Showing 1–11 of 11 results for author: Axelrod, B

LieRE: Generalizing Rotary Position Encodings

Authors: Sophie Ostmeier, Brian Axelrod, Michael E. Moseley, Akshay Chaudhari, Curtis Langlotz

Abstract: While Rotary Position Embeddings (RoPE) for natural language performs well and has become widely adopted, its adoption for other modalities has been slower. Here, we introduce Lie group Relative position Encodings (LieRE) that goes beyond RoPE in supporting higher dimensional inputs. We evaluate the performance of LieRE on 2D and 3D image classification tasks and observe that LieRE leads to marked… ▽ More While Rotary Position Embeddings (RoPE) for natural language performs well and has become widely adopted, its adoption for other modalities has been slower. Here, we introduce Lie group Relative position Encodings (LieRE) that goes beyond RoPE in supporting higher dimensional inputs. We evaluate the performance of LieRE on 2D and 3D image classification tasks and observe that LieRE leads to marked improvements in performance (up to 6%), training efficiency (3.5x reduction), data efficiency (30%) compared to the baselines of RoFormer, DeiT III, RoPE-Mixed and Vision-Llama △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Random Expert Sampling for Deep Learning Segmentation of Acute Ischemic Stroke on Non-contrast CT

Authors: Sophie Ostmeier, Brian Axelrod, Benjamin Pulli, Benjamin F. J. Verhaaren, Abdelkader Mahammedi, Yongkai Liu, Christian Federau, Greg Zaharchuk, Jeremy J. Heit

Abstract: Purpose: Multi-expert deep learning training methods to automatically quantify ischemic brain tissue on Non-Contrast CT Materials and Methods: The data set consisted of 260 Non-Contrast CTs from 233 patients of acute ischemic stroke patients recruited in the DEFUSE 3 trial. A benchmark U-Net was trained on the reference annotations of three experienced neuroradiologists to segment ischemic brain t… ▽ More Purpose: Multi-expert deep learning training methods to automatically quantify ischemic brain tissue on Non-Contrast CT Materials and Methods: The data set consisted of 260 Non-Contrast CTs from 233 patients of acute ischemic stroke patients recruited in the DEFUSE 3 trial. A benchmark U-Net was trained on the reference annotations of three experienced neuroradiologists to segment ischemic brain tissue using majority vote and random expert sampling training schemes. We used a one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test on a set of segmentation metrics to compare bootstrapped point estimates of the training schemes with the inter-expert agreement and ratio of variance for consistency analysis. We further compare volumes with the 24h-follow-up DWI (final infarct core) in the patient subgroup with full reperfusion and we test volumes for correlation to the clinical outcome (mRS after 30 and 90 days) with the Spearman method. Results: Random expert sampling leads to a model that shows better agreement with experts than experts agree among themselves and better agreement than the agreement between experts and a majority-vote model performance (Surface Dice at Tolerance 5mm improvement of 61% to 0.70 +- 0.03 and Dice improvement of 25% to 0.50 +- 0.04). The model-based predicted volume similarly estimated the final infarct volume and correlated better to the clinical outcome than CT perfusion. Conclusion: A model trained on random expert sampling can identify the presence and location of acute ischemic brain tissue on Non-Contrast CT similar to CT perfusion and with better consistency than experts. This may further secure the selection of patients eligible for endovascular treatment in less specialized hospitals. △ Less

Submitted 7 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Journal ref: https://jnis.bmj.com/content/early/2024/02/01/jnis-2023-021283

Non-inferiority of Deep Learning Acute Ischemic Stroke Segmentation on Non-Contrast CT Compared to Expert Neuroradiologists

Authors: Sophie Ostmeier, Brian Axelrod, Benjamin F. J. Verhaaren, Soren Christensen, Abdelkader Mahammedi, Yongkai Liu, Benjamin Pulli, Li-Jia Li, Greg Zaharchuk, Jeremy J. Heit

