Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Miret, S

MatText: Do Language Models Need More than Text & Scale for Materials Modeling?

Authors: Nawaf Alampara, Santiago Miret, Kevin Maik Jablonka

Abstract: Effectively representing materials as text has the potential to leverage the vast advancements of large language models (LLMs) for discovering new materials. While LLMs have shown remarkable success in various domains, their application to materials science remains underexplored. A fundamental challenge is the lack of understanding of how to best utilize text-based representations for materials mo… ▽ More Effectively representing materials as text has the potential to leverage the vast advancements of large language models (LLMs) for discovering new materials. While LLMs have shown remarkable success in various domains, their application to materials science remains underexplored. A fundamental challenge is the lack of understanding of how to best utilize text-based representations for materials modeling. This challenge is further compounded by the absence of a comprehensive benchmark to rigorously evaluate the capabilities and limitations of these text representations in capturing the complexity of material systems. To address this gap, we propose MatText, a suite of benchmarking tools and datasets designed to systematically evaluate the performance of language models in modeling materials. MatText encompasses nine distinct text-based representations for material systems, including several novel representations. Each representation incorporates unique inductive biases that capture relevant information and integrate prior physical knowledge about materials. Additionally, MatText provides essential tools for training and benchmarking the performance of language models in the context of materials science. These tools include standardized dataset splits for each representation, probes for evaluating sensitivity to geometric factors, and tools for seamlessly converting crystal structures into text. Using MatText, we conduct an extensive analysis of the capabilities of language models in modeling materials. Our findings reveal that current language models consistently struggle to capture the geometric information crucial for materials modeling across all representations. Instead, these models tend to leverage local information, which is emphasized in some of our novel representations. Our analysis underscores MatText's ability to reveal shortcomings of text-based methods for materials design. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2024; v1 submitted 25 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Are large language models superhuman chemists?

Authors: Adrian Mirza, Nawaf Alampara, Sreekanth Kunchapu, Benedict Emoekabu, Aswanth Krishnan, Mara Wilhelmi, Macjonathan Okereke, Juliane Eberhardt, Amir Mohammad Elahi, Maximilian Greiner, Caroline T. Holick, Tanya Gupta, Mehrdad Asgari, Christina Glaubitz, Lea C. Klepsch, Yannik Köster, Jakob Meyer, Santiago Miret, Tim Hoffmann, Fabian Alexander Kreth, Michael Ringleb, Nicole Roesner, Ulrich S. Schubert, Leanne M. Stafast, Dinga Wonanke , et al. (3 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have gained widespread interest due to their ability to process human language and perform tasks on which they have not been explicitly trained. This is relevant for the chemical sciences, which face the problem of small and diverse datasets that are frequently in the form of text. LLMs have shown promise in addressing these issues and are increasingly being harnessed… ▽ More Large language models (LLMs) have gained widespread interest due to their ability to process human language and perform tasks on which they have not been explicitly trained. This is relevant for the chemical sciences, which face the problem of small and diverse datasets that are frequently in the form of text. LLMs have shown promise in addressing these issues and are increasingly being harnessed to predict chemical properties, optimize reactions, and even design and conduct experiments autonomously. However, we still have only a very limited systematic understanding of the chemical reasoning capabilities of LLMs, which would be required to improve models and mitigate potential harms. Here, we introduce "ChemBench," an automated framework designed to rigorously evaluate the chemical knowledge and reasoning abilities of state-of-the-art LLMs against the expertise of human chemists. We curated more than 7,000 question-answer pairs for a wide array of subfields of the chemical sciences, evaluated leading open and closed-source LLMs, and found that the best models outperformed the best human chemists in our study on average. The models, however, struggle with some chemical reasoning tasks that are easy for human experts and provide overconfident, misleading predictions, such as about chemicals' safety profiles. These findings underscore the dual reality that, although LLMs demonstrate remarkable proficiency in chemical tasks, further research is critical to enhancing their safety and utility in chemical sciences. Our findings also indicate a need for adaptations to chemistry curricula and highlight the importance of continuing to develop evaluation frameworks to improve safe and useful LLMs. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Are LLMs Ready for Real-World Materials Discovery?

