-
Quantum counterdiabatic driving with local control
Authors:
Changhao Li,
Jiayu Shen,
Ruslan Shaydulin,
Marco Pistoia
Abstract:
Suppression of diabatic transitions in quantum adiabatic evolution stands as a significant challenge for ground state preparations. Counterdiabatic driving has been proposed to compensate for diabatic losses and achieve shortcut to adiabaticity. However, its implementation necessitates the generation of adiabatic gauge potential, which requires knowledge of the spectral gap of instantaneous Hamilt…
▽ More
Suppression of diabatic transitions in quantum adiabatic evolution stands as a significant challenge for ground state preparations. Counterdiabatic driving has been proposed to compensate for diabatic losses and achieve shortcut to adiabaticity. However, its implementation necessitates the generation of adiabatic gauge potential, which requires knowledge of the spectral gap of instantaneous Hamiltonians and involves highly non-local drivings in many-body systems. In this work, we consider local counterdiabatic (LCD) driving with approximate adiabatic gauge potential. Using transverse-field Ising model as an example, we present an in-depth study of the performance and optimization of LCD protocols. We then propose a novel two-step protocol based on LCD and simple local single-body control to further improve the performance. The optimization of these LCD-based protocols does not require knowledge of instantaneous Hamiltonians, and only additional local driving is involved. To benchmark the performance of LCD and the proposed local control-enhanced LCD technique, we experimentally implement digitized adiabatic quantum evolution in a trapped-ion system. We characterize the quality of the prepared states and explore the scaling behavior with system size up to 14 qubits. Our demonstration of quantum shortcut to adiabaticity opens a path towards preparing ground states of complex systems with accessible local controls.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Evidence of Scaling Advantage for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on a Classically Intractable Problem
Authors:
Ruslan Shaydulin,
Changhao Li,
Shouvanik Chakrabarti,
Matthew DeCross,
Dylan Herman,
Niraj Kumar,
Jeffrey Larson,
Danylo Lykov,
Pierre Minssen,
Yue Sun,
Yuri Alexeev,
Joan M. Dreiling,
John P. Gaebler,
Thomas M. Gatterman,
Justin A. Gerber,
Kevin Gilmore,
Dan Gresh,
Nathan Hewitt,
Chandler V. Horst,
Shaohan Hu,
Jacob Johansen,
Mitchell Matheny,
Tanner Mengle,
Michael Mills,
Steven A. Moses
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a leading candidate algorithm for solving optimization problems on quantum computers. However, the potential of QAOA to tackle classically intractable problems remains unclear. Here, we perform an extensive numerical investigation of QAOA on the low autocorrelation binary sequences (LABS) problem, which is classically intractable even for mo…
▽ More
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a leading candidate algorithm for solving optimization problems on quantum computers. However, the potential of QAOA to tackle classically intractable problems remains unclear. Here, we perform an extensive numerical investigation of QAOA on the low autocorrelation binary sequences (LABS) problem, which is classically intractable even for moderately sized instances. We perform noiseless simulations with up to 40 qubits and observe that the runtime of QAOA with fixed parameters scales better than branch-and-bound solvers, which are the state-of-the-art exact solvers for LABS. The combination of QAOA with quantum minimum finding gives the best empirical scaling of any algorithm for the LABS problem. We demonstrate experimental progress in executing QAOA for the LABS problem using an algorithm-specific error detection scheme on Quantinuum trapped-ion processors. Our results provide evidence for the utility of QAOA as an algorithmic component that enables quantum speedups.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2024; v1 submitted 4 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Hardness of the Maximum Independent Set Problem on Unit-Disk Graphs and Prospects for Quantum Speedups
Authors:
Ruben S. Andrist,
Martin J. A. Schuetz,
Pierre Minssen,
Romina Yalovetzky,
Shouvanik Chakrabarti,
Dylan Herman,
Niraj Kumar,
Grant Salton,
Ruslan Shaydulin,
Yue Sun,
Marco Pistoia,
Helmut G. Katzgraber
Abstract:
Rydberg atom arrays are among the leading contenders for the demonstration of quantum speedups. Motivated by recent experiments with up to 289 qubits [Ebadi et al., Science 376, 1209 (2022)] we study the maximum independent set problem on unit-disk graphs with a broader range of classical solvers beyond the scope of the original paper. We carry out extensive numerical studies and assess problem ha…
▽ More
Rydberg atom arrays are among the leading contenders for the demonstration of quantum speedups. Motivated by recent experiments with up to 289 qubits [Ebadi et al., Science 376, 1209 (2022)] we study the maximum independent set problem on unit-disk graphs with a broader range of classical solvers beyond the scope of the original paper. We carry out extensive numerical studies and assess problem hardness, using both exact and heuristic algorithms. We find that quasi-planar instances with Union-Jack-like connectivity can be solved to optimality for up to thousands of nodes within minutes, with both custom and generic commercial solvers on commodity hardware, without any instance-specific fine-tuning. We also perform a scaling analysis, showing that by relaxing the constraints on the classical simulated annealing algorithms considered in Ebadi et al., our implementation is competitive with the quantum algorithms. Conversely, instances with larger connectivity or less structure are shown to display a time-to-solution potentially orders of magnitudes larger. Based on these results we propose protocols to systematically tune problem hardness, motivating experiments with Rydberg atom arrays on instances orders of magnitude harder (for established classical solvers) than previously studied.
△ Less
Submitted 9 January, 2024; v1 submitted 18 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
