-
Constrained Flows in Networks
Authors:
Stéphane Bessy,
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Lucas Picasarri-Arrieta
Abstract:
The support of a flow $x$ in a network is the subdigraph induced by the arcs $uv$ for which $x(uv)>0$. We discuss a number of results on flows in networks where we put certain restrictions on structure of the support of the flow. Many of these problems are NP-hard because they generalize linkage problems for digraphs. For example deciding whether a network ${\cal N}=(D,s,t,c)$ has a maximum flow…
▽ More
The support of a flow $x$ in a network is the subdigraph induced by the arcs $uv$ for which $x(uv)>0$. We discuss a number of results on flows in networks where we put certain restrictions on structure of the support of the flow. Many of these problems are NP-hard because they generalize linkage problems for digraphs. For example deciding whether a network ${\cal N}=(D,s,t,c)$ has a maximum flow $x$ such that the maximum out-degree of the support $D_x$ of $x$ is at most 2 is NP-complete as it contains the 2-linkage problem as a very special case. Another problem which is NP-complete for the same reason is that of computing the maximum flow we can send from $s$ to $t$ along $p$ paths (called a maximum {\bf $p$-path-flow}) in ${\cal N}$. Baier et al. (2005) gave a polynomial time algorithm which finds a $p$-path-flow $x$ whose value is at least $\frac{2}{3}$ of the value of a optimum $p$-path-flow when $p\in \{2,3\}$, and at least $\frac{1}{2}$ when $p\geq 4$. When $p=2$, they show that this is best possible unless P=NP. We show for each $p\geq 2$ that the value of a maximum $p$-path-flow cannot be approximated by any ratio larger than $\frac{9}{11}$, unless P=NP. We also consider a variant of the problem where the $p$ paths must be disjoint. For this problem, we give an algorithm which gets within a factor $\frac{1}{H(p)}$ of the optimum solution, where $H(p)$ is the $p$'th harmonic number ($H(p) \sim \ln(p)$). We show that in the case where the network is acyclic, we can find such a maximum $p$-path-flow in polynomial time for every $p$. We determine the complexity of a number of related problems concerning the structure of flows. For the special case of acyclic digraphs, some of the results we obtain are in some sense best possible.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2024; v1 submitted 2 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
On the inversion number of oriented graphs
Authors:
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Jonas Costa Ferreira da Silva,
Frédéric Havet
Abstract:
Let $D$ be an oriented graph. The inversion of a set $X$ of vertices in $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs with both ends in $X$. The inversion number of $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to make $D$ acyclic. Denoting by $τ(D)$, $τ' (D)$, and $ν(D)$ the cycle transversal number, the cycle arc-transversal number and the cycle packing number…
▽ More
Let $D$ be an oriented graph. The inversion of a set $X$ of vertices in $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs with both ends in $X$. The inversion number of $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to make $D$ acyclic. Denoting by $τ(D)$, $τ' (D)$, and $ν(D)$ the cycle transversal number, the cycle arc-transversal number and the cycle packing number of $D$ respectively, one shows that ${\rm inv}(D) \leq τ' (D)$, ${\rm inv}(D) \leq 2τ(D)$ and there exists a function $g$ such that ${\rm inv}(D)\leq g(ν(D))$. We conjecture that for any two oriented graphs $L$ and $R$, ${\rm inv}(L\rightarrow R) ={\rm inv}(L) +{\rm inv}(R)$ where $L\rightarrow R$ is the dijoin of $L$ and $R$. This would imply that the first two inequalities are tight. We prove this conjecture when ${\rm inv}(L)\leq 1$ and ${\rm inv}(R)\leq 2$ and when ${\rm inv}(L) ={\rm inv}(R)=2$ and $L$ and $R$ are strongly connected. We also show that the function $g$ of the third inequality satisfies $g(1)\leq 4$.
