-
You Can't Solve These Super Mario Bros. Levels: Undecidable Mario Games
Authors:
MIT Hardness Group,
Hayashi Ani,
Erik D. Demaine,
Holden Hall,
Ricardo Ruiz,
Naveen Venkat
Abstract:
We prove RE-completeness (and thus undecidability) of several 2D games in the Super Mario Bros. platform video game series: the New Super Mario Bros. series (original, Wii, U, and 2), and both Super Mario Maker games in all five game styles (Super Mario Bros. 1 and 3, Super Mario World, New Super Mario Bros. U, and Super Mario 3D World). These results hold even when we restrict to constant-size le…
▽ More
We prove RE-completeness (and thus undecidability) of several 2D games in the Super Mario Bros. platform video game series: the New Super Mario Bros. series (original, Wii, U, and 2), and both Super Mario Maker games in all five game styles (Super Mario Bros. 1 and 3, Super Mario World, New Super Mario Bros. U, and Super Mario 3D World). These results hold even when we restrict to constant-size levels and screens, but they do require generalizing to allow arbitrarily many enemies at each location and onscreen, as well as allowing for exponentially large (or no) timer. Our New Super Mario Bros. constructions fit within one standard screen size. In our Super Mario Maker reductions, we work within the standard screen size and use the property that the game engine remembers offscreen objects that are global because they are supported by "global ground". To prove these Mario results, we build a new theory of counter gadgets in the motion-planning-through-gadgets framework, and provide a suite of simple gadgets for which reachability is RE-complete.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
PSPACE-Hard 2D Super Mario Games: Thirteen Doors
Authors:
MIT Hardness Group,
Hayashi Ani,
Erik D. Demaine,
Holden Hall,
Matias Korman
Abstract:
We prove PSPACE-hardness for fifteen games in the Super Mario Bros. 2D platforming video game series. Previously, only the original Super Mario Bros. was known to be PSPACE-hard (FUN 2016), though several of the games we study were known to be NP-hard (FUN 2014). Our reductions build door gadgets with open, close, and traverse traversals, in each case using mechanics unique to the game. While some…
▽ More
We prove PSPACE-hardness for fifteen games in the Super Mario Bros. 2D platforming video game series. Previously, only the original Super Mario Bros. was known to be PSPACE-hard (FUN 2016), though several of the games we study were known to be NP-hard (FUN 2014). Our reductions build door gadgets with open, close, and traverse traversals, in each case using mechanics unique to the game. While some of our door constructions are similar to those from FUN 2016, those for Super Mario Bros. 2, Super Mario Land 2, Super Mario World 2, and the New Super Mario Bros. series are quite different; notably, the Super Mario Bros. 2 door is extremely difficult. Doors remain elusive for just two 2D Mario games (Super Mario Land and Super Mario Run); we prove that these games are at least NP-hard.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Complexity of Motion Planning of Arbitrarily Many Robots: Gadgets, Petri Nets, and Counter Machines
Authors:
Hayashi Ani,
Michael Coulombe,
Erik D. Demaine,
Jenny Diomidova,
Timothy Gomez,
Dylan Hendrickson,
Jayson Lynch
Abstract:
We extend the motion-planning-through-gadgets framework to several new scenarios involving various numbers of robots/agents, and analyze the complexity of the resulting motion-planning problems. While past work considers just one robot or one robot per player, most of our models allow for one or more locations to spawn new robots in each time step, leading to arbitrarily many robots. In the 0-pl…
▽ More
We extend the motion-planning-through-gadgets framework to several new scenarios involving various numbers of robots/agents, and analyze the complexity of the resulting motion-planning problems. While past work considers just one robot or one robot per player, most of our models allow for one or more locations to spawn new robots in each time step, leading to arbitrarily many robots. In the 0-player context, where all motion is deterministically forced, we prove that deciding whether any robot ever reaches a specified location is undecidable, by representing a counter machine. In the 1-player context, where the player can choose how to move the robots, we prove equivalence to Petri nets, EXPSPACE-completeness for reaching a specified location, PSPACE-completeness for reconfiguration, and ACKERMANN-completeness for reconfiguration when robots can be destroyed in addition to spawned. Finally, we consider a variation on the standard 2-player context where, instead of one robot per player, we have one robot shared by the players, along with a ko rule to prevent immediately undoing the previous move. We prove this impartial 2-player game EXPTIME-complete.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
