-
Secure Robotics: A Definition and a Brief Review from a Cybersecurity Control and Implementation Methodology Perspective
Authors:
Adam Haskard,
Damith Herath,
Zena Assaad
Abstract:
Secure robotics is a multi-disciplinary endeavour for improving the cybersecurity posture of robotic and embodied Artificial Intelligence systems. The article surveys emerging concepts and ideas encapsulating the notion of secure robotics and identifies five Secure Robotics Cybersecurity Control Implementation Layers as a crucial starting point for consideration by practitioners. It also recognise…
▽ More
Secure robotics is a multi-disciplinary endeavour for improving the cybersecurity posture of robotic and embodied Artificial Intelligence systems. The article surveys emerging concepts and ideas encapsulating the notion of secure robotics and identifies five Secure Robotics Cybersecurity Control Implementation Layers as a crucial starting point for consideration by practitioners. It also recognises the need for further studies on the relationship between Human-robot trust and the implementation of established and novel cybersecurity controls.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
The Guilty (Silicon) Mind: Blameworthiness and Liability in Human-Machine Teaming
Authors:
Dr Brendan Walker-Munro,
Dr Zena Assaad
Abstract:
As human science pushes the boundaries towards the development of artificial intelligence (AI), the sweep of progress has caused scholars and policymakers alike to question the legality of applying or utilising AI in various human endeavours. For example, debate has raged in international scholarship about the legitimacy of applying AI to weapon systems to form lethal autonomous weapon systems (LA…
▽ More
As human science pushes the boundaries towards the development of artificial intelligence (AI), the sweep of progress has caused scholars and policymakers alike to question the legality of applying or utilising AI in various human endeavours. For example, debate has raged in international scholarship about the legitimacy of applying AI to weapon systems to form lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS). Yet the argument holds true even when AI is applied to a military autonomous system that is not weaponised: how does one hold a machine accountable for a crime? What about a tort? Can an artificial agent understand the moral and ethical content of its instructions? These are thorny questions, and in many cases these questions have been answered in the negative, as artificial entities lack any contingent moral agency. So what if the AI is not alone, but linked with or overseen by a human being, with their own moral and ethical understandings and obligations? Who is responsible for any malfeasance that may be committed? Does the human bear the legal risks of unethical or immoral decisions by an AI? These are some of the questions this manuscript seeks to engage with.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
End-of-Life of Software How is it Defined and Managed?
Authors:
Zena Assaad,
Mina Henein
Abstract:
The rapid development of new software and algorithms, fueled by the immense amount of data available, has made the shelf life of software products a lot shorter. With a rough estimate of more than 40,000 new software projects developed every day, it is becoming quicker and cheaper to abandon old software and acquire new software that meets rapidly changing needs and demands. What happens to softwa…
▽ More
The rapid development of new software and algorithms, fueled by the immense amount of data available, has made the shelf life of software products a lot shorter. With a rough estimate of more than 40,000 new software projects developed every day, it is becoming quicker and cheaper to abandon old software and acquire new software that meets rapidly changing needs and demands. What happens to software that is abandoned and what consequences may arise from 'throwaway' culture (Cooper, 2005) are still open questions. This paper will explore the systems engineering concept of end-of-life for software, it will highlight the gaps in existing software engineering practices, it will bring forward examples of software that has been abandoned in an attempt to decommission and it will explore the repercussions of abandoned software artefacts. A proposed way forward for addressing the identified research gaps is also detailed.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Trust and Safety
Authors:
S. K. Devitt,
R. Horne,
Z. Assaad,
E. Broad,
H. Kurniawati,
B. Cardier,
A. Scott,
S. Lazar,
M. Gould,
C. Adamson,
C. Karl,
F. Schrever,
S. Keay,
K. Tranter,
E. Shellshear,
D. Hunter,
M. Brady,
T. Putland
Abstract:
Robotics in Australia have a long history of conforming with safety standards and risk managed practices. This chapter articulates the current state of trust and safety in robotics including society's expectations, safety management systems and system safety as well as emerging issues and methods for ensuring safety in increasingly autonomous robotics. The future of trust and safety will combine s…
▽ More
Robotics in Australia have a long history of conforming with safety standards and risk managed practices. This chapter articulates the current state of trust and safety in robotics including society's expectations, safety management systems and system safety as well as emerging issues and methods for ensuring safety in increasingly autonomous robotics. The future of trust and safety will combine standards with iterative, adaptive and responsive regulatory and assurance methods for diverse applications of robotics, autonomous systems and artificial intelligence (RAS-AI). Robotics will need novel technical and social approaches to achieve assurance, particularly for game-changing innovations. The ability for users to easily update algorithms and software, which alters the performance of a system, implies that traditional machine assurance performed prior to deployment or sale, will no longer be viable. Moreover, the high frequency of updates implies that traditional certification that requires substantial time will no longer be practical. To alleviate these difficulties, automation of assurance will likely be needed; something like 'ASsurance-as-a-Service' (ASaaS), where APIs constantly ** RAS-AI to ensure abidance with various rules, frameworks and behavioural expectations. There are exceptions to this, such as in contested or communications denied environments, or in underground or undersea mining; and these systems need their own risk assessments and limitations imposed. Indeed, self-monitors are already operating within some systems. To ensure safe operations of future robotics systems, Australia needs to invest in RAS-AI assurance research, stakeholder engagement and continued development and refinement of robust frameworks, methods, guidelines and policy in order to educate and prepare its technology developers, certifiers, and general population.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