We then consider the complexity of deciding whether ${\rm inv}(D)\leq k$ for a given oriented graph $D$. We show that it is NP-complete for $k=1$, which together with the above conjecture would imply that it is NP-complete for every $k$. This contrasts with a result of Belkhechine et al. which states that deciding whether ${\rm inv}(T)\leq k$ for a given tournament $T$ is polynomial-time solvable.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2022; v1 submitted 10 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Component Order Connectivity in Directed Graphs
Authors:
J. Bang-Jensen,
E. Eiben,
G. Gutin,
M. Wahlstrom,
A. Yeo
Abstract:
A directed graph $D$ is semicomplete if for every pair $x,y$ of vertices of $D,$ there is at least one arc between $x$ and $y.$ \viol{Thus, a tournament is a semicomplete digraph.} In the Directed Component Order Connectivity (DCOC) problem, given a digraph $D=(V,A)$ and a pair of natural numbers $k$ and $\ell$, we are to decide whether there is a subset $X$ of $V$ of size $k$ such that the larges…
▽ More
A directed graph $D$ is semicomplete if for every pair $x,y$ of vertices of $D,$ there is at least one arc between $x$ and $y.$ \viol{Thus, a tournament is a semicomplete digraph.} In the Directed Component Order Connectivity (DCOC) problem, given a digraph $D=(V,A)$ and a pair of natural numbers $k$ and $\ell$, we are to decide whether there is a subset $X$ of $V$ of size $k$ such that the largest strong connectivity component in $D-X$ has at most $\ell$ vertices. Note that DCOC reduces to the Directed Feedback Vertex Set problem for $\ell=1.$ We study parametered complexity of DCOC for general and semicomplete digraphs with the following parameters: $k, \ell,\ell+k$ and $n-\ell$. In particular, we prove that DCOC with parameter $k$ on semicomplete digraphs can be solved in time $O^*(2^{16k})$ but not in time $O^*(2^{o(k)})$ unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. \gutin{The upper bound $O^*(2^{16k})$ implies the upper bound $O^*(2^{16(n-\ell)})$ for the parameter $n-\ell.$ We complement the latter by showing that there is no algorithm of time complexity $O^*(2^{o({n-\ell})})$ unless ETH fails.} Finally, we improve \viol{(in dependency on $\ell$)} the upper bound of G{ö}ke, Marx and Mnich (2019) for the time complexity of DCOC with parameter $\ell+k$ on general digraphs from $O^*(2^{O(k\ell\log (k\ell))})$ to $O^*(2^{O(k\log (k\ell))}).$ Note that Drange, Dregi and van 't Hof (2016) proved that even for the undirected version of DCOC on split graphs there is no algorithm of running time $O^*(2^{o(k\log \ell)})$ unless ETH fails and it is a long-standing problem to decide whether Directed Feedback Vertex Set admits an algorithm of time complexity $O^*(2^{o(k\log k)}).$
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2020; v1 submitted 14 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Non-separating spanning trees and out-branchings in digraphsof independence number 2
Authors:
Joergen Bang-Jensen,
Stéphane Bessy,
Anders Yeo
Abstract:
A subgraph H= (V, F) of a graph G= (V,E) is non-separating if G-F, that is, the graph obtained from G by deleting the edges in F, is connected. Analogously we say that a subdigraph X= (V,B) of a digraph D= (V,A) is non-separating if D-B is strongly connected. We study non-separating spanning trees and out-branchings in digraphs of independence number 2. Our main results are that every 2-arc-strong…
▽ More
A subgraph H= (V, F) of a graph G= (V,E) is non-separating if G-F, that is, the graph obtained from G by deleting the edges in F, is connected. Analogously we say that a subdigraph X= (V,B) of a digraph D= (V,A) is non-separating if D-B is strongly connected. We study non-separating spanning trees and out-branchings in digraphs of independence number 2. Our main results are that every 2-arc-strong digraph D of independence number alpha(D) = 2 and minimum in-degree at least 5 and every 2-arc-strong oriented graph with alpha(D) = 2 and minimum in-degree at least 3 has a non-separating out-branching and minimum in-degree 2 is not enough. We also prove a number of other results, including that every 2-arc-strong digraph D with alpha(D)<=2 and at least 14 vertices has a non-separating spanning tree and that every graph G with delta(G)>=4 and alpha(G) = 2 has a non-separating hamiltonian path.
