A New Safety Objective for the Calibration of the Intelligent Driver Model
Authors:
Kingsley Adjenughwure,
Arturo Tejada,
Pedro F. V. Oliveira,
Jeroen Hogema,
Gerdien Klunder
Abstract:
The intelligent driver model (IDM) is one of the most widely used car-following (CF) models in recent years. The parameters of this model have been calibrated using real trajectories obtained from naturalistic driving ,driving simulator experiment and drone data. An important aspect of the model calibration process is defining the main objective of the calibration. This objective, influences the o…
▽ More
The intelligent driver model (IDM) is one of the most widely used car-following (CF) models in recent years. The parameters of this model have been calibrated using real trajectories obtained from naturalistic driving ,driving simulator experiment and drone data. An important aspect of the model calibration process is defining the main objective of the calibration. This objective, influences the objective function and the performance measure for the calibration. For example, to calibrate CF models, the objective is usually to minimize the error in measured spacing or speed while important safety aspects of the models such as the collision avoidance mechanisms are ignored. For such models, there is no guarantee that the calibrated parameters will preserve the safety properties of the model since they are not explicitly taken into account. To explicitly account for the safety properties during calibration, this paper proposes a simple objective function which minimizes both the error in the actual measured spacing (as it is currently done) and the error in the dynamic safety spacing (desired minimum gap) derived from the collision free property of the IDM model. The proposed objective function is used to calibrate two variants of the IDM using vehicle trajectories obtained with drone from a Dutch highway. The calibration performance is then compared in terms of the error in actual spacing and time gap. The results show that the proposed safety objective 15 function leads to lower errors in spacing and time gap compared to when minimizing for only spacing and preserves collision property of the IDM.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
PRISMA: A Novel Approach for Deriving Probabilistic Surrogate Safety Measures for Risk Evaluation
Authors:
Erwin de Gelder,
Kingsley Adjenughwure,
Jeroen Manders,
Ron Snijders,
Jan-Pieter Paardekooper,
Olaf Op den Camp,
Arturo Tejada,
Bart De Schutter
Abstract:
Surrogate Safety Measures (SSMs) are used to express road safety in terms of the safety risk in traffic conflicts. Typically, SSMs rely on assumptions regarding the future evolution of traffic participant trajectories to generate a measure of risk, restricting their applicability to scenarios where these assumptions are valid. In response to this limitation, we present the novel Probabilistic RISk…
▽ More
Surrogate Safety Measures (SSMs) are used to express road safety in terms of the safety risk in traffic conflicts. Typically, SSMs rely on assumptions regarding the future evolution of traffic participant trajectories to generate a measure of risk, restricting their applicability to scenarios where these assumptions are valid. In response to this limitation, we present the novel Probabilistic RISk Measure derivAtion (PRISMA) method. The objective of the PRISMA method is to derive SSMs that can be used to calculate in real time the probability of a specific event (e.g., a crash). The PRISMA method adopts a data-driven approach to predict the possible future traffic participant trajectories, thereby reducing the reliance on specific assumptions regarding these trajectories. Since the PRISMA is not bound to specific assumptions, the PRISMA method offers the ability to derive multiple SSMs for various scenarios. The occurrence probability of the specified event is based on simulations and combined with a regression model, this enables our derived SSMs to make real-time risk estimations. To illustrate the PRISMA method, an SSM is derived for risk evaluation during longitudinal traffic interactions. Since there is no known method to objectively estimate risk from first principles, i.e., there is no known risk ground truth, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to objectively compare the relative merits of two SSMs. Instead, we provide a method for benchmarking our derived SSM with respect to expected risk trends. The application of the benchmarking illustrates that the SSM matches the expected risk trends. Whereas the derived SSM shows the potential of the PRISMA method, future work involves applying the approach for other types of traffic conflicts, such as lateral traffic conflicts or interactions with vulnerable road users.
△ Less
Submitted 4 September, 2023; v1 submitted 14 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
