Exploring Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Multi-Label Text Classification
Authors:
Alexandre Audibert,
Aurélien Gauffre,
Massih-Reza Amini
Abstract:
Learning an effective representation in multi-label text classification (MLTC) is a significant challenge in NLP. This challenge arises from the inherent complexity of the task, which is shaped by two key factors: the intricate connections between labels and the widespread long-tailed distribution of the data. To overcome this issue, one potential approach involves integrating supervised contrasti…
▽ More
Learning an effective representation in multi-label text classification (MLTC) is a significant challenge in NLP. This challenge arises from the inherent complexity of the task, which is shaped by two key factors: the intricate connections between labels and the widespread long-tailed distribution of the data. To overcome this issue, one potential approach involves integrating supervised contrastive learning with classical supervised loss functions. Although contrastive learning has shown remarkable performance in multi-class classification, its impact in the multi-label framework has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth study of supervised contrastive learning and its influence on representation in MLTC context. We emphasize the importance of considering long-tailed data distributions to build a robust representation space, which effectively addresses two critical challenges associated with contrastive learning that we identify: the "lack of positives" and the "attraction-repulsion imbalance". Building on this insight, we introduce a novel contrastive loss function for MLTC. It attains Micro-F1 scores that either match or surpass those obtained with other frequently employed loss functions, and demonstrates a significant improvement in Macro-F1 scores across three multi-label datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
tf.data service: A Case for Disaggregating ML Input Data Processing
Authors:
Andrew Audibert,
Yang Chen,
Dan Graur,
Ana Klimovic,
Jiri Simsa,
Chandramohan A. Thekkath
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) computations commonly execute on expensive specialized hardware, such as GPUs and TPUs, which provide high FLOPs and performance-per-watt. For cost efficiency, it is essential to keep these accelerators highly utilized. This requires preprocessing input data at the rate at which the accelerators can ingest and perform ML computations on the data. To avoid data stalls, the hos…
▽ More
Machine learning (ML) computations commonly execute on expensive specialized hardware, such as GPUs and TPUs, which provide high FLOPs and performance-per-watt. For cost efficiency, it is essential to keep these accelerators highly utilized. This requires preprocessing input data at the rate at which the accelerators can ingest and perform ML computations on the data. To avoid data stalls, the host CPU and RAM required for input data processing per accelerator core used for ML computations varies across jobs. Hence, the traditional approach of processing input data on ML accelerator hosts with a fixed hardware ratio leads to either under-utilizing the accelerators or the host CPU and RAM. In this paper, we address these concerns by building a disaggregated ML data processing system.
We present tf.data service, an open-source disaggregated input data processing service built on top of tf.data in TensorFlow. We show that disaggregating data preprocessing has three key advantages for large-scale ML training jobs. First, the service can horizontally scale-out to right-size CPU/RAM host resources for data processing in each job, saving 32x training time and 26x cost, on average. Second, the service can share ephemeral preprocessed data results across jobs, to optimize CPU usage and reduce redundant computations. Finally, the service supports coordinated reads, a technique that avoids stragglers due to different input sizes in distributed training, reducing training time by 2.2x, on average. Our design is inspired by lessons learned from deploying tf.data service in production, including relaxing data visitation guarantees without impacting model accuracy.
△ Less
Submitted 2 January, 2024; v1 submitted 26 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