△ Less
Submitted 6 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
On the parameterized complexity of 2-partitions
Authors:
Jonas Bamse Andersen,
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Anders Yeo
Abstract:
We give an FPT algorithm for deciding whether the vertex set a digraph $D$ can be partitioned into two disjoint sets $V_1,V_2$ such that the digraph $D[V_1]$ induced by $V_1$ has a vertex that can reach all other vertices by directed paths, the digraph $D[V_2]$ has no vertex of in-degree zero and $|V_i|\geq k_i$, where $k_1,k_2$ are part of the input. This settles an open problem from[1,4].
We give an FPT algorithm for deciding whether the vertex set a digraph $D$ can be partitioned into two disjoint sets $V_1,V_2$ such that the digraph $D[V_1]$ induced by $V_1$ has a vertex that can reach all other vertices by directed paths, the digraph $D[V_2]$ has no vertex of in-degree zero and $|V_i|\geq k_i$, where $k_1,k_2$ are part of the input. This settles an open problem from[1,4].
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Safe sets in digraphs
Authors:
Yandong Bai,
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Shinya Fujita,
Anders Yeo
Abstract:
A non-empty subset $S$ of the vertices of a digraph $D$ is called a {\it safe set} if \begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$, there exists a strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$ such that there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$; and \item[(ii)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$ and every strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$, we ha…
▽ More
A non-empty subset $S$ of the vertices of a digraph $D$ is called a {\it safe set} if \begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$, there exists a strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$ such that there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$; and \item[(ii)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$ and every strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$, we have $|M|\leq |N|$ whenever there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$. \end{itemize} In the case of acyclic digraphs a set $X$ of vertices is a safe set precisely when $X$ is an {\it in-dominating set}, that is, every vertex not in $X$ has at least one arc to $X$. We prove that, even for acyclic digraphs which are traceable (have a hamiltonian path) it is NP-hard to find a minimum cardinality in-dominating set. Then we show that the problem is also NP-hard for tournaments and give, for every positive constant $c$, a polynomial algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set in a tournament on $n$ vertices in which no strong component has size more than $c\log{}(n)$. Under the so called Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) this is close to best possible in the following sense: If ETH holds, then, for every $ε>0$ there is no polynomial time algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set for the class of tournaments in which the largest strong component has size at most $\log^{1+ε}(n)$.
We also discuss bounds on the cardinality of safe sets in tournaments.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
The directed 2-linkage problem with length constraints
Authors:
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Thomas Bellitto,
William Lochet,
Anders Yeo
Abstract:
The {\sc weak 2-linkage} problem for digraphs asks for a given digraph and vertices $s_1,s_2,t_1,t_2$ whether $D$ contains a pair of arc-disjoint paths $P_1,P_2$ such that $P_i$ is an $(s_i,t_i)$-path. This problem is NP-complete for general digraphs but polynomially solvable for acyclic digraphs \cite{fortuneTCS10}. Recently it was shown \cite{bercziESA17} that if $D$ is equipped with a weight fu…
▽ More
The {\sc weak 2-linkage} problem for digraphs asks for a given digraph and vertices $s_1,s_2,t_1,t_2$ whether $D$ contains a pair of arc-disjoint paths $P_1,P_2$ such that $P_i$ is an $(s_i,t_i)$-path. This problem is NP-complete for general digraphs but polynomially solvable for acyclic digraphs \cite{fortuneTCS10}. Recently it was shown \cite{bercziESA17} that if $D$ is equipped with a weight function $w$ on the arcs
which satisfies that all edges have positive weight, then there is a polynomial algorithm for the variant of the weak-2-linkage problem when both paths have to be shortest paths in $D$. In this paper we consider the unit weight case and prove that for every pair constants $k_1,k_2$, there is a polynomial algorithm which decides whether the input digraph $D$ has a pair of arc-disjoint paths $P_1,P_2$ such that $P_i$ is an $(s_i,t_i)$-path and the length of $P_i$ is no more than $d(s_i,t_i)+k_i$, for $i=1,2$, where $d(s_i,t_i)$ denotes the length of the shortest $(s_i,t_i)$-path. We prove that, unless the exponential time hypothesis (ETH) fails, there is no polynomial algorithm for deciding the existence of a solution $P_1,P_2$ to the {\sc weak 2-linkage} problem where each path $P_i$ has length at most $d(s_i,t_i)+ c\log^{1+ε}{}n$ for some constant $c$.
