Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Anand, T

Learning to Infer Unobserved Behaviors: Estimating User's Preference for a Site over Other Sites

Authors: Atanu R Sinha, Tanay Anand, Paridhi Maheshwari, A V Lakshmy, Vishal Jain

Abstract: A site's recommendation system relies on knowledge of its users' preferences to offer relevant recommendations to them. These preferences are for attributes that comprise items and content shown on the site, and are estimated from the data of users' interactions with the site. Another form of users' preferences is material too, namely, users' preferences for the site over other sites, since that s… ▽ More A site's recommendation system relies on knowledge of its users' preferences to offer relevant recommendations to them. These preferences are for attributes that comprise items and content shown on the site, and are estimated from the data of users' interactions with the site. Another form of users' preferences is material too, namely, users' preferences for the site over other sites, since that shows users' base level propensities to engage with the site. Estimating users' preferences for the site, however, faces major obstacles because (a) the focal site usually has no data of its users' interactions with other sites; these interactions are users' unobserved behaviors for the focal site; and (b) the Machine Learning literature in recommendation does not offer a model of this situation. Even if (b) is resolved, the problem in (a) persists since without access to data of its users' interactions with other sites, there is no ground truth for evaluation. Moreover, it is most useful when (c) users' preferences for the site can be estimated at the individual level, since the site can then personalize recommendations to individual users. We offer a method to estimate individual user's preference for a focal site, under this premise. In particular, we compute the focal site's share of a user's online engagements without any data from other sites. We show an evaluation framework for the model using only the focal site's data, allowing the site to test the model. We rely upon a Hierarchical Bayes Method and perform estimation in two different ways - Markov Chain Monte Carlo and Stochastic Gradient with Langevin Dynamics. Our results find good support for the approach to computing personalized share of engagement and for its evaluation. △ Less

Submitted 15 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

HyHTM: Hyperbolic Geometry based Hierarchical Topic Models

Authors: Simra Shahid, Tanay Anand, Nikitha Srikanth, Sumit Bhatia, Balaji Krishnamurthy, Nikaash Puri

Abstract: Hierarchical Topic Models (HTMs) are useful for discovering topic hierarchies in a collection of documents. However, traditional HTMs often produce hierarchies where lowerlevel topics are unrelated and not specific enough to their higher-level topics. Additionally, these methods can be computationally expensive. We present HyHTM - a Hyperbolic geometry based Hierarchical Topic Models - that addres… ▽ More Hierarchical Topic Models (HTMs) are useful for discovering topic hierarchies in a collection of documents. However, traditional HTMs often produce hierarchies where lowerlevel topics are unrelated and not specific enough to their higher-level topics. Additionally, these methods can be computationally expensive. We present HyHTM - a Hyperbolic geometry based Hierarchical Topic Models - that addresses these limitations by incorporating hierarchical information from hyperbolic geometry to explicitly model hierarchies in topic models. Experimental results with four baselines show that HyHTM can better attend to parent-child relationships among topics. HyHTM produces coherent topic hierarchies that specialise in granularity from generic higher-level topics to specific lowerlevel topics. Further, our model is significantly faster and leaves a much smaller memory footprint than our best-performing baseline.We have made the source code for our algorithm publicly accessible. △ Less

Submitted 16 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: This paper is accepted in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2023)

Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI

Authors: Organizers Of QueerInAI, :, Anaelia Ovalle, Arjun Subramonian, Ashwin Singh, Claas Voelcker, Danica J. Sutherland, Davide Locatelli, Eva Breznik, Filip Klubička, Hang Yuan, Hetvi J, Huan Zhang, Jaidev Shriram, Kruno Lehman, Luca Soldaini, Maarten Sap, Marc Peter Deisenroth, Maria Leonor Pacheco, Maria Ryskina, Martin Mundt, Milind Agarwal, Nyx McLean, Pan Xu, A Pranav , et al. (26 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We present Queer in AI as a case study for community-led participatory design in AI. We examine how participatory design and intersectional tenets started and shaped this community's programs over the years. We discuss different challenges that emerged in the process, look at ways this organization has fallen short of operationalizing participatory and intersectional principles, and then assess th… ▽ More We present Queer in AI as a case study for community-led participatory design in AI. We examine how participatory design and intersectional tenets started and shaped this community's programs over the years. We discuss different challenges that emerged in the process, look at ways this organization has fallen short of operationalizing participatory and intersectional principles, and then assess the organization's impact. Queer in AI provides important lessons and insights for practitioners and theorists of participatory methods broadly through its rejection of hierarchy in favor of decentralization, success at building aid and programs by and for the queer community, and effort to change actors and institutions outside of the queer community. Finally, we theorize how communities like Queer in AI contribute to the participatory design in AI more broadly by fostering cultures of participation in AI, welcoming and empowering marginalized participants, critiquing poor or exploitative participatory practices, and bringing participation to institutions outside of individual research projects. Queer in AI's work serves as a case study of grassroots activism and participatory methods within AI, demonstrating the potential of community-led participatory methods and intersectional praxis, while also providing challenges, case studies, and nuanced insights to researchers develo** and using participatory methods. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2023; v1 submitted 29 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: To appear at FAccT 2023

Journal ref: 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Hindi and Marathi

Authors: Neeraja Kirtane, Tanvi Anand

Abstract: As the use of natural language processing increases in our day-to-day life, the need to address gender bias inherent in these systems also amplifies. This is because the inherent bias interferes with the semantic structure of the output of these systems while performing tasks like machine translation. While research is being done in English to quantify and mitigate bias, debiasing methods in Indic… ▽ More As the use of natural language processing increases in our day-to-day life, the need to address gender bias inherent in these systems also amplifies. This is because the inherent bias interferes with the semantic structure of the output of these systems while performing tasks like machine translation. While research is being done in English to quantify and mitigate bias, debiasing methods in Indic Languages are either relatively nascent or absent for some Indic languages altogether. Most Indic languages are gendered, i.e., each noun is assigned a gender according to each language's grammar rules. As a consequence, evaluation differs from what is done in English. This paper evaluates the gender stereotypes in Hindi and Marathi languages. The methodologies will differ from the ones in the English language because there are masculine and feminine counterparts in the case of some words. We create a dataset of neutral and gendered occupation words, emotion words and measure bias with the help of Embedding Coherence Test (ECT) and Relative Norm Distance (RND). We also attempt to mitigate this bias from the embeddings. Experiments show that our proposed debiasing techniques reduce gender bias in these languages. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

CoMeFa: Compute-in-Memory Blocks for FPGAs

Authors: Aman Arora, Tanmay Anand, Aatman Borda, Rishabh Sehgal, Bagus Hanindhito, Jaydeep Kulkarni, Lizy K. John

Abstract: Block RAMs (BRAMs) are the storage houses of FPGAs, providing extensive on-chip memory bandwidth to the compute units implemented using Logic Blocks (LBs) and Digital Signal Processing (DSP) slices. We propose modifying BRAMs to convert them to CoMeFa (Compute-In-Memory Blocks for FPGAs) RAMs. These RAMs provide highly-parallel compute-in-memory by combining computation and storage capabilities in… ▽ More Block RAMs (BRAMs) are the storage houses of FPGAs, providing extensive on-chip memory bandwidth to the compute units implemented using Logic Blocks (LBs) and Digital Signal Processing (DSP) slices. We propose modifying BRAMs to convert them to CoMeFa (Compute-In-Memory Blocks for FPGAs) RAMs. These RAMs provide highly-parallel compute-in-memory by combining computation and storage capabilities in one block. CoMeFa RAMs utilize the true dual port nature of FPGA BRAMs and contain multiple programmable single-bit bit-serial processing elements. CoMeFa RAMs can be used to compute in any precision, which is extremely important for evolving applications like Deep Learning. Adding CoMeFa RAMs to FPGAs significantly increases their compute density. We explore and propose two architectures of these RAMs: CoMeFa-D (optimized for delay) and CoMeFa-A (optimized for area). Compared to existing proposals, CoMeFa RAMs do not require changing the underlying SRAM technology like simultaneously activating multiple rows on the same port, and are practical to implement. CoMeFa RAMs are versatile blocks that find applications in numerous diverse parallel applications like Deep Learning, signal processing, databases, etc. By augmenting an Intel Arria-10-like FPGA with CoMeFa-D (CoMeFa-A) RAMs at the cost of 3.8% (1.2%) area, and with algorithmic improvements and efficient map**, we observe a geomean speedup of 2.5x (1.8x), across several representative benchmarks. Replacing all or some BRAMs with CoMeFa RAMs in FPGAs can make them better accelerators of modern compute-intensive workloads. △ Less

