Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Amodio, P

Implementation of the PaperRank and AuthorRank indices in the Scopus database

Authors: Pierluigi Amodio, Luigi Brugnano, Filippo Scarselli

Abstract: We implement the PaperRank and AuthorRank indices introduced in [Amodio & Brugnano, 2014] in the Scopus database, in order to highlight quantitative and qualitative information that the bare number of citations and/or the h-index of an author are unable to provide. In addition to this, the new indices can be cheaply updated in Scopus, since this has a cost comparable to that of updating the number… ▽ More We implement the PaperRank and AuthorRank indices introduced in [Amodio & Brugnano, 2014] in the Scopus database, in order to highlight quantitative and qualitative information that the bare number of citations and/or the h-index of an author are unable to provide. In addition to this, the new indices can be cheaply updated in Scopus, since this has a cost comparable to that of updating the number of citations. Some examples are reported to provide insight in their potentialities, as well as possible extensions. △ Less

Submitted 19 August, 2021; v1 submitted 25 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 20 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables. Accepted version on Journal of Infometrics

Journal ref: Journal of Informetrics 15 (2021) 101206

Recent advances in bibliometric indexes and the PaperRank problem

Authors: Pierluigi Amodio, Luigi Brugnano

Abstract: Bibliometric indexes are customary used in evaluating the impact of scientific research, even though it is very well known that in different research areas they may range in very different intervals. Sometimes, this is evident even within a single given field of investigation making very difficult (and inaccurate) the assessment of scientific papers. On the other hand, the problem can be recast in… ▽ More Bibliometric indexes are customary used in evaluating the impact of scientific research, even though it is very well known that in different research areas they may range in very different intervals. Sometimes, this is evident even within a single given field of investigation making very difficult (and inaccurate) the assessment of scientific papers. On the other hand, the problem can be recast in the same framework which has allowed to efficiently cope with the ordering of web-pages, i.e., to formulate the PageRank of Google. For this reason, we call such problem the PaperRank problem, here solved by using a similar approach to that employed by PageRank. The obtained solution, which is mathematically grounded, will be used to compare the usual heuristics of the number of citations with a new one here proposed. Some numerical tests show that the new heuristics is much more reliable than the currently used ones, based on the bare number of citations. Moreover, we show that our model improves on recently proposed ones. △ Less

Submitted 10 January, 2013; v1 submitted 26 July, 2012; originally announced July 2012.

MSC Class: 65F15

Journal ref: Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 267 (2014), pp. 182-194