We also prove that the {\sc weak 2-linkage} problem remains NP-complete if we require one of the two paths to be a shortest path while the other path has no restriction on the length.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Proper-walk connection number of graphs
Authors:
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Thomas Bellitto,
Anders Yeo
Abstract:
This paper studies the problem of proper-walk connection number: given an undirected connected graph, our aim is to colour its edges with as few colours as possible so that there exists a properly coloured walk between every pair of vertices of the graph i.e. a walk that does not use consecutively two edges of the same colour. The problem was already solved on several classes of graphs but still o…
▽ More
This paper studies the problem of proper-walk connection number: given an undirected connected graph, our aim is to colour its edges with as few colours as possible so that there exists a properly coloured walk between every pair of vertices of the graph i.e. a walk that does not use consecutively two edges of the same colour. The problem was already solved on several classes of graphs but still open in the general case. We establish that the problem can always be solved in polynomial time in the size of the graph and we provide a characterization of the graphs that can be properly connected with $k$ colours for every possible value of $k$.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2020; v1 submitted 30 June, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Spanning eulerian subdigraphs in semicomplete digraphs
Authors:
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Frédéric Havet,
Anders Yeeo
Abstract:
A digraph is eulerian if it is connected and every vertex has its in-degree equal to its out-degree.
Having a spanning eulerian subdigraph is thus a weakening of having a hamiltonian cycle.
In this paper, we first characterize the pairs $(D,a)$ of a semicomplete digraph $D$ and an arc $a$ such that $D$ has a spanning eulerian subdigraph containing $a$. In particular, we show that if $D$ is…
▽ More
A digraph is eulerian if it is connected and every vertex has its in-degree equal to its out-degree.
Having a spanning eulerian subdigraph is thus a weakening of having a hamiltonian cycle.
In this paper, we first characterize the pairs $(D,a)$ of a semicomplete digraph $D$ and an arc $a$ such that $D$ has a spanning eulerian subdigraph containing $a$. In particular, we show that if $D$ is $2$-arc-strong, then every arc is contained in a spanning eulerian subdigraph.
We then characterize the pairs $(D,a)$ of a semicomplete digraph $D$ and an arc $a$ such that $D$ has a spanning eulerian subdigraph avoiding $a$. In particular, we prove that every $2$-arc-strong semicomplete digraph has a spanning eulerian subdigraph avoiding any prescribed arc. We also prove the existence of a (minimum) function $f(k)$ such that every $f(k)$-arc-strong semicomplete digraph contains a spanning eulerian subdigraph avoiding any prescribed set of $k$ arcs: we prove $f(k)\leq (k+1)^2/4 +1$, conjecture $f(k)=k+1$ and establish this conjecture for $k\leq 3$ and when the $k$ arcs that we delete form a forest of stars.
A digraph $D$ is eulerian-connected if for any two distinct vertices $x,y$, the digraph $D$ has a spanning $(x,y)$-trail. We prove that every $2$-arc-strong semicomplete digraph is eulerian-connected.
