-
On the interplay between data structure and loss function in classification problems
Authors:
Stéphane d'Ascoli,
Marylou Gabrié,
Levent Sagun,
Giulio Biroli
Abstract:
One of the central puzzles in modern machine learning is the ability of heavily overparametrized models to generalize well. Although the low-dimensional structure of typical datasets is key to this behavior, most theoretical studies of overparametrization focus on isotropic inputs. In this work, we instead consider an analytically tractable model of structured data, where the input covariance is b…
▽ More
One of the central puzzles in modern machine learning is the ability of heavily overparametrized models to generalize well. Although the low-dimensional structure of typical datasets is key to this behavior, most theoretical studies of overparametrization focus on isotropic inputs. In this work, we instead consider an analytically tractable model of structured data, where the input covariance is built from independent blocks allowing us to tune the saliency of low-dimensional structures and their alignment with respect to the target function. Using methods from statistical physics, we derive a precise asymptotic expression for the train and test error achieved by random feature models trained to classify such data, which is valid for any convex loss function. We study in detail how the data structure affects the double descent curve, and show that in the over-parametrized regime, its impact is greater for logistic loss than for mean-squared loss: the easier the task, the wider the gap in performance at the advantage of the logistic loss. Our insights are confirmed by numerical experiments on MNIST and CIFAR10.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2021; v1 submitted 9 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: Where & why do they appear?
Authors:
Stéphane d'Ascoli,
Levent Sagun,
Giulio Biroli
Abstract:
A recent line of research has highlighted the existence of a "double descent" phenomenon in deep learning, whereby increasing the number of training examples $N$ causes the generalization error of neural networks to peak when $N$ is of the same order as the number of parameters $P$. In earlier works, a similar phenomenon was shown to exist in simpler models such as linear regression, where the pea…
▽ More
A recent line of research has highlighted the existence of a "double descent" phenomenon in deep learning, whereby increasing the number of training examples $N$ causes the generalization error of neural networks to peak when $N$ is of the same order as the number of parameters $P$. In earlier works, a similar phenomenon was shown to exist in simpler models such as linear regression, where the peak instead occurs when $N$ is equal to the input dimension $D$. Since both peaks coincide with the interpolation threshold, they are often conflated in the litterature. In this paper, we show that despite their apparent similarity, these two scenarios are inherently different. In fact, both peaks can co-exist when neural networks are applied to noisy regression tasks. The relative size of the peaks is then governed by the degree of nonlinearity of the activation function. Building on recent developments in the analysis of random feature models, we provide a theoretical ground for this sample-wise triple descent. As shown previously, the nonlinear peak at $N\!=\!P$ is a true divergence caused by the extreme sensitivity of the output function to both the noise corrupting the labels and the initialization of the random features (or the weights in neural networks). This peak survives in the absence of noise, but can be suppressed by regularization. In contrast, the linear peak at $N\!=\!D$ is solely due to overfitting the noise in the labels, and forms earlier during training. We show that this peak is implicitly regularized by the nonlinearity, which is why it only becomes salient at high noise and is weakly affected by explicit regularization. Throughout the paper, we compare analytical results obtained in the random feature model with the outcomes of numerical experiments involving deep neural networks.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 5 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Finding the Needle in the Haystack with Convolutions: on the benefits of architectural bias
Authors:
Stéphane d'Ascoli,
Levent Sagun,
Joan Bruna,
Giulio Biroli
Abstract:
Despite the phenomenal success of deep neural networks in a broad range of learning tasks, there is a lack of theory to understand the way they work. In particular, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are known to perform much better than Fully-Connected Networks (FCNs) on spatially structured data: the architectural structure of CNNs benefits from prior knowledge on the features of the data, for…
▽ More
Despite the phenomenal success of deep neural networks in a broad range of learning tasks, there is a lack of theory to understand the way they work. In particular, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are known to perform much better than Fully-Connected Networks (FCNs) on spatially structured data: the architectural structure of CNNs benefits from prior knowledge on the features of the data, for instance their translation invariance. The aim of this work is to understand this fact through the lens of dynamics in the loss landscape.
