-
Algorithms for Large-scale Network Analysis and the NetworKit Toolkit
Authors:
Eugenio Angriman,
Alexander van der Grinten,
Michael Hamann,
Henning Meyerhenke,
Manuel Penschuck
Abstract:
The abundance of massive network data in a plethora of applications makes scalable analysis algorithms and software tools necessary to generate knowledge from such data in reasonable time. Addressing scalability as well as other requirements such as good usability and a rich feature set, the open-source software NetworKit has established itself as a popular tool for large-scale network analysis. T…
▽ More
The abundance of massive network data in a plethora of applications makes scalable analysis algorithms and software tools necessary to generate knowledge from such data in reasonable time. Addressing scalability as well as other requirements such as good usability and a rich feature set, the open-source software NetworKit has established itself as a popular tool for large-scale network analysis. This chapter provides a brief overview of the contributions to NetworKit made by the DFG Priority Programme SPP 1736 Algorithms for Big Data. Algorithmic contributions in the areas of centrality computations, community detection, and sparsification are in the focus, but we also mention several other aspects -- such as current software engineering principles of the project and ways to visualize network data within a NetworKit-based workflow.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Interactive Visualization of Protein RINs using NetworKit in the Cloud
Authors:
Eugenio Angriman,
Fabian Brandt-Tumescheit,
Leon Franke,
Alexander van der Grinten,
Henning Meyerhenke
Abstract:
Network analysis has been applied in diverse application domains. In this paper, we consider an example from protein dynamics, specifically residue interaction networks (RINs). In this context, we use NetworKit -- an established package for network analysis -- to build a cloud-based environment that enables domain scientists to run their visualization and analysis workflows on large compute server…
▽ More
Network analysis has been applied in diverse application domains. In this paper, we consider an example from protein dynamics, specifically residue interaction networks (RINs). In this context, we use NetworKit -- an established package for network analysis -- to build a cloud-based environment that enables domain scientists to run their visualization and analysis workflows on large compute servers, without requiring extensive programming and/or system administration knowledge. To demonstrate the versatility of this approach, we use it to build a custom Jupyter-based widget for RIN visualization. In contrast to existing RIN visualization approaches, our widget can easily be customized through simple modifications of Python code, while both supporting a good feature set and providing near real-time speed. It is also easily integrated into analysis pipelines (e.g., that use Python to feed RIN data into downstream machine learning tasks).
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Fully-dynamic Weighted Matching Approximation in Practice
Authors:
Eugenio Angriman,
Henning Meyerhenke,
Christian Schulz,
Bora Uçar
Abstract:
Finding large or heavy matchings in graphs is a ubiquitous combinatorial optimization problem. In this paper, we engineer the first non-trivial implementations for approximating the dynamic weighted matching problem. Our first algorithm is based on random walks/paths combined with dynamic programming. The second algorithm has been introduced by Stubbs and Williams without an implementation. Roughl…
▽ More
Finding large or heavy matchings in graphs is a ubiquitous combinatorial optimization problem. In this paper, we engineer the first non-trivial implementations for approximating the dynamic weighted matching problem. Our first algorithm is based on random walks/paths combined with dynamic programming. The second algorithm has been introduced by Stubbs and Williams without an implementation. Roughly speaking, their algorithm uses dynamic unweighted matching algorithms as a subroutine (within a multilevel approach); this allows us to use previous work on dynamic unweighted matching algorithms as a black box in order to obtain a fully-dynamic weighted matching algorithm. We empirically study the algorithms on an extensive set of dynamic instances and compare them with optimal weighted matchings. Our experiments show that the random walk algorithm typically fares much better than Stubbs/Williams (regarding the time/quality tradeoff), and its results are often not far from the optimum.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
New Approximation Algorithms for Forest Closeness Centrality -- for Individual Vertices and Vertex Groups
Authors:
Alexander van der Grinten,
Eugenio Angriman,
Maria Predari,
Henning Meyerhenke
Abstract:
The emergence of massive graph data sets requires fast mining algorithms. Centrality measures to identify important vertices belong to the most popular analysis methods in graph mining. A measure that is gaining attention is forest closeness centrality; it is closely related to electrical measures using current flow but can also handle disconnected graphs. Recently, [** et al., ICDM'19] proposed…
▽ More
The emergence of massive graph data sets requires fast mining algorithms. Centrality measures to identify important vertices belong to the most popular analysis methods in graph mining. A measure that is gaining attention is forest closeness centrality; it is closely related to electrical measures using current flow but can also handle disconnected graphs. Recently, [** et al., ICDM'19] proposed an algorithm to approximate this measure probabilistically. Their algorithm processes small inputs quickly, but does not scale well beyond hundreds of thousands of vertices.
