Evaluating diversion and treatment policies for opioid use disorder
Authors:
Veronica M. White,
Laura A. Albert
Abstract:
The United States opioid crisis contributed to 80,411 fatalities in 2021. It has strained hospitals, treatment facilities, and law enforcement agencies due to the enormous resources and procedures needed to respond to the crisis. As a result, many individuals who use opioids never receive or finish the treatment they need and instead have many interactions with hospitals or the criminal justice sy…
▽ More
The United States opioid crisis contributed to 80,411 fatalities in 2021. It has strained hospitals, treatment facilities, and law enforcement agencies due to the enormous resources and procedures needed to respond to the crisis. As a result, many individuals who use opioids never receive or finish the treatment they need and instead have many interactions with hospitals or the criminal justice system. This paper introduces a discrete event simulation model that evaluates three opioid use disorder treatment policies: arrest diversion, re-entry case management, and overdose diversion. Publicly available data from 2011 to 2019 in Dane County, Wisconsin, was used to forecast opioid-related outcomes through 2032. Through analyzing a variety of policy-mix implementations, the study offers a versatile framework for evaluating policies at various implementation levels. The results demonstrate that treatment policies that create new pathways and programming by utilizing treatment services and successfully divert at least 20% of eligible individuals can lead to more opioid-resilient communities. The benefits increase when more policies are enacted and/or are offered to more individuals. We assume communities invest in increasing treatment capacity to meet increased treatment demand. In policy-mixes where societal savings from decreased opioid use, hospital encounters, and opioid-related arrests outweigh the costs of opioid use disorder treatment, the 2032 total savings range from $7.04 to $29.73 million. To reverse the opioid crisis within a community, treatment policies may need to be combined with other strategies, such as harm reduction, supply reduction, and use prevention.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2023; v1 submitted 8 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
A mixed-integer programming model for identifying intuitive ambulance dispatching policies
Authors:
Laura A. Albert
Abstract:
Markov decision process models and algorithms can be used to identify optimal policies for dispatching ambulances to spatially distributed customers, where the optimal policies indicate the ambulance to dispatch to each customer type in each state. Since the optimal solutions are dependent on Markov state variables, they may not always correspond to a simple set of rules when implementing the poli…
▽ More
Markov decision process models and algorithms can be used to identify optimal policies for dispatching ambulances to spatially distributed customers, where the optimal policies indicate the ambulance to dispatch to each customer type in each state. Since the optimal solutions are dependent on Markov state variables, they may not always correspond to a simple set of rules when implementing the policies in practice. Restricted policies that conform to a priority list for each type of customer may be desirable for use in practice, since such policies are transparent, explainable, and easy to implement. A priority list policy is an ordered list of ambulances that indicates the preferred order to dispatch the ambulances to a customer type subject to ambulance availability. This paper proposes a constrained Markov decision process model for identifying optimal priority list policies that is formulated as a mixed integer programming model, does not extend the Markov state space, and can be solved using standard algorithms. A series of computational examples illustrate the benefit of intuitive policies. The optimal mixed integer programming solutions to the computational examples have objective function values that are close to those of the unrestricted model and are superior to those of heuristics.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.