediately and irrevocably, among the agents. Towards a unifying treatment of fairness and economic efficiency objectives, we develop an algorithmic framework for finding online allocations to maximize the generalized mean of the values received by the agents. In particular, working with the assumption that each agent's value for the grand bundle of goods is appropriately scaled, we address online maximization of $p$-mean welfare. Parameterized by an exponent term $p \in (-\infty, 1]$, these means encapsulate a range of welfare functions, including social welfare ($p=1$), egalitarian welfare ($p \to -\infty$), and Nash social welfare ($p \to 0$). We present a simple algorithmic template that takes a threshold as input and, with judicious choices for this threshold, leads to both universal and tailored competitive guarantees. First, we show that one can compute online a single allocation that $O (\sqrt{n} \log n)$-approximates the optimal $p$-mean welfare for all $p\le 1$. The existence of such a universal allocation is interesting in and of itself. Moreover, this universal guarantee achieves essentially tight competitive ratios for specific values of $p$. Next, we obtain improved competitive ratios for different ranges of $p$ by executing our algorithm with $p$-specific thresholds, e.g., we provide $O(\log ^3 n)$-competitive ratio for all $p\in (\frac{-1}{\log 2n},1)$. We complement our positive results by establishing lower bounds to show that our guarantees are essentially tight for a wide range of the exponent parameter. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: 32 pages

Approximating Nash Social Welfare under Binary XOS and Binary Subadditive Valuations

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Paritosh Verma

Abstract: We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among agents in a fair and economically efficient manner. In this context, the Nash social welfare-defined as the geometric mean of agents' valuations for their assigned bundles-stands as a fundamental measure that quantifies the extent of fairness of an allocation. Focusing on instances in which the agents' valuations have binary marginals, we… ▽ More We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among agents in a fair and economically efficient manner. In this context, the Nash social welfare-defined as the geometric mean of agents' valuations for their assigned bundles-stands as a fundamental measure that quantifies the extent of fairness of an allocation. Focusing on instances in which the agents' valuations have binary marginals, we develop essentially tight results for (approximately) maximizing Nash social welfare under two of the most general classes of complement-free valuations, i.e., under binary XOS and binary subadditive valuations. For binary XOS valuations, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm that finds a constant-factor (specifically $288$) approximation for the optimal Nash social welfare, in the standard value-oracle model. The allocations computed by our algorithm also achieve constant-factor approximation for social welfare and the groupwise maximin share guarantee. These results imply that-in the case of binary XOS valuations-there necessarily exists an allocation that simultaneously satisfies multiple (approximate) fairness and efficiency criteria. We complement the algorithmic result by proving that Nash social welfare maximization is APX-hard under binary XOS valuations. Furthermore, this work establishes an interesting separation between the binary XOS and binary subadditive settings. In particular, we prove that an exponential number of value queries are necessarily required to obtain even a sub-linear approximation for Nash social welfare under binary subadditive valuations. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2021; v1 submitted 4 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: 25 pages

Optimal Algorithms for Range Searching over Multi-Armed Bandits

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Ramakrishnan Krishnamurthy, Saladi Rahul

Abstract: This paper studies a multi-armed bandit (MAB) version of the range-searching problem. In its basic form, range searching considers as input a set of points (on the real line) and a collection of (real) intervals. Here, with each specified point, we have an associated weight, and the problem objective is to find a maximum-weight point within every given interval. The current work addresses range… ▽ More This paper studies a multi-armed bandit (MAB) version of the range-searching problem. In its basic form, range searching considers as input a set of points (on the real line) and a collection of (real) intervals. Here, with each specified point, we have an associated weight, and the problem objective is to find a maximum-weight point within every given interval. The current work addresses range searching with stochastic weights: each point corresponds to an arm (that admits sample access) and the point's weight is the (unknown) mean of the underlying distribution. In this MAB setup, we develop sample-efficient algorithms that find, with high probability, near-optimal arms within the given intervals, i.e., we obtain PAC (probably approximately correct) guarantees. We also provide an algorithm for a generalization wherein the weight of each point is a multi-dimensional vector. The sample complexities of our algorithms depend, in particular, on the size of the optimal hitting set of the given intervals. Finally, we establish lower bounds proving that the obtained sample complexities are essentially tight. Our results highlight the significance of geometric constructs -- specifically, hitting sets -- in our MAB setting. △ Less

Submitted 4 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: 21 pages

Existence and Computation of Maximin Fair Allocations Under Matroid-Rank Valuations

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Paritosh Verma

Abstract: We study fair and economically efficient allocation of indivisible goods among agents whose valuations are rank functions of matroids. Such valuations constitute a well-studied class of submodular functions (i.e., they exhibit a diminishing returns property) and model preferences in several resource-allocation settings. We prove that, for matroid-rank valuations, a social welfare-maximizing alloca… ▽ More We study fair and economically efficient allocation of indivisible goods among agents whose valuations are rank functions of matroids. Such valuations constitute a well-studied class of submodular functions (i.e., they exhibit a diminishing returns property) and model preferences in several resource-allocation settings. We prove that, for matroid-rank valuations, a social welfare-maximizing allocation that gives each agent her maximin share always exists. Furthermore, such an allocation can be computed in polynomial time. We establish similar existential and algorithmic results for the pairwise maximin share guarantee as well. To complement these results, we show that if the agents have binary XOS valuations or weighted-rank valuations, then maximin fair allocations are not guaranteed to exist. Both of these valuation classes are immediate generalizations of matroid-rank functions. △ Less

Submitted 4 February, 2021; v1 submitted 23 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: 17 pages