This Game Is Not Going To Analyze Itself
Authors:
Aviv Adler,
Hayashi Ani,
Lily Chung,
Michael Coulombe,
Erik D. Demaine,
Jenny Diomidova,
Dylan Hendrickson,
Jayson Lynch
Abstract:
We analyze the puzzle video game This Game Is Not Going To Load Itself, where the player routes data packets of three different colors from given sources to given sinks of the correct color. Given the sources, sinks, and some previously placed arrow tiles, we prove that the game is in Sigma_2^P; in NP for sources of equal period; NP-complete for three colors and six equal-period sources with pla…
▽ More
We analyze the puzzle video game This Game Is Not Going To Load Itself, where the player routes data packets of three different colors from given sources to given sinks of the correct color. Given the sources, sinks, and some previously placed arrow tiles, we prove that the game is in Sigma_2^P; in NP for sources of equal period; NP-complete for three colors and six equal-period sources with player input; and even without player input, simulating the game is both NP- and coNP-hard for two colors and many sources with different periods. On the other hand, we characterize which locations for three data sinks admit a perfect placement of arrow tiles that guarantee correct routing no matter the placement of the data sources, effectively solving most instances of the game as it is normally played.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Traversability, Reconfiguration, and Reachability in the Gadget Framework
Authors:
Hayashi Ani,
Erik Demaine,
Jenny Diomidova,
Dylan Hendrickson,
Jayson Lynch
Abstract:
Consider an agent traversing a graph of "gadgets", each with local state that changes with each traversal by the agent. We characterize the complexity of universal traversal, where the goal is to traverse every gadget at least once, for DAG gadgets, one-state gadgets, and reversible deterministic gadgets. We also study the complexity of reconfiguration, where the goal is to bring the system of g…
▽ More
Consider an agent traversing a graph of "gadgets", each with local state that changes with each traversal by the agent. We characterize the complexity of universal traversal, where the goal is to traverse every gadget at least once, for DAG gadgets, one-state gadgets, and reversible deterministic gadgets. We also study the complexity of reconfiguration, where the goal is to bring the system of gadgets to a specified state, proving many cases PSPACE-complete, and showing in some cases that reconfiguration can be strictly harder than reachability (where the goal is for the agent to reach a specified location), while in other cases, reachability is strictly harder than reconfiguration.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Orthogonal Fold & Cut
Authors:
Hayashi Ani,
Josh Brunner,
Erik D. Demaine,
Martin L. Demaine,
Dylan Hendrickson,
Victor Luo,
Rachana Madhukara
Abstract:
We characterize the cut patterns that can be produced by "orthogonal fold & cut": folding an axis-aligned rectangular sheet of paper along horizontal and vertical creases, and then making a single straight cut (at any angle). Along the way, we solve a handful of related problems: orthogonal fold & punch, 1D fold & cut, signed 1D fold & cut, and 1D interval fold & cut.
We characterize the cut patterns that can be produced by "orthogonal fold & cut": folding an axis-aligned rectangular sheet of paper along horizontal and vertical creases, and then making a single straight cut (at any angle). Along the way, we solve a handful of related problems: orthogonal fold & punch, 1D fold & cut, signed 1D fold & cut, and 1D interval fold & cut.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2023; v1 submitted 2 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
PSPACE-completeness of Pulling Blocks to Reach a Goal
Authors:
Hayashi Ani,
Sualeh Asif,
Erik D. Demaine,
Jenny Diomidova,
Dylan Hendrickson,
Jayson Lynch,
Sarah Scheffler,
Adam Suhl
Abstract:
We prove PSPACE-completeness of all but one problem in a large space of pulling-block problems where the goal is for the agent to reach a target destination. The problems are parameterized by whether pulling is optional, the number of blocks which can be pulled simultaneously, whether there are fixed blocks or thin walls, and whether there is gravity. We show NP-hardness for the remaining proble…
▽ More
We prove PSPACE-completeness of all but one problem in a large space of pulling-block problems where the goal is for the agent to reach a target destination. The problems are parameterized by whether pulling is optional, the number of blocks which can be pulled simultaneously, whether there are fixed blocks or thin walls, and whether there is gravity. We show NP-hardness for the remaining problem, Pull?-1FG (optional pulling, strength 1, fixed blocks, with gravity).
