A Separation-Based Methodology to Consensus Tracking of Switched High-Order Nonlinear Multi-Agent Systems
Authors:
Maolong Lv,
Wenwu Yu,
**de Cao,
Simone Baldi
Abstract:
This work investigates a reduced-complexity adaptive methodology to consensus tracking for a team of uncertain high-order nonlinear systems with switched (possibly asynchronous) dynamics. It is well known that high-order nonlinear systems are intrinsically challenging as feedback linearization and backstep** methods successfully developed for low-order systems fail to work. At the same time, eve…
▽ More
This work investigates a reduced-complexity adaptive methodology to consensus tracking for a team of uncertain high-order nonlinear systems with switched (possibly asynchronous) dynamics. It is well known that high-order nonlinear systems are intrinsically challenging as feedback linearization and backstep** methods successfully developed for low-order systems fail to work. At the same time, even the adding-one power-integrator methodology, well explored for the single-agent high-order case, presents some complexity issues and is unsuited for distributed control. At the core of the proposed distributed methodology is a newly proposed definition for separable functions: this definition allows the formulation of a separation-based lemma to handle the high-order terms with reduced complexity in the control design. Complexity is reduced in a twofold sense: the control gain of each virtual control law does not have to be incorporated in the next virtual control law iteratively, thus leading to a simpler expression of the control laws; the order of the virtual control gains increases only proportionally (rather than exponentially) with the order of the systems, dramatically reducing high-gain issues.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
Think Too Fast Nor Too Slow: The Computational Trade-off Between Planning And Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Thomas M. Moerland,
Anna Deichler,
Simone Baldi,
Joost Broekens,
Catholijn M. Jonker
Abstract:
Planning and reinforcement learning are two key approaches to sequential decision making. Multi-step approximate real-time dynamic programming, a recently successful algorithm class of which AlphaZero [Silver et al., 2018] is an example, combines both by nesting planning within a learning loop. However, the combination of planning and learning introduces a new question: how should we balance time…
▽ More
Planning and reinforcement learning are two key approaches to sequential decision making. Multi-step approximate real-time dynamic programming, a recently successful algorithm class of which AlphaZero [Silver et al., 2018] is an example, combines both by nesting planning within a learning loop. However, the combination of planning and learning introduces a new question: how should we balance time spend on planning, learning and acting? The importance of this trade-off has not been explicitly studied before. We show that it is actually of key importance, with computational results indicating that we should neither plan too long nor too short. Conceptually, we identify a new spectrum of planning-learning algorithms which ranges from exhaustive search (long planning) to model-free RL (no planning), with optimal performance achieved midway.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