Authors: Santiago Miret, N M Anoop Krishnan

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) create exciting possibilities for powerful language processing tools to accelerate research in materials science. While LLMs have great potential to accelerate materials understanding and discovery, they currently fall short in being practical materials science tools. In this position paper, we show relevant failure cases of LLMs in materials science that reveal curren… ▽ More Large Language Models (LLMs) create exciting possibilities for powerful language processing tools to accelerate research in materials science. While LLMs have great potential to accelerate materials understanding and discovery, they currently fall short in being practical materials science tools. In this position paper, we show relevant failure cases of LLMs in materials science that reveal current limitations of LLMs related to comprehending and reasoning over complex, interconnected materials science knowledge. Given those shortcomings, we outline a framework for develo** Materials Science LLMs (MatSci-LLMs) that are grounded in materials science knowledge and hypothesis generation followed by hypothesis testing. The path to attaining performant MatSci-LLMs rests in large part on building high-quality, multi-modal datasets sourced from scientific literature where various information extraction challenges persist. As such, we describe key materials science information extraction challenges which need to be overcome in order to build large-scale, multi-modal datasets that capture valuable materials science knowledge. Finally, we outline a roadmap for applying future MatSci-LLMs for real-world materials discovery via: 1. Automated Knowledge Base Generation; 2. Automated In-Silico Material Design; and 3. MatSci-LLM Integrated Self-Driving Materials Laboratories. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

HoneyBee: Progressive Instruction Finetuning of Large Language Models for Materials Science

Authors: Yu Song, Santiago Miret, Huan Zhang, Bang Liu

Abstract: We propose an instruction-based process for trustworthy data curation in materials science (MatSci-Instruct), which we then apply to finetune a LLaMa-based language model targeted for materials science (HoneyBee). MatSci-Instruct helps alleviate the scarcity of relevant, high-quality materials science textual data available in the open literature, and HoneyBee is the first billion-parameter langua… ▽ More We propose an instruction-based process for trustworthy data curation in materials science (MatSci-Instruct), which we then apply to finetune a LLaMa-based language model targeted for materials science (HoneyBee). MatSci-Instruct helps alleviate the scarcity of relevant, high-quality materials science textual data available in the open literature, and HoneyBee is the first billion-parameter language model specialized to materials science. In MatSci-Instruct we improve the trustworthiness of generated data by prompting multiple commercially available large language models for generation with an Instructor module (e.g. Chat-GPT) and verification from an independent Verifier module (e.g. Claude). Using MatSci-Instruct, we construct a dataset of multiple tasks and measure the quality of our dataset along multiple dimensions, including accuracy against known facts, relevance to materials science, as well as completeness and reasonableness of the data. Moreover, we iteratively generate more targeted instructions and instruction-data in a finetuning-evaluation-feedback loop leading to progressively better performance for our finetuned HoneyBee models. Our evaluation on the MatSci-NLP benchmark shows HoneyBee's outperformance of existing language models on materials science tasks and iterative improvement in successive stages of instruction-data refinement. We study the quality of HoneyBee's language modeling through automatic evaluation and analyze case studies to further understand the model's capabilities and limitations. Our code and relevant datasets are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/BangLab-UdeM-Mila/NLP4MatSci-HoneyBee}. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Towards Foundation Models for Materials Science: The Open MatSci ML Toolkit

Authors: Kin Long Kelvin Lee, Carmelo Gonzales, Matthew Spellings, Mikhail Galkin, Santiago Miret, Nalini Kumar

Abstract: Artificial intelligence and machine learning have shown great promise in their ability to accelerate novel materials discovery. As researchers and domain scientists seek to unify and consolidate chemical knowledge, the case for models with potential to generalize across different tasks within materials science - so-called "foundation models" - grows with ambitions. This manuscript reviews our rece… ▽ More Artificial intelligence and machine learning have shown great promise in their ability to accelerate novel materials discovery. As researchers and domain scientists seek to unify and consolidate chemical knowledge, the case for models with potential to generalize across different tasks within materials science - so-called "foundation models" - grows with ambitions. This manuscript reviews our recent progress with development of Open MatSci ML Toolkit, and details experiments that lay the groundwork for foundation model research and development with our framework. First, we describe and characterize a new pretraining task that uses synthetic data generated from symmetry operations, and reveal complex training dynamics at large scales. Using the pretrained model, we discuss a number of use cases relevant to foundation model development: semantic architecture of datasets, and fine-tuning for property prediction and classification. Our key results show that for simple applications, pretraining appears to provide worse modeling performance than training models from random initialization. However, for more complex instances, such as when a model is required to learn across multiple datasets and types of targets simultaneously, the inductive bias from pretraining provides significantly better performance. This insight will hopefully inform subsequent efforts into creating foundation models for materials science applications. △ Less