All our results may be seen as arc analogues of well-known results on hamiltonian cycles in semicomplete digraphs.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Arc-disjoint Strong Spanning Subdigraphs of Semicomplete Compositions
Authors:
Joergen Bang-Jensen,
Gregory Gutin,
Anders Yeo
Abstract:
A strong arc decomposition of a digraph $D=(V,A)$ is a decomposition of its arc set $A$ into two disjoint subsets $A_1$ and $A_2$ such that both of the spanning subdigraphs $D_1=(V,A_1)$ and $D_2=(V,A_2)$ are strong. Let $T$ be a digraph with $t$ vertices $u_1,\dots , u_t$ and let $H_1,\dots H_t$ be digraphs such that $H_i$ has vertices $u_{i,j_i},\ 1\le j_i\le n_i.$ Then the composition…
▽ More
A strong arc decomposition of a digraph $D=(V,A)$ is a decomposition of its arc set $A$ into two disjoint subsets $A_1$ and $A_2$ such that both of the spanning subdigraphs $D_1=(V,A_1)$ and $D_2=(V,A_2)$ are strong. Let $T$ be a digraph with $t$ vertices $u_1,\dots , u_t$ and let $H_1,\dots H_t$ be digraphs such that $H_i$ has vertices $u_{i,j_i},\ 1\le j_i\le n_i.$ Then the composition $Q=T[H_1,\dots , H_t]$ is a digraph with vertex set $\cup_{i=1}^t V(H_i)=\{u_{i,j_i}\mid 1\le i\le t, 1\le j_i\le n_i\}$ and arc set \[ \left(\cup^t_{i=1}A(H_i) \right) \cup \left( \cup_{u_iu_p\in A(T)} \{u_{ij_i}u_{pq_p} \mid 1\le j_i\le n_i, 1\le q_p\le n_p\} \right). \] We obtain a characterization of digraph compositions $Q=T[H_1,\dots H_t]$ which have a strong arc decomposition when $T$ is a semicomplete digraph and each $H_i$ is an arbitrary digraph. Our characterization generalizes a characterization by Bang-Jensen and Yeo (2003) of semicomplete digraphs with a strong arc decomposition and solves an open problem by Sun, Gutin and Ai (2018) on strong arc decompositions of digraph compositions $Q=T[H_1,\dots , H_t]$ in which $T$ is semicomplete and each $H_i$ is arbitrary. Our proofs are constructive and imply the existence of a polynomial algorithm for constructing a \good{} decomposition of a digraph $Q=T[H_1,\dots , H_t]$, with $T$ semicomplete, whenever such a decomposition exists.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Degree-constrained 2-partitions of graphs
Authors:
Joergen Bang-Jensen,
Stéphane Bessy
Abstract:
A $(δ\geq k_1,δ\geq k_2)$-partition of a graph $G$ is a vertex-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ of $G$ satisfying that $δ(G[V_i])\geq k_i$ for $i=1,2$. We determine, for all positive integers $k_1,k_2$, the complexity of deciding whether a given graph has a $(δ\geq k_1,δ\geq k_2)$-partition.
We also address the problem of finding a function $g(k_1,k_2)$ such that the $(δ\geq k_1,δ\geq k_2)$-partition probl…
▽ More
A $(δ\geq k_1,δ\geq k_2)$-partition of a graph $G$ is a vertex-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ of $G$ satisfying that $δ(G[V_i])\geq k_i$ for $i=1,2$. We determine, for all positive integers $k_1,k_2$, the complexity of deciding whether a given graph has a $(δ\geq k_1,δ\geq k_2)$-partition.