Tight Approximation Guarantees for Concave Coverage Problems

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Omar Fawzi, Paul Fermé

Abstract: In the maximum coverage problem, we are given subsets $T_1, \ldots, T_m$ of a universe $[n]$ along with an integer $k$ and the objective is to find a subset $S \subseteq [m]$ of size $k$ that maximizes $C(S) := \Big|\bigcup_{i \in S} T_i\Big|$. It is a classic result that the greedy algorithm for this problem achieves an optimal approximation ratio of $1-e^{-1}$. In this work we consider a gener… ▽ More In the maximum coverage problem, we are given subsets $T_1, \ldots, T_m$ of a universe $[n]$ along with an integer $k$ and the objective is to find a subset $S \subseteq [m]$ of size $k$ that maximizes $C(S) := \Big|\bigcup_{i \in S} T_i\Big|$. It is a classic result that the greedy algorithm for this problem achieves an optimal approximation ratio of $1-e^{-1}$. In this work we consider a generalization of this problem wherein an element $a$ can contribute by an amount that depends on the number of times it is covered. Given a concave, nondecreasing function $\varphi$, we define $C^{\varphi}(S) := \sum_{a \in [n]}w_a\varphi(|S|_a)$, where $|S|_a = |\{i \in S : a \in T_i\}|$. The standard maximum coverage problem corresponds to taking $\varphi(j) = \min\{j,1\}$. For any such $\varphi$, we provide an efficient algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio equal to the Poisson concavity ratio of $\varphi$, defined by $α_{\varphi} := \min_{x \in \mathbb{N}^*} \frac{\mathbb{E}[\varphi(\text{Poi}(x))]}{\varphi(\mathbb{E}[\text{Poi}(x)])}$. Complementing this approximation guarantee, we establish a matching NP-hardness result when $\varphi$ grows in a sublinear way. As special cases, we improve the result of [Barman et al., IPCO, 2020] about maximum multi-coverage, that was based on the unique games conjecture, and we recover the result of [Dudycz et al., IJCAI, 2020] on multi-winner approval-based voting for geometrically dominant rules. Our result goes beyond these special cases and we illustrate it with applications to distributed resource allocation problems, welfare maximization problems and approval-based voting for general rules. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2021; v1 submitted 2 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: 33 pages. v3 minor corrections and added FPT hardness

Optimal Bounds on the Price of Fairness for Indivisible Goods

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Umang Bhaskar, Nisarg Shah

Abstract: In the allocation of resources to a set of agents, how do fairness guarantees impact the social welfare? A quantitative measure of this impact is the price of fairness, which measures the worst-case loss of social welfare due to fairness constraints. While initially studied for divisible goods, recent work on the price of fairness also studies the setting of indivisible goods. In this paper, we… ▽ More In the allocation of resources to a set of agents, how do fairness guarantees impact the social welfare? A quantitative measure of this impact is the price of fairness, which measures the worst-case loss of social welfare due to fairness constraints. While initially studied for divisible goods, recent work on the price of fairness also studies the setting of indivisible goods. In this paper, we resolve the price of two well-studied fairness notions for the allocation of indivisible goods: envy-freeness up to one good (EF1), and approximate maximin share (MMS). For both EF1 and 1/2-MMS guarantees, we show, via different techniques, that the price of fairness is $O(\sqrt{n})$, where $n$ is the number of agents. From previous work, it follows that our bounds are tight. Our bounds are obtained via efficient algorithms. For 1/2-MMS, our bound holds for additive valuations, whereas for EF1, our bound holds for the more general class of subadditive valuations. This resolves an open problem posed by Bei et al. (2019). △ Less

Submitted 2 November, 2020; v1 submitted 13 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: 24 pages

MSC Class: 91A68 ACM Class: F.2.0

Fair Cake Division Under Monotone Likelihood Ratios

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Nidhi Rathi

Abstract: This work develops algorithmic results for the classic cake-cutting problem in which a divisible, heterogeneous resource (modeled as a cake) needs to be partitioned among agents with distinct preferences. We focus on a standard formulation of cake cutting wherein each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake. While multiple hardness results exist in this setup for finding fair/efficient c… ▽ More This work develops algorithmic results for the classic cake-cutting problem in which a divisible, heterogeneous resource (modeled as a cake) needs to be partitioned among agents with distinct preferences. We focus on a standard formulation of cake cutting wherein each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake. While multiple hardness results exist in this setup for finding fair/efficient cake divisions, we show that, if the value densities of the agents satisfy the monotone likelihood ratio property (MLRP), then strong algorithmic results hold for various notions of fairness and economic efficiency. Addressing cake-cutting instances with MLRP, first we develop an algorithm that finds cake divisions (with connected pieces) that are envy-free, up to an arbitrary precision. The time complexity of our algorithm is polynomial in the number of agents and the bit complexity of an underlying Lipschitz constant. We obtain similar positive results for maximizing social (utilitarian) and egalitarian welfare. In addition, we show that, under MLRP, the problem of maximizing Nash social welfare admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS). Many distribution families bear MLRP. In particular, this property holds if all the value densities belong to any one of the following families: Gaussian (with the same variance), linear, binomial, Poisson, and exponential distributions. Furthermore, it is known that linear translations of any log-concave function satisfy MLRP. Therefore, our results also hold when the value densities of the agents are linear translations of the following (log-concave) distributions: Laplace, gamma, beta, Subbotin, chi-square, Dirichlet, and logistic. Hence, through MLRP, the current work obtains novel cake-cutting algorithms for multiple distribution families. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2021; v1 submitted 31 May, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: 37 pages

ACM Class: F.2.0

Tight Approximation Algorithms for p-Mean Welfare Under Subadditive Valuations

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Umang Bhaskar, Anand Krishna, Ranjani G. Sundaram

Abstract: We develop polynomial-time algorithms for the fair and efficient allocation of indivisible goods among $n$ agents that have subadditive valuations over the goods. We first consider the Nash social welfare as our objective and design a polynomial-time algorithm that, in the value oracle model, finds an $8n$-approximation to the Nash optimal allocation. Subadditive valuations include XOS (fractional… ▽ More We develop polynomial-time algorithms for the fair and efficient allocation of indivisible goods among $n$ agents that have subadditive valuations over the goods. We first consider the Nash social welfare as our objective and design a polynomial-time algorithm that, in the value oracle model, finds an $8n$-approximation to the Nash optimal allocation. Subadditive valuations include XOS (fractionally subadditive) and submodular valuations as special cases. Our result, even for the special case of submodular valuations, improves upon the previously best known $O(n \log n)$-approximation ratio of Garg et al. (2020). More generally, we study maximization of $p$-mean welfare. The $p$-mean welfare is parameterized by an exponent term $p \in (-\infty, 1]$ and encompasses a range of welfare functions, such as social welfare ($p = 1$), Nash social welfare ($p \to 0$), and egalitarian welfare ($p \to -\infty$). We give an algorithm that, for subadditive valuations and any given $p \in (-\infty, 1]$, computes (in the value oracle model and in polynomial time) an allocation with $p$-mean welfare at least $\frac{1}{8n}$ times the optimal. Further, we show that our approximation guarantees are essentially tight for XOS and, hence, subadditive valuations. We adapt a result of Dobzinski et al. (2010) to show that, under XOS valuations, an $O \left(n^{1-\varepsilon} \right)$ approximation for the $p$-mean welfare for any $p \in (-\infty,1]$ (including the Nash social welfare) requires exponentially many value queries; here, $\varepsilon>0$ is any fixed constant. △ Less