Abstract: To determine if a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning model can accurately segment acute ischemic changes on non-contrast CT compared to neuroradiologists. Non-contrast CT (NCCT) examinations from 232 acute ischemic stroke patients who were enrolled in the DEFUSE 3 trial were included in this study. Three experienced neuroradiologists independently segmented hypodensity that reflected… ▽ More To determine if a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning model can accurately segment acute ischemic changes on non-contrast CT compared to neuroradiologists. Non-contrast CT (NCCT) examinations from 232 acute ischemic stroke patients who were enrolled in the DEFUSE 3 trial were included in this study. Three experienced neuroradiologists independently segmented hypodensity that reflected the ischemic core on each scan. The neuroradiologist with the most experience (expert A) served as the ground truth for deep learning model training. Two additional neuroradiologists (experts B and C) segmentations were used for data testing. The 232 studies were randomly split into training and test sets. The training set was further randomly divided into 5 folds with training and validation sets. A 3-dimensional CNN architecture was trained and optimized to predict the segmentations of expert A from NCCT. The performance of the model was assessed using a set of volume, overlap, and distance metrics using non-inferiority thresholds of 20%, 3ml, and 3mm. The optimized model trained on expert A was compared to test experts B and C. We used a one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test to test for the non-inferiority of the model-expert compared to the inter-expert agreement. The final model performance for the ischemic core segmentation task reached a performance of 0.46+-0.09 Surface Dice at Tolerance 5mm and 0.47+-0.13 Dice when trained on expert A. Compared to the two test neuroradiologists the model-expert agreement was non-inferior to the inter-expert agreement, p < 0.05. The CNN accurately delineates the hypodense ischemic core on NCCT in acute ischemic stroke patients with an accuracy comparable to neuroradiologists. △ Less

Submitted 7 September, 2023; v1 submitted 24 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Journal ref: Sci Rep 13, 16153 (2023)

USE-Evaluator: Performance Metrics for Medical Image Segmentation Models with Uncertain, Small or Empty Reference Annotations

Authors: Sophie Ostmeier, Brian Axelrod, Jeroen Bertels, Fabian Isensee, Maarten G. Lansberg, Soren Christensen, Gregory W. Albers, Li-Jia Li, Jeremy J. Heit

Abstract: Performance metrics for medical image segmentation models are used to measure the agreement between the reference annotation and the predicted segmentation. Usually, overlap metrics, such as the Dice, are used as a metric to evaluate the performance of these models in order for results to be comparable. However, there is a mismatch between the distributions of cases and difficulty level of segment… ▽ More Performance metrics for medical image segmentation models are used to measure the agreement between the reference annotation and the predicted segmentation. Usually, overlap metrics, such as the Dice, are used as a metric to evaluate the performance of these models in order for results to be comparable. However, there is a mismatch between the distributions of cases and difficulty level of segmentation tasks in public data sets compared to clinical practice. Common metrics fail to measure the impact of this mismatch, especially for clinical data sets that include low signal pathologies, a difficult segmentation task, and uncertain, small, or empty reference annotations. This limitation may result in ineffective research of machine learning practitioners in designing and optimizing models. Dimensions of evaluating clinical value include consideration of the uncertainty of reference annotations, independence from reference annotation volume size, and evaluation of classification of empty reference annotations. We study how uncertain, small, and empty reference annotations influence the value of metrics for medical image segmentation on an in-house data set regardless of the model. We examine metrics behavior on the predictions of a standard deep learning framework in order to identify metrics with clinical value. We compare to a public benchmark data set (BraTS 2019) with a high-signal pathology and certain, larger, and no empty reference annotations. We may show machine learning practitioners, how uncertain, small, or empty reference annotations require a rethinking of the evaluation and optimizing procedures. The evaluation code was released to encourage further analysis of this topic. https://github.com/SophieOstmeier/UncertainSmallEmpty.git △ Less

Submitted 7 September, 2023; v1 submitted 26 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: 16 pages, 10 figures, Published in Medical Image Analysis

On the Statistical Complexity of Sample Amplification

Authors: Brian Axelrod, Shivam Garg, Yanjun Han, Vatsal Sharan, Gregory Valiant

Abstract: Given $n$ i.i.d. samples drawn from an unknown distribution $P$, when is it possible to produce a larger set of $n+m$ samples which cannot be distinguished from $n+m$ i.i.d. samples drawn from $P$? (Axelrod et al. 2019) formalized this question as the sample amplification problem, and gave optimal amplification procedures for discrete distributions and Gaussian location models. However, these proc… ▽ More Given $n$ i.i.d. samples drawn from an unknown distribution $P$, when is it possible to produce a larger set of $n+m$ samples which cannot be distinguished from $n+m$ i.i.d. samples drawn from $P$? (Axelrod et al. 2019) formalized this question as the sample amplification problem, and gave optimal amplification procedures for discrete distributions and Gaussian location models. However, these procedures and associated lower bounds are tailored to the specific distribution classes, and a general statistical understanding of sample amplification is still largely missing. In this work, we place the sample amplification problem on a firm statistical foundation by deriving generally applicable amplification procedures, lower bound techniques and connections to existing statistical notions. Our techniques apply to a large class of distributions including the exponential family, and establish a rigorous connection between sample amplification and distribution learning. △ Less

Submitted 12 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Causal Strategic Linear Regression

