A Forensic Qualitative Analysis of Contributions to Wikipedia from Anonymity Seeking Users
Authors:
Kaylea Champion,
Nora McDonald,
Stephanie Bankes,
Joseph Zhang,
Rachel Greenstadt,
Andrea Forte,
Benjamin Mako Hill
Abstract:
By choice or by necessity, some contributors to commons-based peer production sites use privacy-protecting services to remain anonymous. As anonymity seekers, users of the Tor network have been cast both as ill-intentioned vandals and as vulnerable populations concerned with their privacy. In this study, we use a dataset drawn from a corpus of Tor edits to Wikipedia to uncover the character of Tor…
▽ More
By choice or by necessity, some contributors to commons-based peer production sites use privacy-protecting services to remain anonymous. As anonymity seekers, users of the Tor network have been cast both as ill-intentioned vandals and as vulnerable populations concerned with their privacy. In this study, we use a dataset drawn from a corpus of Tor edits to Wikipedia to uncover the character of Tor users' contributions. We build in-depth narrative descriptions of Tor users' actions and conduct a thematic analysis that places their editing activity into seven broad groups. We find that although their use of a privacy-protecting service marks them as unusual within Wikipedia, the character of many Tor users' contributions is in line with the expectations and norms of Wikipedia. However, our themes point to several important places where lack of trust promotes disorder, and to contributions where risks to contributors, service providers, and communities are unaligned.
△ Less
Submitted 17 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
Non-spatial Probabilistic Condorcet Election Methodology
Authors:
Ben Wise,
Steven Bankes
Abstract:
There is a class of models for pol/mil/econ bargaining and conflict that is loosely based on the Median Voter Theorem which has been used with great success for about 30 years. However, there are fundamental mathematical limitations to these models. They apply to issues which can be represented on a single one-dimensional continuum. They represent fundamental group decision process by a determinis…
▽ More
There is a class of models for pol/mil/econ bargaining and conflict that is loosely based on the Median Voter Theorem which has been used with great success for about 30 years. However, there are fundamental mathematical limitations to these models. They apply to issues which can be represented on a single one-dimensional continuum. They represent fundamental group decision process by a deterministic Condorcet Election: deterministic voting by all actors, and deterministic outcomes of each vote. This work provides a methodology for addressing a broader class of problems. The first extension is to continuous issue sets where the consequences of policies are not well-described by a distance measure or utility is not monotonic in distance. The second fundamental extension is to inherently discrete issue sets. Because the options cannot easily be mapped into a multidimensional space so that the utility depends on distance, we refer to it as a non-spatial issue set. The third, but most fundamental, extension is to represent the negotiating process as a probabilistic Condorcet election (PCE). The actors' generalized voting is deterministic, but the outcomes of the votes is probabilistic. The PCE provides the flexibility to make the first two extensions possible; this flexibility comes at the cost of less precise predictions and more complex validation. The methodology has been implemented in two proof-of-concept prototypes which address the subset selection problem of forming a parliament, and strategy optimization for one-dimensional issues.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