Submitted 5 July, 2020; v1 submitted 15 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: 19 pages

Uniform Welfare Guarantees Under Identical Subadditive Valuations

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Ranjani G. Sundaram

Abstract: We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among agents that have an identical subadditive valuation over the goods. The extent of fairness and efficiency of allocations is measured by the generalized means of the values that the allocations generate among the agents. Parameterized by an exponent term $p$, generalized-mean welfares encompass multiple well-studied objectives, such as soci… ▽ More We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among agents that have an identical subadditive valuation over the goods. The extent of fairness and efficiency of allocations is measured by the generalized means of the values that the allocations generate among the agents. Parameterized by an exponent term $p$, generalized-mean welfares encompass multiple well-studied objectives, such as social welfare, Nash social welfare, and egalitarian welfare. We establish that, under identical subadditive valuations and in the demand oracle model, one can efficiently find a single allocation that approximates the optimal generalized-mean welfare---to within a factor of $40$---uniformly for all $p \in (-\infty, 1]$. Hence, by way of a constant-factor approximation algorithm, we obtain novel results for maximizing Nash social welfare and egalitarian welfare for identical subadditive valuations. △ Less

Submitted 1 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: 24 pages

Quantifying Infra-Marginality and Its Trade-off with Group Fairness

Authors: Arpita Biswas, Siddharth Barman, Amit Deshpande, Amit Sharma

Abstract: In critical decision-making scenarios, optimizing accuracy can lead to a biased classifier, hence past work recommends enforcing group-based fairness metrics in addition to maximizing accuracy. However, doing so exposes the classifier to another kind of bias called infra-marginality. This refers to individual-level bias where some individuals/subgroups can be worse off than under simply optimizing… ▽ More In critical decision-making scenarios, optimizing accuracy can lead to a biased classifier, hence past work recommends enforcing group-based fairness metrics in addition to maximizing accuracy. However, doing so exposes the classifier to another kind of bias called infra-marginality. This refers to individual-level bias where some individuals/subgroups can be worse off than under simply optimizing for accuracy. For instance, a classifier implementing race-based parity may significantly disadvantage women of the advantaged race. To quantify this bias, we propose a general notion of $η$-infra-marginality that can be used to evaluate the extent of this bias. We prove theoretically that, unlike other fairness metrics, infra-marginality does not have a trade-off with accuracy: high accuracy directly leads to low infra-marginality. This observation is confirmed through empirical analysis on multiple simulated and real-world datasets. Further, we find that maximizing group fairness often increases infra-marginality, suggesting the consideration of both group-level fairness and individual-level infra-marginality. However, measuring infra-marginality requires knowledge of the true distribution of individual-level outcomes correctly and explicitly. We propose a practical method to measure infra-marginality, and a simple algorithm to maximize group-wise accuracy and avoid infra-marginality. △ Less

Submitted 3 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Fair and Efficient Cake Division with Connected Pieces

Authors: Eshwar Ram Arunachaleswaran, Siddharth Barman, Rachitesh Kumar, Nidhi Rathi

Abstract: The classic cake-cutting problem provides a model for addressing fair and efficient allocation of a divisible, heterogeneous resource (metaphorically, the cake) among agents with distinct preferences. Focusing on a standard formulation of cake cutting, in which each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake, this work establishes algorithmic and hardness results for multiple fairness/effic… ▽ More The classic cake-cutting problem provides a model for addressing fair and efficient allocation of a divisible, heterogeneous resource (metaphorically, the cake) among agents with distinct preferences. Focusing on a standard formulation of cake cutting, in which each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake, this work establishes algorithmic and hardness results for multiple fairness/efficiency measures. First, we consider the well-studied notion of envy-freeness and develop an efficient algorithm that finds a cake division (with connected pieces) wherein the envy is multiplicatively within a factor of 2+o(1). The same algorithm in fact achieves an approximation ratio of 3+o(1) for the problem of finding cake divisions with as large a Nash social welfare (NSW) as possible. NSW is another standard measure of fairness and this work also establishes a connection between envy-freeness and NSW: approximately envy-free cake divisions (with connected pieces) always have near-optimal Nash social welfare. Furthermore, we develop an approximation algorithm for maximizing the $ρ$-mean welfare--this unifying objective, with different values of $ρ$, interpolates between notions of fairness (NSW) and efficiency (average social welfare). Finally, we complement these algorithmic results by proving that maximizing NSW (and, in general, the $ρ$-mean welfare) is APX-hard in the cake-division context. △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2021; v1 submitted 25 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: 31 pages

ACM Class: F.2.0

The Edgeworth Conjecture with Small Coalitions and Approximate Equilibria in Large Economies

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Federico Echenique

Abstract: We revisit the connection between bargaining and equilibrium in exchange economies, and study its algorithmic implications. We consider bargaining outcomes to be allocations that cannot be blocked (i.e., profitably re-traded) by coalitions of small size and show that these allocations must be approximate Walrasian equilibria. Our results imply that deciding whether an allocation is approximately W… ▽ More We revisit the connection between bargaining and equilibrium in exchange economies, and study its algorithmic implications. We consider bargaining outcomes to be allocations that cannot be blocked (i.e., profitably re-traded) by coalitions of small size and show that these allocations must be approximate Walrasian equilibria. Our results imply that deciding whether an allocation is approximately Walrasian can be done in polynomial time, even in economies for which finding an equilibrium is known to be computationally hard. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 26 pages

Tight Approximation Bounds for Maximum Multi-Coverage

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Omar Fawzi, Suprovat Ghoshal, Emirhan Gürpınar