We also address the problem of finding a function $g(k_1,k_2)$ such that the $(δ\geq k_1,δ\geq k_2)$-partition problem is ${\cal
NP}$-complete for the class of graphs of minimum degree less than $g(k_1,k_2)$ and polynomial for all graphs with minimum degree at least $g(k_1,k_2)$. We prove that $g(1,k)=k$ for $k\ge 3$, that $g(2,2)=3$ and that $g(2,3)$, if it exists, has value 4 or 5.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Bipartite spanning sub(di)graphs induced by 2-partitions
Authors:
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Stéphane Bessy,
Frédéric Havet,
Anders Yeo
Abstract:
For a given $2$-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ of the vertices of a (di)graph $G$, we study properties of the spanning bipartite subdigraph $B_G(V_1,V_2)$ of $G$ induced by those arcs/edges that have one end in each $V_i$. We determine, for all pairs of non-negative integers $k_1,k_2$, the complexity of deciding whether $G$ has a 2-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that each vertex in $V_i$ has at least $k_i$ (ou…
▽ More
For a given $2$-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ of the vertices of a (di)graph $G$, we study properties of the spanning bipartite subdigraph $B_G(V_1,V_2)$ of $G$ induced by those arcs/edges that have one end in each $V_i$. We determine, for all pairs of non-negative integers $k_1,k_2$, the complexity of deciding whether $G$ has a 2-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that each vertex in $V_i$ has at least $k_i$ (out-)neighbours in $V_{3-i}$. We prove that it is ${\cal NP}$-complete to decide whether a digraph $D$ has a 2-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that each vertex in $V_1$ has an out-neighbour in $V_2$ and each vertex in $V_2$ has an in-neighbour in $V_1$. The problem becomes polynomially solvable if we require $D$ to be strongly connected. We give a characterisation, based on the so-called strong component digraph of a non-strong digraph of the structure of ${\cal NP}$-complete instances in terms of their strong component digraph. When we want higher in-degree or out-degree to/from the other set the problem becomes ${\cal NP}$-complete even for strong digraphs. A further result is that it is ${\cal NP}$-complete to decide whether a given digraph $D$ has a $2$-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that $B_D(V_1,V_2)$ is strongly connected. This holds even if we require the input to be a highly connected eulerian digraph.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
Out-degree reducing partitions of digraphs
Authors:
Joergen Bang-Jensen,
Stéphane Bessy,
Frédéric Havet,
Anders Yeo
Abstract:
Let $k$ be a fixed integer. We determine the complexity of finding a $p$-partition $(V_1, \dots, V_p)$ of the vertex set of a given digraph such that the maximum out-degree of each of the digraphs induced by $V_i$, ($1\leq i\leq p$) is at least $k$ smaller than the maximum out-degree of $D$. We show that this problem is polynomial-time solvable when $p\geq 2k$ and ${\cal NP}$-complete otherwise. T…
▽ More
Let $k$ be a fixed integer. We determine the complexity of finding a $p$-partition $(V_1, \dots, V_p)$ of the vertex set of a given digraph such that the maximum out-degree of each of the digraphs induced by $V_i$, ($1\leq i\leq p$) is at least $k$ smaller than the maximum out-degree of $D$. We show that this problem is polynomial-time solvable when $p\geq 2k$ and ${\cal NP}$-complete otherwise. The result for $k=1$ and $p=2$ answers a question posed in \cite{bangTCS636}. We also determine, for all fixed non-negative integers $k_1,k_2,p$, the complexity of deciding whether a given digraph of maximum out-degree $p$ has a $2$-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that the digraph induced by $V_i$ has maximum out-degree at most $k_i$ for $i\in [2]$. It follows from this characterization that the problem of deciding whether a digraph has a 2-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that each vertex $v\in V_i$ has at least as many neighbours in the set $V_{3-i}$ as in $V_i$, for $i=1,2$ is ${\cal NP}$-complete. This solves a problem from \cite{kreutzerEJC24} on majority colourings.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
Out-colourings of Digraphs
Authors:
Noga Alon,
Joergen Bang-Jensen,
Stéphane Bessy
Abstract:
We study vertex colourings of digraphs so that no out-neighbourhood is monochromatic and call such a colouring an {\bf out-colouring}. The problem of deciding whether a given digraph has an out-colouring with only two colours (called a 2-out-colouring) is ${\cal