In this paper, we first propose a different approximation algorithm; it is up to two orders of magnitude faster and more accurate in practice. Our method exploits the strong connection between uniform spanning trees and forest distances by adapting and extending recent approximation algorithms for related single-vertex problems. This results in a nearly-linear time algorithm with an absolute probabilistic error guarantee. In addition, we are the first to consider the problem of finding an optimal group of vertices w.r.t. forest closeness. We prove that this latter problem is NP-hard; to approximate it, we adapt a greedy algorithm by [Li et al., WWW'19], which is based on (partial) matrix inversion. Moreover, our experiments show that on disconnected graphs, group forest closeness outperforms existing centrality measures in the context of semi-supervised vertex classification.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Group-Harmonic and Group-Closeness Maximization -- Approximation and Engineering
Authors:
Eugenio Angriman,
Ruben Becker,
Gianlorenzo D'Angelo,
Hugo Gilbert,
Alexander van der Grinten,
Henning Meyerhenke
Abstract:
Centrality measures characterize important nodes in networks. Efficiently computing such nodes has received a lot of attention. When considering the generalization of computing central groups of nodes, challenging optimization problems occur. In this work, we study two such problems, group-harmonic maximization and group-closeness maximization both from a theoretical and from an algorithm engineer…
▽ More
Centrality measures characterize important nodes in networks. Efficiently computing such nodes has received a lot of attention. When considering the generalization of computing central groups of nodes, challenging optimization problems occur. In this work, we study two such problems, group-harmonic maximization and group-closeness maximization both from a theoretical and from an algorithm engineering perspective.
On the theoretical side, we obtain the following results. For group-harmonic maximization, unless $P=NP$, there is no polynomial-time algorithm that achieves an approximation factor better than $1-1/e$ (directed) and $1-1/(4e)$ (undirected), even for unweighted graphs. On the positive side, we show that a greedy algorithm achieves an approximation factor of $λ(1-2/e)$ (directed) and $λ(1-1/e)/2$ (undirected), where $λ$ is the ratio of minimal and maximal edge weights. For group-closeness maximization, the undirected case is $NP$-hard to be approximated to within a factor better than $1-1/(e+1)$ and a constant approximation factor is achieved by a local-search algorithm. For the directed case, however, we show that, for any $ε<1/2$, the problem is $NP$-hard to be approximated within a factor of $4|V|^{-ε}$.
From the algorithm engineering perspective, we provide efficient implementations of the above greedy and local search algorithms. In our experimental study we show that, on small instances where an optimum solution can be computed in reasonable time, the quality of both the greedy and the local search algorithms come very close to the optimum. On larger instances, our local search algorithms yield results with superior quality compared to existing greedy and local search solutions, at the cost of additional running time. We thus advocate local search for scenarios where solution quality is of highest concern.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Approximation of the Diagonal of a Laplacian's Pseudoinverse for Complex Network Analysis
Authors:
Eugenio Angriman,
Maria Predari,
Alexander van der Grinten,
Henning Meyerhenke
Abstract:
The ubiquity of massive graph data sets in numerous applications requires fast algorithms for extracting knowledge from these data. We are motivated here by three electrical measures for the analysis of large small-world graphs $G = (V, E)$ -- i.e., graphs with diameter in $O(\log |V|)$, which are abundant in complex network analysis. From a computational point of view, the three measures have in…
▽ More
The ubiquity of massive graph data sets in numerous applications requires fast algorithms for extracting knowledge from these data. We are motivated here by three electrical measures for the analysis of large small-world graphs $G = (V, E)$ -- i.e., graphs with diameter in $O(\log |V|)$, which are abundant in complex network analysis. From a computational point of view, the three measures have in common that their crucial component is the diagonal of the graph Laplacian's pseudoinverse, $L^\dagger$. Computing diag$(L^\dagger)$ exactly by pseudoinversion, however, is as expensive as dense matrix multiplication -- and the standard tools in practice even require cubic time. Moreover, the pseudoinverse requires quadratic space -- hardly feasible for large graphs. Resorting to approximation by, e.g., using the Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform, requires the solution of $O(\log |V| / ε^2)$ Laplacian linear systems to guarantee a relative error, which is still very expensive for large inputs.