Abstract: In the classic maximum coverage problem, we are given subsets $T_1, \dots, T_m$ of a universe $[n]$ along with an integer $k$ and the objective is to find a subset $S \subseteq [m]$ of size $k$ that maximizes $C(S) := |\cup_{i \in S} T_i|$. It is well-known that the greedy algorithm for this problem achieves an approximation ratio of $(1-e^{-1})$ and there is a matching inapproximability result. W… ▽ More In the classic maximum coverage problem, we are given subsets $T_1, \dots, T_m$ of a universe $[n]$ along with an integer $k$ and the objective is to find a subset $S \subseteq [m]$ of size $k$ that maximizes $C(S) := |\cup_{i \in S} T_i|$. It is well-known that the greedy algorithm for this problem achieves an approximation ratio of $(1-e^{-1})$ and there is a matching inapproximability result. We note that in the maximum coverage problem if an element $e \in [n]$ is covered by several sets, it is still counted only once. By contrast, if we change the problem and count each element $e$ as many times as it is covered, then we obtain a linear objective function, $C^{(\infty)}(S) = \sum_{i \in S} |T_i|$, which can be easily maximized under a cardinality constraint. We study the maximum $\ell$-multi-coverage problem which naturally interpolates between these two extremes. In this problem, an element can be counted up to $\ell$ times but no more; hence, we consider maximizing the function $C^{(\ell)}(S) = \sum_{e \in [n]} \min\{\ell, |\{i \in S : e \in T_i\}| \}$, subject to the constraint $|S| \leq k$. Note that the case of $\ell = 1$ corresponds to the standard maximum coverage setting and $\ell = \infty$ gives us a linear objective. We develop an efficient approximation algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio of $1 - \frac{\ell^{\ell}e^{-\ell}}{\ell!}$ for the $\ell$-multi-coverage problem. In particular, when $\ell = 2$, this factor is $1-2e^{-2} \approx 0.73$ and as $\ell$ grows the approximation ratio behaves as $1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2π\ell}}$. We also prove that this approximation ratio is tight, i.e., establish a matching hardness-of-approximation result, under the Unique Games Conjecture. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2022; v1 submitted 2 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 27 pages

Journal ref: Math. Program. 192, 443-476 (2022)

Fair Division of Indivisible Goods Among Strategic Agents

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Ganesh Ghalme, Shweta Jain, Pooja Kulkarni, Shivika Narang

Abstract: We study fair division of indivisible goods in a single-parameter environment. In particular, we develop truthful social welfare maximizing mechanisms for fairly allocating indivisible goods. Our fairness guarantees are in terms of solution concepts which are tailored to address allocation of indivisible goods and, hence, provide an appropriate framework for fair division of goods. This work speci… ▽ More We study fair division of indivisible goods in a single-parameter environment. In particular, we develop truthful social welfare maximizing mechanisms for fairly allocating indivisible goods. Our fairness guarantees are in terms of solution concepts which are tailored to address allocation of indivisible goods and, hence, provide an appropriate framework for fair division of goods. This work specifically considers fairness in terms of envy freeness up to one good (EF1), maximin share guarantee (MMS), and Nash social welfare (NSW). Our first result shows that (in a single-parameter environment) the problem of maximizing welfare, subject to the constraint that the allocation of the indivisible goods is EF1, admits a polynomial-time, 1/2-approximate, truthful auction. We further prove that this problem is NP-Hard and, hence, an approximation is warranted. This hardness result also complements prior works which show that an arbitrary EF1 allocation can be computed efficiently. We also establish a bi-criteria approximation guarantee for the problem of maximizing social welfare under MMS constraints. In particular, we develop a truthful auction which efficiently finds an allocation wherein each agent gets a bundle of value at least $\left(1/2 - \varepsilon \right)$ times her maximin share and the welfare of the computed allocation is at least the optimal, here $\varepsilon >0$ is a fixed constant. We complement this result by showing that maximizing welfare is computationally hard even if one aims to only satisfy the MMS constraint approximately. △ Less

Submitted 27 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Fair Division with a Secretive Agent

Authors: Eshwar Ram Arunachaleswaran, Siddharth Barman, Nidhi Rathi

Abstract: We study classic fair-division problems in a partial information setting. This paper respectively addresses fair division of rent, cake, and indivisible goods among agents with cardinal preferences. We will show that, for all of these settings and under appropriate valuations, a fair (or an approximately fair) division among n agents can be efficiently computed using only the valuations of n-1 age… ▽ More We study classic fair-division problems in a partial information setting. This paper respectively addresses fair division of rent, cake, and indivisible goods among agents with cardinal preferences. We will show that, for all of these settings and under appropriate valuations, a fair (or an approximately fair) division among n agents can be efficiently computed using only the valuations of n-1 agents. The nth (secretive) agent can make an arbitrary selection after the division has been proposed and, irrespective of her choice, the computed division will admit an overall fair allocation. For the rent-division setting we prove that the (well-behaved) utilities of n-1 agents suffice to find a rent division among n rooms such that, for every possible room selection of the secretive agent, there exists an allocation (of the remaining n-1 rooms among the n-1 agents) which ensures overall envy freeness (fairness). We complement this existential result by develo** a polynomial-time algorithm that finds such a fair rent division under quasilinear utilities. In this partial information setting, we also develop efficient algorithms to compute allocations that are envy-free up to one good (EF1) and epsilon-approximate envy free. These two notions of fairness are applicable in the context of indivisible goods and divisible goods (cake cutting), respectively. This work also addresses fairness in terms of proportionality and maximin shares. Our key result here is an efficient algorithm that, even with a secretive agent, finds a 1/19-approximate maximin fair allocation (of indivisible goods) under submodular valuations of the non-secretive agents. One of the main technical contributions of this paper is the development of novel connections between different fair-division paradigms, e.g., we use our existential results for envy-free rent-division to develop an efficient EF1 algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Comments: 27 pages

On the Proximity of Markets with Integral Equilibria

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy

Abstract: We study Fisher markets that admit equilibria wherein each good is integrally assigned to some agent. While strong existence and computational guarantees are known for equilibria of Fisher markets with additive valuations, such equilibria, in general, assign goods fractionally to agents. Hence, Fisher markets are not directly applicable in the context of indivisible goods. In this work we show tha… ▽ More We study Fisher markets that admit equilibria wherein each good is integrally assigned to some agent. While strong existence and computational guarantees are known for equilibria of Fisher markets with additive valuations, such equilibria, in general, assign goods fractionally to agents. Hence, Fisher markets are not directly applicable in the context of indivisible goods. In this work we show that one can always bypass this hurdle and, up to a bounded change in agents' budgets, obtain markets that admit an integral equilibrium. We refer to such markets as pure markets and show that, for any given Fisher market (with additive valuations), one can efficiently compute a "near-by," pure market with an accompanying integral equilibrium. Our work on pure markets leads to novel algorithmic results for fair division of indivisible goods. Prior work in discrete fair division has shown that, under additive valuations, there always exist allocations that simultaneously achieve the seemingly incompatible properties of fairness and efficiency; here fairness refers to envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and efficiency corresponds to Pareto efficiency. However, polynomial-time algorithms are not known for finding such allocations. Considering relaxations of proportionality and EF1, respectively, as our notions of fairness, we show that fair and Pareto efficient allocations can be computed in strongly polynomial time. △ Less