We introduce a method that maps a CNN to its equivalent FCN (denoted as eFCN). Such an embedding enables the comparison of CNN and FCN training dynamics directly in the FCN space. We use this method to test a new training protocol, which consists in training a CNN, embedding it to FCN space at a certain ``relax time'', then resuming the training in FCN space. We observe that for all relax times, the deviation from the CNN subspace is small, and the final performance reached by the eFCN is higher than that reachable by a standard FCN of same architecture. More surprisingly, for some intermediate relax times, the eFCN outperforms the CNN it stemmed, by combining the prior information of the CNN and the expressivity of the FCN in a complementary way. The practical interest of our protocol is limited by the very large size of the highly sparse eFCN. However, it offers interesting insights into the persistence of architectural bias under stochastic gradient dynamics. It shows the existence of some rare basins in the FCN loss landscape associated with very good generalization. These can only be accessed thanks to the CNN prior, which helps navigate the landscape during the early stages of optimization.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2020; v1 submitted 16 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learning
Authors:
Mario Geiger,
Arthur Jacot,
Stefano Spigler,
Franck Gabriel,
Levent Sagun,
Stéphane d'Ascoli,
Giulio Biroli,
Clément Hongler,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Supervised deep learning involves the training of neural networks with a large number $N$ of parameters. For large enough $N$, in the so-called over-parametrized regime, one can essentially fit the training data points. Sparsity-based arguments would suggest that the generalization error increases as $N$ grows past a certain threshold $N^{*}$. Instead, empirical studies have shown that in the over…
▽ More
Supervised deep learning involves the training of neural networks with a large number $N$ of parameters. For large enough $N$, in the so-called over-parametrized regime, one can essentially fit the training data points. Sparsity-based arguments would suggest that the generalization error increases as $N$ grows past a certain threshold $N^{*}$. Instead, empirical studies have shown that in the over-parametrized regime, generalization error keeps decreasing with $N$. We resolve this paradox through a new framework. We rely on the so-called Neural Tangent Kernel, which connects large neural nets to kernel methods, to show that the initialization causes finite-size random fluctuations $\|f_{N}-\bar{f}_{N}\|\sim N^{-1/4}$ of the neural net output function $f_{N}$ around its expectation $\bar{f}_{N}$. These affect the generalization error $ε_{N}$ for classification: under natural assumptions, it decays to a plateau value $ε_{\infty}$ in a power-law fashion $\sim N^{-1/2}$. This description breaks down at a so-called jamming transition $N=N^{*}$. At this threshold, we argue that $\|f_{N}\|$ diverges. This result leads to a plausible explanation for the cusp in test error known to occur at $N^{*}$. Our results are confirmed by extensive empirical observations on the MNIST and CIFAR image datasets. Our analysis finally suggests that, given a computational envelope, the smallest generalization error is obtained using several networks of intermediate sizes, just beyond $N^{*}$, and averaging their outputs.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2019; v1 submitted 6 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalization
Authors:
Stefano Spigler,
Mario Geiger,
Stéphane d'Ascoli,
Levent Sagun,
Giulio Biroli,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
We argue that in fully-connected networks a phase transition delimits the over- and under-parametrized regimes where fitting can or cannot be achieved. Under some general conditions, we show that this transition is sharp for the hinge loss. In the whole over-parametrized regime, poor minima of the loss are not encountered during training since the number of constraints to satisfy is too small to h…
▽ More
We argue that in fully-connected networks a phase transition delimits the over- and under-parametrized regimes where fitting can or cannot be achieved. Under some general conditions, we show that this transition is sharp for the hinge loss. In the whole over-parametrized regime, poor minima of the loss are not encountered during training since the number of constraints to satisfy is too small to hamper minimization. Our findings support a link between this transition and the generalization properties of the network: as we increase the number of parameters of a given model, starting from an under-parametrized network, we observe that the generalization error displays three phases: (i) initial decay, (ii) increase until the transition point --- where it displays a cusp --- and (iii) slow decay toward a constant for the rest of the over-parametrized regime. Thereby we identify the region where the classical phenomenon of over-fitting takes place, and the region where the model keeps improving, in line with previous empirical observations for modern neural networks.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2019; v1 submitted 22 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networks
Authors:
Mario Geiger,
Stefano Spigler,
Stéphane d'Ascoli,
Levent Sagun,
Marco Baity-Jesi,