NP}$-complete. We show that for every choice of positive integers $r,k$ there exists a $k$-strong bipartite tournament which needs at l…
▽ More
We study vertex colourings of digraphs so that no out-neighbourhood is monochromatic and call such a colouring an {\bf out-colouring}. The problem of deciding whether a given digraph has an out-colouring with only two colours (called a 2-out-colouring) is ${\cal
NP}$-complete. We show that for every choice of positive integers $r,k$ there exists a $k$-strong bipartite tournament which needs at least $r$ colours in every out-colouring. Our main results are on tournaments and semicomplete digraphs. We prove that, except for the Paley tournament $P_7$, every strong semicomplete digraph of minimum out-degree at least 3 has a 2-out-colouring. Furthermore, we show that every semicomplete digraph on at least 7 vertices has a 2-out-colouring if and only if it has a {\bf balanced} such colouring, that is, the difference between the number of vertices that receive colour 1 and colour 2 is at most one. In the second half of the paper we consider the generalization of 2-out-colourings to vertex partitions $(V_1,V_2)$ of a digraph $D$ so that each of the three digraphs induced by respectively, the vertices of $V_1$, the vertices of $V_2$ and all arcs between $V_1$ and $V_2$ have minimum out-degree $k$ for a prescribed integer $k\geq 1$. Using probabilistic arguments we prove that there exists an absolute positive constant $c$ so that every semicomplete digraph of minimum out-degree at least $2k+c\sqrt{k}$ has such a partition. This is tight up to the value of $c$.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2017; v1 submitted 20 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
$χ$-bounded families of oriented graphs
Authors:
Pierre Aboulker,
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Nicolas Bousquet,
Pierre Charbit,
Frédéric Havet,
Frédéric Maffray,
Jose Zamora
Abstract:
A famous conjecture of Gyárfás and Sumner states for any tree $T$ and integer $k$, if the chromatic number of a graph is large enough, either the graph contains a clique of size $k$ or it contains $T$ as an induced subgraph. We discuss some results and open problems about extensions of this conjecture to oriented graphs. We conjecture that for every oriented star $S$ and integer $k$, if the chroma…
▽ More
A famous conjecture of Gyárfás and Sumner states for any tree $T$ and integer $k$, if the chromatic number of a graph is large enough, either the graph contains a clique of size $k$ or it contains $T$ as an induced subgraph. We discuss some results and open problems about extensions of this conjecture to oriented graphs. We conjecture that for every oriented star $S$ and integer $k$, if the chromatic number of a digraph is large enough, either the digraph contains a clique of size $k$ or it contains $S$ as an induced subgraph. As an evidence, we prove that for any oriented star $S$, every oriented graph with sufficiently large chromatic number contains either a transitive tournament of order $3$ or $S$ as an induced subdigraph. We then study for which sets ${\cal P}$ of orientations of $P_4$ (the path on four vertices) similar statements hold. We establish some positive and negative results.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
Completing orientations of partially oriented graphs
Authors:
Joergen Bang-Jensen,
J. Huang,
Xuding Zhu
Abstract:
We initiate a general study of what we call orientation completion problems. For a fixed class C of oriented graphs, the orientation completion problem asks whether a given partially oriented graph P can be completed to an oriented graph in C by orienting the (non-oriented) edges in P. Orien- tation completion problems commonly generalize several existing problems including recognition of certain…
▽ More
We initiate a general study of what we call orientation completion problems. For a fixed class C of oriented graphs, the orientation completion problem asks whether a given partially oriented graph P can be completed to an oriented graph in C by orienting the (non-oriented) edges in P. Orien- tation completion problems commonly generalize several existing problems including recognition of certain classes of graphs and digraphs as well as extending representations of certain geometrically representable graphs. We study orientation completion problems for various classes of oriented graphs, including k-arc- strong oriented graphs, k-strong oriented graphs, quasi-transitive oriented graphs, local tournament, acyclic local tournaments, locally transitive tournaments, locally transitive local tournaments, in- tournaments, and oriented graphs which have directed cycle factors. We show that the orientation completion problem for each of these classes is either polynomial time solvable or NP-complete. We also show that some of the NP-complete problems become polynomial time solvable when the input oriented graphs satisfy certain extra conditions. Our results imply that the representation extension problems for proper interval graphs and for proper circular arc graphs are polynomial time solvable, which generalize a previous result.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