Submitted 21 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Comments: 17 pages

Fully Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes for Fair Rent Division

Authors: Eshwar Ram Arunachaleswaran, Siddharth Barman, Nidhi Rathi

Abstract: We study the problem of fair rent division that entails splitting the rent and allocating the rooms of an apartment among roommates (agents) in a fair manner. In this setup, a distribution of the rent and an allocation is said to be fair if it is envy free, i.e., under the imposed rents, no agent has a strictly stronger preference for any other agent's room. The cardinal preferences of the agents… ▽ More We study the problem of fair rent division that entails splitting the rent and allocating the rooms of an apartment among roommates (agents) in a fair manner. In this setup, a distribution of the rent and an allocation is said to be fair if it is envy free, i.e., under the imposed rents, no agent has a strictly stronger preference for any other agent's room. The cardinal preferences of the agents are expressed via functions which specify the utilities of the agents for the rooms at every possible room rent/price. While envy-free solutions are guaranteed to exist under reasonably general utility functions, efficient algorithms for finding them were known only for quasilinear utilities. This work addresses this notable gap and develops approximation algorithms for fair rent division with minimal assumptions on the utility functions. Specifically, we show that if the agents have continuous, monotone decreasing, and piecewise-linear utilities, then the fair rent-division problem admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS). That is, we develop algorithms that find allocations and prices of the rooms such that for each agent a the utility of the room assigned to it is within a factor of $(1 + ε)$ of the utility of the room most preferred by a. Here, $ε>0$ is an approximation parameter, and the running time of the algorithms is polynomial in $1/ε$ and the input size. In addition, we show that the methods developed in this work provide truthful mechanisms for special cases of the rent-division problem. Envy-free solutions correspond to equilibria of a two-sided matching market with monetary transfers; hence, this work also provides efficient algorithms for finding approximate equilibria in such markets. We complement the algorithmic results by proving that the fair rent division problem lies in the intersection of the complexity classes PPAD and PLS. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: 41 pages, 5 figures

Fair Division Under Cardinality Constraints

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Arpita Biswas

Abstract: We consider the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, among agents, under cardinality constraints and additive valuations. In this setting, we are given a partition of the entire set of goods---i.e., the goods are categorized---and a limit is specified on the number of goods that can be allocated from each category to any agent. The objective here is to find a fair allocation in which th… ▽ More We consider the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, among agents, under cardinality constraints and additive valuations. In this setting, we are given a partition of the entire set of goods---i.e., the goods are categorized---and a limit is specified on the number of goods that can be allocated from each category to any agent. The objective here is to find a fair allocation in which the subset of goods assigned to any agent satisfies the given cardinality constraints. This problem naturally captures a number of resource-allocation applications, and is a generalization of the well-studied (unconstrained) fair division problem. The two central notions of fairness, in the context of fair division of indivisible goods, are envy freeness up to one good (EF1) and the (approximate) maximin share guarantee (MMS). We show that the existence and algorithmic guarantees established for these solution concepts in the unconstrained setting can essentially be achieved under cardinality constraints. Specifically, we develop efficient algorithms which compute EF1 and approximately MMS allocations in the constrained setting. Furthermore, focusing on the case wherein all the agents have the same additive valuation, we establish that EF1 allocations exist and can be computed efficiently even under laminar matroid constraints. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: 22 pages. A part of these results is accepted at the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2018. The proof of Lemma 5 in the earlier version had a bug. To address the issue and in lieu of general matroids, the current version provides a proof of this result specialized for Laminar matroids

Greedy Algorithms for Maximizing Nash Social Welfare

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy, Rohit Vaish

Abstract: We study the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among agents with additive valuations. The extent of fairness of an allocation is measured by its Nash social welfare, which is the geometric mean of the valuations of the agents for their bundles. While the problem of maximizing Nash social welfare is known to be APX-hard in general, we study the effectiveness of simple, greedy… ▽ More We study the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among agents with additive valuations. The extent of fairness of an allocation is measured by its Nash social welfare, which is the geometric mean of the valuations of the agents for their bundles. While the problem of maximizing Nash social welfare is known to be APX-hard in general, we study the effectiveness of simple, greedy algorithms in solving this problem in two interesting special cases. First, we show that a simple, greedy algorithm provides a 1.061-approximation guarantee when agents have identical valuations, even though the problem of maximizing Nash social welfare remains NP-hard for this setting. Second, we show that when agents have binary valuations over the goods, an exact solution (i.e., a Nash optimal allocation) can be found in polynomial time via a greedy algorithm. Our results in the binary setting extend to provide novel, exact algorithms for optimizing Nash social welfare under concave valuations. Notably, for the above mentioned scenarios, our techniques provide a simple alternative to several of the existing, more sophisticated techniques for this problem such as constructing equilibria of Fisher markets or using real stable polynomials. △ Less

Submitted 27 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: 13 pages

Groupwise Maximin Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Arpita Biswas, Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy, Y. Narahari

Abstract: We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among n agents in a fair manner. For this problem, maximin share (MMS) is a well-studied solution concept which provides a fairness threshold. Specifically, maximin share is defined as the minimum utility that an agent can guarantee for herself when asked to partition the set of goods into n bundles such that the remaining (n-1) agents pick thei… ▽ More We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among n agents in a fair manner. For this problem, maximin share (MMS) is a well-studied solution concept which provides a fairness threshold. Specifically, maximin share is defined as the minimum utility that an agent can guarantee for herself when asked to partition the set of goods into n bundles such that the remaining (n-1) agents pick their bundles adversarially. An allocation is deemed to be fair if every agent gets a bundle whose valuation is at least her maximin share. Even though maximin shares provide a natural benchmark for fairness, it has its own drawbacks and, in particular, it is not sufficient to rule out unsatisfactory allocations. Motivated by these considerations, in this work we define a stronger notion of fairness, called groupwise maximin share guarantee (GMMS). In GMMS, we require that the maximin share guarantee is achieved not just with respect to the grand bundle, but also among all the subgroups of agents. Hence, this solution concept strengthens MMS and provides an ex-post fairness guarantee. We show that in specific settings, GMMS allocations always exist. We also establish the existence of approximate GMMS allocations under additive valuations, and develop a polynomial-time algorithm to find such allocations. Moreover, we establish a scale of fairness wherein we show that GMMS implies approximate envy freeness. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the existence of GMMS allocations in a large set of randomly generated instances. For the same set of instances, we additionally show that our algorithm achieves an approximation factor better than the established, worst-case bound. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: 19 pages

