-
Getting aligned on representational alignment
Authors:
Ilia Sucholutsky,
Lukas Muttenthaler,
Adrian Weller,
Andi Peng,
Andreea Bobu,
Been Kim,
Bradley C. Love,
Erin Grant,
Iris Groen,
Jascha Achterberg,
Joshua B. Tenenbaum,
Katherine M. Collins,
Katherine L. Hermann,
Kerem Oktar,
Klaus Greff,
Martin N. Hebart,
Nori Jacoby,
Qiuyi Zhang,
Raja Marjieh,
Robert Geirhos,
Sherol Chen,
Simon Kornblith,
Sunayana Rane,
Talia Konkle,
Thomas P. O'Connell
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Biological and artificial information processing systems form representations that they can use to categorize, reason, plan, navigate, and make decisions. How can we measure the extent to which the representations formed by these diverse systems agree? Do similarities in representations then translate into similar behavior? How can a system's representations be modified to better match those of an…
▽ More
Biological and artificial information processing systems form representations that they can use to categorize, reason, plan, navigate, and make decisions. How can we measure the extent to which the representations formed by these diverse systems agree? Do similarities in representations then translate into similar behavior? How can a system's representations be modified to better match those of another system? These questions pertaining to the study of representational alignment are at the heart of some of the most active research areas in cognitive science, neuroscience, and machine learning. For example, cognitive scientists measure the representational alignment of multiple individuals to identify shared cognitive priors, neuroscientists align fMRI responses from multiple individuals into a shared representational space for group-level analyses, and ML researchers distill knowledge from teacher models into student models by increasing their alignment. Unfortunately, there is limited knowledge transfer between research communities interested in representational alignment, so progress in one field often ends up being rediscovered independently in another. Thus, greater cross-field communication would be advantageous. To improve communication between these fields, we propose a unifying framework that can serve as a common language between researchers studying representational alignment. We survey the literature from all three fields and demonstrate how prior work fits into this framework. Finally, we lay out open problems in representational alignment where progress can benefit all three of these fields. We hope that our work can catalyze cross-disciplinary collaboration and accelerate progress for all communities studying and develo** information processing systems. We note that this is a working paper and encourage readers to reach out with their suggestions for future revisions.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2023; v1 submitted 18 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Brain-inspired learning in artificial neural networks: a review
Authors:
Samuel Schmidgall,
Jascha Achterberg,
Thomas Miconi,
Louis Kirsch,
Ro** Ziaei,
S. Pardis Hajiseyedrazi,
Jason Eshraghian
Abstract:
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have emerged as an essential tool in machine learning, achieving remarkable success across diverse domains, including image and speech generation, game playing, and robotics. However, there exist fundamental differences between ANNs' operating mechanisms and those of the biological brain, particularly concerning learning processes. This paper presents a comprehens…
▽ More
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have emerged as an essential tool in machine learning, achieving remarkable success across diverse domains, including image and speech generation, game playing, and robotics. However, there exist fundamental differences between ANNs' operating mechanisms and those of the biological brain, particularly concerning learning processes. This paper presents a comprehensive review of current brain-inspired learning representations in artificial neural networks. We investigate the integration of more biologically plausible mechanisms, such as synaptic plasticity, to enhance these networks' capabilities. Moreover, we delve into the potential advantages and challenges accompanying this approach. Ultimately, we pinpoint promising avenues for future research in this rapidly advancing field, which could bring us closer to understanding the essence of intelligence.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Building artificial neural circuits for domain-general cognition: a primer on brain-inspired systems-level architecture
Authors:
Jascha Achterberg,
Danyal Akarca,
Moataz Assem,
Moritz Heimbach,
Duncan E. Astle,
John Duncan
Abstract:
There is a concerted effort to build domain-general artificial intelligence in the form of universal neural network models with sufficient computational flexibility to solve a wide variety of cognitive tasks but without requiring fine-tuning on individual problem spaces and domains. To do this, models need appropriate priors and inductive biases, such that trained models can generalise to out-of-d…
▽ More
There is a concerted effort to build domain-general artificial intelligence in the form of universal neural network models with sufficient computational flexibility to solve a wide variety of cognitive tasks but without requiring fine-tuning on individual problem spaces and domains. To do this, models need appropriate priors and inductive biases, such that trained models can generalise to out-of-distribution examples and new problem sets. Here we provide an overview of the hallmarks endowing biological neural networks with the functionality needed for flexible cognition, in order to establish which features might also be important to achieve similar functionality in artificial systems. We specifically discuss the role of system-level distribution of network communication and recurrence, in addition to the role of short-term topological changes for efficient local computation. As machine learning models become more complex, these principles may provide valuable directions in an otherwise vast space of possible architectures. In addition, testing these inductive biases within artificial systems may help us to understand the biological principles underlying domain-general cognition.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Encoder-decoder semantic segmentation models for electroluminescence images of thin-film photovoltaic modules
Authors:
Evgenii Sovetkin,
Elbert Jan Achterberg,
Thomas Weber,
Bart E. Pieters
Abstract:
We consider a series of image segmentation methods based on the deep neural networks in order to perform semantic segmentation of electroluminescence (EL) images of thin-film modules. We utilize the encoder-decoder deep neural network architecture. The framework is general such that it can easily be extended to other types of images (e.g. thermography) or solar cell technologies (e.g. crystalline…
▽ More
We consider a series of image segmentation methods based on the deep neural networks in order to perform semantic segmentation of electroluminescence (EL) images of thin-film modules. We utilize the encoder-decoder deep neural network architecture. The framework is general such that it can easily be extended to other types of images (e.g. thermography) or solar cell technologies (e.g. crystalline silicon modules). The networks are trained and tested on a sample of images from a database with 6000 EL images of Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide (CIGS) thin film modules. We selected two types of features to extract, shunts and so called "droplets". The latter feature is often observed in the set of images. Several models are tested using various combinations of encoder-decoder layers, and a procedure is proposed to select the best model. We show exemplary results with the best selected model. Furthermore, we applied the best model to the full set of 6000 images and demonstrate that the automated segmentation of EL images can reveal many subtle features which cannot be inferred from studying a small sample of images. We believe these features can contribute to process optimization and quality control.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.