Authors: Yonadav Shavit, Benjamin Edelman, Brian Axelrod

Abstract: In many predictive decision-making scenarios, such as credit scoring and academic testing, a decision-maker must construct a model that accounts for agents' propensity to "game" the decision rule by changing their features so as to receive better decisions. Whereas the strategic classification literature has previously assumed that agents' outcomes are not causally affected by their features (and… ▽ More In many predictive decision-making scenarios, such as credit scoring and academic testing, a decision-maker must construct a model that accounts for agents' propensity to "game" the decision rule by changing their features so as to receive better decisions. Whereas the strategic classification literature has previously assumed that agents' outcomes are not causally affected by their features (and thus that strategic agents' goal is deceiving the decision-maker), we join concurrent work in modeling agents' outcomes as a function of their changeable attributes. As our main contribution, we provide efficient algorithms for learning decision rules that optimize three distinct decision-maker objectives in a realizable linear setting: accurately predicting agents' post-gaming outcomes (prediction risk minimization), incentivizing agents to improve these outcomes (agent outcome maximization), and estimating the coefficients of the true underlying model (parameter estimation). Our algorithms circumvent a hardness result of Miller et al. (2020) by allowing the decision maker to test a sequence of decision rules and observe agents' responses, in effect performing causal interventions through the decision rules. △ Less

Submitted 25 August, 2022; v1 submitted 23 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: 18 pages; published at ICML 2020

Near-optimal Approximate Discrete and Continuous Submodular Function Minimization

Authors: Brian Axelrod, Yang P. Liu, Aaron Sidford

Abstract: In this paper we provide improved running times and oracle complexities for approximately minimizing a submodular function. Our main result is a randomized algorithm, which given any submodular function defined on $n$-elements with range $[-1, 1]$, computes an $ε$-additive approximate minimizer in $\tilde{O}(n/ε^2)$ oracle evaluations with high probability. This improves over the… ▽ More In this paper we provide improved running times and oracle complexities for approximately minimizing a submodular function. Our main result is a randomized algorithm, which given any submodular function defined on $n$-elements with range $[-1, 1]$, computes an $ε$-additive approximate minimizer in $\tilde{O}(n/ε^2)$ oracle evaluations with high probability. This improves over the $\tilde{O}(n^{5/3}/ε^2)$ oracle evaluation algorithm of Chakrabarty \etal~(STOC 2017) and the $\tilde{O}(n^{3/2}/ε^2)$ oracle evaluation algorithm of Hamoudi \etal. Further, we leverage a generalization of this result to obtain efficient algorithms for minimizing a broad class of nonconvex functions. For any function $f$ with domain $[0, 1]^n$ that satisfies $\frac{\partial^2f}{\partial x_i \partial x_j} \le 0$ for all $i \neq j$ and is $L$-Lipschitz with respect to the $L^\infty$-norm we give an algorithm that computes an $ε$-additive approximate minimizer with $\tilde{O}(n \cdot \mathrm{poly}(L/ε))$ function evaluation with high probability. △ Less

Submitted 31 August, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Log-Concave Maximum Likelihood via Locally Exponential Families

Authors: Brian Axelrod, Ilias Diakonikolas, Anastasios Sidiropoulos, Alistair Stewart, Gregory Valiant

Abstract: We consider the problem of computing the maximum likelihood multivariate log-concave distribution for a set of points. Specifically, we present an algorithm which, given $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and an accuracy parameter $ε>0$, runs in time $poly(n,d,1/ε),$ and returns a log-concave distribution which, with high probability, has the property that the likelihood of the $n$ points under the retu… ▽ More We consider the problem of computing the maximum likelihood multivariate log-concave distribution for a set of points. Specifically, we present an algorithm which, given $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and an accuracy parameter $ε>0$, runs in time $poly(n,d,1/ε),$ and returns a log-concave distribution which, with high probability, has the property that the likelihood of the $n$ points under the returned distribution is at most an additive $ε$ less than the maximum likelihood that could be achieved via any log-concave distribution. This is the first computationally efficient (polynomial time) algorithm for this fundamental and practically important task. Our algorithm rests on a novel connection with exponential families: the maximum likelihood log-concave distribution belongs to a class of structured distributions which, while not an exponential family, "locally" possesses key properties of exponential families. This connection then allows the problem of computing the log-concave maximum likelihood distribution to be formulated as a convex optimization problem, and solved via an approximate first-order method. Efficiently approximating the (sub) gradients of the objective function of this optimization problem is quite delicate, and is the main technical challenge in this work. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: The present paper is a merger of two independent works arXiv:1811.03204 and arXiv:1812.05524, proposing essentially the same algorithm to compute the log-concave MLE