Submitted 11 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 17 pages, 7 figures, 1 table. Accepted paper/presentation at the AI4Science workshop at Super Computing '23

Searching for High-Value Molecules Using Reinforcement Learning and Transformers

Authors: Raj Ghugare, Santiago Miret, Adriana Hugessen, Mariano Phielipp, Glen Berseth

Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) over text representations can be effective for finding high-value policies that can search over graphs. However, RL requires careful structuring of the search space and algorithm design to be effective in this challenge. Through extensive experiments, we explore how different design choices for text grammar and algorithmic choices for training can affect an RL policy's… ▽ More Reinforcement learning (RL) over text representations can be effective for finding high-value policies that can search over graphs. However, RL requires careful structuring of the search space and algorithm design to be effective in this challenge. Through extensive experiments, we explore how different design choices for text grammar and algorithmic choices for training can affect an RL policy's ability to generate molecules with desired properties. We arrive at a new RL-based molecular design algorithm (ChemRLformer) and perform a thorough analysis using 25 molecule design tasks, including computationally complex protein docking simulations. From this analysis, we discover unique insights in this problem space and show that ChemRLformer achieves state-of-the-art performance while being more straightforward than prior work by demystifying which design choices are actually helpful for text-based molecule design. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

EGraFFBench: Evaluation of Equivariant Graph Neural Network Force Fields for Atomistic Simulations

Authors: Vaibhav Bihani, Utkarsh Pratiush, Sajid Mannan, Tao Du, Zhimin Chen, Santiago Miret, Matthieu Micoulaut, Morten M Smedskjaer, Sayan Ranu, N M Anoop Krishnan

Abstract: Equivariant graph neural networks force fields (EGraFFs) have shown great promise in modelling complex interactions in atomic systems by exploiting the graphs' inherent symmetries. Recent works have led to a surge in the development of novel architectures that incorporate equivariance-based inductive biases alongside architectural innovations like graph transformers and message passing to model at… ▽ More Equivariant graph neural networks force fields (EGraFFs) have shown great promise in modelling complex interactions in atomic systems by exploiting the graphs' inherent symmetries. Recent works have led to a surge in the development of novel architectures that incorporate equivariance-based inductive biases alongside architectural innovations like graph transformers and message passing to model atomic interactions. However, thorough evaluations of these deploying EGraFFs for the downstream task of real-world atomistic simulations, is lacking. To this end, here we perform a systematic benchmarking of 6 EGraFF algorithms (NequIP, Allegro, BOTNet, MACE, Equiformer, TorchMDNet), with the aim of understanding their capabilities and limitations for realistic atomistic simulations. In addition to our thorough evaluation and analysis on eight existing datasets based on the benchmarking literature, we release two new benchmark datasets, propose four new metrics, and three challenging tasks. The new datasets and tasks evaluate the performance of EGraFF to out-of-distribution data, in terms of different crystal structures, temperatures, and new molecules. Interestingly, evaluation of the EGraFF models based on dynamic simulations reveals that having a lower error on energy or force does not guarantee stable or reliable simulation or faithful replication of the atomic structures. Moreover, we find that no model clearly outperforms other models on all datasets and tasks. Importantly, we show that the performance of all the models on out-of-distribution datasets is unreliable, pointing to the need for the development of a foundation model for force fields that can be used in real-world simulations. In summary, this work establishes a rigorous framework for evaluating machine learning force fields in the context of atomic simulations and points to open research challenges within this domain. △ Less

Submitted 24 November, 2023; v1 submitted 3 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

MatSciML: A Broad, Multi-Task Benchmark for Solid-State Materials Modeling

Authors: Kin Long Kelvin Lee, Carmelo Gonzales, Marcel Nassar, Matthew Spellings, Mikhail Galkin, Santiago Miret