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2022; v1 submitted 7 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Walking through Doors is Hard, even without Staircases: Proving PSPACE-hardness via Planar Assemblies of Door Gadgets
Authors:
Hayashi Ani,
Jeffrey Bosboom,
Erik D. Demaine,
Jenny Diomidova,
Dylan Hendrickson,
Jayson Lynch
Abstract:
A door gadget has two states and three tunnels that can be traversed by an agent (player, robot, etc.): the "open" and "close" tunnel sets the gadget's state to open and closed, respectively, while the "traverse" tunnel can be traversed if and only if the door is in the open state. We prove that it is PSPACE-complete to decide whether an agent can move from one location to another through a plan…
▽ More
A door gadget has two states and three tunnels that can be traversed by an agent (player, robot, etc.): the "open" and "close" tunnel sets the gadget's state to open and closed, respectively, while the "traverse" tunnel can be traversed if and only if the door is in the open state. We prove that it is PSPACE-complete to decide whether an agent can move from one location to another through a planar assembly of such door gadgets, removing the traditional need for crossover gadgets and thereby simplifying past PSPACE-hardness proofs of Lemmings and Nintendo games Super Mario Bros., Legend of Zelda, and Donkey Kong Country. Our result holds in all but one of the possible local planar embedding of the open, close, and traverse tunnels within a door gadget; in the one remaining case, we prove NP-hardness.
We also introduce and analyze a simpler type of door gadget, called the self-closing door. This gadget has two states and only two tunnels, similar to the "open" and "traverse" tunnels of doors, except that traversing the traverse tunnel also closes the door. In a variant called the symmetric self-closing door, the "open" tunnel can be traversed if and only if the door is closed. We prove that it is PSPACE-complete to decide whether an agent can move from one location to another through a planar assembly of either type of self-closing door. Then we apply this framework to prove new PSPACE-hardness results for eight different 3D Mario games and Sokobond.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Trains, Games, and Complexity: 0/1/2-Player Motion Planning through Input/Output Gadgets
Authors:
Hayashi Ani,
Erik D. Demaine,
Dylan H. Hendrickson,
Jayson Lynch
Abstract:
We analyze the computational complexity of motion planning through local "input/output" gadgets with separate entrances and exits, and a subset of allowed traversals from entrances to exits, each of which changes the state of the gadget and thereby the allowed traversals. We study such gadgets in the zero-, one-, and two-player settings, in particular extending past motion-planning-through-gadge…
▽ More
We analyze the computational complexity of motion planning through local "input/output" gadgets with separate entrances and exits, and a subset of allowed traversals from entrances to exits, each of which changes the state of the gadget and thereby the allowed traversals. We study such gadgets in the zero-, one-, and two-player settings, in particular extending past motion-planning-through-gadgets work [DGLR18, DHL20] to zero-player games for the first time, by considering "branchless" connections between gadgets that route every gadget's exit to a unique gadget's entrance. Our complexity results include containment in L, NL, P, NP, and PSPACE; as well as hardness for NL, P, NP, and PSPACE. We apply these results to show PSPACE-completeness for certain mechanics in the video games Factorio, [the Sequence], and a restricted version of Trainyard, improving the result of [ALP18a]. This work strengthens prior results on switching graphs, ARRIVAL [DGK+17], and reachability switching games [FGMS21].
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2023; v1 submitted 6 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
