Evaluating the diversity and utility of materials proposed by generative models
Authors:
Alexander New,
Michael Pekala,
Elizabeth A. Pogue,
Nam Q. Le,
Janna Domenico,
Christine D. Piatko,
Christopher D. Stiles
Abstract:
Generative machine learning models can use data generated by scientific modeling to create large quantities of novel material structures. Here, we assess how one state-of-the-art generative model, the physics-guided crystal generation model (PGCGM), can be used as part of the inverse design process. We show that the default PGCGM's input space is not smooth with respect to parameter variation, mak…
▽ More
Generative machine learning models can use data generated by scientific modeling to create large quantities of novel material structures. Here, we assess how one state-of-the-art generative model, the physics-guided crystal generation model (PGCGM), can be used as part of the inverse design process. We show that the default PGCGM's input space is not smooth with respect to parameter variation, making material optimization difficult and limited. We also demonstrate that most generated structures are predicted to be thermodynamically unstable by a separate property-prediction model, partially due to out-of-domain data challenges. Our findings suggest how generative models might be improved to enable better inverse design.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
Closed-loop machine learning for discovery of novel superconductors
Authors:
Elizabeth A. Pogue,
Alexander New,
Kyle McElroy,
Nam Q. Le,
Michael J. Pekala,
Ian McCue,
Eddie Gienger,
Janna Domenico,
Elizabeth Hedrick,
Tyrel M. McQueen,
Brandon Wilfong,
Christine D. Piatko,
Christopher R. Ratto,
Andrew Lennon,
Christine Chung,
Timothy Montalbano,
Gregory Bassen,
Christopher D. Stiles
Abstract:
The discovery of novel materials drives industrial innovation, although the pace of discovery tends to be slow due to the infrequency of "Eureka!" moments. These moments are typically tangential to the original target of the experimental work: "accidental discoveries". Here we demonstrate the acceleration of intentional materials discovery - targeting material properties of interest while generali…
▽ More
The discovery of novel materials drives industrial innovation, although the pace of discovery tends to be slow due to the infrequency of "Eureka!" moments. These moments are typically tangential to the original target of the experimental work: "accidental discoveries". Here we demonstrate the acceleration of intentional materials discovery - targeting material properties of interest while generalizing the search to a large materials space with machine learning (ML) methods. We demonstrate a closed-loop ML discovery process targeting novel superconducting materials, which have industrial applications ranging from quantum computing to sensors to power delivery. By closing the loop, i.e. by experimentally testing the results of the ML-generated superconductivity predictions and feeding data back into the ML model to refine, we demonstrate that success rates for superconductor discovery can be more than doubled. In four closed-loop cycles, we discovered a new superconductor in the Zr-In-Ni system, re-discovered five superconductors unknown in the training datasets, and identified two additional phase diagrams of interest for new superconducting materials. Our work demonstrates the critical role experimental feedback provides in ML-driven discovery, and provides definite evidence that such technologies can accelerate discovery even in the absence of knowledge of the underlying physics.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