Finding Fair and Efficient Allocations

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy, Rohit Vaish

Abstract: We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among a set of agents in a fair and efficient manner. An allocation is said to be fair if it is envy-free up to one good (EF1), which means that each agent prefers its own bundle over the bundle of any other agent up to the removal of one good. In addition, an allocation is deemed efficient if it satisfies Pareto optimality (PO). While… ▽ More We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among a set of agents in a fair and efficient manner. An allocation is said to be fair if it is envy-free up to one good (EF1), which means that each agent prefers its own bundle over the bundle of any other agent up to the removal of one good. In addition, an allocation is deemed efficient if it satisfies Pareto optimality (PO). While each of these well-studied properties is easy to achieve separately, achieving them together is far from obvious. Recently, Caragiannis et al. (2016) established the surprising result that when agents have additive valuations for the goods, there always exists an allocation that simultaneously satisfies these two seemingly incompatible properties. Specifically, they showed that an allocation that maximizes the Nash social welfare (NSW) objective is both EF1 and PO. However, the problem of maximizing NSW is NP-hard. As a result, this approach does not provide an efficient algorithm for finding a fair and efficient allocation. In this paper, we bypass this barrier, and develop a pseudopolynomial time algorithm for finding allocations that are EF1 and PO; in particular, when the valuations are bounded, our algorithm finds such an allocation in polynomial time. Furthermore, we establish a stronger existence result compared to Caragiannis et al. (2016): For additive valuations, there always exists an allocation that is EF1 and fractionally PO. Another contribution of our work is to show that our algorithm provides a polynomial-time 1.45-approximation to the NSW objective. This improves upon the best known approximation ratio for this problem (namely, the 2-approximation algorithm of Cole et al. (2017)). Unlike many of the existing approaches, our algorithm is completely combinatorial. △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2018; v1 submitted 15 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: 40 pages. Updated version

Online Learning for Structured Loss Spaces

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Aditya Gopalan, Aadirupa Saha

Abstract: We consider prediction with expert advice when the loss vectors are assumed to lie in a set described by the sum of atomic norm balls. We derive a regret bound for a general version of the online mirror descent (OMD) algorithm that uses a combination of regularizers, each adapted to the constituent atomic norms. The general result recovers standard OMD regret bounds, and yields regret bounds for n… ▽ More We consider prediction with expert advice when the loss vectors are assumed to lie in a set described by the sum of atomic norm balls. We derive a regret bound for a general version of the online mirror descent (OMD) algorithm that uses a combination of regularizers, each adapted to the constituent atomic norms. The general result recovers standard OMD regret bounds, and yields regret bounds for new structured settings where the loss vectors are (i) noisy versions of points from a low-rank subspace, (ii) sparse vectors corrupted with noise, and (iii) sparse perturbations of low-rank vectors. For the problem of online learning with structured losses, we also show lower bounds on regret in terms of rank and sparsity of the source set of the loss vectors, which implies lower bounds for the above additive loss settings as well. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2017; v1 submitted 13 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Comments: 24 pages

Approximation Algorithms for Maximin Fair Division

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Sanath Kumar Krishnamurthy

Abstract: We consider the problem of allocating indivisible goods fairly among n agents who have additive and submodular valuations for the goods. Our fairness guarantees are in terms of the maximin share, that is defined to be the maximum value that an agent can ensure for herself, if she were to partition the goods into n bundles, and then receive a minimum valued bundle. Since maximin fair allocations (i… ▽ More We consider the problem of allocating indivisible goods fairly among n agents who have additive and submodular valuations for the goods. Our fairness guarantees are in terms of the maximin share, that is defined to be the maximum value that an agent can ensure for herself, if she were to partition the goods into n bundles, and then receive a minimum valued bundle. Since maximin fair allocations (i.e., allocations in which each agent gets at least her maximin share) do not always exist, prior work has focused on approximation results that aim to find allocations in which the value of the bundle allocated to each agent is (multiplicatively) as close to her maximin share as possible. In particular, Procaccia and Wang (2014) along with Amanatidis et al. (2015) have shown that under additive valuations a 2/3-approximate maximin fair allocation always exists and can be found in polynomial time. We complement these results by develo** a simple and efficient algorithm that achieves the same approximation guarantee. Furthermore, we initiate the study of approximate maximin fair division under submodular valuations. Specifically, we show that when the valuations of the agents are nonnegative, monotone, and submodular, then a 0.21-approximate maximin fair allocation is guaranteed to exist. In fact, we show that such an allocation can be efficiently found by using a simple round-robin algorithm. A technical contribution of the paper is to analyze the performance of this combinatorial algorithm by employing the concept of multilinear extensions. △ Less

Submitted 6 April, 2020; v1 submitted 6 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 35 pages

Testing Sparsity over Known and Unknown Bases

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Arnab Bhattacharyya, Suprovat Ghoshal

Abstract: Sparsity is a basic property of real vectors that is exploited in a wide variety of applications. In this work, we describe property testing algorithms for sparsity that observe a low-dimensional projection of the input. We consider two settings. In the first setting, for a given design matrix A in R^{d x m}, we test whether an input vector y in R^d equals Ax for some k-sparse unit vector x. Our… ▽ More Sparsity is a basic property of real vectors that is exploited in a wide variety of applications. In this work, we describe property testing algorithms for sparsity that observe a low-dimensional projection of the input. We consider two settings. In the first setting, for a given design matrix A in R^{d x m}, we test whether an input vector y in R^d equals Ax for some k-sparse unit vector x. Our algorithm projects the input onto O(k \eps^{-2} log m) dimensions, accepts if the property holds, rejects if ||y - Ax|| > \eps for any O(k/\eps^2)-sparse vector x, and runs in time polynomial in m. Our algorithm is based on the approximate Caratheodory's theorem. Previously known algorithms that solve the problem for arbitrary A with qualitatively similar guarantees run in exponential time. In the second setting, the design matrix A is unknown. Given input vectors y_1, y_2,...,y_p in R^d whose concatenation as columns forms Y in R^{d x p} , the goal is to decide whether Y=AX for matrices A in R^{d x m} and X in R^{m x p} such that each column of X is k-sparse, or whether Y is "far" from having such a decomposition. We give such a testing algorithm which projects the input vectors to O(log p/\eps^2) dimensions and assumes that the unknown A satisfies k-restricted isometry. Our analysis gives a new robust characterization of gaussian width in terms of sparsity. △ Less