Abstract: We propose MatSci ML, a novel benchmark for modeling MATerials SCIence using Machine Learning (MatSci ML) methods focused on solid-state materials with periodic crystal structures. Applying machine learning methods to solid-state materials is a nascent field with substantial fragmentation largely driven by the great variety of datasets used to develop machine learning models. This fragmentation ma… ▽ More We propose MatSci ML, a novel benchmark for modeling MATerials SCIence using Machine Learning (MatSci ML) methods focused on solid-state materials with periodic crystal structures. Applying machine learning methods to solid-state materials is a nascent field with substantial fragmentation largely driven by the great variety of datasets used to develop machine learning models. This fragmentation makes comparing the performance and generalizability of different methods difficult, thereby hindering overall research progress in the field. Building on top of open-source datasets, including large-scale datasets like the OpenCatalyst, OQMD, NOMAD, the Carolina Materials Database, and Materials Project, the MatSci ML benchmark provides a diverse set of materials systems and properties data for model training and evaluation, including simulated energies, atomic forces, material bandgaps, as well as classification data for crystal symmetries via space groups. The diversity of properties in MatSci ML makes the implementation and evaluation of multi-task learning algorithms for solid-state materials possible, while the diversity of datasets facilitates the development of new, more generalized algorithms and methods across multiple datasets. In the multi-dataset learning setting, MatSci ML enables researchers to combine observations from multiple datasets to perform joint prediction of common properties, such as energy and forces. Using MatSci ML, we evaluate the performance of different graph neural networks and equivariant point cloud networks on several benchmark tasks spanning single task, multitask, and multi-data learning scenarios. Our open-source code is available at https://github.com/IntelLabs/matsciml. △ Less

Submitted 11 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

MatSci-NLP: Evaluating Scientific Language Models on Materials Science Language Tasks Using Text-to-Schema Modeling

Authors: Yu Song, Santiago Miret, Bang Liu

Abstract: We present MatSci-NLP, a natural language benchmark for evaluating the performance of natural language processing (NLP) models on materials science text. We construct the benchmark from publicly available materials science text data to encompass seven different NLP tasks, including conventional NLP tasks like named entity recognition and relation classification, as well as NLP tasks specific to ma… ▽ More We present MatSci-NLP, a natural language benchmark for evaluating the performance of natural language processing (NLP) models on materials science text. We construct the benchmark from publicly available materials science text data to encompass seven different NLP tasks, including conventional NLP tasks like named entity recognition and relation classification, as well as NLP tasks specific to materials science, such as synthesis action retrieval which relates to creating synthesis procedures for materials. We study various BERT-based models pretrained on different scientific text corpora on MatSci-NLP to understand the impact of pretraining strategies on understanding materials science text. Given the scarcity of high-quality annotated data in the materials science domain, we perform our fine-tuning experiments with limited training data to encourage the generalize across MatSci-NLP tasks. Our experiments in this low-resource training setting show that language models pretrained on scientific text outperform BERT trained on general text. MatBERT, a model pretrained specifically on materials science journals, generally performs best for most tasks. Moreover, we propose a unified text-to-schema for multitask learning on \benchmark and compare its performance with traditional fine-tuning methods. In our analysis of different training methods, we find that our proposed text-to-schema methods inspired by question-answering consistently outperform single and multitask NLP fine-tuning methods. The code and datasets are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/BangLab-UdeM-Mila/NLP4MatSci-ACL23}. △ Less

Submitted 14 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

The Open MatSci ML Toolkit: A Flexible Framework for Machine Learning in Materials Science

Authors: Santiago Miret, Kin Long Kelvin Lee, Carmelo Gonzales, Marcel Nassar, Matthew Spellings

Abstract: We present the Open MatSci ML Toolkit: a flexible, self-contained, and scalable Python-based framework to apply deep learning models and methods on scientific data with a specific focus on materials science and the OpenCatalyst Dataset. Our toolkit provides: 1. A scalable machine learning workflow for materials science leveraging PyTorch Lightning, which enables seamless scaling across different c… ▽ More We present the Open MatSci ML Toolkit: a flexible, self-contained, and scalable Python-based framework to apply deep learning models and methods on scientific data with a specific focus on materials science and the OpenCatalyst Dataset. Our toolkit provides: 1. A scalable machine learning workflow for materials science leveraging PyTorch Lightning, which enables seamless scaling across different computation capabilities (laptop, server, cluster) and hardware platforms (CPU, GPU, XPU). 2. Deep Graph Library (DGL) support for rapid graph neural network prototy** and development. By publishing and sharing this toolkit with the research community via open-source release, we hope to: 1. Lower the entry barrier for new machine learning researchers and practitioners that want to get started with the OpenCatalyst dataset, which presently comprises the largest computational materials science dataset. 2. Enable the scientific community to apply advanced machine learning tools to high-impact scientific challenges, such as modeling of materials behavior for clean energy applications. We demonstrate the capabilities of our framework by enabling three new equivariant neural network models for multiple OpenCatalyst tasks and arrive at promising results for compute scaling and model performance. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: Paper accompanying Open-Source Software from https://github.com/IntelLabs/matsciml

Report number: 2835-8856

Journal ref: Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2023)