Sample Amplification: Increasing Dataset Size even when Learning is Impossible

Authors: Brian Axelrod, Shivam Garg, Vatsal Sharan, Gregory Valiant

Abstract: Given data drawn from an unknown distribution, $D$, to what extent is it possible to ``amplify'' this dataset and output an even larger set of samples that appear to have been drawn from $D$? We formalize this question as follows: an $(n,m)$ $\text{amplification procedure}$ takes as input $n$ independent draws from an unknown distribution $D$, and outputs a set of $m > n$ ``samples''. An amplifica… ▽ More Given data drawn from an unknown distribution, $D$, to what extent is it possible to ``amplify'' this dataset and output an even larger set of samples that appear to have been drawn from $D$? We formalize this question as follows: an $(n,m)$ $\text{amplification procedure}$ takes as input $n$ independent draws from an unknown distribution $D$, and outputs a set of $m > n$ ``samples''. An amplification procedure is valid if no algorithm can distinguish the set of $m$ samples produced by the amplifier from a set of $m$ independent draws from $D$, with probability greater than $2/3$. Perhaps surprisingly, in many settings, a valid amplification procedure exists, even when the size of the input dataset, $n$, is significantly less than what would be necessary to learn $D$ to non-trivial accuracy. Specifically we consider two fundamental settings: the case where $D$ is an arbitrary discrete distribution supported on $\le k$ elements, and the case where $D$ is a $d$-dimensional Gaussian with unknown mean, and fixed covariance. In the first case, we show that an $\left(n, n + Θ(\frac{n}{\sqrt{k}})\right)$ amplifier exists. In particular, given $n=O(\sqrt{k})$ samples from $D$, one can output a set of $m=n+1$ datapoints, whose total variation distance from the distribution of $m$ i.i.d. draws from $D$ is a small constant, despite the fact that one would need quadratically more data, $n=Θ(k)$, to learn $D$ up to small constant total variation distance. In the Gaussian case, we show that an $\left(n,n+Θ(\frac{n}{\sqrt{d}} )\right)$ amplifier exists, even though learning the distribution to small constant total variation distance requires $Θ(d)$ samples. In both the discrete and Gaussian settings, we show that these results are tight, to constant factors. Beyond these results, we formalize a number of curious directions for future research along this vein. △ Less

Submitted 2 December, 2019; v1 submitted 26 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: Added discussion about potential applications

An Efficient Algorithm for High-Dimensional Log-Concave Maximum Likelihood

Authors: Brian Axelrod, Gregory Valiant

Abstract: The log-concave maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) problem answers: for a set of points $X_1,...X_n \in \mathbb R^d$, which log-concave density maximizes their likelihood? We present a characterization of the log-concave MLE that leads to an algorithm with runtime $poly(n,d, \frac 1 ε,r)$ to compute a log-concave distribution whose log-likelihood is at most $ε$ less than that of the MLE, and $r$ i… ▽ More The log-concave maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) problem answers: for a set of points $X_1,...X_n \in \mathbb R^d$, which log-concave density maximizes their likelihood? We present a characterization of the log-concave MLE that leads to an algorithm with runtime $poly(n,d, \frac 1 ε,r)$ to compute a log-concave distribution whose log-likelihood is at most $ε$ less than that of the MLE, and $r$ is parameter of the problem that is bounded by the $\ell_2$ norm of the vector of log-likelihoods the MLE evaluated at $X_1,...,X_n$. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Provably Safe Robot Navigation with Obstacle Uncertainty

Authors: Brian Axelrod, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Tomás Lozano-Pérez

Abstract: As drones and autonomous cars become more widespread it is becoming increasingly important that robots can operate safely under realistic conditions. The noisy information fed into real systems means that robots must use estimates of the environment to plan navigation. Efficiently guaranteeing that the resulting motion plans are safe under these circumstances has proved difficult. We examine how t… ▽ More As drones and autonomous cars become more widespread it is becoming increasingly important that robots can operate safely under realistic conditions. The noisy information fed into real systems means that robots must use estimates of the environment to plan navigation. Efficiently guaranteeing that the resulting motion plans are safe under these circumstances has proved difficult. We examine how to guarantee that a trajectory or policy is safe with only imperfect observations of the environment. We examine the implications of various mathematical formalisms of safety and arrive at a mathematical notion of safety of a long-term execution, even when conditioned on observational information. We present efficient algorithms that can prove that trajectories or policies are safe with much tighter bounds than in previous work. Notably, the complexity of the environment does not affect our methods ability to evaluate if a trajectory or policy is safe. We then use these safety checking methods to design a safe variant of the RRT planning algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: RSS 2017