-
Privacy Can Arise Endogenously in an Economic System with Learning Agents
Authors:
Nivasini Ananthakrishnan,
Tiffany Ding,
Mariel Werner,
Sai Praneeth Karimireddy,
Michael I. Jordan
Abstract:
We study price-discrimination games between buyers and a seller where privacy arises endogenously--that is, utility maximization yields equilibrium strategies where privacy occurs naturally. In this game, buyers with a high valuation for a good have an incentive to keep their valuation private, lest the seller charge them a higher price. This yields an equilibrium where some buyers will send a sig…
▽ More
We study price-discrimination games between buyers and a seller where privacy arises endogenously--that is, utility maximization yields equilibrium strategies where privacy occurs naturally. In this game, buyers with a high valuation for a good have an incentive to keep their valuation private, lest the seller charge them a higher price. This yields an equilibrium where some buyers will send a signal that misrepresents their type with some probability; we refer to this as buyer-induced privacy. When the seller is able to publicly commit to providing a certain privacy level, we find that their equilibrium response is to commit to ignore buyers' signals with some positive probability; we refer to this as seller-induced privacy. We then turn our attention to a repeated interaction setting where the game parameters are unknown and the seller cannot credibly commit to a level of seller-induced privacy. In this setting, players must learn strategies based on information revealed in past rounds. We find that, even without commitment ability, seller-induced privacy arises as a result of reputation building. We characterize the resulting seller-induced privacy and seller's utility under no-regret and no-policy-regret learning algorithms and verify these results through simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Delegating Data Collection in Decentralized Machine Learning
Authors:
Nivasini Ananthakrishnan,
Stephen Bates,
Michael I. Jordan,
Nika Haghtalab
Abstract:
Motivated by the emergence of decentralized machine learning (ML) ecosystems, we study the delegation of data collection. Taking the field of contract theory as our starting point, we design optimal and near-optimal contracts that deal with two fundamental information asymmetries that arise in decentralized ML: uncertainty in the assessment of model quality and uncertainty regarding the optimal pe…
▽ More
Motivated by the emergence of decentralized machine learning (ML) ecosystems, we study the delegation of data collection. Taking the field of contract theory as our starting point, we design optimal and near-optimal contracts that deal with two fundamental information asymmetries that arise in decentralized ML: uncertainty in the assessment of model quality and uncertainty regarding the optimal performance of any model. We show that a principal can cope with such asymmetry via simple linear contracts that achieve 1-1/e fraction of the optimal utility. To address the lack of a priori knowledge regarding the optimal performance, we give a convex program that can adaptively and efficiently compute the optimal contract. We also study linear contracts and derive the optimal utility in the more complex setting of multiple interactions.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2024; v1 submitted 4 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Impossibility results for fair representations
Authors:
Tosca Lechner,
Shai Ben-David,
Sushant Agarwal,
Nivasini Ananthakrishnan
Abstract:
With the growing awareness to fairness in machine learning and the realization of the central role that data representation has in data processing tasks, there is an obvious interest in notions of fair data representations. The goal of such representations is that a model trained on data under the representation (e.g., a classifier) will be guaranteed to respect some fairness constraints.
Such r…
▽ More
With the growing awareness to fairness in machine learning and the realization of the central role that data representation has in data processing tasks, there is an obvious interest in notions of fair data representations. The goal of such representations is that a model trained on data under the representation (e.g., a classifier) will be guaranteed to respect some fairness constraints.
Such representations are useful when they can be fixed for training models on various different tasks and also when they serve as data filtering between the raw data (known to the representation designer) and potentially malicious agents that use the data under the representation to learn predictive models and make decisions.
A long list of recent research papers strive to provide tools for achieving these goals.
However, we prove that this is basically a futile effort. Roughly stated, we prove that no representation can guarantee the fairness of classifiers for different tasks trained using it; even the basic goal of achieving label-independent Demographic Parity fairness fails once the marginal data distribution shifts. More refined notions of fairness, like Odds Equality, cannot be guaranteed by a representation that does not take into account the task specific labeling rule with respect to which such fairness will be evaluated (even if the marginal data distribution is known a priory). Furthermore, except for trivial cases, no representation can guarantee Odds Equality fairness for any two different tasks, while allowing accurate label predictions for both.
While some of our conclusions are intuitive, we formulate (and prove) crisp statements of such impossibilities, often contrasting impressions conveyed by many recent works on fair representations.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Semi-Supervised Off Policy Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Aaron Sonabend-W,
Nilanjana Laha,
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan,
Tianxi Cai,
Rajarshi Mukherjee
Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown great success in estimating sequential treatment strategies which take into account patient heterogeneity. However, health-outcome information, which is used as the reward for reinforcement learning methods, is often not well coded but rather embedded in clinical notes. Extracting precise outcome information is a resource intensive task, so most of the availab…
▽ More
Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown great success in estimating sequential treatment strategies which take into account patient heterogeneity. However, health-outcome information, which is used as the reward for reinforcement learning methods, is often not well coded but rather embedded in clinical notes. Extracting precise outcome information is a resource intensive task, so most of the available well-annotated cohorts are small. To address this issue, we propose a semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach that efficiently leverages a small sized labeled data with true outcome observed, and a large unlabeled data with outcome surrogates. In particular, we propose a semi-supervised, efficient approach to Q-learning and doubly robust off policy value estimation. Generalizing SSL to sequential treatment regimes brings interesting challenges: 1) Feature distribution for Q-learning is unknown as it includes previous outcomes. 2) The surrogate variables we leverage in the modified SSL framework are predictive of the outcome but not informative to the optimal policy or value function. We provide theoretical results for our Q-function and value function estimators to understand to what degree efficiency can be gained from SSL. Our method is at least as efficient as the supervised approach, and moreover safe as it robust to mis-specification of the imputation models.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2021; v1 submitted 8 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