In this paper, we present a novel approximation algorithm that requires the solution of only one Laplacian linear system. The remaining parts are purely combinatorial -- mainly sampling uniform spanning trees, which we relate to diag$(L^\dagger)$ via effective resistances. For small-world networks, our algorithm obtains a $\pm ε$-approximation with high probability, in a time that is nearly-linear in $|E|$ and quadratic in $1 / ε$. Another positive aspect of our algorithm is its parallel nature due to independent sampling. We thus provide two parallel implementations of our algorithm: one using OpenMP, one MPI + OpenMP. In our experiments against the state of the art, our algorithm (i) yields more accurate results, (ii) is much faster and more memory-efficient, and (iii) obtains good parallel speedups, in particular in the distributed setting.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2021; v1 submitted 24 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Local Search for Group Closeness Maximization on Big Graphs
Authors:
Eugenio Angriman,
Alexander van der Grinten,
Henning Meyerhenke
Abstract:
In network analysis and graph mining, closeness centrality is a popular measure to infer the importance of a vertex. Computing closeness efficiently for individual vertices received considerable attention. The NP-hard problem of group closeness maximization, in turn, is more challenging: the objective is to find a vertex group that is central as a whole and state-of-the-art heuristics for it do no…
▽ More
In network analysis and graph mining, closeness centrality is a popular measure to infer the importance of a vertex. Computing closeness efficiently for individual vertices received considerable attention. The NP-hard problem of group closeness maximization, in turn, is more challenging: the objective is to find a vertex group that is central as a whole and state-of-the-art heuristics for it do not scale to very big graphs yet.
In this paper, we present new local search heuristics for group closeness maximization. By using randomized approximation techniques and dynamic data structures, our algorithms are often able to perform locally optimal decisions efficiently. The final result is a group with high (but not optimal) closeness centrality.
We compare our algorithms to the current state-of-the-art greedy heuristic both on weighted and on unweighted real-world graphs. For graphs with hundreds of millions of edges, our local search algorithms take only around ten minutes, while greedy requires more than ten hours. Overall, our new algorithms are between one and two orders of magnitude faster, depending on the desired group size and solution quality. For example, on weighted graphs and $k = 10$, our algorithms yield solutions of $12,4\%$ higher quality, while also being $793,6\times$ faster. For unweighted graphs and $k = 10$, we achieve solutions within $99,4\%$ of the state-of-the-art quality while being $127,8\times$ faster.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Group Centrality Maximization for Large-scale Graphs
Authors:
Eugenio Angriman,
Alexander van der Grinten,
Aleksandar Bojchevski,
Daniel Zügner,
Stephan Günnemann,
Henning Meyerhenke
Abstract:
The study of vertex centrality measures is a key aspect of network analysis. Naturally, such centrality measures have been generalized to groups of vertices; for popular measures it was shown that the problem of finding the most central group is $\mathcal{NP}$-hard. As a result, approximation algorithms to maximize group centralities were introduced recently. Despite a nearly-linear running time,…
▽ More
The study of vertex centrality measures is a key aspect of network analysis. Naturally, such centrality measures have been generalized to groups of vertices; for popular measures it was shown that the problem of finding the most central group is $\mathcal{NP}$-hard. As a result, approximation algorithms to maximize group centralities were introduced recently. Despite a nearly-linear running time, approximation algorithms for group betweenness and (to a lesser extent) group closeness are rather slow on large networks due to high constant overheads.
That is why we introduce GED-Walk centrality, a new submodular group centrality measure inspired by Katz centrality. In contrast to closeness and betweenness, it considers walks of any length rather than shortest paths, with shorter walks having a higher contribution. We define algorithms that (i) efficiently approximate the GED-Walk score of a given group and (ii) efficiently approximate the (proved to be $\mathcal{NP}$-hard) problem of finding a group with highest GED-Walk score.