DAG-width and circumference of digraphs
Authors:
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Tilde My Larsen
Abstract:
We prove that every digraph of circumference $l$ has DAG-width at most $l$ and this is best possible. As a consequence of our result we deduce that the $k$-linkage problem is polynomially solvable for every fixed $k$ in the class of digraphs with bounded circumference. This answers a question posed in \cite{bangTCS562}. We also prove that the weak $k$-linkage problem (where we ask for arc-disjoint…
▽ More
We prove that every digraph of circumference $l$ has DAG-width at most $l$ and this is best possible. As a consequence of our result we deduce that the $k$-linkage problem is polynomially solvable for every fixed $k$ in the class of digraphs with bounded circumference. This answers a question posed in \cite{bangTCS562}. We also prove that the weak $k$-linkage problem (where we ask for arc-disjoint paths) is polynomially solvable for every fixed $k$ in the class of digraphs with circumference 2 as well as for digraphs with a bounded number of disjoint cycles each of length at least 3. The case of bounded circumference digraphs is open. Finally we prove that the minimum spanning strong subdigraph problem is NP-hard on digraphs of DAG-width at most 5.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
-
Finding an induced subdivision of a digraph
Authors:
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Frédéric Havet,
Nicolas Trotignon
Abstract:
We consider the following problem for oriented graphs and digraphs: Given an oriented graph (digraph) $G$, does it contain an induced subdivision of a prescribed digraph $D$? The complexity of this problem depends on $D$ and on whether $G$ must be an oriented graph or is allowed to contain 2-cycles. We give a number of examples of polynomial instances as well as several NP-completeness proofs.
We consider the following problem for oriented graphs and digraphs: Given an oriented graph (digraph) $G$, does it contain an induced subdivision of a prescribed digraph $D$? The complexity of this problem depends on $D$ and on whether $G$ must be an oriented graph or is allowed to contain 2-cycles. We give a number of examples of polynomial instances as well as several NP-completeness proofs.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2013;
originally announced September 2013.
-
Arc-Disjoint Paths and Trees in 2-Regular Digraphs
Authors:
Jørgen Bang-Jensen,
Sven Simonsen
Abstract:
An out-(in-)branching B_s^+ (B_s^-) rooted at s in a digraph D is a connected spanning subdigraph of D in which every vertex x != s has precisely one arc entering (leaving) it and s has no arcs entering (leaving) it. We settle the complexity of the following two problems:
1) Given a 2-regular digraph $D$, decide if it contains two arc-disjoint branchings B^+_u, B^-_v.
2) Given a 2-regular digr…
▽ More
An out-(in-)branching B_s^+ (B_s^-) rooted at s in a digraph D is a connected spanning subdigraph of D in which every vertex x != s has precisely one arc entering (leaving) it and s has no arcs entering (leaving) it. We settle the complexity of the following two problems:
1) Given a 2-regular digraph $D$, decide if it contains two arc-disjoint branchings B^+_u, B^-_v.
2) Given a 2-regular digraph D, decide if it contains an out-branching B^+_u such that D remains connected after removing the arcs of B^+_u.
Both problems are NP-complete for general digraphs. We prove that the first problem remains NP-complete for 2-regular digraphs, whereas the second problem turns out to be polynomial when we do not prescribe the root in advance. We also prove that, for 2-regular digraphs, the latter problem is in fact equivalent to deciding if $D$ contains two arc-disjoint out-branchings. We generalize this result to k-regular digraphs where we want to find a number of pairwise arc-disjoint spanning trees and out-branchings such that there are k in total, again without prescribing any roots.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2012;
originally announced March 2012.
