-
Anytime Minibatch with Delayed Gradients
Authors:
Haider Al-Lawati,
Stark C. Draper
Abstract:
Distributed optimization is widely deployed in practice to solve a broad range of problems. In a typical asynchronous scheme, workers calculate gradients with respect to out-of-date optimization parameters while the master uses stale (i.e., delayed) gradients to update the parameters. While using stale gradients can slow the convergence, asynchronous methods speed up the overall optimization with…
▽ More
Distributed optimization is widely deployed in practice to solve a broad range of problems. In a typical asynchronous scheme, workers calculate gradients with respect to out-of-date optimization parameters while the master uses stale (i.e., delayed) gradients to update the parameters. While using stale gradients can slow the convergence, asynchronous methods speed up the overall optimization with respect to wall clock time by allowing more frequent updates and reducing idling times. In this paper, we present a variable per-epoch minibatch scheme called Anytime Minibatch with Delayed Gradients (AMB-DG). In AMB-DG, workers compute gradients in epochs of a fixed time while the master uses stale gradients to update the optimization parameters. We analyze AMB-DG in terms of its regret bound and convergence rate. We prove that for convex smooth objective functions, AMB-DG achieves the optimal regret bound and convergence rate. We compare the performance of AMB-DG with that of Anytime Minibatch (AMB) which is similar to AMB-DG but does not use stale gradients. In AMB, workers stay idle after each gradient transmission to the master until they receive the updated parameters from the master while in AMB-DG workers never idle. We also extend AMB-DG to the fully distributed setting. We compare AMB-DG with AMB when the communication delay is long and observe that AMB-DG converges faster than AMB in wall clock time. We also compare the performance of AMB-DG with the state-of-the-art fixed minibatch approach that uses delayed gradients. We run our experiments on a real distributed system and observe that AMB-DG converges more than two times.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Anytime MiniBatch: Exploiting Stragglers in Online Distributed Optimization
Authors:
Nuwan Ferdinand,
Haider Al-Lawati,
Stark C. Draper,
Matthew Nokleby
Abstract:
Distributed optimization is vital in solving large-scale machine learning problems. A widely-shared feature of distributed optimization techniques is the requirement that all nodes complete their assigned tasks in each computational epoch before the system can proceed to the next epoch. In such settings, slow nodes, called stragglers, can greatly slow progress. To mitigate the impact of stragglers…
▽ More
Distributed optimization is vital in solving large-scale machine learning problems. A widely-shared feature of distributed optimization techniques is the requirement that all nodes complete their assigned tasks in each computational epoch before the system can proceed to the next epoch. In such settings, slow nodes, called stragglers, can greatly slow progress. To mitigate the impact of stragglers, we propose an online distributed optimization method called Anytime Minibatch. In this approach, all nodes are given a fixed time to compute the gradients of as many data samples as possible. The result is a variable per-node minibatch size. Workers then get a fixed communication time to average their minibatch gradients via several rounds of consensus, which are then used to update primal variables via dual averaging. Anytime Minibatch prevents stragglers from holding up the system without wasting the work that stragglers can complete. We present a convergence analysis and analyze the wall time performance. Our numerical results show that our approach is up to 1.5 times faster in Amazon EC2 and it is up to five times faster when there is greater variability in compute node performance.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
SoS Fault Modelling at the Architectural Level in an Emergency Response Case Study
Authors:
Claire Ingram,
Steve Riddle,
John Fitzgerald,
Sakina A. H. J. Al-Lawati,
Afra Alrbaiyan
Abstract:
Systems of systems (SoSs) are particularly vulnerable to faults and other threats to their dependability, but frequently inhabit domains that demand high levels of dependability. For this reason fault tolerance analysis is important in SoS engineering. The COMPASS project has previously proposed a Fault Tolerance Architecture Framework (FMAF), consisting of a collection of viewpoints that support…
▽ More
Systems of systems (SoSs) are particularly vulnerable to faults and other threats to their dependability, but frequently inhabit domains that demand high levels of dependability. For this reason fault tolerance analysis is important in SoS engineering. The COMPASS project has previously proposed a Fault Tolerance Architecture Framework (FMAF), consisting of a collection of viewpoints that support systematic reasoning about faults in an SoS at the architectural level. The FMAF has been demonstrated previously with an analysis of an example fault in an emergency response SoS. In this paper we present further examples of the FMAF's practical use, by analysing different types of faults drawn from the same emergency response case study. These example faults exercise different aspects of the FMAF, demonstrate its use in more complex fault modelling scenarios, and raise new questions for further development.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2014; v1 submitted 30 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