Experiments on several real-world datasets show that scores obtained by GED-Walk improve performance on common graph mining tasks such as collective classification and graph-level classification. An evaluation of empirical running times demonstrates that maximizing GED-Walk (in approximation) is two orders of magnitude faster compared to group betweenness approximation and for group sizes $\leq 100$ one to two orders faster than group closeness approximation. For graphs with tens of millions of edges, approximate GED-Walk maximization typically needs less than one minute. Furthermore, our experiments suggest that the maximization algorithms scale linearly with the size of the input graph and the size of the group.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Guidelines for Experimental Algorithmics in Network Analysis
Authors:
Eugenio Angriman,
Alexander van der Grinten,
Moritz von Looz,
Henning Meyerhenke,
Martin Nöllenburg,
Maria Predari,
Charilaos Tzovas
Abstract:
The field of network science is a highly interdisciplinary area; for the empirical analysis of network data, it draws algorithmic methodologies from several research fields. Hence, research procedures and descriptions of the technical results often differ, sometimes widely. In this paper we focus on methodologies for the experimental part of algorithm engineering for network analysis -- an importa…
▽ More
The field of network science is a highly interdisciplinary area; for the empirical analysis of network data, it draws algorithmic methodologies from several research fields. Hence, research procedures and descriptions of the technical results often differ, sometimes widely. In this paper we focus on methodologies for the experimental part of algorithm engineering for network analysis -- an important ingredient for a research area with empirical focus. More precisely, we unify and adapt existing recommendations from different fields and propose universal guidelines -- including statistical analyses -- for the systematic evaluation of network analysis algorithms. This way, the behavior of newly proposed algorithms can be properly assessed and comparisons to existing solutions become meaningful. Moreover, as the main technical contribution, we provide SimexPal, a highly automated tool to perform and analyze experiments following our guidelines. To illustrate the merits of SimexPal and our guidelines, we apply them in a case study: we design, perform, visualize and evaluate experiments of a recent algorithm for approximating betweenness centrality, an important problem in network analysis. In summary, both our guidelines and SimexPal shall modernize and complement previous efforts in experimental algorithmics; they are not only useful for network analysis, but also in related contexts.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Parallel Adaptive Sampling with almost no Synchronization
Authors:
Alexander van der Grinten,
Eugenio Angriman,
Henning Meyerhenke
Abstract:
Approximation via sampling is a widespread technique whenever exact solutions are too expensive. In this paper, we present techniques for an efficient parallelization of adaptive (a. k. a. progressive) sampling algorithms on multi-threaded shared-memory machines. Our basic algorithmic technique requires no synchronization except for atomic load-acquire and store-release operations. It does, howeve…
▽ More
Approximation via sampling is a widespread technique whenever exact solutions are too expensive. In this paper, we present techniques for an efficient parallelization of adaptive (a. k. a. progressive) sampling algorithms on multi-threaded shared-memory machines. Our basic algorithmic technique requires no synchronization except for atomic load-acquire and store-release operations. It does, however, require O(n) memory per thread, where n is the size of the sampling state. We present variants of the algorithm that either reduce this memory consumption to O(1) or ensure that deterministic results are obtained. Using the KADABRA algorithm for betweenness centrality (a popular measure in network analysis) approximation as a case study, we demonstrate the empirical performance of our techniques. In particular, on a 32-core machine, our best algorithm is 2.9x faster than what we could achieve using a straightforward OpenMP-based parallelization and 65.3x faster than the existing implementation of KADABRA.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Computing Top-k Closeness Centrality in Fully-dynamic Graphs
Authors:
Patrick Bisenius,
Elisabetta Bergamini,
Eugenio Angriman,
Henning Meyerhenke
Abstract:
Closeness is a widely-studied centrality measure. Since it requires all pairwise distances, computing closeness for all nodes is infeasible for large real-world networks. However, for many applications, it is only necessary to find the k most central nodes and not all closeness values. Prior work has shown that computing the top-k nodes with highest closeness can be done much faster than computing…
▽ More
Closeness is a widely-studied centrality measure. Since it requires all pairwise distances, computing closeness for all nodes is infeasible for large real-world networks. However, for many applications, it is only necessary to find the k most central nodes and not all closeness values. Prior work has shown that computing the top-k nodes with highest closeness can be done much faster than computing closeness for all nodes in real-world networks. However, for networks that evolve over time, no dynamic top-k closeness algorithm exists that improves on static recomputation. In this paper, we present several techniques that allow us to efficiently compute the k nodes with highest (harmonic) closeness after an edge insertion or an edge deletion. Our algorithms use information obtained during earlier computations to omit unnecessary work. However, they do not require asymptotically more memory than the static algorithms (i. e., linear in the number of nodes). We propose separate algorithms for complex networks (which exhibit the small-world property) and networks with large diameter such as street networks, and we compare them against static recomputation on a variety of real-world networks. On many instances, our dynamic algorithms are two orders of magnitude faster than recomputation; on some large graphs, we even reach average speedups between $10^3$ and $10^4$.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