Submitted 12 September, 2017; v1 submitted 3 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Comments: This version subsumes the previous one; 25 pages

Approximating Nash Equilibria in Tree Polymatrix Games

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Katrina Ligett, Georgios Piliouras

Abstract: We develop a quasi-polynomial time Las Vegas algorithm for approximating Nash equilibria in polymatrix games over trees, under a mild renormalizing assumption. Our result, in particular, leads to an expected polynomial-time algorithm for computing approximate Nash equilibria of tree polymatrix games in which the number of actions per player is a fixed constant. Further, for trees with constant deg… ▽ More We develop a quasi-polynomial time Las Vegas algorithm for approximating Nash equilibria in polymatrix games over trees, under a mild renormalizing assumption. Our result, in particular, leads to an expected polynomial-time algorithm for computing approximate Nash equilibria of tree polymatrix games in which the number of actions per player is a fixed constant. Further, for trees with constant degree, the running time of the algorithm matches the best known upper bound for approximating Nash equilibria in bimatrix games (Lipton, Markakis, and Mehta 2003). Notably, this work closely complements the hardness result of Rubinstein (2015), which establishes the inapproximability of Nash equilibria in polymatrix games over constant-degree bipartite graphs with two actions per player. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

Comments: Appeared in the proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT), 2015. 11 pages

Computational Aspects of Private Bayesian Persuasion

Authors: Yakov Babichenko, Siddharth Barman

Abstract: We study computational questions in a game-theoretic model that, in particular, aims to capture advertising/persuasion applications such as viral marketing. Specifically, we consider a multi-agent Bayesian persuasion model where an informed sender (marketer) tries to persuade a group of agents (consumers) to adopt a certain product. The quality of the product is known to the sender, but it is unkn… ▽ More We study computational questions in a game-theoretic model that, in particular, aims to capture advertising/persuasion applications such as viral marketing. Specifically, we consider a multi-agent Bayesian persuasion model where an informed sender (marketer) tries to persuade a group of agents (consumers) to adopt a certain product. The quality of the product is known to the sender, but it is unknown to the agents. The sender is allowed to commit to a signaling policy where she sends a private signal---say, a viral marketing ad---to every agent. This work studies the computation aspects of finding a signaling policy that maximizes the sender's revenue. We show that if the sender's utility is a submodular function of the set of agents that adopt the product, then we can efficiently find a signaling policy whose revenue is at least (1-1/e) times the optimal. We also prove that approximating the sender's optimal revenue by a factor better than (1-1/e) is NP-hard and, hence, the developed approximation guarantee is essentially tight. When the senders' utility is a function of the number of agents that adopt the product (i.e., the utility function is anonymous), we show that an optimal signaling policy can be computed in polynomial time. Our results are based on an interesting connection between the Bayesian persuasion problem and the evaluation of the concave closure of a set function. △ Less

Submitted 4 March, 2016; originally announced March 2016.

Comments: 16 pages

Algorithmic Aspects of Optimal Channel Coding

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Omar Fawzi

Abstract: A central question in information theory is to determine the maximum success probability that can be achieved in sending a fixed number of messages over a noisy channel. This was first studied in the pioneering work of Shannon who established a simple expression characterizing this quantity in the limit of multiple independent uses of the channel. Here we consider the general setting with only one… ▽ More A central question in information theory is to determine the maximum success probability that can be achieved in sending a fixed number of messages over a noisy channel. This was first studied in the pioneering work of Shannon who established a simple expression characterizing this quantity in the limit of multiple independent uses of the channel. Here we consider the general setting with only one use of the channel. We observe that the maximum success probability can be expressed as the maximum value of a submodular function. Using this connection, we establish the following results: 1. There is a simple greedy polynomial-time algorithm that computes a code achieving a (1-1/e)-approximation of the maximum success probability. Moreover, for this problem it is NP-hard to obtain an approximation ratio strictly better than (1-1/e). 2. Shared quantum entanglement between the sender and the receiver can increase the success probability by a factor of at most 1/(1-1/e). In addition, this factor is tight if one allows an arbitrary non-signaling box between the sender and the receiver. 3. We give tight bounds on the one-shot performance of the meta-converse of Polyanskiy-Poor-Verdu. △ Less

Submitted 21 October, 2016; v1 submitted 17 August, 2015; originally announced August 2015.

Comments: v2: 16 pages. Added alternate proof of main result with random coding

Journal ref: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory ( Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Feb. 2018 )

A Tale of Two Metrics: Simultaneous Bounds on Competitiveness and Regret

Authors: Lachlan L. H. Andrew, Siddharth Barman, Katrina Ligett, Minghong Lin, Adam Meyerson, Alan Roytman, Adam Wierman

Abstract: We consider algorithms for "smoothed online convex optimization" problems, a variant of the class of online convex optimization problems that is strongly related to metrical task systems. Prior literature on these problems has focused on two performance metrics: regret and the competitive ratio. There exist known algorithms with sublinear regret and known algorithms with constant competitive ratio… ▽ More We consider algorithms for "smoothed online convex optimization" problems, a variant of the class of online convex optimization problems that is strongly related to metrical task systems. Prior literature on these problems has focused on two performance metrics: regret and the competitive ratio. There exist known algorithms with sublinear regret and known algorithms with constant competitive ratios; however, no known algorithm achieves both simultaneously. We show that this is due to a fundamental incompatibility between these two metrics - no algorithm (deterministic or randomized) can achieve sublinear regret and a constant competitive ratio, even in the case when the objective functions are linear. However, we also exhibit an algorithm that, for the important special case of one-dimensional decision spaces, provides sublinear regret while maintaining a competitive ratio that grows arbitrarily slowly. △ Less

Submitted 15 August, 2015; originally announced August 2015.

Computing Optimal Tolls in Routing Games without Knowing the Latency Functions

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Umang Bhaskar, Chaitanya Swamy

Abstract: We consider the following question: in a nonatomic routing game, can the tolls that induce the minimum latency flow be computed without knowing the latency functions? Since the latency functions are unknown, we assume we are given an oracle that has access to the underlying routing game. A query to the oracle consists of tolls on edges, and the response is the resulting equilibrium flow. We show t… ▽ More We consider the following question: in a nonatomic routing game, can the tolls that induce the minimum latency flow be computed without knowing the latency functions? Since the latency functions are unknown, we assume we are given an oracle that has access to the underlying routing game. A query to the oracle consists of tolls on edges, and the response is the resulting equilibrium flow. We show that in this model, it is impossible to obtain optimal tolls. However, if we augment the oracle so that it returns the total latency of the equilibrium flow induced by the tolls in addition to the flow itself, then the required tolls can be computed with a polynomial number of queries. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2015; originally announced May 2015.