Submitted 23 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: 10 pages, 12 figures, 4 tables, FCCM conference

Causal Effect Identification in Cluster DAGs

Authors: Tara V. Anand, Adèle H. Ribeiro, ** Tian, Elias Bareinboim

Abstract: Reasoning about the effect of interventions and counterfactuals is a fundamental task found throughout the data sciences. A collection of principles, algorithms, and tools has been developed for performing such tasks in the last decades (Pearl, 2000). One of the pervasive requirements found throughout this literature is the articulation of assumptions, which commonly appear in the form of causal d… ▽ More Reasoning about the effect of interventions and counterfactuals is a fundamental task found throughout the data sciences. A collection of principles, algorithms, and tools has been developed for performing such tasks in the last decades (Pearl, 2000). One of the pervasive requirements found throughout this literature is the articulation of assumptions, which commonly appear in the form of causal diagrams. Despite the power of this approach, there are significant settings where the knowledge necessary to specify a causal diagram over all variables is not available, particularly in complex, high-dimensional domains. In this paper, we introduce a new graphical modeling tool called cluster DAGs (for short, C-DAGs) that allows for the partial specification of relationships among variables based on limited prior knowledge, alleviating the stringent requirement of specifying a full causal diagram. A C-DAG specifies relationships between clusters of variables, while the relationships between the variables within a cluster are left unspecified, and can be seen as a graphical representation of an equivalence class of causal diagrams that share the relationships among the clusters. We develop the foundations and machinery for valid inferences over C-DAGs about the clusters of variables at each layer of Pearl's Causal Hierarchy (Pearl and Mackenzie 2018; Bareinboim et al. 2020) - L1 (probabilistic), L2 (interventional), and L3 (counterfactual). In particular, we prove the soundness and completeness of d-separation for probabilistic inference in C-DAGs. Further, we demonstrate the validity of Pearl's do-calculus rules over C-DAGs and show that the standard ID identification algorithm is sound and complete to systematically compute causal effects from observational data given a C-DAG. Finally, we show that C-DAGs are valid for performing counterfactual inferences about clusters of variables. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2023; v1 submitted 22 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Report number: Columbia Causal AI Laboratory, Technical Report (R-77)

Using the Dempster-Shafer Scheme in a Diagnostic Expert System Shell

Authors: Gautam Biswas, Teywansh S. Anand

Abstract: This paper discusses an expert system shell that integrates rule-based reasoning and the Dempster-Shafer evidence combination scheme. Domain knowledge is stored as rules with associated belief functions. The reasoning component uses a combination of forward and backward inferencing mechanisms to allow interaction with users in a mixed-initiative format. This paper discusses an expert system shell that integrates rule-based reasoning and the Dempster-Shafer evidence combination scheme. Domain knowledge is stored as rules with associated belief functions. The reasoning component uses a combination of forward and backward inferencing mechanisms to allow interaction with users in a mixed-initiative format. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Third Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1987)

Report number: UAI-P-1987-PG-98-105