Copyright Protection and Accountability of Generative AI:Attack, Watermarking and Attribution
Authors:
Haonan Zhong,
Jiamin Chang,
Ziyue Yang,
Tingmin Wu,
Pathum Chamikara Mahawaga Arachchige,
Chehara Pathmabandu,
Minhui Xue
Abstract:
Generative AI (e.g., Generative Adversarial Networks - GANs) has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, Generative AI introduces significant concerns regarding the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) (resp. model accountability) pertaining to images (resp. toxic images) and models (resp. poisoned models) generated. In this paper, we propose an evaluation framework to pr…
▽ More
Generative AI (e.g., Generative Adversarial Networks - GANs) has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, Generative AI introduces significant concerns regarding the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) (resp. model accountability) pertaining to images (resp. toxic images) and models (resp. poisoned models) generated. In this paper, we propose an evaluation framework to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the copyright protection measures for GANs, evaluate their performance across a diverse range of GAN architectures, and identify the factors that affect their performance and future research directions. Our findings indicate that the current IPR protection methods for input images, model watermarking, and attribution networks are largely satisfactory for a wide range of GANs. We highlight that further attention must be directed towards protecting training sets, as the current approaches fail to provide robust IPR protection and provenance tracing on training sets.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
PPaaS: Privacy Preservation as a Service
Authors:
Pathum Chamikara Mahawaga Arachchige,
Peter Bertok,
Ibrahim Khalil,
Dongxi Liu,
Seyit Camtepe
Abstract:
Personally identifiable information (PII) can find its way into cyberspace through various channels, and many potential sources can leak such information. Data sharing (e.g. cross-agency data sharing) for machine learning and analytics is one of the important components in data science. However, due to privacy concerns, data should be enforced with strong privacy guarantees before sharing. Differe…
▽ More
Personally identifiable information (PII) can find its way into cyberspace through various channels, and many potential sources can leak such information. Data sharing (e.g. cross-agency data sharing) for machine learning and analytics is one of the important components in data science. However, due to privacy concerns, data should be enforced with strong privacy guarantees before sharing. Different privacy-preserving approaches were developed for privacy preserving data sharing; however, identifying the best privacy-preservation approach for the privacy-preservation of a certain dataset is still a challenge. Different parameters can influence the efficacy of the process, such as the characteristics of the input dataset, the strength of the privacy-preservation approach, and the expected level of utility of the resulting dataset (on the corresponding data mining application such as classification). This paper presents a framework named \underline{P}rivacy \underline{P}reservation \underline{a}s \underline{a} \underline{S}ervice (PPaaS) to reduce this complexity. The proposed method employs selective privacy preservation via data perturbation and looks at different dynamics that can influence the quality of the privacy preservation of a dataset. PPaaS includes pools of data perturbation methods, and for each application and the input dataset, PPaaS selects the most suitable data perturbation approach after rigorous evaluation. It enhances the usability of privacy-preserving methods within its pool; it is a generic platform that can be used to sanitize big data in a granular, application-specific manner by employing a suitable combination of diverse privacy-preserving algorithms to provide a proper balance between privacy and utility.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2021; v1 submitted 4 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