Giulio Biroli,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Deep learning has been immensely successful at a variety of tasks, ranging from classification to AI. Learning corresponds to fitting training data, which is implemented by descending a very high-dimensional loss function. Understanding under which conditions neural networks do not get stuck in poor minima of the loss, and how the landscape of that loss evolves as depth is increased remains a chal…
▽ More
Deep learning has been immensely successful at a variety of tasks, ranging from classification to AI. Learning corresponds to fitting training data, which is implemented by descending a very high-dimensional loss function. Understanding under which conditions neural networks do not get stuck in poor minima of the loss, and how the landscape of that loss evolves as depth is increased remains a challenge. Here we predict, and test empirically, an analogy between this landscape and the energy landscape of repulsive ellipses. We argue that in FC networks a phase transition delimits the over- and under-parametrized regimes where fitting can or cannot be achieved. In the vicinity of this transition, properties of the curvature of the minima of the loss are critical. This transition shares direct similarities with the jamming transition by which particles form a disordered solid as the density is increased, which also occurs in certain classes of computational optimization and learning problems such as the perceptron. Our analysis gives a simple explanation as to why poor minima of the loss cannot be encountered in the overparametrized regime, and puts forward the surprising result that the ability of fully connected networks to fit random data is independent of their depth. Our observations suggests that this independence also holds for real data. We also study a quantity $Δ$ which characterizes how well ($Δ<0$) or badly ($Δ>0$) a datum is learned. At the critical point it is power-law distributed, $P_+(Δ)\simΔ^θ$ for $Δ>0$ and $P_-(Δ)\sim(-Δ)^{-γ}$ for $Δ<0$, with $θ\approx0.3$ and $γ\approx0.2$. This observation suggests that near the transition the loss landscape has a hierarchical structure and that the learning dynamics is prone to avalanche-like dynamics, with abrupt changes in the set of patterns that are learned.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2019; v1 submitted 25 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Comparing Dynamics: Deep Neural Networks versus Glassy Systems
Authors:
M. Baity-Jesi,
L. Sagun,
M. Geiger,
S. Spigler,
G. Ben Arous,
C. Cammarota,
Y. LeCun,
M. Wyart,
G. Biroli
Abstract:
We analyze numerically the training dynamics of deep neural networks (DNN) by using methods developed in statistical physics of glassy systems. The two main issues we address are (1) the complexity of the loss landscape and of the dynamics within it, and (2) to what extent DNNs share similarities with glassy systems. Our findings, obtained for different architectures and datasets, suggest that dur…
▽ More
We analyze numerically the training dynamics of deep neural networks (DNN) by using methods developed in statistical physics of glassy systems. The two main issues we address are (1) the complexity of the loss landscape and of the dynamics within it, and (2) to what extent DNNs share similarities with glassy systems. Our findings, obtained for different architectures and datasets, suggest that during the training process the dynamics slows down because of an increasingly large number of flat directions. At large times, when the loss is approaching zero, the system diffuses at the bottom of the landscape. Despite some similarities with the dynamics of mean-field glassy systems, in particular, the absence of barrier crossing, we find distinctive dynamical behaviors in the two cases, showing that the statistical properties of the corresponding loss and energy landscapes are different. In contrast, when the network is under-parametrized we observe a typical glassy behavior, thus suggesting the existence of different phases depending on whether the network is under-parametrized or over-parametrized.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2018; v1 submitted 19 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Perspective: Energy Landscapes for Machine Learning
Authors:
Andrew J. Ballard,
Ritankar Das,
Stefano Martiniani,
Dhagash Mehta,
Levent Sagun,
Jacob D. Stevenson,
David J. Wales
Abstract:
Machine learning techniques are being increasingly used as flexible non-linear fitting and prediction tools in the physical sciences. Fitting functions that exhibit multiple solutions as local minima can be analysed in terms of the corresponding machine learning landscape. Methods to explore and visualise molecular potential energy landscapes can be applied to these machine learning landscapes to…
▽ More
Machine learning techniques are being increasingly used as flexible non-linear fitting and prediction tools in the physical sciences. Fitting functions that exhibit multiple solutions as local minima can be analysed in terms of the corresponding machine learning landscape. Methods to explore and visualise molecular potential energy landscapes can be applied to these machine learning landscapes to gain new insight into the solution space involved in training and the nature of the corresponding predictions. In particular, we can define quantities analogous to molecular structure, thermodynamics, and kinetics, and relate these emergent properties to the structure of the underlying landscape. This Perspective aims to describe these analogies with examples from recent applications, and suggest avenues for new interdisciplinary research.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