Online Convex Optimization Using Predictions

Authors: Niangjun Chen, Anish Agarwal, Adam Wierman, Siddharth Barman, Lachlan L. H. Andrew

Abstract: Making use of predictions is a crucial, but under-explored, area of online algorithms. This paper studies a class of online optimization problems where we have external noisy predictions available. We propose a stochastic prediction error model that generalizes prior models in the learning and stochastic control communities, incorporates correlation among prediction errors, and captures the fact t… ▽ More Making use of predictions is a crucial, but under-explored, area of online algorithms. This paper studies a class of online optimization problems where we have external noisy predictions available. We propose a stochastic prediction error model that generalizes prior models in the learning and stochastic control communities, incorporates correlation among prediction errors, and captures the fact that predictions improve as time passes. We prove that achieving sublinear regret and constant competitive ratio for online algorithms requires the use of an unbounded prediction window in adversarial settings, but that under more realistic stochastic prediction error models it is possible to use Averaging Fixed Horizon Control (AFHC) to simultaneously achieve sublinear regret and constant competitive ratio in expectation using only a constant-sized prediction window. Furthermore, we show that the performance of AFHC is tightly concentrated around its mean. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2015; originally announced April 2015.

Comments: 30 pages

Finding Any Nontrivial Coarse Correlated Equilibrium Is Hard

Authors: Siddharth Barman, Katrina Ligett

Abstract: One of the most appealing aspects of the (coarse) correlated equilibrium concept is that natural dynamics quickly arrive at approximations of such equilibria, even in games with many players. In addition, there exist polynomial-time algorithms that compute exact (coarse) correlated equilibria. In light of these results, a natural question is how good are the (coarse) correlated equilibria that can… ▽ More One of the most appealing aspects of the (coarse) correlated equilibrium concept is that natural dynamics quickly arrive at approximations of such equilibria, even in games with many players. In addition, there exist polynomial-time algorithms that compute exact (coarse) correlated equilibria. In light of these results, a natural question is how good are the (coarse) correlated equilibria that can arise from any efficient algorithm or dynamics. In this paper we address this question, and establish strong negative results. In particular, we show that in multiplayer games that have a succinct representation, it is NP-hard to compute any coarse correlated equilibrium (or approximate coarse correlated equilibrium) with welfare strictly better than the worst possible. The focus on succinct games ensures that the underlying complexity question is interesting; many multiplayer games of interest are in fact succinct. Our results imply that, while one can efficiently compute a coarse correlated equilibrium, one cannot provide any nontrivial welfare guarantee for the resulting equilibrium, unless P=NP. We show that analogous hardness results hold for correlated equilibria, and persist under the egalitarian objective or Pareto optimality. To complement the hardness results, we develop an algorithmic framework that identifies settings in which we can efficiently compute an approximate correlated equilibrium with near-optimal welfare. We use this framework to develop an efficient algorithm for computing an approximate correlated equilibrium with near-optimal welfare in aggregative games. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2015; originally announced April 2015.

Comments: 21 pages

ACM Class: F.2.0

Computation of a Tree 3-Spanner on Trapezoid Graphs

Authors: Sambhu Charan Barman, Sukumar Mondal, Madhumangal Pal

Abstract: In a graph, a spanning tree is said to be a tree t-spanner of the graph if the distance between any two vertices in is at most times their distance in . The tree t-spanner has many applications in networks and distributed environments. In this paper, an algorithm is presented to find a tree -spanner on trapezoid graphs in time, where is the number of vertices of the graph. In a graph, a spanning tree is said to be a tree t-spanner of the graph if the distance between any two vertices in is at most times their distance in . The tree t-spanner has many applications in networks and distributed environments. In this paper, an algorithm is presented to find a tree -spanner on trapezoid graphs in time, where is the number of vertices of the graph. △ Less

Submitted 11 August, 2014; v1 submitted 30 July, 2014; originally announced July 2014.

Comments: 16 pages

Approximating Nash Equilibria and Dense Subgraphs via an Approximate Version of Carathéodory's Theorem

Authors: Siddharth Barman

Abstract: We present algorithmic applications of an approximate version of Carathéodory's theorem. The theorem states that given a set of vectors $X$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, for every vector in the convex hull of $X$ there exists an $\varepsilon$-close (under the $p$-norm distance, for $2\leq p < \infty$) vector that can be expressed as a convex combination of at most $b$ vectors of $X$, where the bound $b$ depe… ▽ More We present algorithmic applications of an approximate version of Carathéodory's theorem. The theorem states that given a set of vectors $X$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, for every vector in the convex hull of $X$ there exists an $\varepsilon$-close (under the $p$-norm distance, for $2\leq p < \infty$) vector that can be expressed as a convex combination of at most $b$ vectors of $X$, where the bound $b$ depends on $\varepsilon$ and the norm $p$ and is independent of the dimension $d$. This theorem can be derived by instantiating Maurey's lemma, early references to which can be found in the work of Pisier (1981) and Carl (1985). However, in this paper we present a self-contained proof of this result. Using this theorem we establish that in a bimatrix game with $ n \times n$ payoff matrices $A, B$, if the number of non-zero entries in any column of $A+B$ is at most $s$ then an $\varepsilon$-Nash equilibrium of the game can be computed in time $n^{O\left(\frac{\log s }{\varepsilon^2}\right)}$. This, in particular, gives us a polynomial-time approximation scheme for Nash equilibrium in games with fixed column sparsity $s$. Moreover, for arbitrary bimatrix games---since $s$ can be at most $n$---the running time of our algorithm matches the best-known upper bound, which was obtained by Lipton, Markakis, and Mehta (2003). The approximate Carathéodory's theorem also leads to an additive approximation algorithm for the normalized densest $k$-subgraph problem. Given a graph with $n$ vertices and maximum degree $d$, the developed algorithm determines a subgraph with exactly $k$ vertices with normalized density within $\varepsilon$ (in the additive sense) of the optimal in time $n^{O\left( \frac{\log d}{\varepsilon^2}\right)}$. Additionally, we show that a similar approximation result can be achieved for the problem of finding a $k \times k$-bipartite subgraph of maximum normalized density. △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2015; v1 submitted 9 June, 2014; originally announced June 2014.

Comments: 28 pages; added references and extensions