-
Efficient Deterministic Distributed Coloring with Small Bandwidth
Authors:
Philipp Bamberger,
Fabian Kuhn,
Yannic Maus
Abstract:
We show that the $(degree+1)$-list coloring problem can be solved deterministically in $O(D \cdot \log n \cdot\log^2Δ)$ rounds in the \CONGEST model, where $D$ is the diameter of the graph, $n$ the number of nodes, and $Δ$ the maximum degree. Using the recent polylogarithmic-time deterministic network decomposition algorithm by Rozhoň and Ghaffari [STOC 2020], this implies the first efficient (i.e…
▽ More
We show that the $(degree+1)$-list coloring problem can be solved deterministically in $O(D \cdot \log n \cdot\log^2Δ)$ rounds in the \CONGEST model, where $D$ is the diameter of the graph, $n$ the number of nodes, and $Δ$ the maximum degree. Using the recent polylogarithmic-time deterministic network decomposition algorithm by Rozhoň and Ghaffari [STOC 2020], this implies the first efficient (i.e., $\poly\log n$-time) deterministic \CONGEST algorithm for the $(Δ+1)$-coloring and the $(\mathit{degree}+1)$-list coloring problem. Previously the best known algorithm required $2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}$ rounds and was not based on network decompositions.
Our techniques also lead to deterministic $(\mathit{degree}+1)$-list coloring algorithms for the congested clique and the massively parallel computation (MPC) model. For the congested clique, we obtain an algorithm with time complexity $O(\logΔ\cdot\log\logΔ)$, for the MPC model, we obtain algorithms with round complexity $O(\log^2Δ)$ for the linear-memory regime and $O(\log^2Δ+ \log n)$ for the sublinear memory regime.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2020; v1 submitted 5 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
On the Complexity of Distributed Splitting Problems
Authors:
Philipp Bamberger,
Mohsen Ghaffari,
Fabian Kuhn,
Yannic Maus,
Jara Uitto
Abstract:
One of the fundamental open problems in the area of distributed graph algorithms is the question of whether randomization is needed for efficient symmetry breaking. While there are fast, $\text{poly}\log n$-time randomized distributed algorithms for all of the classic symmetry breaking problems, for many of them, the best deterministic algorithms are almost exponentially slower. The following basi…
▽ More
One of the fundamental open problems in the area of distributed graph algorithms is the question of whether randomization is needed for efficient symmetry breaking. While there are fast, $\text{poly}\log n$-time randomized distributed algorithms for all of the classic symmetry breaking problems, for many of them, the best deterministic algorithms are almost exponentially slower. The following basic local splitting problem, which is known as the \emph{weak splitting} problem takes a central role in this context: Each node of a graph $G=(V,E)$ has to be colored red or blue such that each node of sufficiently large degree has at least one node of each color among its neighbors. Ghaffari, Kuhn, and Maus [STOC '17] showed that this seemingly simple problem is complete w.r.t. the above fundamental open question in the following sense: If there is an efficient $\text{poly}\log n$-time determinstic distributed algorithm for weak splitting, then there is such an algorithm for all locally checkable graph problems for which an efficient randomized algorithm exists. In this paper, we investigate the distributed complexity of weak splitting and some closely related problems. E.g., we obtain efficient algorithms for special cases of weak splitting, where the graph is nearly regular. In particular, we show that if $δ$ and $Δ$ are the minimum and maximum degrees of $G$ and if $δ=Ω(\log n)$, weak splitting can be solved deterministically in time $O\big(\fracΔδ\cdot\text{poly}(\log n)\big)$. Further, if $δ= Ω(\log\log n)$ and $Δ\leq 2^{\varepsilonδ}$, there is a randomized algorithm with time complexity $O\big(\fracΔδ\cdot\text{poly}(\log\log n)\big)$.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Local Distributed Algorithms in Highly Dynamic Networks
Authors:
Philipp Bamberger,
Fabian Kuhn,
Yannic Maus
Abstract:
The present paper studies local distributed graph problems in highly dynamic networks. Communication and changes of the graph happen in synchronous rounds and our algorithms always, i.e., in every round, satisfy non-trivial guarantees, no matter how dynamic the network is.
We define a (in our view) natural generalization of static graph problems to the dynamic graph setting. Throughout the execu…
▽ More
The present paper studies local distributed graph problems in highly dynamic networks. Communication and changes of the graph happen in synchronous rounds and our algorithms always, i.e., in every round, satisfy non-trivial guarantees, no matter how dynamic the network is.
We define a (in our view) natural generalization of static graph problems to the dynamic graph setting. Throughout the execution of an algorithm we consider a sliding window over the last $T$, e.g., polylogarithmic, rounds. Then, in some round, the feasibility of an output only depends on the topology of the graphs in the current sliding window and we call a feasible output a $T$-dynamic solution. The guarantees of a $T$-dynamic solution become stronger the more stable the graph is during this sliding window and, in particular, they coincide with the definition of the static graph problem if the graph is static throughout the window. We further present an abstract framework that allows to develop algorithms that output $T$-dynamic solutions in all rounds. The resulting algorithms have another desirable property: If a constant neighborhood around some part of the graph is stable during an interval $[t_1,t_2]$, the algorithms compute a static solution for this part of the graph throughout the interval $[t_1+T',t_2]$ for some (small) $T'>0$.
We demonstrate our generic framework with two sample problems that abstract basic operations in dynamic networks, namely $\textit{(degree+1)-vertex coloring}$ and $\textit{maximal independent set (MIS)}$. To illustrate the given guarantees consider the vertex coloring problem: The sliding window of our (randomized) algorithm is of length $T=O(\log n)$ and any conflict between two nodes caused by a newly inserted edge is resolved within that time. During this conflict resolving both nodes always output colors that are not in conflict with their respective 'old' neighbors.
△ Less
Submitted 7 December, 2018; v1 submitted 27 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
